Research Article

Efficacy and Safety of 20G vs. 22G Needles in CT-Guided Transthoracic Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsies

Number: 23 August 31, 2024
TR EN

Efficacy and Safety of 20G vs. 22G Needles in CT-Guided Transthoracic Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsies

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to compare the diagnostic accuracy and complication rates of 20G and 22G needles in transthoracic fine needle aspiration biopsy (TFNAB). Method: This retrospective study reviewed lung biopsy results from procedures performed between January 2018 and March 2020. Patients included had non-diagnostic bronchoscopic biopsies or were deemed inappropriate for bronchoscopic biopsy. A total of 127 patients underwent Computed tomography (CT) guided TFNAB using either 20G or 22G needles. Data on lesion size, localization, diagnostic adequacy, and complications were collected and analyzed. Results: The study cohort included 127 patients with a mean age of 63.21 years. Of these, 72 underwent biopsies with a 22G needle and 55 with a 20G needle. The overall diagnostic accuracy was 96.8%, with no significant differences between the 20G and 22G needle groups (p=0.206). Complications occurred in 59 patients (46.5%), with pneumothorax being the most common, and two cases required chest tube placement. The rate of pulmonary hemorrhage was 18.9%. There were no significant differences in complication rates between the needle sizes (p=0.985). Conclusion: CT-guided TFNAB using both 20G and 22G needles is safe and effective, with high diagnostic accuracy and low complication rates. The choice of needle size does not significantly impact diagnostic outcomes or complication rates, allowing clinicians flexibility based on patient-specific factors and procedural requirements.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Boskovic T, Stanic J, Pena-Karan S, et al. Pneumothorax after transthoracic needle biopsy of lung lesions under CT guidance. J Thorac Dis. 2014;6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S99-S107. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2013.12.08.
  2. 2. Chen CK, Chang HT, Chen YC, Chiang SC, Chou HP, Chen TJ. Utilization and safety of percutaneous lung biopsy: A 10-year nationwide population-based study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(8):1316. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16081316.
  3. 3. Unver E, Yilmaz A, Aksoy F, et al. Does needle size affect diagnostic yield of transthoracic needle biopsy in malignant pulmonary lesions? Comparison of 18-, 22- and 25-gauge needles in surgical specimens [published correction appears in Respirology. 2007;12(1):157. [corrected to Celik, O]]. Respirology. 2006;11(5):648-651. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1843.2006.00901.x.
  4. 4. Weisbrod GL. Transthoracic percutaneous lung biopsy. Radiol Clin North Am. 1990;28(3):647-655.
  5. 5. Lucidarme O, Howarth N, Finet JF, Grenier PA. Intrapulmonary lesions: Percutaneous automated biopsy with a detachable, 18-gauge, coaxial cutting needle. Radiology. 1998;207(3):759-765. doi: 10.1148/radiology.207.3.9609901.
  6. 6. Nair AV, Anirudh S, Moorthy S, Cyril P, Rajamma BM, Ramachandran PV. CT-guided lung fine needle aspiration biopsy: Analysis of efficacy, yield and intricacies. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2018;39(2):250-253.
  7. 7. Esakov YS, Shrainer IV, Kirpichnikova EI, et al. Klinicheskaya effektivnost' transtorakal'noi biopsii perifericheskikh novoobrazovanii legkikh pod kontrolem MSKT [Clinical efficacy of CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy of peripheral lung lesions]. Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2022;(5):34-42. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia202205134.
  8. 8. Takeshita J, Masago K, Kato R, et al. CT-guided fine-needle aspiration and core needle biopsies of pulmonary lesions: A single-center experience with 750 biopsies in Japan. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;204(1):29-34. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13151.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Radiology and Organ Imaging

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

August 31, 2024

Publication Date

August 31, 2024

Submission Date

June 21, 2024

Acceptance Date

August 5, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Number: 23

APA
Mutlu, İ. N., Özcan, B., Dablan, A., Cingöz, M., Güzelbey, T., & Kılıçkesmez, Ö. (2024). Efficacy and Safety of 20G vs. 22G Needles in CT-Guided Transthoracic Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsies. Istanbul Gelisim University Journal of Health Sciences, 23, 571-584. https://doi.org/10.38079/igusabder.1503088
AMA
1.Mutlu İN, Özcan B, Dablan A, Cingöz M, Güzelbey T, Kılıçkesmez Ö. Efficacy and Safety of 20G vs. 22G Needles in CT-Guided Transthoracic Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsies. IGUSABDER. 2024;(23):571-584. doi:10.38079/igusabder.1503088
Chicago
Mutlu, İlhan Nahit, Burcu Özcan, Ali Dablan, Mehmet Cingöz, Tevfik Güzelbey, and Özgür Kılıçkesmez. 2024. “Efficacy and Safety of 20G Vs. 22G Needles in CT-Guided Transthoracic Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsies”. Istanbul Gelisim University Journal of Health Sciences, nos. 23: 571-84. https://doi.org/10.38079/igusabder.1503088.
EndNote
Mutlu İN, Özcan B, Dablan A, Cingöz M, Güzelbey T, Kılıçkesmez Ö (August 1, 2024) Efficacy and Safety of 20G vs. 22G Needles in CT-Guided Transthoracic Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsies. Istanbul Gelisim University Journal of Health Sciences 23 571–584.
IEEE
[1]İ. N. Mutlu, B. Özcan, A. Dablan, M. Cingöz, T. Güzelbey, and Ö. Kılıçkesmez, “Efficacy and Safety of 20G vs. 22G Needles in CT-Guided Transthoracic Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsies”, IGUSABDER, no. 23, pp. 571–584, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.38079/igusabder.1503088.
ISNAD
Mutlu, İlhan Nahit - Özcan, Burcu - Dablan, Ali - Cingöz, Mehmet - Güzelbey, Tevfik - Kılıçkesmez, Özgür. “Efficacy and Safety of 20G Vs. 22G Needles in CT-Guided Transthoracic Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsies”. Istanbul Gelisim University Journal of Health Sciences. 23 (August 1, 2024): 571-584. https://doi.org/10.38079/igusabder.1503088.
JAMA
1.Mutlu İN, Özcan B, Dablan A, Cingöz M, Güzelbey T, Kılıçkesmez Ö. Efficacy and Safety of 20G vs. 22G Needles in CT-Guided Transthoracic Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsies. IGUSABDER. 2024;:571–584.
MLA
Mutlu, İlhan Nahit, et al. “Efficacy and Safety of 20G Vs. 22G Needles in CT-Guided Transthoracic Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsies”. Istanbul Gelisim University Journal of Health Sciences, no. 23, Aug. 2024, pp. 571-84, doi:10.38079/igusabder.1503088.
Vancouver
1.İlhan Nahit Mutlu, Burcu Özcan, Ali Dablan, Mehmet Cingöz, Tevfik Güzelbey, Özgür Kılıçkesmez. Efficacy and Safety of 20G vs. 22G Needles in CT-Guided Transthoracic Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsies. IGUSABDER. 2024 Aug. 1;(23):571-84. doi:10.38079/igusabder.1503088

 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)