Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

AN EXPLORATORY SURVEY ON ORGANIZATIONAL READINESS FOR EVALUATION IN TURKEY

Year 2020, Volume: 21 Issue: 2, 275 - 286, 29.01.2021
https://doi.org/10.24889/ifede.839771

Abstract

References

  • Cousins, J. B., Elliott, C., Amo, C., Bourgeois, I., Chouinard, J. A., Goh, S. C., Lahey, R. (2008). Organizational capacity to do and use evaluation: Results of a pan-Canadian survey of evaluators. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 23(3), 1-35.
  • Kusek, Jody Zall (2011). Assessing Country Readiness for Results-Based Monitoring and Evaluation to Support Results Informed Budgeting. Global Expert Team (GET) Brief. World Bank, Washington, DC. World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/10456 License: CC BY 3.0 IGO.
  • Morariu, J., E. Reed and K. Brennan (2012). Readiness for Evaluation and Learning. Assessing Grant maker and Grantee Capacity. Innovation Network.
  • Preskill, H. and Torres, R.T. (1999). Evaluative inquiry for learning in organizations. Thousand Oaks. CA.
  • Rugh, J., and Segone, M., editors (2013). Voluntary Organizations for Professional Evaluation (VOPEs): Learning from Africa, Americas, Asia, Australasia, Europe and Middle East. EvalPartners, UNICEF, IOCE.
  • Segone, M. and Ocampo, A. (2006). IOCE (International Organization for Cooperation in Evaluation). Creating and developing evaluation organizations. Lessons learned from Africa, Americas, Asia, Australasia and Europe, Peru
  • Tarsilla, M. (2012). From building evaluation capacity to supporting evaluation capacity development: The cases of Democratic Republic of Congo, Niger and South Africa. PhD Dissertation. Western Michigan University.
  • United Nations Evaluation Group (2016, 2017). Norms and standards for evaluation. New York: UNEG.

TÜRKİYE’DE KURUMLARIN DEĞERLENDİRME KONUSUNDA HAZIR OLMA DURUMLARI İLE İLGİLİ KEŞİFSEL BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Year 2020, Volume: 21 Issue: 2, 275 - 286, 29.01.2021
https://doi.org/10.24889/ifede.839771

Abstract

In designing Evaluation Capacity Building (ECB) programs in a country, it is vital to know the baseline situation. A necessary step is to reveal the status of current understanding and practices of evaluation. The objective of the paper is to explore the evaluation readiness of organizations in Turkey. Following the literature on organizational culture on evaluative inquiry, the study reports on the development and administration of a structured questionnaire with particular focus on various dimensions of organizational readiness for evaluation such as culture, leadership, resources and existing evaluation practices, if any. The survey sample includes 71 representatives of government agencies and, domestic and international NGOs in Turkey. Although evaluation is regarded and perceived as a tool for organizational learning and improved organizational performance, the culture, leadership and structure of the organizations do not show supporting characteristics on the implementation and use of evaluation in organizations. The results reveal a necessity of positioning evaluation as a major tool for efficient use of resources and organizational learning in Turkish organizations.

References

  • Cousins, J. B., Elliott, C., Amo, C., Bourgeois, I., Chouinard, J. A., Goh, S. C., Lahey, R. (2008). Organizational capacity to do and use evaluation: Results of a pan-Canadian survey of evaluators. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 23(3), 1-35.
  • Kusek, Jody Zall (2011). Assessing Country Readiness for Results-Based Monitoring and Evaluation to Support Results Informed Budgeting. Global Expert Team (GET) Brief. World Bank, Washington, DC. World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/10456 License: CC BY 3.0 IGO.
  • Morariu, J., E. Reed and K. Brennan (2012). Readiness for Evaluation and Learning. Assessing Grant maker and Grantee Capacity. Innovation Network.
  • Preskill, H. and Torres, R.T. (1999). Evaluative inquiry for learning in organizations. Thousand Oaks. CA.
  • Rugh, J., and Segone, M., editors (2013). Voluntary Organizations for Professional Evaluation (VOPEs): Learning from Africa, Americas, Asia, Australasia, Europe and Middle East. EvalPartners, UNICEF, IOCE.
  • Segone, M. and Ocampo, A. (2006). IOCE (International Organization for Cooperation in Evaluation). Creating and developing evaluation organizations. Lessons learned from Africa, Americas, Asia, Australasia and Europe, Peru
  • Tarsilla, M. (2012). From building evaluation capacity to supporting evaluation capacity development: The cases of Democratic Republic of Congo, Niger and South Africa. PhD Dissertation. Western Michigan University.
  • United Nations Evaluation Group (2016, 2017). Norms and standards for evaluation. New York: UNEG.
There are 8 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Economics
Journal Section Article
Authors

Sedef Akgüngör 0000-0002-5178-8948

Yaprak Gülcan This is me 0000-0001-7779-8071

Yeşim Kuştepeli 0000-0001-9600-2892

Publication Date January 29, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2020 Volume: 21 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Akgüngör, S., Gülcan, Y., & Kuştepeli, Y. (2021). TÜRKİYE’DE KURUMLARIN DEĞERLENDİRME KONUSUNDA HAZIR OLMA DURUMLARI İLE İLGİLİ KEŞİFSEL BİR ARAŞTIRMA. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(2), 275-286. https://doi.org/10.24889/ifede.839771
AMA Akgüngör S, Gülcan Y, Kuştepeli Y. TÜRKİYE’DE KURUMLARIN DEĞERLENDİRME KONUSUNDA HAZIR OLMA DURUMLARI İLE İLGİLİ KEŞİFSEL BİR ARAŞTIRMA. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi. January 2021;21(2):275-286. doi:10.24889/ifede.839771
Chicago Akgüngör, Sedef, Yaprak Gülcan, and Yeşim Kuştepeli. “TÜRKİYE’DE KURUMLARIN DEĞERLENDİRME KONUSUNDA HAZIR OLMA DURUMLARI İLE İLGİLİ KEŞİFSEL BİR ARAŞTIRMA”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi 21, no. 2 (January 2021): 275-86. https://doi.org/10.24889/ifede.839771.
EndNote Akgüngör S, Gülcan Y, Kuştepeli Y (January 1, 2021) TÜRKİYE’DE KURUMLARIN DEĞERLENDİRME KONUSUNDA HAZIR OLMA DURUMLARI İLE İLGİLİ KEŞİFSEL BİR ARAŞTIRMA. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi 21 2 275–286.
IEEE S. Akgüngör, Y. Gülcan, and Y. Kuştepeli, “TÜRKİYE’DE KURUMLARIN DEĞERLENDİRME KONUSUNDA HAZIR OLMA DURUMLARI İLE İLGİLİ KEŞİFSEL BİR ARAŞTIRMA”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 275–286, 2021, doi: 10.24889/ifede.839771.
ISNAD Akgüngör, Sedef et al. “TÜRKİYE’DE KURUMLARIN DEĞERLENDİRME KONUSUNDA HAZIR OLMA DURUMLARI İLE İLGİLİ KEŞİFSEL BİR ARAŞTIRMA”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi 21/2 (January 2021), 275-286. https://doi.org/10.24889/ifede.839771.
JAMA Akgüngör S, Gülcan Y, Kuştepeli Y. TÜRKİYE’DE KURUMLARIN DEĞERLENDİRME KONUSUNDA HAZIR OLMA DURUMLARI İLE İLGİLİ KEŞİFSEL BİR ARAŞTIRMA. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi. 2021;21:275–286.
MLA Akgüngör, Sedef et al. “TÜRKİYE’DE KURUMLARIN DEĞERLENDİRME KONUSUNDA HAZIR OLMA DURUMLARI İLE İLGİLİ KEŞİFSEL BİR ARAŞTIRMA”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 21, no. 2, 2021, pp. 275-86, doi:10.24889/ifede.839771.
Vancouver Akgüngör S, Gülcan Y, Kuştepeli Y. TÜRKİYE’DE KURUMLARIN DEĞERLENDİRME KONUSUNDA HAZIR OLMA DURUMLARI İLE İLGİLİ KEŞİFSEL BİR ARAŞTIRMA. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi. 2021;21(2):275-86.

Dokuz Eylül University Journal of Faculty of Business
is indexed and abstracted by TR-DİZİN, SOBIAD and Araştırmax. 

Dokuz Eylül University Publisher's Web Page

Journal Contact Details