Is Nuclear Power Acceptance Related To Environmental Literacy In Turkey?

Abstract

Nuclear energy seems to be a promising alternative to meet Turkey’s growing energy needs, and governments have been working on it foryears. However, public acceptance of nuclear power is an important factor for governments to consider. This study aims to explore public acceptance of nuclear power in Turkey and its relationship with environmental literacy. There were 524 participants of this study, and data was gathered through a descriptive questionnaire, an environmental literacy scale for adults, and a questionnaire about acceptance of nuclear power. Findings were evaluated both qualitatively and quantitatively. It was found that the majority of the participants oppose the development of nuclear power as a major fuel source, particularly with reference to the harmful effects of nuclear power on the environment and general concerns over safety.Moreover, there is a slight negative correlation between acceptance of nuclear power and environmental literacy (i.e. participants with higher environmental literacy scores tended to oppose nuclear power). Also, a slight positive correlation was found between acceptance of nuclear power and gender(i.e. male support nuclear power more than female, those with children are more likely to oppose nuclear power). 

Keywords

• Nuclear power,public acceptance,environmental literacy,gender,having children

References

1. Alp, E., Ertepinar, H., Tekkaya, C., & Yilmaz, A. (2006). A statistical analysis of children’s environmental knowledge and attitudes in Turkey. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 15(3), 210-223.
2. Aslan, O., Sagir, S. U., & Cansaran, A. (2008).The adaptation of environment attitude scala and determination of primary school students' environmental attitutes. Selcuk University Journal of Ahmet Kelesoglu Education Faculty, 25, 283-295.
3. Atabek-Yiğit, E., Köklükaya, A. N., Yavuz, M., & Demirhan, E. (2014).Development and validation of Environmental literacy scale for adults (ELSA). Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(3), 425-435.
4. Ateş, H., & Saraçoğlu, M. (2013). Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Gözünden Nükleer Enerji [Pre-service science teachers' perspective about nuclear energy].Journal of Kirsehir Education Faculty, 14(3), 175-193.
5. Benzer, E., Karadeniz Bayrak, B., Dilek Eren, C., & Gurdal, A. (2014).Knowledge and opinions of teacher candidates about energy and energy resources. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(1), 243-257. http://dx.doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2014.01.020.
6. Bilen, K., Özel, M., & Sürücü, A. (2013).Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının yenilenebilir enerjiye yönelik tutumları[Pre-service science teachers’ awareness about renewable energy].Dumlupınar University Journal of Social Sciences, 36, 101-112.
7. Bisconti, A. S. (2010). “Not” in my back yard! Is really “Yes” in my back yard. Natural Gas and Electricity, 23-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gas.10101.
8. Çakıcı, A. C., & Yılmaz, B. E. (2012).Mersin'deki otel çalışanlarının nükleer kaygıları, çevresel yaklaşım ve çevreci tüketim eğilimleri üzerine bir araştırma [A survey research on nuclear concern, environmental approach and consumption of hotel employees in Mersin].Cag University Journal of Social Sciences, 9(2), 1-22.

9. Davidson, D. J., & Freudenburg, W. R. (1996). Gender and environmental risk concerns: A review and analysis of available research. Environment and behavior, 28(3), 302-339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916596283003.
10. Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources (2014).Information on nuclear power plants and nuclear power plants to be established in our country (Report No: 1). Ankara: Department of Nuclear Power Project Implementation
11. http://www.enerji.gov.tr/yayinlar_raporlar/Nukleer_Santraller_ve_Ulkemizde_Kurulacak_Nukleer_Santrale_Iliskin_Bilgiler.pdf (accessed 25.10.2014)
12. Ergün, S., & Polat, M. A. (2012).Nükleer enerji ve Türkiye'ye yansımaları [Nuclear energy and its reflections in Turkey].İnönü University International Journal of Social Sciences,1(2), 34-58.
13. Ertor-Akyazi, P., Adaman, F., Ozkaynak, B., & Zenginobuz, U. (2012). Citizens’ preferences on nuclear and renewable energy sources: Evidence from Turkey. Energy Policy, 47, 309-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.072.
14. Eş, H., Işık, S., Ayas, C., Uyanık, G., Bilen, K., Özel, M., & Köse, S. (2016).Türkiye için yeni bir sosyobilimseltartışma: Nükleer ile yaşam [A new socio-scientific issue for Turkey: Life with nuclear].Turkish Journal of Education, 5(2), 47-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.19128/turje.92919.
15. Gökmen, A., Atik, A. D., Ekici, G., Çimen, O., & Altunsoy, S. (2010).Analysis of high school students’ opinions on the benefits and harms of nuclear energy in terms of environmental values. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2350-2356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.335.
16. Greenberg, M., & Truelove, H. B. (2011). Energy choices and risk beliefs: is it just global warming and fear of a nuclear power plant accident?. Risk Analysis, 31(5), 819-831. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01535.x.
17. Guo, Y., & Ren, T. (2017). When it is unfamiliar to me: Local acceptance of planned nuclear power plants in China in the post-Fukushima era. Energy Policy, 100, 113-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.10.002.
18. Gürbüz, H., Kışoğlu, M., Alaş, A., & Sülün, A. (2011).Biyoloji öğretmeni adaylarının çevre okuryazarlıklarının farklı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi [Investigation of the biology teacher candidates' environmental literacy in terms of different variables]. E-International Journal of Educational Research, 2(1), 1-14.
19. Gwartney-Gibbs, P. A., & Lach, D. H. (1991).Sex differences in attitudes toward nuclear war. Journal of Peace Research, 28(2), 161-174.
20. http://www.akkunpp.com/project-history- 2.
21. http://www.world-nuclear.org/information- library/country-profiles/countries- t-z/turkey.aspx
22. International Energy Agency, 2017, Key World Energy Statistics, https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/KeyWorld2017.pdf(Accessed 27.01.2018)
23. International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA. (2017). 50 years of nuclear energy, Retriwed from http GC/GC48/ Documents/gc48inf-4_ftn3.pdf, February, 2017.
24. Kahyaoğlu, M., & Kaya, M. F. (2012).Öğretmen adaylarının çevre kirliliğine ve çevreyle ilgili sivil toplum örgütlerine yönelik görüşleri [Teacher candidates’ views about environmental pollution and non-governmental organizations related to the environment].Journal of Educational Research, 2(1), 91-107.
25. Kaya, İ. S. (2012).Nükleer enerji dünyasında çevre ve insan [Environment and human in the nuclear energy world].Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of Social Sciences, 24, 71-90.
26. Kenar, I. (2013). Nuclear energy reality in Turkey and the attitude of the science teachers towards the issue. The Anthropologist, 16(1-2), 153-165. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2013.11891344.
27. Kim, Y., Kim, M., & Kim, W. (2013).Effect of Fukushima nuclear disaster on global public acceptance of nuclear energy.Energy Policy, 61, 822-828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.107.
28. Kim, Y., Kim, W., & Kim, M. (2014). An International comparative analysis od public acceptance of nuclear energy. Energy Policy, 66, 475-483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.11.039.
29. Köksal, B., & Civan, A. (2010). Factors that affect the decision of having nuclear energy and predictions for Turkey.International Relations, 6(24), 117-140.
30. Melikoglu, M. (2016). The role of renewables and nuclear energy in Turkey’s vision 202 energy targets: Economic and technical scrutiny. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 62, 1-12.
31. http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/media/weowebsite/2015/WEO2015_Chapter01.pdf
32. Neumann, S., & Hopf, M. (2012). Students’ conceptions about ‘radiation’: Results from an explorative interview study of 9th grade students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(6), 826-834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9369-9.
33. Nowotny, J., Hoshino, T., Dodson, J., Atanacio, A.J., Ionescu, M., Peterson, V., Prince, K. E., Yamawaki, M., Bak, T., Sigmund, W., Veziroglu, T. N., & Alim, M.A. (2016). Towards sustainable energy.Generation of hydrogen fuel using nuclear energy, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 41(30), 12812-12825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.05.054.
34. Orr, D.W. (1990). Environmental education and ecological literacy.The Education Digest, 55(9), 49-53.
35. Owens, M. A. (2000).The environmental literacy of urban middle school teachers, (PhD Thesis). Emory University, Division of Educational Studies, Atlanta, GA, USA.
36. Özdemir, N. (2014).Sosyo Bilimsel Esaslar Çerçevesinde Sosyo Bilimsel Konuları Tartışmak Tutumları Nasıl Etkiler? Nükleer Santraller [How does it affect attitudes to discuss socioscientific issues within the framework of socioscientific principles? Nuclear energy].Turkish Studies - International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 9(2), 1197-1214. https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.6237.
37. Özdemir, N., & Çobanoğlu, O. E. (2008).Türkiye’de nükleer santrallerin kurulmasi ve nükleer enerji kullanimi konusundaki öğretmen adaylarinin tutumlari [Prospective teachers’ attitudes towards the use of nuclear energy and the construction of nuclear plants in Turkey].H.U. Journal of Education, 34, 218-232.
38. Palabıyık, H., Yavaş, H., & Aydın, M. (2010).Türkiye’de nükleer santral kurulabilir mi? Çatışmadan uzlaşıya: Türkiye’de nükleer enerji projelerinde sosyal kabul sorunu ve halkın reddetme sendromunun araştırılması [Can a nuclear power plants be constructedin Turkey? From conflict to agreement: the social acceptence problem of nuclear energy projects in Turkey and analysis the investigation of public refusal syndrome]. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Development, 5(2), 175-201.
39. Roth, C. E. (1992). Environmental literacy: Its roots, evolution, and directions in the 1990s. Colombus, OH: Eric Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.Siegrist, M., & Visschers, V. H. (2013). Acceptance of nuclear power: the Fukushima effect.Energy Policy, 59, 112-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.07.051.
40. Stoutenborough, J.W., Sturgess, S.G., & Vedlitz, A. ( 2013). Knowledge, risk, and policy support: public perceptions of nuclear power. Energy Policy, 62, 176–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.098.
41. Sürmeli, H., Duru, N., & Duru, R. (2017).Nükleer enerji ve nükleer santraller konusuna yöneliköğretmen tutumlarının farklı değişkenler açısındanincelenmesi [Investigating teachers’ attitudes towards nuclear energy and nuclear power plants in terms of different variables]. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(1), 293-319.
42. Şenyuva, E., & Bodur, G. (2016).Üniversite öğrencilerinin nükleer santrallere ilişkin görüşleri ile çevre okuryazarlık düzeyleri ilişkisi [University students' views on nuclear power plants and relationships with environmental literacy]. Journal of Kirsehir Education Faculty, 17(1), 19-37.
43. Teksoz, G., Sahin, F., & Ertepinar, H. (2010).Çevre okuryazarliği, öğretmen adaylari ve sürdürülebilir bir gelecek [Environmental literacy, pre-service teachers, and a sustainable future ]. H.U. Journal of Education, 39, 307-320.
44. Tuncer, G., Tekkaya, C., Sungur, S., Cakiroglu, J., Ertepinar, H. & Kaplowits, M. (2009). Assessing pre-service teachers’ environmental literacy in Turkey as a mean to develop teacher education programs, International Journal of Educational Development, 29(4), 426-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2008.10.003.
45. Udum, Ş. (2010). Turkey's nuclear comeback: An Energy Renaissance in an Evolving Regional Security Context. The Nonproliferation Review, 17(2), 365-377. https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2010.485434.
46. Ulucinar-Sagir, S., Aslan, O., & Cansaran, A. (2008). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin çevre bilgisi ve çevre tutumlarının farklı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi [The examination of elementary school students’environmental knowledge and environmental attitudes with respect to different variables], Elementary Education Online, 7(2), 496-511.
47. Özbakır Umut, M.. Topuz, Y. V., &Nurtanış Velioğlu, M.(2015). Çöpten Geri Dönüşüme Giden Yolda Sürdürülebilir Tüketiciler [The sustainable consumers on the way from waste].Celal Bayar University Journal of Social Sciences, 13(2), 263-288.
48. Venable, D., Pidgeon, N., Simkons, P., Henwood, K., & Parkhill, K., (2009). Living with nuclear power: A Q method study of local community perceptions.Risk Analysis, 29 (8), 1090-1104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01259.x.
49. Visschers, V. H., & Siegrist, M. (2013). How a nuclear power plant accident influences acceptance of nuclear power: Results of a longitudinal study before and after the Fukushima disaster. Risk analysis, 33(2), 333-347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01861.x.
50. Whitfield, S. C., Rosa, E. A., Dan, A., & Dietz, T. (2009). The future of nuclear power: Value orientations and risk perception. Risk Analysis, 29(3), 425-437. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01155.x.
51. Wittner, L. S. (2003). The forgotten years of the world nuclear disarmament movement, 1975-78. Journal of Peace Research, 40(4), 435-456. https://doi.org/10.1177/00223433030404005.
52. Wright, J.M. (2006). The comparative effect of constructivist versus traditional teaching methods on environmental literacy of post-secondary non-science majors (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Graduate School of University of Nevada.
53. Yılmaz, V., Çelik, H. E., & Arslan, M. S. T. (2010).Enerji çeşitleri ve geri dönüşüme karşi tutumlarin çevresel davranişa etkisi [Effects of Attitude towards Energy Variety and Recycling on Environmental Behaviors].Fırat University Journal of Social Science, 20(2), 323-342.
54. Zengin Kırbağ, F., Keçeci, G., Kırılmazkaya, G., & Şener, A. (2011).İlköğretim öğrencilerinin nükleer enerji sosyobilimsel konusunu onlineargümantasyon yöntemi ile öğrenmesi [Elemantary school students learning about nuclear power plants with the on-line scientific argumentation learning program].e-Journal of New World Sciences Academy, 7(2) 647-654.
55. World Nuclear Association, 2017, (accessed 15.01.2018)
56. Electricity Generation Company, 2015. (accessed 12.12.2017)
57. Akkuyu Nuclear , 2017. (accessed 17.10.2017).