Personality and Experience of Mobbing: Three Types of Mobbing and the Consequences at the Workplace

Year 2019, Volume: 6 Issue: 1, 55 - 66, 19.04.2019

Doruk Uysal Irak

https://doi.org/10.18394/iid.457447

Cited By: 1

Abstract

The study aims to investigate the relationship between neuroticism and  types of mobbing. It also focuses on the interaction between three types of mobbing with employee attitudes and the role of person-organization fit in this relationship. Data was collected from 329 employees and proposed model was tested through Structural Equation Modelling. Study showed that employees high in neuroticism were more likely report person-related mobbing compared to the work related or physical mobbing. Moreover, as expected work-related mobbing was related to job satisfaction, life satisfaction and turnover intentions where person-organization fit was a mediator. By emphasizing the differences between types of mobbing, new perspectives on how to deal with mobbing at workplace will be explored. New interventions would be developed by focusing the differences between various mobbing experiences in the organizations. 

Keywords

Mobbing, Neuroticism, Satisfaction, Person-Organization Fit, Turnover Intentions

Kişilik ve Psikolojik Şiddete Uğrama: Psikolojik Şiddetin Üç Türü ve İşyerinde Sonuçları

Abstract

Bu
araştırma nörotisizm ve farklı zorbalık türleri arasındaki ilişkileri
incelemeyi amaçlamıştır. Ayrıca üç tür zorbalık ile çalışan tutumları ve
birey-örgüt uyumu arasındaki ilişkilerin rolü de incelenmiştir. Üçyüzyirmidokuz
çalışandan anket yöntemiyle toplanan veriler önerilen modelde Yapısal Eşitlik
Modeli kullanılarak test edilmiştir.
Araştırma sonuçlarına gore nörotisizm puanı yüksek çalışanlar diğer zorbalık
türleriyle karşılaştırıldığında en çok birey odaklı zorbalığa maruz
kaldıklarını rapor etmişlerdir. Ayrıca beklendiği gibi iş odaklı zorbalık, iş
doyumu, yaşam doyumu ve işten ayrılma ile ilişkili bulunmuştur. Bu ilişkide
birey-örgüt uyumunun da aracı değişken olduğu görülmüştür.  Zorbalık türleri arasındaki farkların
araştırılmasıyla işyerinde zorbalıkla nasıl mücadele edilebileceğine ilişkin
yeni bakış açıları oluşturulabilecektir. Ayrıca işyerinde karşılaşılan farklı
zorbalık yaşantıları arasındaki çeşitlilikler yeni müdahale tekniklerinin
geliştirilmesine destek olacaktır

Keywords

Zorbalık, Doyum, Nörotisizm, Birey-Örgüt Uyumu, İşten Ayrılma Eğilimi

References

• Acar, P., Kıyak, M. & Sine, B. (2014). The relationship between organizational culture and mobbing: An application on construction companies. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, 29(4), 281-298.
• Aquino, K. & Lamertz, K. (2004). A relational model of workplace victimization: Social roles and patterns of victimization in dyadic relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1023–1034. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1023
• Archer, D. (1999). Exploring “bullying” culture in the paramilitary organization. International Journal of Manpower, 20, 94-105. doi:10.1108/01437729910268687
• Arthur, Jr. W., Bell, S., Villado, A. J. & Doverspike, D. (2006). The use of person-organization fit in employment decision making: An assessment of its criterion-related validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 786-801. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.786
• Assouline, M. & Meir, E.I. (1987). Meta-analysis of the relationship between congruence and well-being measures. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31, 319-332. Doi: 0.1016/0001-879187900467
• Aydın, O. & Őcel, H. (2009). The Negative Act Questionnaire: A study for validity and Reliability. Turkish Psychological Articles, 12, 94-103.
• Björkqvist, K., Österman, K. & Hjelt-Back, M. (1994). Aggression among university Employees. Aggressive Behavior, 20,173-184. doi:10.1002/1098-2337
• Blau, P. M. (1964). Power and exchange in social life, New York: Wiley.
• Bowling, N. A., Beehr, T. A., Bennett, M. M. & Watson, C. P. (2010). Target personality and workplace victimization: A prospective analysis. Work and Stress, 24, 140-158. doi:10.1080/02678373.2010.489635
• Brayfield, A. H. & Rothe, H.F. (1951). An index of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology. 35, 307- 311. doi:10.1037/h0055617
• Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, D. & Klesh, J. (1979). The Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
• Cortina, L. M., Magley, V. J., Williams, J. H. & Langhout, R. D. (2001). Incivility in the workplace: Incidence and impact. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, 64–80. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.6.1.64
• Costa, P. T., Jr. & McCrae, R. R. (1980). Still stable after all these years: Personality as a key to some issues in adulthood and old age. In P. B. Baltes & O. G. Brim, Jr. (Eds.), Life span development and behavior (Vol. 3, pp. 65-102). New York: Academic Press.
• Coyne, I., Seigne, E. & Randall, P. (2000). Predicting workplace victim status from Personality. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 9, 335-349. doi:10.1080/135943200417957
• Coyne, I., Smith-Lee Chong, P., Seigne, E. & Randall, P. (2003). Self and peer nominations of bullying: An analysis of incident rates, individual differences and perceptions of the working environment. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 12, 209-228. doi:10.1080/13594320344000101
• Çiftçi, G. E. & Öneren, M. (2013). Çalışanlarda psikolojik yıldırma ve endişe düzeyi, İş, Güç Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi, 15(2), doi: 10.4026/1303-2860.2013.0226.x
• Daffern, M., Gilbert, F., Lee, S. & Chu, C.M. (2015). The relationship between early maladaptive schema, psychopathic traits and neuroticism in an offender sample. Clinical Psychologist, doi:10.1111/cp.12069
• Diener, E., Emmons, R.A., Larsen, R. J. & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment,49,71-75. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
• Einarsen, S. (2000). Harassment and bullying at work: A review of the Scandinavian Approach. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 5, 379-401. doi:10.1016/S1359-1789(98)00043-3
• Einarsen, S., Hoel, H. & Notelaers, G. (2009). Measuring exposure to bullying and harassment at work: Validity, factor structure and psychometric properties of the Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised. Work and Stress, 23, 29-44. doi:10.1080/02678370902815673
• Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., Zapf, D. & Cooper, C. L. (2011). The concept of bullying and harassment at work: The European tradition. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf & C.L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and harassment in the workplace. Developments in theory, research and practice (pp. 3-40), Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
• Einarsen, S. & Raknes, B. I. (1997). Harassment at work and the victimization of men. Violence and Victims, 12, 247-263.
• Einarsen, S., Raknes, B. I. & Matthiesen, S. B. (1994). Bullying and harassment at work and their relationships to work environment quality: An exploratory study. European Work and Organizational Psychology, 4, 381-401. doi:10.1080/13594329408410497
• Ertureten, A., Cemalcılar, Z. & Aycan, Z. (2013). The relationship of downward mobbing with leadership style and organizational attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics,116, 205-216. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1468-2
• Francis, L. J., Brown, L. B. & Philipchalk, R. (1992). The development of an abbreviated form of the Revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQR-A): Its use among students in England, Canada, the USA and Australia. Personality and Individual Differences,13, 443-449.
• Gül, H., Oktay, E. & Gökçe, E. (2008). İş tatmini, stres, örgütsel bağlılık, işten ayrılma niyeti ve performans arasındaki ilişkiler: Sağlık sektöründe bir uygulama. Akademik Bakış, 15, 1-11.
• Hauge L. J., Skogstad A. & Einarsen S. (2010). The relative impact of workplace bullying as a social stressor at work. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 51, 426–433. doi: 10.1111/ j.1467-9450.2010.00813.x
• Headey, B. & Wearing.A.(1989). Personality, life events, and subjective well-being: Toward a dynamic equilibrium model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 731-739. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.731
• Hershcovis, M. S. (2011). Incivility, social undermining, bullying…oh my!: A call to reconcile constructs within workplace aggression research. Journal of Organizational Behavior,32, 499-519. doi: 10.1002/job.689
• Jacobs, K. E., Szer, D. & Roodenburg, J. (2012). The moderating effect of personality on the accuracy of self-estimates of intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 744-749. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.12.040
• Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E. & Thoresen, C. J. (2002). Are measures of self-esteem, neuroticism, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy indicators of a common core construct? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 693-710. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.83.3.693
• Karancı, N. A., Dirik, G. &Yorulmaz, O. (2007). Reliability and validity studies of Turkish translation of Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Revised-Abbreviated. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry, 18(3), 1-7.
• Karsavuran, S. & Kaya, S. (2017). The relationship between burnout and mobbing among hospital managers. Nursing Ethics, 24(3), 337-348.
• Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
• Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49,1-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01790.x
• Lanyon, R. I. & Goodstein, L. D. (1997). Personality assessment. New York: Wiley.
• Leymann, H. (1990). Mobbing and psychological terror at workplaces. Violence and Victims, 5,119-126.
• Leymann, H. (1996). The content and development of mobbing at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 165-184. doi:10.1080/13594329608414853
• Matthiesen, S. B. & Einarsen, S. (2001). MMPI-2 configurations after persistent bullying at Work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10, 467–484. doi:10.1080/13594320143000753
• Neall, A. M. & Tuckey, M. R. (2014). A methodological review of research on the antecedents and consequences of workplace harassment. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87, 225-257. doi:10.1111/joop.12059
• Nielsen, M. B. & Einarsen, S. (2012). Outcomes of exposure to workplace bullying: Ameta-analytic review. Work & Stress: An International Journal of Work, Health & Organisations, 26,309-332. doi:10.1080/02678373.2012.734709
• Nielsen, M. B., Glaso, L., Matthiesen, S. B., Eid, J. & Einarsen, S. (2013). Bullying and risk-perception as health hazards on oil rigs. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28, 367-383. doi:10.1108/JMP-12-2012-0395
• Nielsen, M. B. & Knardahl, S. (2015). Is workplace bullying related to the personality traits of victims? A two-year prospective study. Work & Stress: An International Journal of Work, Health & Organisations,29,128-149. doi:10.1080/02678373.2015.1032383
• Nielsen, M. B., Notelaers, G. & Einarsen, S. (2011). Measuring exposure to workplace bullying. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf & C.L. Cooper, (Eds.), Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace. Developments in theory, research and practice (pp.149-174), Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
• Notelaers, G., Einarsen, S., De Witte, H. & Vermunt, J. (2006). Measuring exposure to bullying at work: The validity and advantages of the latent class cluster approach. Work & Stress,20, 288-301.doi:10.1080/02678370601071594
• Oldham, G. R. (1996). Job design, International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology,11, 33-60.
• Resick, C. J., Baltes, B. B. & Shantz, C. W. (2007). Person-organization fit and work-related attitudes and decisions: Examining interactive effects with job fit and conscientiousness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1446-1455. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1446
• Salin, D. (2001). Prevalence and forms of bullying among business professionals: A comparison of two different strategies for measuring bullying. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology,10, 425-441. doi:10.1080/13594320143000771
• Salin, D., Cowan, R., Adewumi, O., Apospori, E., Bovhantin, J., D’Cruz, P, Zedlacher, E. (2018). Workplace bullying across the globe: A cross-cultural comparison. Personnel Review, 47(4). Doi. 10.1108/PR-03-2017-0092.
• Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437-453. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1987.tb00609.x
• Spector, P. E. (2006). Method Variance in Organizational Research: Truth or Urban Legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 221-232. doi:10.1177/1094428105284955
• Thomson, W. (2016). Depression, neuroticism, and the discrepancy between actual and ideal self-perception. Personality and Individual Differences,88, 219-224. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.09.003
• Trépanier, S. G., Fernet, C. & Austin, S. (2015). A longitudinal investigation of workplace bullying, basic need satisfaction, and employee functioning. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 20, 105-116. doi:10.1037/a0037726
• Velez, B. L. & Moradi, B. (2012). Workplace support, discrimination, and person- organization fit: Tests of the theory of work adjustment with LBG individuals. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 59, 399-407. doi:10.1037/a0028326
• Watson, D., Clark, L. A. & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,54, 1063-1070. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063
• Yetim, U. (1993). Life satisfaction: A study based on the organization of personal projects. Social Indicators Research, 29, 277-289. doi:10.1007/BF01079516
• Yıldırım, A. & Yıldırım, D. (2007). Mobbing in the workplace by peers and managers: Mobbing experienced by nurses working in healthcare facilities in Turkey and its effect on nurses. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 16(8), 1444-1453.
• Zapf, D. & Einarsen, S. (2011). Individual antecedents of bullying: Victims and perpetrators. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf & C.L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Developments in theory research and practice, 177-200. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.