Research Article

The Necropolitics of Linguistic Indoctrination in Agustina Bazterrica’s Tender Is the Flesh

Volume: 6 Number: 2 October 31, 2026
EN TR

The Necropolitics of Linguistic Indoctrination in Agustina Bazterrica’s Tender Is the Flesh

Abstract

Necropolitical control is fundamentally sustained through political rhetoric and engineered through the gradual erosion and redefinition of quotidian terms. Dystopian fiction is especially rife with imagining worlds where language is weaponized to subvert common topoi: from Orwellian doublespeak to Atwood’s scriptural euphemisms and Burgess’s invented slang. A contemporary novel that intensifies the linguistic tradition is Agustina Bazterrica’s Tender Is the Flesh (2017), which depicts a society where cannibalism is a legally and socially accepted norm. In this novel, the state-sanctioned clinical vocabulary that reduces human beings to meat, heads, or products functions as a mechanism of systemic indoctrination that legitimizes the consumption of human flesh and universalizes the morally unacceptable. Through a discursive analysis of the text, this paper demonstrates how the establishment of this distinct linguistic mode enforces a necropolitical hierarchy. Drawing on Achille Mbembe’s “necropolitics” to illuminate the structural sovereign mechanisms of state-sanctioned death and Giorgio Agamben’s conceptualization of “bare life” to explain the ontological reduction of consumable subjects, this article argues that engineered language, in tandem with institutional means of control, structurally stratifies society between the consumers and the consumed, and renders systemic violence morally permissible.

Keywords

Ethical Statement

The author of this article confirms that this research does not require a research ethics committee approval. The author of this article confirms that her work complies with the principles of research and publication ethics. Artificial Intelligence (AI) Use Declaration: The author declares that generative AI tools were used solely for language editing, proofreading, or formatting purposes. The author reviewed the AI-assisted output and takes full responsibility for the final content of the article.

References

  1. Agamben, Giorgio. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Translated by Daniel Heller-Roazen, Stanford University Press, 1998.
  2. ---. State of Exception. Translated by Kevin Attell, University of Chicago Press, 2005.
  3. Atwood, Margaret. The Handmaid’s Tale. McClelland and Stewart, 1985.
  4. Bazterrica, Agustina. Tender Is the Flesh. Translated by Sarah Moses, Scribner, 2020.
  5. Bourdieu, Pierre. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Translated by Richard Nice, Harvard University Press, 1984.
  6. Butler, Judith. Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable?. Verso, 2009.
  7. Choudhury, Poulomi. “Abatthorror: Tracking the Animal-Industrial Complex in Agustina Bazterrica’s Tender Is the Flesh.” Monstrum, vol. 8, no. 2, 2025, pp. 42–69. doi:10.7202/1127527ar.
  8. Deleuze, Gilles. Foucault. Translated by Seán Hand, University of Minnesota Press, 1988.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Literary Theory, Stylistics and Textual Analysis

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

October 31, 2026

Submission Date

August 6, 2026

Acceptance Date

September 22, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 6 Number: 2

APA
Aouine, N. (2026). The Necropolitics of Linguistic Indoctrination in Agustina Bazterrica’s Tender Is the Flesh. IDEAS: Journal of English Literary Studies, 6(2), 55-71. https://doi.org/10.62352/ideas.2012383
AMA
1.Aouine N. The Necropolitics of Linguistic Indoctrination in Agustina Bazterrica’s Tender Is the Flesh. IDEAS. 2026;6(2):55-71. doi:10.62352/ideas.2012383
Chicago
Aouine, Nouha. 2026. “The Necropolitics of Linguistic Indoctrination in Agustina Bazterrica’s Tender Is the Flesh”. IDEAS: Journal of English Literary Studies 6 (2): 55-71. https://doi.org/10.62352/ideas.2012383.
EndNote
Aouine N (October 1, 2026) The Necropolitics of Linguistic Indoctrination in Agustina Bazterrica’s Tender Is the Flesh. IDEAS: Journal of English Literary Studies 6 2 55–71.
IEEE
[1]N. Aouine, “The Necropolitics of Linguistic Indoctrination in Agustina Bazterrica’s Tender Is the Flesh”, IDEAS, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 55–71, Oct. 2026, doi: 10.62352/ideas.2012383.
ISNAD
Aouine, Nouha. “The Necropolitics of Linguistic Indoctrination in Agustina Bazterrica’s Tender Is the Flesh”. IDEAS: Journal of English Literary Studies 6/2 (October 1, 2026): 55-71. https://doi.org/10.62352/ideas.2012383.
JAMA
1.Aouine N. The Necropolitics of Linguistic Indoctrination in Agustina Bazterrica’s Tender Is the Flesh. IDEAS. 2026;6:55–71.
MLA
Aouine, Nouha. “The Necropolitics of Linguistic Indoctrination in Agustina Bazterrica’s Tender Is the Flesh”. IDEAS: Journal of English Literary Studies, vol. 6, no. 2, Oct. 2026, pp. 55-71, doi:10.62352/ideas.2012383.
Vancouver
1.Nouha Aouine. The Necropolitics of Linguistic Indoctrination in Agustina Bazterrica’s Tender Is the Flesh. IDEAS. 2026 Oct. 1;6(2):55-71. doi:10.62352/ideas.2012383

IDEAS: Journal of English Literary Studies is published by The English Language and Literature Research Association of Türkiye (IDEA).