Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Hedeflerine Ulaşmada Ekonomik Büyüme ve İnsana Yakışır İşin Rolü: OECD Ülkelerinde Bulanık Küme Yaklaşımı

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışma, ekonomik büyüme ve insana yakışır işin, OECD üyesi ülkelerin Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçlarına (SKA) ulaşmaları üzerindeki etkisini incelemeyi amaçlamıştır. Yöntem: 38 OECD üyesi ülkenin genel SKA puanları ile ekonomik büyüme ve insana yakışır işe (SKA 8) ilişkin gösterge puanlarını içeren 2024 Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Raporu’ndan elde edilen veriler, Bulanık Küme Nitel Karşılaştırmalı Analiz (fsQCA) yöntemiyle analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular: Finansal kapsayıcılık ve temel çalışan haklarının korunması, sürdürülebilir kalkınmaya katkıda bulunan en etkili göstergeler olarak belirlenmiştir. Sonuç: Çalışma, OECD ülkelerinde sürdürülebilir kalkınmaya katkıda bulunan kritik faktörleri belirlemiş ve ülkelerin öncelik vermesi, iyileştirmesi ve somut politika eylemleriyle desteklemesi gereken alanlara ilişkin değerli içgörüler sunmuştur.

Keywords

• Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma
• Ekonomik Büyüme
• İnsana Yakışır İş
• Hedef 8
• Bulanık Küme Nitel Karşılaştırmalı Analiz

The Role of Economic Growth and Decent Work in Achieving Sustainable Development Goals: Fuzzy Set Approach on OECD Countries

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to examine the impact of economic growth and decent work on the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by OECD member countries. Method: The data obtained from the 2024 Sustainable Development Report, which included the overall SDG scores and the indicator scores related to economic growth and decent work (SDG 8) for 38 OECD member countries, were analyzed using the Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) method. Results: Financial inclusion and protection of basic workers’ rights were identified as the most impactful indicators contributing to sustainable development. Conclusion: The study identified the critical factors contributing to sustainable development in OECD countries and provided valuable insights into the areas that countries should prioritize, improve, and support through concrete policy actions.

Keywords

• Sustainable Development
• Economic Growth
• Decent Work
• Goal 8
• Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis

References

1. ABRAHAM, K. G., & KEARNEY, M. S. (2020). Explaining the decline in the US employment-to-population ratio: A review of the evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 58(3), 585–643. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20191480
2. ADEOSUN, O. T., BELLO, A. O. & ARULEBA, T. J. (2022). Our youths are not lazy: Depreciating unemployment through sustainable development policies in Nigeria. Journal of Good Governance and Sustainable Development in Africa, 6(6), 57-67. https://journals.rcmss.com/index.php/jggsda/article/view/620
3. ALAM, S., ZHANG, J., & SHEHZAD, M. U. (2023). The mechanism of knowledge management processes toward knowledge workers operational performance under green technology implementation: An empirical analysis. Kybernetes, 52(12), 6542–6571. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-06-2022-0859
4. ALSAMAWI, A., MCBAIN, D., MURRAY, J., & GESCHKE, A. (2016). Social impacts of international trade on the Chinese transport sector. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 20(3), 603–610. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12322
5. ANHOLON, R., RAMPASSO, I. S., MARTINS, V. W., SERAFIM, M. P., LEAL FILHO, W., & QUELHAS, O. L. (2021). COVID-19 and the targets of SDG 8: Reflections on Brazilian scenario. Kybernetes, 50(5), 1679–1686. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-12-2020-0833
6. BIESZK-STOLORZ, B., & DMYTROW, K. (2023). Decent work and economic growth in EU countries—Static and dynamic analyses of Sustainable Development Goal 8. Sustainability, 15(18), Article 13327. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813327
7. BILEK-STEINDL, S., & URL, T. (2022). Nowcasting and monitoring SDG 8. Empirica, 49(2), 313–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-022-09533-0
8. BOYD, D. S., JACKSON, B., WARDLAW, J., FOODY, G. M., MARSH, S., & BALES, K. (2018). Slavery from space: Demonstrating the role for satellite remote sensing to inform evidence-based action related to UN SDG number 8. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 142, 380–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.02.012

9. CANGIALOSI, N. (2023). Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in organizational psychology: Theoretical overview, research guidelines, and a step-by-step tutorial using R software. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 26, Article e21. https://doi.org/10.1017/SJP.2023.21
10. CARLSEN, L. (2021). Decent work and economic growth in the European Union: A partial order analysis of Eurostat SDG 8 data. Green Finance, 3(4), 483–494. https://doi.org/10.3934/GF.2021022
11. CHEN, C. W. (2024). Who wins and who loses in global SDGs rankings? Clarifying the influence of the North‐South divide and foreign direct investment on spillover effects. Sustainable Development, 32, 2653–2665. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2806
12. CHERTKOYSKAYA, E. (2023). From economic growth to socio-ecological transformation: rethinking visions of economy and work under SDG 8. In PARTZSCH L. (Eds.), The Environment in Global Sustainability Governance (pp. 197-216). Bristol University Press.
13. CHIGBU, B. I., & NEKHWEVHA, F. (2023). Exploring the concepts of decent work through the lens of SDG 8: Addressing challenges and inadequacies. Frontiers in Sociology, 8, Article 1266141. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1266141
14. CIESLIK, K., BARFORD, A., & VIRA, B. (2022). Young people not in employment, education or training (NEET) in Sub-Saharan Africa: Sustainable development target 8.6 missed and reset. Journal of Youth Studies, 25(8), 1126–1147. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2021.1939287
15. CLEMENTE-SUAREZ, V. J., RODRIGUEZ-BESTEIRO, S., CABELLO-ERAS, J. J., BUSTAMANTE-SANCHEZ, A., NAVARRO-JIMENEZ, E., DONOSO-GONZALES, M., ... & TORNERO-AGUILERA, J. F. (2022). Sustainable development goals in the COVID-19 pandemic: A narrative review. Sustainability, 14(13), Article 7726. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137726
16. COLLIE, A. (2024). Disparities in death at work: Reflections on occupational injury fatality data. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 81(3), 167–168. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2023-109318
17. DLUHOPOLSKYI, O., & DLUHOPOLSKA, T. (2024). NEETs integration into social and economic activity in a context of sustainability. Agora International Journal of Economical Sciences, 18(1), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.15837/aijes.v18i1.6708
18. DUSA, A. (2018). QCA with R: A comprehensive resource. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75668-4
19. ERDOGAN, E., FLYNN, P., NASYA, B., PAABORT, H., & LENDZHOVA, V. (2021). NEET rural–urban ecosystems: The role of urban social innovation diffusion in supporting sustainable rural pathways to education, employment, and training. Sustainability, 13(21), Article 12053. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112053
20. FAPOHUNDA, T. M. (2012). Towards improved access to full employment and decent work for women in Nigeria. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(8), 104–112. Retrieved from http://www.ijhssnet.com
21. GEREMEW, Y. M., HUANG, W. J., & HUNG, K. (2024). Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis as a mixed-method and analysis technique: A comprehensive systematic review. Journal of Travel Research, 63(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875231168619
22. GIMENEZ, J., BAYARRI, B., MALATO, S., PERAL, J., & ESPLUGAS, S. (2024). Occupational risk assessment in AOPs labs and management system that comply with UN Sustainable Development Goals. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 182, 903–917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2023.12.033
23. GRZEBYK, M., STEC, M., & HEJDUKOVA, P. (2023). Implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 8 in European Union countries: A measurement concept and a multivariate comparative analysis. Sustainable Development, 31(4), 2758–2769. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2545
24. GSI, (2016). The Global Slavery Index 2016. Walk Free Foundation, Australia.
25. GUAITA-FERNANDEZ, P., MARTIN MARTIN, J. M., RIBEIRO NAVARRETE, S., & PUERTAS, R. (2024). Analysis of gender-based violence in the context of the sustainable development goals. Sustainable Development, 32(5), 4946–4958. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2940
26. GUBA, E. G. & LINCOLN, Y. S. (2005). Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences. In DENZIN Y.K., LINCOLN N.K. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research, (3rd Ed., pp.191-215). Sage Publications, USA.
27. GÜNBAYI, I., & SORM, S. (2018). Social paradigms in guiding social research design: The functional, interpretive, radical humanist and radical structural paradigms. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 9(2), 57–76. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED585253
28. HESS, P. N. (2016). Economic growth and sustainable development (2nd ed.). Routledge.
29. IDUSERI, E. O., ABBAS, I. I., & IZUNOBI, J. U. (2022). Role of sustainable development goals in combating youth unemployment: A case study of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Abuja, Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Development, 15(3), 125–146. https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v15n3p125
30. ISLAM, I. (2023). From competition to inclusion: Assessing the nature of the South Asian labour market from the perspective of international core labour standards and the Sustainable Development Goals. South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management, 10(2), 224–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/23220937231201100
31. ILO. (1998). Declaration on fundamental principles and rights at work. Retrieved November 24, 2024, from https://www.ilo.org/
32. JASNI, N. S., KAMARUDIN, S. N., & ABDULLAH, A. (2023). The effects of COVID-19 on unemployment in realising Sustainable Development Goals: Evidence from Malaysia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business (JAFEB), 10(1), 201–208. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2023.vol10.no1.0201
33. KAUSHIK, V., & WALSH, C. A. (2019). Pragmatism as a research paradigm and its implications for social work research. Social Sciences, 8(9), 255. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8090255
34. KHAN, T. (2022). Slavery and Sustainable Development. In FILHO, W.L. (Eds.). Responsible Consumption and Production (pp. 645-655). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
35. KORAUŠ, A., SIMIONESCU, M., BILAN, Y., & SCHONFELD, J. (2017). The impact of monetary variables on the economic growth and sustainable development: Case of selected countries. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 6(3), 383–390. https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2017.6.3(5)
36. LEON, C. B. (1981). The employment-population ratio: Its value in labor force analysis. Monthly Labor Review, 104, 36.
37. LIU, Y., MEZEI, J., KOSTAKOS, V., & LI, H. (2017). Applying configurational analysis to IS behavioural research: A methodological alternative for modelling combinatorial complexities. Information Systems Journal, 27(1), 59–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12094
38. MA, T., PEDEN, A. E., PEDEN, M., HYDER, A. A., JAGNOOR, J., DUAN, L., ... & IVERS, R. Q. (2021). Out of the silos: Embedding injury prevention into the Sustainable Development Goals. Injury Prevention, 27(2), 166–171. https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2020-043850
39. MALIK, A., LAFORTUNE, G., CARTER, S., LI, M., LENZEN, M., & KROLL, C. (2021). International spillover effects in the EU's textile supply chains: A global SDG assessment. Journal of Environmental Management, 295, 113037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113037
40. MALIK, A., LAFORTUNE, G., MORA, C. J., CARTER, S., & LENZEN, M. (2022). International spillovers embodied in the EU’s supply chains: Tracking forced labour, accidents at work and climate impacts in the EU’s consumption of fossil and mineral raw materials. New York.
41. MEGYESIOVA, S., & LIESKOYSKA, V. (2018). Analysis of the sustainable development indicators in the OECD countries. Sustainability, 10(12), 4554. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124554
42. MONACO, S. (2024). SDG 8. Promote Sustained, Inclusive and Sustainable Economic Growth, Full and Productive Employment, and Decent Work for All. In MONACO S. (Eds.), Identity, Territories, and Sustainability: Challenges and Opportunities for Achieving the UN Sustainable Development Goals (1st ed., pp. 81–86). Emerald Publishing Limited, British.
43. MORA, C. J., MALIK, A., & MURRAY, J. (2024). From mines to consumption via global supply chains: A viewpoint on assessing modern slavery and disease interactions. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 104, 107353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107353
44. MOUSSA, T., ALLAM, A., & ELMARZOUKY, M. (2022). Global modern slavery and Sustainable Development Goals: Does institutional environment quality matter? Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(5), 2230–2244. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3018
45. MUSEBA, T. J., RANGANAI, E., & GIANFRATE, G. (2021). Customer perception of adoption and use of digital financial services and mobile money services in Uganda. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 15(2), 177–203. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-07-2020-0127
46. NYIMBIRI, B. A. (2021). The impact of the mobile money on people’s use of financial services in Sub-Sahara Africa. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 9(1), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.2478/mdke-2021-0010
47. PAPPAS, I. O., & WOODSIDE, A. G. (2021). Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA): Guidelines for research practice in information systems and marketing. International Journal of Information Management, 58, 102310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102310
48. PICATOSTE, X. & RODRIGUEZ-CRESPO, E. (2020). Decreasing youth unemployment as a way to achieve sustainable development. In FILHO W.L., AZUL A.M., BRANDLI L., SALVIA A.L., & WALL T. (Eds.). Decent work and economic growth (1st Ed., pp. 244-253). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
49. PUIU, S. (2020). NEETs—A Human Resource with a High Potential for the Sustainable Development of the European Union. In IDOWU S.O., SCHMIDPETER R., ZU L. (Eds.). The Future of the UN Sustainable Development Goals: Business Perspectives for Global Development in 2030 (pp. 239-260). Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
50. RAGIN, C. C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. University of Chicago Press.
51. RAGIN, C. C. (2006). Set relations in social research: Evaluating their consistency and coverage. Political Analysis, 14(3), 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpj019
52. RAGIN, C. C. (2014). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Univ of California Press.
53. RASHID, A. A. (2018). The Fourth Industrial Revolution impact to the future of sustainable urban development in Malaysia. Urbanice Malaysia, 8, 1–25.
54. ROY, C. K., XIAOLING, H., & BANIK, B. (2021). Achieving SDG target 8.1 (sustain economic growth) in developing countries: How aid for trade policy and regulations can assist? Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies, 14(3), 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCEFTS-12-2020-0071
55. RUESGA-BENITO, S. M., GONZALES-LAXE, F., & PICATOSTE, X. (2018). Sustainable development, poverty, and risk of exclusion for young people in the European Union: The case of NEETs. Sustainability, 10(12), 4708. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124708
56. SAHA, T., MIAH, R., RAHMAN, M., DAS, S. K., & HOQUE, E. (2023). Disclosures for slavery accounting concerning SDG 8 and corporate attributes: A study on the banking industry of Bangladesh. Future Business Journal, 9(1), 20.
57. SAHIBZADA, U. F., LATIF, K. F., & XU, Y. (2022). Symmetric and asymmetric modeling of knowledge management enablers to knowledge management processes and knowledge worker productivity in higher education institutes. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 35(3), 729–756. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-08-2020-0346
58. SCHNEIDER, C. Q., & WAGEMANN, C. (2010). Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets: Agenda for a research approach and a data analysis technique. Comparative Sociology, 9(3), 376–396. https://doi.org/10.1163/156913210X12493538729838
59. SEDITA, S. R., BLASI, S., & YANG, J. (2022). The cultural dimensions of sustainable development: A cross‐country configurational analysis. Sustainable Development, 30(6), 1838–1849. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2351
60. SHILLING, H. J., WIEDMANN, T., & MALIK, A. (2021). Modern slavery footprints in global supply chains. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 25(6), 1518–1528. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13169
61. SIDDIKEE, M. N., ZAHID, J. R., SANJIDA, A., & OSHCHEPKOVA, P. (2022). Sustainable economic growth and unemployment nexus of SDG 2030: Bangladesh in Asia. SN Business & Economics, 2(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-021-00190-2
62. SIMAS, M. S., GOLSTEIJN, L., HUIJBREGTS, M. A., WOOD, R., & HERTWICH, E. G. (2014). The “bad labor” footprint: Quantifying the social impacts of globalization. Sustainability, 6(11), 7514–7540. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6117514
63. SU, B. C., WU, L. W., & YEN, Y. C. (2021). Antecedents and consequences of trust and loyalty in physical banks affecting mobile payments. Sustainability, 13(22), 12368. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212368
64. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT REPORT. (2024). Sustainable Development Report. Retrieved November 12, 2024, from https://dashboards.sdgindex.org/map/goals/SDG8
65. TJAHJANTO, H., TUHANA, T., MAFRUHAH, I., ISTIQOMAH, N., & ISMOYOWATI, D. (2023). High unemployment, disrupted economic growth and Sustainable Development Goals: Analyzing unemployment reduction. Economics & Sociology, 16(1), 106–120. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2023/16-1/7
66. WAILES, E., & MACKENZIE, F. (2023). Protecting people with communication disability from modern slavery: Supporting Sustainable Development Goals 8 and 16. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 25(1), 42–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2022.2150309
67. WU, P. L., YEH, S. S., & WOODSIDE, A. G. (2014). Applying complexity theory to deepen service dominant logic: Configural analysis of customer experience-and-outcome assessments of professional services for personal transformations. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1647–1670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.03.012
68. XU, Y., GHOSE, A., & XIAO, B. (2024). Mobile payment adoption: An empirical investigation of Alipay. Information Systems Research, 35(2), 807–828. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.0156
69. ZEB-OBIPI, I., & KPURUNEE, G. L. (2023). Exploring means of promoting Sustainable Development Goal 8 (decent work and economic growth) in Nigeria: Human resource management perspective. African Journal of Business and Economic Development, 3(2). Retrieved from http://www.ijaar.org/ajbed
70. ZEHRI, C., EL AMIN, B. M., INAAM, Z., & SEKRAFI, H. (2024). Exploring the nexus of decent work, financial inclusion, and economic growth: A study aligned with SDG 8. Sustainable Futures, 7, 100213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100213
71. ZOHRABI, M. (2013). Mixed method research: Instruments, validity, reliability and reporting findings. Theory and practice in language studies, 3(2), 254. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.2.254-262