İnsan Kaynaklarının Seçiminde Genel Bilişsel Yetenek Testlerinin Uygulanması

Öz

Organizasyonların varlık ve başarılarını sürdürmesinde, yönetimin en önemli fonksiyonlarından birinin uygun nitelikteki insan kaynaklarının temini olduğu bilinmektedir. Bir organizasyondaki en önemli faaliyetlerden biri olan personel alım faaliyetlerinde, iş için gerekli olan bilgi, beceri ve yeteneklere sahip olan en uygun adayların seçilmesi amacıyla farklı seçim yöntemleri kullanılmaktadır. Yapılan bu derleme çalışmasında; yaygın kullanılan seçme yöntemleri tanıtılmış ve bunlar arasında iş performansını yordamada en yüksek geçerlilik oranına sahip olan genel bilişsel yetenek testleri, avantaj ve dezavantajları ile incelenmiştir. Çalışmanın sonuç bölümünde ise, bilişsel yetenek ölçümlerinin kısıtlarını gidermeye ve iş performansını yordama gücünü artırmaya yönelik bazı önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Personel Seçimi,Seçme Yöntemleri,Seçim Testleri,Genel Bilişsel Yetenek

APPLICATION OF COGNITIVE ABILITY TESTS IN PERSONNEL SELECTION

Öz

It is known that human resources are one of the most important functions of management to continue organizational existence and success. In recruitment processes, different kinds of selection methods are being used to select most appropriate candidates who have knowledge, skills and abilities required for the job. In this literature review, common selection methods were introduced and the general cognitive ability tests which have the highest level of validity of prediction power of job performance were examined with their advantages and disadvantages. In the discussion part of study, some recommendations were made to overcome the restrictions and increase the predictive power of cognitive ability measurements.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Personnel Selection,Selection Methods,Selection Tests,General Cognitive Ability

Kaynakça

1. KAYNAKÇAArden, R., Plomin, R. (2006). Sex Differences in Variance of Intelligence Across Childhood, Personality and Individual Differences, 41(1), 39-48. Arthur, W., Jr., Day, E. A. (2011). Assessment Centers, Zedeck, S. (Ed.), APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Volume 2, Selecting and Developing Members for The Organization, Washington, DC, APA, 205-235.
2. Arthur, W. Jr., Day, E.A., McNelly, T.L., Edens, P.S. (2003). A Meta-Analysis of the Criterion-Related Validity of Assessment Center Dimensions, Personnel Psychology, 56(1), 125-154.
3. Berry, C.M., Gruys, M.L., Sackett, P.R. (2006). Educational Attainment as a Proxy for Cognitive Ability in Selection: Effects on Levels of Cognitive Ability and Adverse Impact, Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 696-705.
4. Carles, S.A. (2006). Applicant Reactions to Multiple Selection Procedures for the Police Force, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 55(2), 145-167.Carstairs, J.R., Myors, B., Shores, A., Fogarty, G. (2006), Influence of Language Background on Tests of Cognitive Abilities: Australian Data, Australian Psychologist, 41(1), 48-54.
5. Chan, D., Schmitt, N., Sacco, J.M., DeShon, R.P. (1998). Understanding Pretest and Posttest Reactions to Cognitive Ability and Personality Tests, Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 471-485.
6. Cook, M. (2004). Personnel Selection: Adding Value Through People, WestSussex, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
7. Cronshaw, S.F., Hamilton, L.K., Onyura, B.R., Winston, A.S. (2006). Case for Non-Biased Intelligence Testing Against Black Africans Has Not Been Made: A Comment on Rushton, Skuy, and Bons, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14(3), 278-287.
8. Dean, M.A., Russell, C. J. (2005). An Examination of Biodata Theory-Based Constructs in a Field Context, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13(2), 143-149.

9. Dobson, P. (2000). An Investigation into the Relationship between Neuroticism, Extraversion and Cognitive Test Performance in Selection, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8(3), 99-109.
10. Dye, D.A., Reck, M., McDaniel, M.A. (1993). The Validity of Job Knowledge Measures, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 1(3), 153-157.Eren, E. (2004). Örgütsel Davranış ve Yönetim Psikolojisi (8’nci Basım), İstanbul, Beta Basım Yayım.
11. Fine, S. & Dover, S. (2005). “Cognitive Ability, Personality, and Low Fidelity Simulation Measures in Predicting Training Performance among Customer Service Representatives”, Applied H.R.M. Research, 10(2), 103-106.
12. Fruyt, F.D., Aluja, A., Garcı´a, L.F., Rolland, J.P., Jung, S.C. (2006). Positive Presentation Management and Intelligence and the Personality Differentiation by Intelligence Hypothesis in Job Applicants, International Journal Of Selection And Assessment, 14(2), 101-112.
13. Gardner, H. (1993). Zihin Çerçeveleri Çoklu Zekâ Kuramı (2004). (Çev. Ebru Kılıç), İstanbul, Alfa Yayınları.
14. Gordon, H.W., Leighty, R. (1988). Importance of Specialized Cognitive Function in the Selection of Military Pilots, Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(1), 38-45.Gottfredson, L.S. (1997). Mainstream science on intelligence: An editorial with 52 signatories, history and bibliography, Intelligence, 24, 13-23.
15. Hausdorf, P. A., Mireille, M., Chawla, L.A. (2003). Cognitive Ability Testing and Employment Selection: Does Test Content Relate to Adverse Impact?, Applied H.R.M. Research, 7(2), 41-48.
16. Hausknecht, J.P., Halpert, J. A., Di Paolo N.T., Meghan O., Gerrard M. (2007). Retesting in Selection: A Meta-Analysis of Coaching and Practice Effects for Tests of Cognitive Ability, Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 373-385.
17. Hooft, E., Van, A. J., Flier, H., Mine, M. R. (2006). Construct Validity of Multi-Source Performance Ratings: An Examination of the Relationship of Self-Supervisor and Peer-Ratings with Cognitive and Personality Measures, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14(1), 67-81.
18. Huffcutt, A.I., Arthur, W.J. (1994). Hunter and Hunter (1984) Revisited: Interview Validity for Entry-Level Job, Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(1),184-190.
19. Hunter, J.E., Hunter, R.F. (1984). Validity and Utility of Alternative Predictors of Job Performance, Psychological Bulletin, 96(11), 72-98.
20. Hülsheger, U.R., Maier, G.W., Stump T. (2007). Validity of General Mental Ability for the Prediction of Job Performance and Training Success in Germany: A Meta-Analysis, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15(1), 3-18.
21. Kleiman, L.S., Lounsbury J. W. (1978). Validating Procedures for Selection Social Work Personnel, Social Work, 23(6), 481-85.
22. Kuncel, N.R., Hezlett, S.A. (2010). Fact and Fiction in Cognitive Ability Testing for Admissions and Hiring Decisions, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(6) 339-345.
23. Lohman, D.F., Lakin J.M. (2009). Consistencies in Sex Differences on the Cognitive Abilities Test Across Countries, Grades, Test Forms, and Cohorts, British Journal of Educational Psycholog, 79, 389-407.
24. Lubinski, D. (2004).Introduction to the Special Section on Cognitive Abilities: 100 Years After Spearman’s (1904) General Intelligence, Objectively Determined and Measured, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(1), 96-111.
25. Murpy, K.R., Dzieweczynski, J.L. (2005). Why Don’t Measures of Broad Dimensions of Personality Perform Better as Predictors of Job Performance?, Human Performance, 18(4), 343-357.
26. Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, Jr., Thomas, J., Boykin, A. W., Brody, N., Ceci, S.J., Loehlin, J.C., Perloff, R., Sternberg, R.J., Urbina, S. (1996). Intelligence: Knowns and Unknowns, American Psychologist, 51(2), 77-101.
27. Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., Dilchert, S. (2005). Cognitive Ability in Personnel Selection Decisions, The Blackwell Handbook of Personnel Selection, A. Evers, N. Anderson ve O. Voskuijl (Ed.), London, Blackwell Publishing, 143-173.
28. Ones, D.S., Dilchert, S., Visvesvaran, C., Judge, T.A. (2007), In Support of Personality Assessment in Organizational Settings, Personnel Psychology, 60(4), 995-1027.
29. Outtz, J.L. (2002). The Role of Cognitive Ability Tests in Employment Selection, Human Performance, 15(1/2), 161-171.
30. Öner, N. (1997). Türkiye’de Kullanılan Psikolojik Testler (3. Basım), İstanbul, Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
31. Palumbo, M.V., Miller, C.E., Shalin, V.L., Debra S. (2005). The Impact of Job Knowledge in the Cognitive Ability-Performance Relationship, Applied H.R.M. Research, 10(1), 13-20.
32. Raven, J.C. (1960). Guide to the Standard Progressive Matrices, London, H. K. Lewis & Co. Ltd.
33. Reilly, R.R. & Chao, G.T. (1982). Validity and Fairness of Some Alternative Employee Selection Procedures, Personnel Psychology, 35(1), 1-62.Pichot, P. (1965). Psikoloji Alanlarındaki Testler (Çev. Selmin Evrim), İstanbul, Anıl Yayınevi.
34. Roth, P.L., Bobko, P., McFarland, L.A. (2005). A Meta-Analysis of Work Sample Test Validity: Updating and Integrating Some Classical Literature, Personnel Psychology, 58(4), 1009-1037.
35. Sackett, P. R., Shen, W., Myors, B. Lievens, F., Schollaert, E., Van Hoye, G., Cronshaw, S.F.,Onyura, B., Mladinic, A., Rodríguez, V., Steiner, D.D., Rolland, F., Schuler, H., Frintrup, A., Nikolaou, I., Tomprou, M., Subramony, S., Raj, S.B., Tzafrir, S., Bamberger, P., Bertolino, M., Mariani, M., Fraccaroli, F.,Sekiguchi, T., Yang, H., Anderson, N. R., Evers, A., Chernyshenko, O., Englert, P., Kriek, H. J., Joubert, T., Salgado, J. F., König, C. J., Thommen, L.A., Chuang, A., Sinangil, H. K., Bayazit, M., Cook, M., Aguinis H. (2010). Perspectives From Twenty-Two Countries on the Legal Environment for Selection, Handbook of Employee Selection, Farr, J. L., Tippins, N. T. (Ed.), New York, Taylor & Francis Group, 651-676.
36. Schoenemann, P. T., Budinger T. F., Sarich V. M., William S., Wang, Y. (2000). Brain Size Does Not Predict General Cognitive Ability within Families, PNAS, 97(9), 4932-4937.
37. Schmitt, N. (2014). Personality and Cognitive Ability as Predictors of Effective Performance at Work, Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 45-65.
38. Smith, M., Smith, P. (2005). Testing People at Work: Competencies in Psychometric Testing, London, Blackwell Publishing.Steven L.T., Scroggins, W.A. (2006). Psychological Testing in Personnel Selection: Contemporary Issues in Cognitive Ability and Personality Testing, Journal of Business Inquiry, 5, 28-38.
39. Şemin, R. (1972). Zekânın Değerlendirilmesi, İstanbul, İstanbul Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Basımevi.Taylor, J.L., O’Hara, R., Mumenthaler, M.S., Rosen, A.C., Yesavage, J.A. (2005). “Cognitive Ability, Expertise, and Age Differences in Following Air-Traffic Control Instructions”, Psychology and Aging, 20(1), 117-133.
40. Thomas, S.L., Scroggins, W.A. (2006). Psychological Testing in Personnel Selection: Contemporary Issues in Cognitive Ability and Personality Testing, Journal of Business Inquiry, 5, 28-38.
41. Wernimont, P.F., Campbell, J.P. (1968).Signs, Sample, and Criteria, Journal of Applied Psychology, 52(5), 372-376.Witt, L.A., Burke, L.A. (2003). Using Cognitive Ability and Personality to Select Information Technology Professions, Mahmood, M. A. (Ed.), Advanced Topics in End User Computing, Hershey, IGI Publishing, 2003, 1-17.
42. Zeidner, J., Scholarios, D., Johnson C.D. (2003). Evaluating Job Knowledge Criterion Components for Use in Classification Research, Military Psychology, 15(2), 97-116.