International Carriage of Goods Contracts Defeated by Coronavirus: An Attempt to Identify Carrier’s Liability through Multinational Carriage of Goods Conventions
Abstract
Coronavirus (Covid-19), emerged not only as a health, social and commercial crisis, but also as a transport crisis. The initial reminiscence of the coronavirus chaos on the transport industry may have been the memory of people stranded on the Diamond Princess cruise ship when the vessel was quarantined for days. The Diamond Princess incident happened to be a bitter memory of coronavirus’s influence on passenger transport known by the whole world. On the other hand, the crisis freight transport industry experienced went rather behind closed doors. The decline in production was the main factor that led to the crisis in the international transportation market. The global measures taken to stop the spread of the virus resulted in decrease of production rates. In addition, certain animal species and food products were banned from export and import. The decrease in production and the export and import restrictions on products led to a decrease in the global movement of goods. Direct measures implemented over international freight transport also added to the already existing complexities. The closure of ports and state borders, the cessation of railway and airline activities negatively affected the conventional operation of transport vehicles. Labor restrictions and crew quarantine measures created delays in transportation processes. All in all, the measures related to Covid-19 had a direct, negative outcome for international carriage of goods contracts between shippers and carriers, which mostly resulted in delay or impossibility of delivery of goods. This article analyzes the precautionary measures taken by states in the course of the pandemic from the view of contracts of carriage of goods. Carrier’s liability will be set forth by virtue of the uniform law rules set up by multinational carriage of goods conventions.
Keywords
References
- Acar-Ünal Ö, ‘Covid-19 Virüsünün Sözleşmelere Etkisinin TBK MD. 138 Hükmü Çerçevesinde Değerlendirilmesi’ in Yusuf Çalışkan & Yeliz Bozkurt Gümrükçüoğlu and Others (eds) Koronavirüs Döneminde Güncel Hukuki Meseleler Sempozyumu Bildiri Tam Metin Kitabı (İBn HaLdun Üniversitesi YayınLarı, İstanBuL 2020) 285-330. google scholar
- Akıncı Ş, ‘Covid-19’un Borç ilişkilerine ve Bazı Borçlar Hukuku Sözleşmelerine Etkisi’ (2020) 19(38) İstanbul Tic Üni Sos Bil Derg 62-103. google scholar
- Arkan S, Demiryoluyla Yapılan Uluslararası Eşya Taşımaları (Banka ve Ticaret Hukuku Araştırma Enstitüsü Ankara 1987). google scholar
- Berlingieri F, ‘A Comparative Analysis of The Hague-Visby Rules, the Hamburg Rules and the Rotterdam Rules’ https://www.uncitral. org/pdf/engLish/workinggroups /wg_3/BerLingieri _paper_comparing_RR_HamB_HVR.pdf> Date of Access 10 OctoBer 2024. google scholar
- Bonomi A, ‘ArticLe 9: Overriding Mandatory Provisions’ in ULrich Magnus and Peter Mankowski (eds), European Commentaries on Private International Law II (ECPIL) (ECPIL) (Otto Schmidt CoLogne 2017) 599-660. google scholar
- Bonomi A, Le Norme Imperative nel Diritto Internazionale Privato (SchuLthess Zurich 1998), (Imperative). google scholar
- Cassar R, ‘EvoLution or DevoLution: Aviation Law and Practice After Covid-19’ (2020) 45 (SpeciaL Issue) Air & Space L 3-16. google scholar
- ChandLer G F III, ‘A Comparison of COGSA, The Hague/VisBy RuLes, and the HamBurg RuLes’ (1984) 15(2) J Mar L & Com 233-292. google scholar
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Public Law (Other)
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Publication Date
October 24, 2025
Submission Date
October 19, 2024
Acceptance Date
August 25, 2025
Published in Issue
Year 2025 Volume: 83 Number: 3