Bibliometric Analysis of Studies on Academic Freedom in the Field of Educational Sciences

Year 2024, , 175 - 192, 30.07.2024

Aydın Güven , Semra K Güngör

https://doi.org/10.31458/iejes.1445310

Abstract

This study aims to analyze and interpret academic publications related to “academic freedom” indexed in the Web of Science database using bibliometric analysis methods. A bibliometric analysis was conducted to evaluate the academic publications on the topic of academic freedom in the field of education and educational sciences, which are indexed in the WoS database. Additionally, scientific field mapping techniques were employed. A total of 579 studies on academic freedom were identified within the field of education sciences. The various maps were analyzed in terms of specific usage types, authors, works, years of publication, and authors. The research findings indicate that Philip Altbach is the most frequently cited author. The most frequently cited research is that of African Higher Education: The Challenges for the 21st Century," The most effective source is the Higher Education Journal. The most frequently cited institution is Boston College. The United States of America is the country with the highest number of citations. To contribute to the field, it is recommended to increase the research on "academic freedom" indexed in the WoS database. Increasing the number of bibliometric analysis studies in different fields will contribute to the literature.

Keywords

Higher education, academic freedom, bibliometric analysis, web of science, qualitative research

Ethical Statement

Ethics Commission In this study it is not necessary. Because the data is used Web of Science database.

References

• Alkış, B. (2015). Akademik özgürlük [Academic freedom]. (Master’s thesis, Galatasaray University, İstanbul, Türkiye). Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
• Arslan, M. (2005). Cumhuriyet dönemi üniversite reformları bağlamında üniversitelerimizde demokratiklik tartışmaları [Discussions on democracy in our universities in the context of university reforms in the Republican period]. Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 1(18), 23-49.
• Boulton, G., & Lucas, C. (2011). What are universities for?. Chinese Science Bulletin, 56 (23), 2506-2517.
• Bağış, M. (2021). Bibliyometrik araştırmalarda kullanılan başlıca analiz teknikleri [Main analysis techniques used in bibliometric research]. In Öztürk, O. & Gürler, G. (Ed.), Bir literatür incelemesi aracı olarak bibliyometrik analiz [Bibliometric analysis as a literature review tool] (pp.97-108). Nobel Akademi Yayıncılık.
• Bozkurt, S. (2012). Örgütsel demokrasiyi ve akademik özgürlüğü benimseme ve Türkiye’de uygulanabilir bulma düzeyine ilişkin öğretim elemanlarının görüşleri [Academicians’ point of view about organizational democracy and academic freedom receptivity and applicability level in Türkiye]. Doktora Tezi. Ankara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara. [Doctoral dissertation, Ankara University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara]. Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2019). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (26. Baskı) [Scientific research methods]. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
• Doğan, D. (2015). Türkiye’deki yükseköğretim kurumlarında hesap verebilirlik ve akademik özgürlük [Accountability and academic freedom in higher education institutions in Türkiye]. Doktora Tezi. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Eskişehir. [Doctoral dissertation, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Eskişehir]. Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/ EPO (European Patent Office) (2021). Patent index 2021. Retrieved from https://www.epo.org/about-us/annual-reports-statistics/statistics/2021/statistics/patent-applications.html#tab
• Ertem, H. Y. (2021). Does academic freedom make sense in Turkey? A content analysis study. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 19(5), 511-521.
• European Universities Association. (1988). Magna charta universitatum, (Bologna, EUA). Retrieved from: Retrieved from http://www.magna-charta.org/resources/files/Turkish.pdf
• Güner, H. (2017). Eğitim fakülteleri öğretim üyelerinin akademik özgürlük algılarının incelenmesi [Investigation of academic freedom perceptions of faculty of education faculty members]. Doktora Tezi. Marmara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul. [Doctoral dissertation, Marmara University, Institute of Educational Sciences, İstanbul]. Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
• Güner, H. & Levent, F. A. (2020). Etik ve hesap verebilirlik bağlamında akademik özgürlük (1. Baskı) [Academic freedom in the context of ethics and accountability]. Nobel Akademi Yayıncılık.
• Güneş, E. (2012). Günümüz uluslararası siyasal sistemin yapısı ve güç dağılımı [Structure and power distribution of contemporary international political system] Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, 12(23), 78-101.
• Gürüz, K. (2003). Dünyada ve Türkiye’de yükseköğretim tarihçe ve bugünkü sevk ve idare sistemleri (2. Baskı) [History of higher education in the world and in Türkiye and today's referral and administration systems]. Cem Web Ofset.
• Karadağ, E., & Yücel, C. (2020). Akademik ekoloji akademisyenlerin gözünden üniversiteler [Academic ecology universities through the eyes of academics]. ÜniAr Yayınları.
• Kıranlı-Güngör, S., & Atalay, B. (2018) Anadolu liselerinde görev yapan öğretmenlerin meslek etiğine ilişkin görüşleri [Opinions of teachers working in Anatolian high schools on professional ethics] Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 26(5), 1751-1764. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.3055
• Koç, A. (2021). Bibliyometrik araştırmalarda ilgili literatüre ilişkin veri setinin oluşturulması: Wos ve scopus veri tabanları üzerinden uygulamalar [Establishment of dataset related to related literature in bibliometric studies: applications on wos and scopus databases]. In Öztürk, O. & Gürler, G. (Ed.), Bir literatür incelemesi aracı olarak bibliyometrik analiz [Bir literatür incelemesi aracı olarak bibliyometrik analiz]. (pp.67-92). Nobel Akademi Yayıncılık.
• Kurt, A. (2019). Türkiye’de kentleşme ve çevre sorunları alanında hazırlanmış kayıtlı lisansüstü tezlerin bibliyometrik incelemesi [Bibliometric analysis of registered graduate theses in the field of urbanization and environmental problems in Türkiye]. (Master’s thesis, Aksaray University, Aksaray, Türkiye). Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
• Özipek, B. B. (2008). Akademik özgürlüğün anlamı ve gerekliliği [The meaning and necessity of academic freedom]. Liberal Düşünce Dergisi, 6(24), 185-195.
• Polanyi, M. (1947). The foundations of academic freedom. The Lancet, 249(6453), 583-586.
• Sağır, A. (2019). Çin Halk Cumhuriyeti’nde düşünce kuruluşlarının gelişimi:”Sorumlu büyük güç” olma yolunda gerçekleştirilen düşünce kuruluşu açılımı [Development of think tanks in the People’s Republic of China: A think-tank initiative to become a “responsible great power”] Cappadocia Journal of Area Studies, 1(1), 78-99. https://doi.org/10.38154/cjas.29
• Summak, M. S. (1998). Academic human rights and freedoms in Turkey. In The Educational Forum, 62(1), 32-39. Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131729708982678
• UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (2020). 2020 Human development report. Retrieved from https://www.undp.org/tr/turkiye/publications/2020-i%CC%87nsani-geli%C5%9Fme-raporu
• Vokhobzhonovna, X. S. (2023). The evolution of the concept of academic freedom in higher education institutions. American Journal of Social Sciences And Humanity Research, 3(12), 365-370.
• World University Service. (2003). Lima declaration: Academic freedom and autonomy of higher education institutions. Eğitim, Bilim ve Toplum, 1(4), 88-93.
• Yıldız, N. (2008). Neoliberal küreselleşme ve eğitim [Neoliberal globalization and education] Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(2), 13-32.