BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

BİREYSEL DEĞERLERİN ÖRGÜTSEL ADALET VE SONUÇLARI İLİŞKİSİNDE YÖNLENDİRİCİ ETKİSİ:AKADEMİK PERSONEL ÜZERİNDE BİR ANALİZ

Yıl 2006, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 19 - 40, 01.06.2006

Füsun Çınar Altıntaş

Öz

Bu çalışmada, çalışanların bireysel değerlerinin yönlendiriciliği kapsamında, örgütsel adalet ve örgütsel adaletin sonuçları (gurur duygusu ve işten ayrılma niyeti) arasındaki etkileşim araştırılmıştır. Bireysel değerler, kendini gerçekleştirme ve kendini aşma bağlamında incelenmiştir. Araştırmanın örneklemi Türkiye’de devlet üniversitelerinin iktisadi ve idari bilimler fakültelerinde çeşitli ünvanlarla görev yapan akademisyenlerdir. Çalışmada web tabanlı anket kullanılmıştır. Ankete 247 kişi katılmıştır. Araştırmanın hipotezleri çalışanların kendini gerçekleştirme ve kendini aşma değerlerinin yüksek veya düşük olmaları üzerine kurgulanmıştır. Bu anlamda toplam iki adet hipotez gerçekleştirilmiştir. Elde edilen en önemli bulgu, dağıtım ve işlem adaletinin gurur duygusu üzerindeki etkisinin hem kendini aşma hem de kendini gerçekleştirme değeri yüksek olan bireylerde daha yüksek çıktığıdır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Anahtar : Bireysel Değer Uyumu İşlem Adaleti Dağıtım Adaleti Gruba Dayalı Değer Modeli Gurur İşten Ayrılma Niyeti

Kaynakça

  • Adams, J.S. (1965). Inequity in Social Exchange. Advances and Experimental Social Pyschology, L. Berkowitz (Edt.) New York: Academic Press.
  • Alexander, S., ve Ruderman, M. (1987). The Role of Procedural and
  • Distributive Justice in Organizational Behavior. Social Justice
  • Research, Vol. 1, No. 2 177–198.
  • Amirsahi, M. (Ekim 2006). “An Empirical Study of Managerial Value Systems and Decision- Making Styles Among The Managers In Iran, http://adt.curtin.edu.au/theses/available/adt- WCU20020715.132703/.
  • Aytaç, M., Aytaç, S., Fırat, Z., Bayram, N. ve Keser, A. (2001). Akademisyenlerin Çalışma Yaşamı ve Kariyer Sorunları. Bursa: Uludağ Üniversitesi Araştırma Fonu İşletmesi.
  • Berry, J.B. , Portinga, Y.H., Marshall, H.S. ve Dosen, P.R. (1992). Cross Cultural Psychology Research and Applications, Cambridge University Press.
  • Bies, R.J., Shapiro, D.L. ve Cumming, LL. (1988). Causal Accounts and Managing Organizational Conflict: Is it Enough to Say It’ s not My Fault ? Communication Research, Vol. 15,No. 4, 381–399.
  • Bilsky, W. ve Schwartz, S. (1994). Values and Personality. European Journal of Personality, Vol.8, No. 3, 163–181.
  • Bozeman, D. P. ve Perrewe, P. L. (2001). The Effect of Item Content Overlap on Organizational Commitment Questionnaire—Turnover Cognition Relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol. 86,
  • Bozkurt, T. (1997). İşletme Kültürü: Kavram Tanımı ve Metodolojik Sorunlar. Endüstri ve Örgüt Psikolojisi, S.Tevrüz (Der.), İstanbul Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayını.
  • Brockner, J. ve Wiesenfeld, B. M. (1996). An Integrative Framework for Explaining Reactions to Decisions: The Interactive Effects of Outcomes and Procedures. Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 120, No.2, 189–208.
  • Brown, R.J., Hinkle, S., Ely, P.G., Fox-Cardmone, L., Maras, P. ve Taylor, L.A. (1992). Recognizing Group Diversity: Indivudualist-Collectivist and Autonomous-Relational Social Orientations and Their Implications for Intergroup Processes. British Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 31, 327–342.
  • Budak, G. veSürvegil, O., (2005). Tükenmişlik Ve Tükenmişliği Etkileyen Örgütsel Faktörlerin Analizine İlişkin Akademik Personel Üzerinde Bir Uygulama. D.E.Ü.İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi Cilt: 20, Sayı:2, 95–108.
  • Calder, B.J., PhilipS, L.W. ve Tybout, A.M. (1981). Designing Research for Application. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 8, 197–207.
  • Cohen, Y.C. ve P.E. Spector (2001). The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes Vol. 86, No. 2, 278–321.
  • Corbitt, B.J., Thanasankit, T. ve Han, Y. (2003). Trust and E-Commerce: A Study of Consumer Perceptions. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, Vol. 2, No.3, 203–215.
  • Dailey, R.C. ve Delaney, K.J. (1992). Disributive and Procedural Justice as Antecedents of Job Dissatisfaction and Intent to Turnover. Human Relations, Vol. 45, No. 3, 305–317.
  • De Bats, D.L. ve Bartelds, B. (Kasım 2006). The Structure of Human Values: A Principal Components Analysis of the Rokeach Value Survey,http//www.Ub.Rug.Nl/Eldoc/Dis/Ppsw/D.L.H.M.Debats/C5.pdf
  • Elizur, D., Ingvar, B., Raymond, H. ve Beck, I.M. (1991). The Structure of Work Values: The Cross Cultural Comparison. The Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 12, 21–38.
  • Ericson, R.F. (1969). The Impact of Cybernetic Information Technology on Management Value Systems. Management Science, Vol. 16, No. 2, 40–60.
  • Feather, N.T. (1994). Human Values and Their Relation to Justice. Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 50, No. 4, 129–151.
  • Feather, N.T. (2002). Values and Value Dilemmas in Relation to Judgements Concerning Outcomes of an Industrial Conflict. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 28, No. 4, 446– 459.
  • Folger, R (1987). Distributive and Procedural Justice in the Workplace. Social Justice Research, Vol. 1, No. 1, 143–159.
  • Folger, R. ve Konovsky, M.A. (1989). Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions To Pay Raise Decisions. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 32, No. 1, 115–130.
  • Gandal, N. ve Roccas, S. (2002). Good Neighbors/Bad Citizens: Personal Value Priorities of Economists. Working Paper, No. 3660, Center for Economic Policy Research (CEPR).
  • Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational Justice: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. Journal of Management, Vol. 16, No. 2, 399–432.
  • Greenberg, J. (1996). The Quest for Justice on the Job: Essays and Experiments. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Guth, W.D. ve Tagiuri, R. (1965). Personal Values and Corporate Strategy. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 43, No.5, 123–132.
  • Hansson, S.O. (2001). Structure of Values and Norms, West Nyack, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hitlin, S. (2003). Values as the Core of Personal Identity: Drawing Links Between Two Theories of Self. Social Psychology Quarterly, Vo 66, No. 2, 118–137.
  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture Consequences; Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Accross Nations. Second Editions, Sage Publications Inc.
  • Lipponen, J., Olkkonen, M.E. ve Myyry, L. (2004). Personal Value Orientation as a Moderator in the Relationships Between Perceived Organizational Justice and its Hypothesized Consequences. Social Justice Research, Vol.17, No. 3, 275–292.
  • Jetten, J., Spears, R. ve Manstead, A.R. (1997). Distinctiveness Threat and Prototypicality: Combined Effects on Intergroup Discrimination and Collective Self-Esteem. European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 27, 635–657.
  • Kahle, L.R., Rose, G. ve Sholam, A. (1999). Findings of LOV Throughout the World and Other Evidence of Cross –National Consumer Psychographics Introduction. Journal of EuroMarketing, Vol. 8, No. 1/2, 1–13.
  • Konovsky, M. A. ve Cropanzano, R. (1991). Perceived Fairness of Employee Drug Testing as a Predictor of Employee Attitudes and Job Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 76, No.5, 698–707.
  • Mayton, D.M., Ball-Rokeach, S.J. ve Loges, W.E. (1994). Human Values and Social Issues: An Introduction. Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 50, No. 4, 1–8.
  • MacCallum, R. C. ve Austin, J.T. (2000). Applications of Structural Equation Modeling in Psychological Research. Annual Reivew of Psychology, Vol. 51, No. 1, 201–226.
  • Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship Between Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: Do Fairness Perceptions Influence Employee Citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 76, No.6, 845–855.
  • Mowday, R.T. ve Colwell, K.A. (1996). Employee Reactions to Unfair Outcomes in the Workplace: The Contributions of Adams' Equity Theory to Understanding Work Motivation. Porter, G. Bigley ve R. Steers (Edt.), Motivation and Work Behavior. New York: Mc Graw- Hill.
  • Mummendey, A. L., Klink, A. Mielke, R., Wenzel, M. ve Blanz, M. (1999). Socio-Structural Characteristics of Intergroup Relations and Identity Management Strategies: Results From A Field Study in East Germany. European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 29, No. 2–3, 259–285.
  • Özdevecioğlu, M. (2006). Kurumsal Adalet, Kurumsal Kültür, Organizasyonlar, Kurallar ve Kurumlar. Çoşkun Can Aktan (Editör), Sermaye Piyasası Kurulu, Kurumsal Araştırmalar Serisi No.3, Yayın No:195, Ankara.
  • Özen, Ş. (1996). Bürokratik Kültür 1, Yönetsel Değerlerin Toplumsal Temelleri, Türkiye ve Orta Doğu Amme İdaresi Enstitüsü, Yayın No. 272, Ankara.
  • Ralston, D.A., Thang, N. ve Van- Napier, N.K. (1999). A Comparative Study of the Work Values of North and South Vietnamese Managers. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 30, No. 4, 655–672.
  • Roccas, S. (2003). Identification and Status Revisited: The Moderating Role of Self-Enhancement and Self–Transcendence Values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 29, No. 1, 726–736.
  • Rokeach, M., (1973). The Nature of Human Values, New York: The Free Press .
  • Rohan, M. J. (2000). A Rose by Any Name? The Values Construct. Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 4, No. 3, 255–277.
  • Rubin, M. ve Hewstone, M.(1998). Social Identity Theory’s Self-Esteem Hypothesis: A Review and Some Suggestion for Clarification. Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 2, No. 1, 40–62.
  • Ryckman, R.M. ve Houston, D. M. (2003). Value Priorities in American and British Female and Male University Students. The Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 143, No. 1, 127–138.
  • Sager, J. K., Griffeth, R.W. ve Hom, P.W. (1998). A Comparison of Structural Models Representing Turnover Cognitions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 53,No. 2, 254–273.
  • Sargut, S. (2001). Kültürlerarası Farklılaşma ve Yönetim, Genişletilmiş 2. Baskı, Ankara: İmge Kitabevi.
  • Sax, L.J., Gilmartin S.K. ve Bryant A.N. (2003). Assessing Response Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Web and Paper Surveys. Research in Higher Education, Vol.44, No.4, 409-431.
  • Scandura, T.A. (1999). Rethinking Leader-Member Exchange: An Organizational Justice Perspective. Leadership Qurterly, Vol. 10,
  • Schwartz, S.H. (1990). Individualism-Collectivism, Critique and Proposed Refinements. Journal of Cross Cultural Pyschology, Vol.21, No. 2, 139–157.
  • Schwartz, S. (1992). Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoritical Advances and Empirical Test in 20 Countries. Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Academic Pres, San Diego, CA, Vol.25, 1–65.
  • Schwartz, S. (1994a). Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human Values? Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 50 No. 4, 19–45.
  • Schwartz, S. (1994b). Beyond Individualism/Collectivisim, New Cultural Dimension of Values. Individualism and Collectivism Theory, Method and Applications, U.Kim, H.C. Triandis, Çiğdem Kağıtçıbaşı ve diğerleri (edt), Cross-Cultural Research and Methodology Series, Vol. 18, Sage Publications.
  • Schwartz, S. (1996). Value Priorities and Behavior: Applying a Theory of Integrated Value Systems. Edt. Clive Sligman- James M.Olson-Mark P.Zanna, The Psychology of Values, The Ontorio Symposium, Vol. 8, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  • Schwartz, S.ve Sagiv, L. (2000). Value Priorities and Subjective Well – Being: Direct Relations and Congruity Effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 30, No. 2, 177–198.
  • Schwartz, S., Sagiv, L. ve Boehnke, K. (2000). Worries and Values. Journal of Personality, Vol. 68, No. 2, 309–346.
  • Segars, A.H. ve Grover, V. (1993). Re-Examining Perceived Ease of Use and Usefulness: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis. MIS Quarterly, December, 517–525.
  • Smith, H.J. ve Tyler T.R. (1997). Choosing The Right Pond: The Impact of Group Membership on Self-Esteem and Group-Oriented Behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 33, No. 2, 146–170.
  • Sousa, F.H. ve Vala, J. (2002). Relational Justice in Organizations: The Group-Value Model and Support for Change. Social Justice Research, Vol. 15, No. 2, 99–121.
  • Stone-Romero, E.F. ve Anderson, L.E. (1994). Relative Power Of Moderated Multiple-Regression and The Comparison Of Subgroup Correlation-Coefficients For Detecting Moderating Effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 79, No. 3, 354–359.
  • Turan, S., Durceylan, B. ve Şişman, M. (2005). Üniversite Yöneticilerinin Benimsedikleri İdari ve Kültürel Değerler. Manas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Sayı 13, 181–202.
  • Tyler, T.R. (1994). Psychological Model of the Justice Motive: Antecedents of Distributive and Procedural Justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 67, No. 5, 850–863.
  • Tyler, T.R. ve Blader, S.L. (2000). Cooperation in Groups, Procedural Justice Social Identity and Behavioral Engagement, Essay in Social Psychology, New York University.
  • Tyler, T.R. ve Blader, S.L. (2003). The Group Engagement Model: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Cooperative Behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 7, No. 4, 349–361.
  • Tyler, T.R., Degoey, P. ve Smith, H.J. (1996). Understanding Why The Justice of Group Procedures Matters. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 70, No. 2, 913–930.
  • Vlagsma, B. K., Pieters, G.M. ve M. Wedel (2002). The Dynamics of Value Segments: Modeling Framework and Empirical Illustration. International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol.19, No. 3, 267–285.
  • Westwood, R.I. ve Posner, B.Z. (1997). Managerial Values Across Cultures: Australia, Hong Kong and The United States. Asia Pasific Journal of Management, Vol. 14, No. 1, 34–66.
  • Whiteley, A. (1995). Managing Change A Core Values Approach, Mc Millan Education.
  • Wiener, Y. (1988). Forms of Value Systems: A Focus on Organizational Effectiveness and Cultural Change and Maintenance. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 13, No. 4, 534–545.

BİREYSEL DEĞERLERİN ÖRGÜTSEL ADALET VE SONUÇLARI İLİŞKİSİNDE YÖNLENDİRİCİ ETKİSİ:AKADEMİK PERSONEL ÜZERİNDE BİR ANALİZ

Yıl 2006, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 19 - 40, 01.06.2006

Füsun Çınar Altıntaş

Öz

Bu çalışmada, çalışanların bireysel değerlerinin yönlendiriciliği kapsamında, örgütsel adalet ve örgütsel adaletin sonuçları (gurur duygusu ve işten ayrılma niyeti) arasındaki etkileşim araştırılmıştır. Bireysel değerler, kendini gerçekleştirme ve kendini aşma bağlamında incelenmiştir. Araştırmanın örneklemi Türkiye’de devlet üniversitelerinin iktisadi ve idari bilimler fakültelerinde çeşitli ünvanlarla görev yapan akademisyenlerdir. Çalışmada web tabanlı anket kullanılmıştır. Ankete 247 kişi katılmıştır. Araştırmanın hipotezleri çalışanların kendini gerçekleştirme ve kendini aşma değerlerinin yüksek veya düşük olmaları üzerine kurgulanmıştır. Bu anlamda toplam iki adet hipotez gerçekleştirilmiştir. Elde edilen en önemli bulgu, dağıtım ve işlem adaletinin gurur duygusu üzerindeki etkisinin hem kendini aşma hem de kendini gerçekleştirme değeri yüksek olan bireylerde daha yüksek çıktığıdır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Anahtar : Bireysel Değer Uyumu İşlem Adaleti Dağıtım Adaleti Gruba Dayalı Değer Modeli Gurur İşten Ayrılma Niyeti

Kaynakça

  • Adams, J.S. (1965). Inequity in Social Exchange. Advances and Experimental Social Pyschology, L. Berkowitz (Edt.) New York: Academic Press.
  • Alexander, S., ve Ruderman, M. (1987). The Role of Procedural and
  • Distributive Justice in Organizational Behavior. Social Justice
  • Research, Vol. 1, No. 2 177–198.
  • Amirsahi, M. (Ekim 2006). “An Empirical Study of Managerial Value Systems and Decision- Making Styles Among The Managers In Iran, http://adt.curtin.edu.au/theses/available/adt- WCU20020715.132703/.
  • Aytaç, M., Aytaç, S., Fırat, Z., Bayram, N. ve Keser, A. (2001). Akademisyenlerin Çalışma Yaşamı ve Kariyer Sorunları. Bursa: Uludağ Üniversitesi Araştırma Fonu İşletmesi.
  • Berry, J.B. , Portinga, Y.H., Marshall, H.S. ve Dosen, P.R. (1992). Cross Cultural Psychology Research and Applications, Cambridge University Press.
  • Bies, R.J., Shapiro, D.L. ve Cumming, LL. (1988). Causal Accounts and Managing Organizational Conflict: Is it Enough to Say It’ s not My Fault ? Communication Research, Vol. 15,No. 4, 381–399.
  • Bilsky, W. ve Schwartz, S. (1994). Values and Personality. European Journal of Personality, Vol.8, No. 3, 163–181.
  • Bozeman, D. P. ve Perrewe, P. L. (2001). The Effect of Item Content Overlap on Organizational Commitment Questionnaire—Turnover Cognition Relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol. 86,
  • Bozkurt, T. (1997). İşletme Kültürü: Kavram Tanımı ve Metodolojik Sorunlar. Endüstri ve Örgüt Psikolojisi, S.Tevrüz (Der.), İstanbul Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayını.
  • Brockner, J. ve Wiesenfeld, B. M. (1996). An Integrative Framework for Explaining Reactions to Decisions: The Interactive Effects of Outcomes and Procedures. Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 120, No.2, 189–208.
  • Brown, R.J., Hinkle, S., Ely, P.G., Fox-Cardmone, L., Maras, P. ve Taylor, L.A. (1992). Recognizing Group Diversity: Indivudualist-Collectivist and Autonomous-Relational Social Orientations and Their Implications for Intergroup Processes. British Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 31, 327–342.
  • Budak, G. veSürvegil, O., (2005). Tükenmişlik Ve Tükenmişliği Etkileyen Örgütsel Faktörlerin Analizine İlişkin Akademik Personel Üzerinde Bir Uygulama. D.E.Ü.İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi Cilt: 20, Sayı:2, 95–108.
  • Calder, B.J., PhilipS, L.W. ve Tybout, A.M. (1981). Designing Research for Application. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 8, 197–207.
  • Cohen, Y.C. ve P.E. Spector (2001). The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes Vol. 86, No. 2, 278–321.
  • Corbitt, B.J., Thanasankit, T. ve Han, Y. (2003). Trust and E-Commerce: A Study of Consumer Perceptions. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, Vol. 2, No.3, 203–215.
  • Dailey, R.C. ve Delaney, K.J. (1992). Disributive and Procedural Justice as Antecedents of Job Dissatisfaction and Intent to Turnover. Human Relations, Vol. 45, No. 3, 305–317.
  • De Bats, D.L. ve Bartelds, B. (Kasım 2006). The Structure of Human Values: A Principal Components Analysis of the Rokeach Value Survey,http//www.Ub.Rug.Nl/Eldoc/Dis/Ppsw/D.L.H.M.Debats/C5.pdf
  • Elizur, D., Ingvar, B., Raymond, H. ve Beck, I.M. (1991). The Structure of Work Values: The Cross Cultural Comparison. The Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 12, 21–38.
  • Ericson, R.F. (1969). The Impact of Cybernetic Information Technology on Management Value Systems. Management Science, Vol. 16, No. 2, 40–60.
  • Feather, N.T. (1994). Human Values and Their Relation to Justice. Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 50, No. 4, 129–151.
  • Feather, N.T. (2002). Values and Value Dilemmas in Relation to Judgements Concerning Outcomes of an Industrial Conflict. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 28, No. 4, 446– 459.
  • Folger, R (1987). Distributive and Procedural Justice in the Workplace. Social Justice Research, Vol. 1, No. 1, 143–159.
  • Folger, R. ve Konovsky, M.A. (1989). Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions To Pay Raise Decisions. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 32, No. 1, 115–130.
  • Gandal, N. ve Roccas, S. (2002). Good Neighbors/Bad Citizens: Personal Value Priorities of Economists. Working Paper, No. 3660, Center for Economic Policy Research (CEPR).
  • Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational Justice: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. Journal of Management, Vol. 16, No. 2, 399–432.
  • Greenberg, J. (1996). The Quest for Justice on the Job: Essays and Experiments. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Guth, W.D. ve Tagiuri, R. (1965). Personal Values and Corporate Strategy. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 43, No.5, 123–132.
  • Hansson, S.O. (2001). Structure of Values and Norms, West Nyack, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hitlin, S. (2003). Values as the Core of Personal Identity: Drawing Links Between Two Theories of Self. Social Psychology Quarterly, Vo 66, No. 2, 118–137.
  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture Consequences; Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Accross Nations. Second Editions, Sage Publications Inc.
  • Lipponen, J., Olkkonen, M.E. ve Myyry, L. (2004). Personal Value Orientation as a Moderator in the Relationships Between Perceived Organizational Justice and its Hypothesized Consequences. Social Justice Research, Vol.17, No. 3, 275–292.
  • Jetten, J., Spears, R. ve Manstead, A.R. (1997). Distinctiveness Threat and Prototypicality: Combined Effects on Intergroup Discrimination and Collective Self-Esteem. European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 27, 635–657.
  • Kahle, L.R., Rose, G. ve Sholam, A. (1999). Findings of LOV Throughout the World and Other Evidence of Cross –National Consumer Psychographics Introduction. Journal of EuroMarketing, Vol. 8, No. 1/2, 1–13.
  • Konovsky, M. A. ve Cropanzano, R. (1991). Perceived Fairness of Employee Drug Testing as a Predictor of Employee Attitudes and Job Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 76, No.5, 698–707.
  • Mayton, D.M., Ball-Rokeach, S.J. ve Loges, W.E. (1994). Human Values and Social Issues: An Introduction. Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 50, No. 4, 1–8.
  • MacCallum, R. C. ve Austin, J.T. (2000). Applications of Structural Equation Modeling in Psychological Research. Annual Reivew of Psychology, Vol. 51, No. 1, 201–226.
  • Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship Between Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: Do Fairness Perceptions Influence Employee Citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 76, No.6, 845–855.
  • Mowday, R.T. ve Colwell, K.A. (1996). Employee Reactions to Unfair Outcomes in the Workplace: The Contributions of Adams' Equity Theory to Understanding Work Motivation. Porter, G. Bigley ve R. Steers (Edt.), Motivation and Work Behavior. New York: Mc Graw- Hill.
  • Mummendey, A. L., Klink, A. Mielke, R., Wenzel, M. ve Blanz, M. (1999). Socio-Structural Characteristics of Intergroup Relations and Identity Management Strategies: Results From A Field Study in East Germany. European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 29, No. 2–3, 259–285.
  • Özdevecioğlu, M. (2006). Kurumsal Adalet, Kurumsal Kültür, Organizasyonlar, Kurallar ve Kurumlar. Çoşkun Can Aktan (Editör), Sermaye Piyasası Kurulu, Kurumsal Araştırmalar Serisi No.3, Yayın No:195, Ankara.
  • Özen, Ş. (1996). Bürokratik Kültür 1, Yönetsel Değerlerin Toplumsal Temelleri, Türkiye ve Orta Doğu Amme İdaresi Enstitüsü, Yayın No. 272, Ankara.
  • Ralston, D.A., Thang, N. ve Van- Napier, N.K. (1999). A Comparative Study of the Work Values of North and South Vietnamese Managers. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 30, No. 4, 655–672.
  • Roccas, S. (2003). Identification and Status Revisited: The Moderating Role of Self-Enhancement and Self–Transcendence Values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 29, No. 1, 726–736.
  • Rokeach, M., (1973). The Nature of Human Values, New York: The Free Press .
  • Rohan, M. J. (2000). A Rose by Any Name? The Values Construct. Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 4, No. 3, 255–277.
  • Rubin, M. ve Hewstone, M.(1998). Social Identity Theory’s Self-Esteem Hypothesis: A Review and Some Suggestion for Clarification. Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 2, No. 1, 40–62.
  • Ryckman, R.M. ve Houston, D. M. (2003). Value Priorities in American and British Female and Male University Students. The Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 143, No. 1, 127–138.
  • Sager, J. K., Griffeth, R.W. ve Hom, P.W. (1998). A Comparison of Structural Models Representing Turnover Cognitions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 53,No. 2, 254–273.
  • Sargut, S. (2001). Kültürlerarası Farklılaşma ve Yönetim, Genişletilmiş 2. Baskı, Ankara: İmge Kitabevi.
  • Sax, L.J., Gilmartin S.K. ve Bryant A.N. (2003). Assessing Response Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Web and Paper Surveys. Research in Higher Education, Vol.44, No.4, 409-431.
  • Scandura, T.A. (1999). Rethinking Leader-Member Exchange: An Organizational Justice Perspective. Leadership Qurterly, Vol. 10,
  • Schwartz, S.H. (1990). Individualism-Collectivism, Critique and Proposed Refinements. Journal of Cross Cultural Pyschology, Vol.21, No. 2, 139–157.
  • Schwartz, S. (1992). Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoritical Advances and Empirical Test in 20 Countries. Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Academic Pres, San Diego, CA, Vol.25, 1–65.
  • Schwartz, S. (1994a). Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human Values? Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 50 No. 4, 19–45.
  • Schwartz, S. (1994b). Beyond Individualism/Collectivisim, New Cultural Dimension of Values. Individualism and Collectivism Theory, Method and Applications, U.Kim, H.C. Triandis, Çiğdem Kağıtçıbaşı ve diğerleri (edt), Cross-Cultural Research and Methodology Series, Vol. 18, Sage Publications.
  • Schwartz, S. (1996). Value Priorities and Behavior: Applying a Theory of Integrated Value Systems. Edt. Clive Sligman- James M.Olson-Mark P.Zanna, The Psychology of Values, The Ontorio Symposium, Vol. 8, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  • Schwartz, S.ve Sagiv, L. (2000). Value Priorities and Subjective Well – Being: Direct Relations and Congruity Effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 30, No. 2, 177–198.
  • Schwartz, S., Sagiv, L. ve Boehnke, K. (2000). Worries and Values. Journal of Personality, Vol. 68, No. 2, 309–346.
  • Segars, A.H. ve Grover, V. (1993). Re-Examining Perceived Ease of Use and Usefulness: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis. MIS Quarterly, December, 517–525.
  • Smith, H.J. ve Tyler T.R. (1997). Choosing The Right Pond: The Impact of Group Membership on Self-Esteem and Group-Oriented Behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 33, No. 2, 146–170.
  • Sousa, F.H. ve Vala, J. (2002). Relational Justice in Organizations: The Group-Value Model and Support for Change. Social Justice Research, Vol. 15, No. 2, 99–121.
  • Stone-Romero, E.F. ve Anderson, L.E. (1994). Relative Power Of Moderated Multiple-Regression and The Comparison Of Subgroup Correlation-Coefficients For Detecting Moderating Effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 79, No. 3, 354–359.
  • Turan, S., Durceylan, B. ve Şişman, M. (2005). Üniversite Yöneticilerinin Benimsedikleri İdari ve Kültürel Değerler. Manas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Sayı 13, 181–202.
  • Tyler, T.R. (1994). Psychological Model of the Justice Motive: Antecedents of Distributive and Procedural Justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 67, No. 5, 850–863.
  • Tyler, T.R. ve Blader, S.L. (2000). Cooperation in Groups, Procedural Justice Social Identity and Behavioral Engagement, Essay in Social Psychology, New York University.
  • Tyler, T.R. ve Blader, S.L. (2003). The Group Engagement Model: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Cooperative Behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 7, No. 4, 349–361.
  • Tyler, T.R., Degoey, P. ve Smith, H.J. (1996). Understanding Why The Justice of Group Procedures Matters. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 70, No. 2, 913–930.
  • Vlagsma, B. K., Pieters, G.M. ve M. Wedel (2002). The Dynamics of Value Segments: Modeling Framework and Empirical Illustration. International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol.19, No. 3, 267–285.
  • Westwood, R.I. ve Posner, B.Z. (1997). Managerial Values Across Cultures: Australia, Hong Kong and The United States. Asia Pasific Journal of Management, Vol. 14, No. 1, 34–66.
  • Whiteley, A. (1995). Managing Change A Core Values Approach, Mc Millan Education.
  • Wiener, Y. (1988). Forms of Value Systems: A Focus on Organizational Effectiveness and Cultural Change and Maintenance. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 13, No. 4, 534–545.
Toplam 73 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Füsun Çınar Altıntaş Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Haziran 2006
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2006 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Altıntaş, F. Ç. (2006). BİREYSEL DEĞERLERİN ÖRGÜTSEL ADALET VE SONUÇLARI İLİŞKİSİNDE YÖNLENDİRİCİ ETKİSİ:AKADEMİK PERSONEL ÜZERİNDE BİR ANALİZ. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(2), 19-40.
AMA Altıntaş FÇ. BİREYSEL DEĞERLERİN ÖRGÜTSEL ADALET VE SONUÇLARI İLİŞKİSİNDE YÖNLENDİRİCİ ETKİSİ:AKADEMİK PERSONEL ÜZERİNDE BİR ANALİZ. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi. Haziran 2006;7(2):19-40.
Chicago Altıntaş, Füsun Çınar. “BİREYSEL DEĞERLERİN ÖRGÜTSEL ADALET VE SONUÇLARI İLİŞKİSİNDE YÖNLENDİRİCİ ETKİSİ:AKADEMİK PERSONEL ÜZERİNDE BİR ANALİZ”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi 7, sy. 2 (Haziran 2006): 19-40.
EndNote Altıntaş FÇ (01 Haziran 2006) BİREYSEL DEĞERLERİN ÖRGÜTSEL ADALET VE SONUÇLARI İLİŞKİSİNDE YÖNLENDİRİCİ ETKİSİ:AKADEMİK PERSONEL ÜZERİNDE BİR ANALİZ. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi 7 2 19–40.
IEEE F. Ç. Altıntaş, “BİREYSEL DEĞERLERİN ÖRGÜTSEL ADALET VE SONUÇLARI İLİŞKİSİNDE YÖNLENDİRİCİ ETKİSİ:AKADEMİK PERSONEL ÜZERİNDE BİR ANALİZ”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 7, sy. 2, ss. 19–40, 2006.
ISNAD Altıntaş, Füsun Çınar. “BİREYSEL DEĞERLERİN ÖRGÜTSEL ADALET VE SONUÇLARI İLİŞKİSİNDE YÖNLENDİRİCİ ETKİSİ:AKADEMİK PERSONEL ÜZERİNDE BİR ANALİZ”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi 7/2 (Haziran 2006), 19-40.
JAMA Altıntaş FÇ. BİREYSEL DEĞERLERİN ÖRGÜTSEL ADALET VE SONUÇLARI İLİŞKİSİNDE YÖNLENDİRİCİ ETKİSİ:AKADEMİK PERSONEL ÜZERİNDE BİR ANALİZ. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi. 2006;7:19–40.
MLA Altıntaş, Füsun Çınar. “BİREYSEL DEĞERLERİN ÖRGÜTSEL ADALET VE SONUÇLARI İLİŞKİSİNDE YÖNLENDİRİCİ ETKİSİ:AKADEMİK PERSONEL ÜZERİNDE BİR ANALİZ”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 7, sy. 2, 2006, ss. 19-40.
Vancouver Altıntaş FÇ. BİREYSEL DEĞERLERİN ÖRGÜTSEL ADALET VE SONUÇLARI İLİŞKİSİNDE YÖNLENDİRİCİ ETKİSİ:AKADEMİK PERSONEL ÜZERİNDE BİR ANALİZ. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi. 2006;7(2):19-40.
Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi
TR-DİZİN, SOBIAD, Araştırmax tarafından taranmaktadır.

Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Yayınevi Web Sitesi

Dergi İletişim Bilgileri Sayfası