YEŞİL PAPAĞANLAR (PSİTTACULA KRAMERİ) VE TÜRKİYE’DEKİ HABİTATLARININ COĞRAFİ AÇIDAN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Öz

Yeşil papağanların (Psittacula krameri) doğal yaşam alanları bir diğer söyleyişle anavatanları Orta Afrika ve Güney Asya’dır, otuz beş ülkede yerli tür olarak bulunmaktadır. Bununla birlikte otuz altı farklı ülkede olduğu gibi Türkiye’de de egzotik türler olarak yaşayabilmektedir. Tutsak hayvan olarak getirildikleri bu ülkelerde kafeslerden kaçmayı başarmış ve tarla, bahçe ya da şehirlerin çevresinde çoğalmışlardır. Anavatanlarında Köppen-Geiger iklim sınıflandırmasına göre tropikal iklim koşulları olmasına karşın, kurak-yarı kurak ikliminden, dağ iklimine kadar farklı hava koşullarına adapte olmayı başarmışlardır. Türkiye’de kırsal alanlardan ve tarım alanlarından daha çok şehir içi yeşil alanları kendilerine yaşam alanı olarak seçtikleri gözlenmektedir. Doğal ve/veya antropik habitatlarında belli başlı besinleri otlar, çiçekler, nektar, sert kabuklu ya da taş çekirdekli meyveler, sebzeler, çeşitli tohumlardır. Türkiye’de ilk kez 1976 yılında, Ankara’da gözlemlendikleri rapor edilmiştir. Türkiye’deki yaşam alanlarının özellikleri şu şekilde sıralanabilir:  1. Aşırı soğuk geçen kış mevsiminde şehir iklimin mikroklima alanı oluşturması. Şehirde binaların kışın yaydığı antropojenik ısı ve kış koşullarında şehir ikliminin kırsal bölgelerden daha sıcak olması. 2. Şehir içi yeşil alanlarda onlarca egzotik bitki türünün bulunması. 3. Binaların çatı bölümlerinin ve yeşil alanlardaki egzotik ağaçların uygun yuvalama koşullarını sunması. 4. Yeşil alanların besin, barınma, sosyalleşme imkânı sağlayan birer ekosistem işlevi görmesi. 5. Doğal avcılarının bulunmaması ya da nadiren bulunması. 6. Kayda değer bir rakiplerinin ve/veya rekabetin olmaması. Yeşil papağanlar birçok Avrupa ülkesinde ve Avustralya’da tehlikeli ‘işgalci’ tür ya da ‘zararlı’ olarak değerlendirilmekle birlikte Türkiye’de yerli türlerle ilişkisi ve ekonomik etkileri konusunda gerçekleştirilmiş ayrıntılı bir araştırma bulunmamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yeşil Papağan (Psittacula Krameri),İşgalci Tür,Egzotik Tür,Şehir İçi Yeşil Alan Ekosistemleri,Arazi Kullanım

ROSE-RINGED PARAKEETS (PSITTACULA KRAMERI) AND GEOGRAPHICAL EVALUATION OF HABITATS IN TURKEY

Öz

The natural habitat of rose-ringed parakeets (Psittacula krameri) is Africa, South Asia. However, it can live as exotic species in our country as it is in many Southwest Asian countries. In these countries where they were taken to captive animals, they managed to escape from the cages and to recruit them in their urban areas or agricultural fields. Although their homeland has equatorial climatic conditions for Köppen-Geiger climate classification, they have been adapting to different weather conditions from arid-semiarid climate to snow climate. In Turkey, they prepare the green spaces within the urban area more often than rural areas and agricultural areas. In the natural environment, fruits, vegetables, various seeds, nuts are the main foods. It is reported as they have been first observed in 1976 in Ankara. Factors influencing their selection of urban parks, forests in Turkey can be listed as; 1. The anthropogenic heat and winter conditions of public buildings in the city and d also in the winter conditions urban climate are more suitable than in rural areas. 2. The roofing sections of the buildings shall provide proper nesting conditions. 3. A simple urban green area in Turkey is to have purely exotic plant species. 4. Urban green spaces has offers the ecosystem services as a part of the betting area. 5. The absence of a hunter or competitor in urban areas. In many European countries and in Australia rose-ringed parakeets are considered as invasive species or pest species, but there are no detailed studies on the relationship of domesticated birds and other living things with in Turkey.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Rose-Ringed Parakeet (Psittacula Krameri),Invasive Species,Exotic Species,Urban Green Ecosystems,Land Use

Kaynakça

1. Akyıldırım, B. (2008). Mülteci papağanlar. 1453 İstanbul Kültür ve Sanat Dergisi, 3, 146-152.
2. Akyıldırım, B. & Arslan, M. (2018). Türkiye’ye Yerleşen Egzotik Kuş Türleri: Yeşil papağan (Psittacula krameri) ve İskender papağanı (Psittacula eupatria), 20.01.2018 tarihinde http://www.trakus.org/kods_bird/pdf/91371.pdf adresinden edinilmiştir.
3. Alderton, D. (2011). The Ultimate Encyclopedia of Caged and Aviary Birds: A Practical Family Reference Guide to Keeping Pet Birds, with Expert Advice on Buying, Understanding, Breeding and Exhibiting Birds: Hermes House.
4. Ali, S. (1943). The Book of Indian Birds. Bombay: The Bombay Natural History Society
5. BirdLife International. (2016). Psittacula krameri. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T22685441A93073464., 15.01.2018 tarihinde http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-3.RLTS.T22685441A93073464.en adresinden elde edilmiştir.
6. BirdLife International. (2018). Species factsheet: Psittacula krameri, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Red List for birds 2017, 15.01.2018 tarihinde (http://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/rose-ringed-parakeet-psittacula-krameri/details, adresinden edinilmiştir.
7. Boyla, K., Aydemir, G. & Eken, G. (1998). The status and distribution of Ring-Necked Parakeet Psittakula krameri in Turkey. Turna, 1, 24-27.
8. Brooks, J. E.; Hussain, I. & Ahmad, E. (1988). A Partial Research Bibliography of the Rose-ringed Parakeet (Psittacula Krameri): National Agricultural Research Centre, Pakistan.

9. Budiansky, S. (1998). If a Lion Could Talk: Animal Intelligence And The Evolution Of Consciousness. New York: Free Press.
10. Butler, C. (2003). Population Biology of The Introduced Rose-Ringed Parakeet Psittacula Krameri İn The UK. London: University of Oxford.
11. CABI. (2018). Psittacula krameri (rose-ringed parakeet), Invasive Species CompendiumWallingford, UK: CAB International. 15.01.2018 tarihinde https://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/45158, adresinden edinilmiştir.
12. CORINE. (2012). Corine Land Cover. Version 18.5.1. 15.01.2018 tarihinde http://land.copernicus.eu/pan-european/corine-land-cover/clc- 2012/view, adresinden edinilmiştir.
13. DAISIE. (2009). Handbook of alien species in Europe; Springer series in invasion ecology: Delivering Alien Invasive Species Inventory for Europe; Heidelberg, Springer Verlag.
14. Desmidt, M., Ducatelle, R., Uyttebroek, E., Charlier, G. & Hoorens, J. (1991). Respiratory adenovirus-like infection in a rose-ringed parakeet (Psittacula krameri), Avian Diseases, 1001-1006.
15. Dhanda, S. & Dhindsa, M. (1998). Nest-site selection and other aspects of breeding ecology of the rose-ringed parakeet Psittacula krameri. In M. S. Dhindsa, P. S. Rao ve B. M. Parasharaya (Eds.), Birds in agricultural ecosystems, Society of Applied Ornithology Proceedings Hyderabad, India, 85-102.
16. Dhindsa, M.S. & Saini, H.K. (1994). Agricultural ornithology: an Indian perspective. Journal of Biosciences, 19, 391-402.
17. Dodaro, G. & Battisti, C. (2014). Rose-ringed parakeet (Psittacula krameri) and starling (Sturnus vulgaris) syntopics in a Mediterranean urban park: evidence for competition in nest-site selection? Belgian Journal of Zoology, 144.
18. Dunbabin, K. M. (1999). Mosaics of The Greek And Roman World. London: Cambridge University Press.
19. eBird. (2018). High Counts, 15.01.2018 tarihinde http://ebird.org/ebird/sightingsLocation.form?reset=high_count-true, adresinden edinilmiştir.
20. Forshaw, J. M.& Knight, F. (2010). Parrots of the World. Princeton University Press.
21. Groombridge, J. J., Jones, C. G., Nichols, R. A., Carlton, M. & Bruford, M. W., (2004). Molecular phylogeny and morphological change in the Psittacula parakeets. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 31, 96-108.
22. Hancock, R. & Martin, J. (2015). Predation of rose-ringed parakeets by raptors and owls in Inner London. British Birds, 6, 349-353.
23. Hernández-Brito, D., Luna, Á., Carrete, M. & Tella, J. L. (2014). Alien rose-ringed parakeets (Psittacula krameri) attack black rats (Rattus rattus) sometimes resulting in death. Hystrix, the Italian Journal of Mammalogy, 25, 121-123.
24. Hossain, M., Husain, K. & Rahman, M. (1993). Some aspects of the breeding biology of the rose-ringed parakeet, Psittacula krameri borealis (Neumann). Bangladesh Journal of Zoology, 21, 77-85.
25. Hürriyet. (2017). Üniversiteli sincap hayata tutundu, 24.01.2018 tarihinde http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/universiteli-sincap-hayata-tutundu- 40623100, adresinden edinilmiştir.
26. Kahl-Dunkel, A. & Werner, R. (2002). Winterverbreitung des Halsbandsittichs Psittacula krameri in Köln. Die Vogelwelt, 123, 17-20.
27. Kaleta, E., Blanco, P. K., Yilmaz, A., Redmann, T. & Hofheinz, S. (2007). Avian influenza A viruses in birds of the order Psittaciformes: reports on virus isolations, transmission experiments and vaccinations and initial studies on innocuity and efficacy of oseltamivir in ovo. DTW. Deutsche tierarztliche Wochenschrift, 114, 260-267.
28. Kark, S., Iwaniuk, A., Schalimtzek, A. & Banker, E. (2007). Living in the city: can anyone become an ‘urban exploiter'? Journal of Biogeography, 34, 638-651.
29. Khan, H. A.; Beg, M. A. & Khan, A. A. (2004). Breeding habitats of the Rose-Ringed Parakeet (Psittacula krameri) in the cultivations of Central Punjab. Pakistan Journal of Zoology, 36, 133-138.
30. Kirkpatrick, W. & Martin, G. (2006). Indian ringneck parakeet. Pestnote, 3, 85-99.
31. Kondiah, K., Albertyn, J. & Bragg, R. (2006). Genetic diversity of the Rep gene of beak and feather disease virus in South Africa. Archives of virology, 151, 2539-2545.
32. Kottek, M., Grieser, J., Beck, C., Rudolf, B. & Rubel, F. (2006). World Map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 15, 259-263.
33. Krause, T. (2004). F 1-und F 2-Hybriden zwischen Alexandersittich Psittacula eupatria und Halsbandsittich P. krameri im Volksgarten in Dusseldorf. Charadrius, 40, 7-12.
34. Krishnaprasadan, T., Kotak, V. C., Sharp, P. J., Schmedemann, R. & Haase, E. (1988). Environmental and hormonal factors in seasonal breeding in free-living male Indian rose-ringed parakeets (Psittacula krameri). Hormones and Behavior, 22, 488-496.
35. Kushwaha, P. K. (2011). Cephalic Indices of Some Birds in Relation to Their Feeding Habits. [Skull; bill; measurement; ratio; relation]. Academic Voices: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1, 7.
36. Lamba, B. (1966). Nidification of some common Indian birds 10. The rose-ringed parakeet, Psittacula krameri scopoli. Proceedings of the Zoological Society, Calcutta 19, 77-85.
37. Low, R. (1980). Parrots: their care and breeding. London: Blandford Press.
38. Low, R. (2003). The worldwide trade in wild-caught parrots. In R. Porter (Ed.), Proceedings to the International Aviculturists Society, International Aviculturists Society Memphis USA.
39. Mase, M., Imada, T., Sanada, Y., Etoh, M., Sanada, N., Tsukamoto, K., Kawaoka, Y. & Yamaguchi, S., (2001). Imported parakeets harbor H9N2 influenza A viruses that are genetically closely related to those transmitted to humans in Hong Kong. Journal of virology, 75, 3490- 3494.
40. Menchetti, M., Mori, E. & Angelici, F. M. (2016). Effects of the Recent World Invasion by Ring-Necked Parakeets Psittacula krameri. In F. M. Angelici (Ed.), Problematic Wildlife: A Cross-Disciplinary Approach, Springer International Publishing Cham, 253-266.
41. Nebot, J. C. (1999). First report on the rose-ringed parakeet (Psittacula krameri) in Venezuela and preliminary observations on its behavior. Ornitologia Neotropical, 10, 115-117.
42. Pârâu, L. G., Strubbe, D., Mori, E., Menchetti, M., Ancillotto, L., Kleunen, A. v., White, R. L., Luna, Á., Hernández-Brito, D. & Louarn, M. L. (2016). Rose-ringed Parakeet Psittacula krameri populations and numbers in Europe: a complete overview. The Open Ornithology Journal, 9, 1-13.
43. Parr, M., Juniper, T., D'Silva, C., Powell, D., Johnston, D., Franklin, K. & Restall, R., (2010). Parrots: A Guide to Parrots of the World: Bloomsbury Publishing.
44. Piasecki, T., Kurenbach, B., Chrząstek, K., Bednarek, K., Kraberger, S., Martin, D. P. & Varsani, A., (2012). Molecular characterisation of an avihepadnavirus isolated from Psittacula krameri (ring-necked parrot). Archives of virology, 157, 585-590.
45. Pithon, J. A. & Dytham, C. (1999). Breeding performance of Ring-necked Parakeets Psittacula krameri in small introduced populations in southeast England. Bird Study, 46, 342-347.
46. Postigo, J.-L. (2016). New records of invasive Parakeet hybrids in Spain. A great opportunity to apply the rapid response mechanism. European Journal of Ecology, 2, 19-22.
47. Reznikova, Z. (2007). Animal İntelligence: From İndividual to Social Cognition. London: Cambridge University Press.
48. Shivanarayan, N., Babu, K. & Ali, M., (1981). Breeding biology of rose-ringed parakeet Psittacula krameri at Maruteru. Pavo, 19, 92-96.
49. Shwartz, A., Strubbe, D., Butler, C. J., Matthysen, E. & Kark, S. (2009). The effect of enemy‐release and climate conditions on invasive birds: a regional test using the rose‐ringed parakeet (Psittacula krameri) as a case study. Diversity and Distributions, 15, 310-318.
50. Singh, R., Kumar, A. & Lehana, P. K. (2017a). Effect of bandwidth modifications on the quality of speech imitated by Alexandrine and Indian Ringneck parrots. International Journal of Speech Technology, 20, 659-672.
51. Singh, R., Kumar, A. & Lehana, P. K. (2017b). Investigating the Quality of Speech of Birds Using Linear Predictive Coding. International Journal of Scientific and Technical Advancements, 3, 1-12.
52. Srivastava, U. & Singh, S. (2012). Seasonal plasticity in neurons of APH in female Indian ringneck parrot (Psittacula krameri). National Academy Science Letters, 35, 259-262.
53. Strubbe, D. & Matthysen, E. (2009). Establishment success of invasive ring-necked and monk parakeets in Europe. Journal of Biogeography, 36, 2264-2278.
54. Sudershan, R. G. & Shivanarayan, A. (1981). Note on the food of nestlings of Rose-ringed Parakeet in Hyderabad. Pavo, 19, 97-99.
55. Sudhi, S. & Shubha, S. (2012), Emotion, cognition, social intelligence and related brain network in Indian green ring neck parrot Psittacula krameri. Journal of Experimental Zoology, India, 15, 91-96.
56. TÜİK. (2018). Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu, Adrese Dayalı Nüfus Kayıt Sistemi Sonuçları, 2016, 15.01.2018 tarihinde http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=24638, adresinden edinilmiştir.
57. Wasserman, E. A. & Zentall, T. R. (2009). Comparative cognition : experimental explorations of animal intelligence: Oxford University Press, Oxford; New York.