Şanlıurfa’da Safkan Arap Atlarında Borrelia burgdorferi Seropozitifliğinin Belirlenmesi

Year 2019, , 221 - 224, 25.12.2019

Ömer Demir Oktay Keskin

https://doi.org/10.31196/huvfd.667768

Abstract

Lyme Borreliozis veya Lyme hastalığı, Borrelia burgdorferi’nin neden olduğu kenelerle nakladilen zoonotik bir infeksiyondur. Hastalığın taşınması, Ixodes cinsi kenelerle olmaktadır. Lyme Borreliozis evcil hayvanların (at, sığır, köpek, kedi, koyun vb.) ve insanların çeşitli organ ve sistemlerini etkilemektedir. Hastalık, klinik olarak pek çok hastalığı taklit ettiğinden veteriner hekimler tarafından genellikle gözden kaçırılmaktadır. Etkenin kültüre edilmesi zor olduğundan teşhiste genellikle ELISA ve IFAT gibi serolojik yöntemler kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, Lyme Borreliozis’in Şanlıurfa’daki sağlıklı Safkan Arap atlarında seropozitiflik durumunun belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaca yönelik olarak Eylül 2016- Temmuz 2017 tarihleri arasında halk elinde yetiştiriciliği yapılan pedigrili damızlık Safkan Arap atlarından tesadüfi örnekleme ile 186 kan serum örneği alındı. Serum örneklerinde anti-B. burgdorferi IgG antikorları ticari bir ELISA kiti ile araştırıldı. İncelenen 186 serum örneğinin 11'i (%5.9) pozitif, 3'ü (%1.6) şüpheli ve 172'si de (%92.5) negatif bulundu. Bu çalışma ile ilk kez Şanlıurfa İli'nde Safkan Arap atlarında anti-B. burgdorferi antikorlarının varlığı gösterilmiştir. Hem etkenin neden olduğu ekonomik kayıplar hem de infeksiyonun zoonoz karakteri nedeniyle, veteriner hekimler klinik çalışmalarında Lyme Borreliosis'i de dikkate almalıdırlar. Ayrıca, hastalığa karşı gerekli önleyici tedbirler alınmalı ve bölgedeki farklı hayvan türlerinde hastalığın mevcut durumunu araştırmak için daha ileri çalışmalar yapılmalıdır.

Keywords

Lyme, At, ELISA, Seroprevalans

Supporting Institution

HÜBAK

Project Number

17053

Determination of Borrelia burgdorferi Seropositivty in Arabian Thoroughbred Horses in Sanliurfa

Abstract

Lyme Borreliosis or Lyme disease is a zoonotic disease caused by Borrelia burgdorferi. The transport of the disease is by the Ixodesticks. The disease affects various organs and systems of humans and domesticated animals (horses, cattle, dogs, cats, sheep, etc.). Veterinarians generally misdiagnose the disease because Lymeborreliosis imitates many diseases clinically. Due to difficulties in culturing of the agent, serological methods such as ELISA and IFAT are widely used for diagnosis of the disease. In this study, it was aimed to determine the seropositivity of Lyme Borreliosis in healthy thoroughbred Arabian horses in Sanliurfa. For this aim, between Autumn 2016 and Spring 2017, 186 serum samples were taken from randomly chosen pedigree purebred Arabian horses owned by the local people. Anti-Borrelia burgdorferi IgG antibodies were investigated by a commercial ELISA kit. Of 186 serum samples examined, 11 (5.9%) were found as positive, and three (1.6%) serum samples were found as doubtful. The rest of the serum samples (172, 92.5%) were found to be negative. This study is the first reporting the presence of anti-B. burgdorferi antibodies in Sanliurfa province. Due to both economic losses caused by the agent and zoonosis character of the disease, veterinarians should not ignore Lyme Borreliosis in their clinical studies. In additon, necessary preventive measures should be taken against the disease, and further studies should be conducted to search the current status of the disease in different animal species in the region

Keywords

Lyme Borreliosis, Horse, ELISA, Seroprevalence

Project Number

17053

References

• Agudelo CF, Schanilec P, Kybicova K, Kohout P, 2011: Cardiac manifestations of borreliosis in a dog: a case report. Vet Med-Czech. 56 (2), 85-92.
• Basile RC, Rivera GG, Del Rio LA, de Bonis TC, do Amaral GP, Giangrecco E, Ferraz G, Yoshinari NH, Canola PA, Queiroz N, 2015: Aanaphlactoid reaction caused by sodium ceftriaxone in two horses experimentally infected by B.burgdorferi. BMC Vet Res, 11, 197.
• Bhide M, Yılmaz Z, Golcü E, Torun S, Mikula S, 2008: Seroprevalence of anti-Borrelia burgdorferi antibodies in dogs and horses in Turkey. Ann Agric Environ Med, 15, 85-90.
• Caroline NH, Mayhew IG, Katherine EW, Smith KC, Dorothy C, Chang YF, Novosol V, McDonough SP, Chang CF, Jacobson RH, Divers T, Quimby FW, Shin S, Lein DH, 2000: Experimental infection of ponies with Borrelia burgdorferi by exposure to Ixodesticks. Vet Pathol, 37, 68-76.
• Chomel B, 2015: Lyme disease. Rev Sci Tech Off Int Epiz, 34(2), 569-576.
• Cohen ND, Heck FC, Heim B, Flad DM, Bosler EM, Cohen D, 1992: Seroprevalance of antibodies to B.burgdorferi in a population of horses in central Texas. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 201, 1030-1034.
• Ebani VV, Bertolleni F, Pinzuati P, Cerri D, 2012: Seroprevalence of Leptospira spp. and Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in Italian horses. Ann Agric Environ Med, 19(2), 237-240.
• Egenvall A, Franzen P, Gunnarsson A, Engvall EO, Vagsholm I,Wikstrom UB, Artursson K, 2001: Cross-sectional study of the seroprevalence to Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and granulocytic Ehrlichia spp. and demographic, clinical and tick-exposure factors in Swedish horses. Prev Vet Med, 49, 191-208.
• Esendal ÖM, İzgür M, Arda M, Akay Ö, Keskin O, 1996: Köpeklerde Borrelia burgdorferi antikorlarının floresan antikor tekniği ile saptanması. I. Uluslararası Veteriner Mikrobiyoloji Kongresi, İstanbul,128-129.
• Fritz CL, Kjemtrup AM, 2003: Lyme Borreliosis. J AmVet Assoc, 223, 1261-1270.
• Funk RA, Pleasant RS, Witonsky SG, Reeder DS, Werre SR, Hodgson DR, 2016: Seroprevalence of B. burgdorferi in horses presented for coggins testing in Soutwest Virginia an change in positive test results approximately 1 year later. J Vet Int Med, 30, 1300-1304.
• Hansen MG, Christoffeersen M, Thuesen LR, Petersen MR, Bojesen AM, 2010: Seroprevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in Danish horses. ActaVet Scand, 52, 3.
• İzgür M, Arda M, Akay Ö, Esendal ÖM, Keskin O, 1996: Sığır kan serumlarında Borrelia burgdorferi antikorlarının floresan antikor tekniği ile saptanması. I. Uluslararası Veteriner Mikrobiyoloji Kongresi, İstanbul, 174-175.
• Kiss T, Cadar D, Krupaci AF, Bordeanu A, Brudasxca GF, Mihalca AD, Mircean V, Gliga L, Dumitrache MO, Spin M, 2011: Serological reactivity to Borrelia burgdorferi sensulato in dogs and horses from distinct areas in Romania. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis, 11(9), 1259-1262.
• Kolk VJH, 2016: Lyme borrelliosis in the horse. JEBAS, 4, 196-202.
• Koneman EW, Allen SD, Janda WM, Schreckenberger PC, Winn WC, 1997: Lyme disease. color atlas and textbook of diagnostic mcrobiology, JB Lippincott Company, Philadelphia, 964, 971.
• Lee SH, Yun SH, Choi E, Park YS, Lee SE, Cho GJ, Kwon OD, Kwak D, 2016: Serolojical detection of Borrelia borgdorferi among horses in Korea. Korean J Parasitol, 54(1), 97-101.
• Magnarelli LA, Ijdo JW, Van Andel AE, Wu C, Padula SJ, Fikrig E, 2000: Serologic confirmation of Ehrlichia equi and Borrelia burgdorferi infections in horses from the northeastern United States. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 217, 1045-1050.
• Maurizi L, Marié JL, Aoun O, Courtin C, Gorsane S, Chal D, Davoust B, 2010: Seroprevalence survey of equine Lyme borreliosis in France and in sub-Saharan Africa, Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis, 10, 535-537.
• Skotarczak B, 2002: Canine borreliosis – epidemiology and diagnostics. Ann Agric Environ Med, 9, 137-140.
• Stefancikova A, Stepanova G, Derdakova M, Pet’ko B, Kysel’ova J, Ciganek K J, Strojny L, Cislakova L, Travnicek M, 2002: Serological evidence for Borrelia burgdorferi infection associated with clinical signs in diary Cattle in Slovakia, Vet Res Commun, 6, 601-611.
• Stefanciková A, Adaszek L, Petko B, Winiarczyk S, Dudinák V, 2008: Serological evidence of Borrelia burgdorferi sensulato in horses and cattle from Poland and diagnostic problems of Lyme borreliosis. Ann Agric Environ Med, 15, 37–43.
• Uslu O, 2008: Köpeklerde Lyme hastalığının araştırılması. Yüksek lisans tezi, Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Aydın.