İngilizce'yi Yabancı Dil Olarak Öğrenenler Arasında Büyük Beş Kişilik Özellikleri ve Sınav Kaygısı

Year 2017, Issue: 11, 1 - 21, 01.04.2017

Mehmet Asmalı

Abstract

Bu çalışma, İngilizce’yi yabancı dil olarak öğrenen Türk öğrencilerin Büyük Beş Kişilik Özelliklerinin, sınav kaygıları ile ilişkisini incelemiştir. Veriler Goldberg’in 2001 Uluslararası Kişilik Madde Havuzu ve Sarason'un 1984 adapte edilmiş Sınav Kaygısı Ölçeği ile toplanmıştır. Temel amaç, katılımcıların sınav kaygısını tespit etmek ve öğrencilerin sınav kaygısını tahmin eden kişilik özelliklerini belirlemektir. Tanımlayıcı istatistikler, öğrencilerin orta seviyede sınav kaygısına sahip olduklarını göstermiştir. Öğrencilerin güven problemi olduğu açıktır. Öğrenciler sınavdan sonra daha iyi yapabileceklerini düşünmektedirler. Diğer yandan, katılımcılar motivasyonla ilgili maddelerde daha az endişeli bulunmuşlardır. Pearson korealsyon analizi, sınav kaygısı ile ‘duygusal stabillik’, ‘hayal gücü’, ve ‘dışa dönüklük’ kişilik özellikleri arasında negative ilişki ortaya çıkarmıştır. Regresyon analizi, sınav kaygısının anlamlı belirleyicilerini ‘duygusal stabillik’ ve ‘hayal gücü’ kişilik özellikleri olarak bulmuştur.

Keywords

Sınav kaygısı, Büyük Beş Kişilik Özellikleri, çoklu regresyon, duygusal stabillik

Big Five Personality Traits and Test Anxiety among English as a Foreign Language Learners

Abstract

This study investigated Big Five Personality Traits and test anxiety of Turkish EFL learners. The data were gathered via two questionnaires, Goldberg’s 2001 International Personality Item Pool and adapted version of Sarason's 1984 Test Anxiety Scale. The main objectives were to find out participants' test anxiety and to identify personality traits predicting students’ test anxiety. Descriptive statistics showed that students had a moderate level of test anxiety. It was obvious that students had a confidence problem. Students believed that they would do better after the exam. On the other hand, the participants were found to be less anxious about the motivation related items. Pearson product moment analyses yielded negative relationships between test anxiety and personality traits of ‘emotional stability’, ‘imagination’, and ‘extraversion’. Regression analyses significantly identified ‘emotional stability’, and ‘imagination’ personality traits as predicting test anxiety. The model was significant, though explaining only 20% of the variance in test anxiety.

Keywords

Test anxiety, Big Five Personality, multiple regression, emotional stability

References

• Asmalı, M. (2014). The Relationship between the Big Five Personality Traits and language learning strategies. Balikesir University The Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 17 (32), 1-19.
• Aydın, S. & Zengin, B. (2008). Yabancı dil eğitiminde kaygı: Bir litera- tür özeti [Anxiety in foreign language teaching: a review of litera- ture]. The Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 4 (1), 81–94.
• Aydın, S., Yavuz, F. & Yeşilyurt, S. (2006). Test anxiety in foreign lan- guage learning. Journal of Social Sciences Institute Balıkesir Universi- ty, 9 (16), 145-160.
• Aysan, F. (1988). Lise öğrencilerinin stres yaşantılarında kullandıkları başa çıkma stratejilerinin bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi [In- vestigation of some variables in relation to high school students' strategies to deal with stress]. Unpublished Doctoral Disserta- tion, Ankara: Hacettepe University.
• Aysan, F. (1993). Stresle başaçıkma stratejilerinin değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of strategies to deal wih stress]. Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi. 4, 185-192.
• Bachman, L. (2004). Statistical analyses for language assessment. Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Burger J. M. (1993). Kişilik [Personality]. Istanbul: Kaknüs Yayınları.
• Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1984). Self-focused attention in test- anxiety: A general theory applied to a specific phenomenon. In H. M. van der Ploeg; R. Schwartzer, & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Ad- vances in Test Anxiety Research (pp. 3-20). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
• Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
• Chamorro, T., Ahmetoglu, G. & Furnham, A. (2008). Little more than personality: Dispositional determinants of test anxiety (the big five, core self-evaluations, and self-assessed intelligence). Learn- ing and Individual Differences,18, 258–263.
• Çubukçu, F. (2007). Foreign language anxiety. Iranian Journal of Lan- guage Studies,1 (2), 133-147.
• Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The Psychology of the language learner, individual differences in second language acquisition. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publisher.
• Einat, A. (2000). Learning disabilties – The challenge (in Hebrew). Tel Aviv, Israel: Reches Publishers, Educational Projects.
• Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition, Second Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• El-Zahhar, N. E., & Hocever, D. (1991). Cultural and sexual differences in test anxiety, trait anxiety and arousability. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 22(2), 238–249.
• Gardner, R. C., & Maclntyre, P. D. (1993). A student's contribution to second language learning: part II affective factors. Language Teaching, 26, l-11.
• Goldberg, L. R. (2001). International Personality Item Pool. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/1AfXuFc.
• Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the big-five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42.
• Harpell, J. V. & Andrews, J. J. W. (2012). Multi-informant test anxiety assessment of adolescents. Psychology, 3, 518-524.
• Humphreys, M. S., & Revelle, W. (1984). Personality, motivation, and performance: a theory of the relationship between individual differences and ınformation processing. Psychological Review, 91, 153−184.
• Khosravi, M. & Bigdely, I. (2008). The relationship between personality factors and test anxiety among university students. Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 12 (1), 13-24.
• Köksal, O., Arslan, C. & Bakla, A. (2014). An investigation into foreign language learning anxiety, stress and personality in higher edu- cation. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 5 (2), 199-208.
• Liebert, R. M., & Morris, L. W. (1967). Cognitive and emotional com- ponents of test anxiety: a distinction and some ınitial data. Psy- chological Reports, 20, 975-978.
• Lufi, D. & Okasha, S. and Cohen, A. (2004). Test anxiety and its effect on the personality of students with learning disabilities. Learn- ing Disability Quarterly, 27, 176-184.
• Madsen, H. S. & Murray, N. (1984). Retrospective evaluation of testing in Esl content and skills courses. Paper presented at at the an- nual meeting of the teachers of English to speakers of other lan- guages (18th, Houston, TX, March 6-11, 1984).
• Madsen, H. S. (1982). Determining the debilitative ımpact of test anxie- ty. Language Learning, 32, 133-143.
• McCrae, R. & Costa, P. T. (2003). Personality in adulthood: A five-factor theory perspective. New York: Guilford Press.
• McIlroy, D.; Bunting, B. & Adamson, G. (2000). An evaluation of the factor structure and predictive utility of a test anxiety scale with reference to students’ past performance and personality indi- ces. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 17–32.
• Nodoushan, M. S. (2015). Anxiety as it pertains to EFL writing ability and performance. I-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 8(4), 1-10.
• Nodoushan, M. S., (2009). Measurement theory in language testing: past traditions and current trends. I-manager’s Journal on Educa- tional Psychology, 3(2), 1-12.
• Öz, H. (2014). Big five personality traits and willingness to communi- cate among foreign language learners in Turkey. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 42, 1473-1482.
• Pervin, L. A., & John, O. P. (2001). Personality: theory and research (8th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
• Petridou, A. & Williams, J. (2007). Accounting for aberrant test re- sponse patterns using multilevel models. Journal of Educational Measurement, 44 (3), 227–247.
• Putwain, D. W. (2007). Test anxiety in UK schoolchildren: Prevalence and demographic patterns. British Journal of Educational Psycholo- gy, 77 (3), 579–593.
• Sarason, I. G. (1984), Stress, anxiety, and cognitive interference: reac- tions to tests. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 929- 938.
• Scovel, T. (1991). The effect of affect on foreign language learning: A review of the anxiety research. In Horwitz, E.K., & Young, D. J. (Eds.), Language Anxiety: From Theory and Research to Classroom Implications (pp. 15-24), Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Shaked, Y. (1996, September 30). During The Test I am in a Shock. Marive (Israeli daily newspaper), A1, p. 6-7.
• Shohamy, E. (1982). Affective considerations in language teaching. Modern Language Journal, 66 (1), 13 – 17.
• Shomoossi, N., Kassaian, Z. & Ketabi, S. (2009). Variation of test anxie- ty over listening and speaking test performance. Iranian Journal of Language Studies, 3 (1), 65-78.
• Smyth, F. (1995). Standardized testing in college admission: How the act and sat are used and compared. Journal of College Admission, 148, 24-31.
• Spielberger, C.D. (1972). Current trends in theory and research on anxiety. In C.D. Spielberger (Eds.), Anxiety: Current trends in the- ory and research (pp. 3-19). New York: Academic Press.
• Verhoeven, L., & Vermeer, A. (2002). Communicative competence and personality dimensions in first and second language learners. Ap- plied Psycholinguistics, 23(3), 361-374.
• Zee, K. V., Thijs, M. & Schakel, L. (2002). The relationship of emotional intelligence with academic intelligence and the big five. European Journal of Personality, 16 (2), 103-125.
• Zeidner, M. (1998). Test anxiety: The state of the art. New York: Plenum.