EVALUATION OF THERMAL COMFORT IN TERMS OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY IN WEAVING FACILITIES BY FUZZY LOGIC

Year 2022, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 273 - 279, 31.08.2022

Murat Kodaloğlu , Feyza Akarslan Kodaloğlu

https://doi.org/10.46519/ij3dptdi.1081567

Cited By: 9

Abstract

EVALUATION OF THERMAL COMFORT IN TERMS OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY IN WEAVING FACILITIES BY FUZZY LOGIC

Abstract

The fuzzy-based approach was chosen because fuzzy logic enables computerization of human reasoning. In recent years, Forecast accuracy and applicability to success in general. Models that show as fuzzy were developed. Data that are difficult to collect with exceptional predictive accuracy can be developed by utilizing the experience of fuzzy logic based models. One of the basic conditions necessary for a person to continue his life in a healthy way is to keep the body temperature at a normal temperature. Thermal comfort means that the majority of the workers in the working environment are in a certain comfort while continuing their physical and mental activities in terms of climatic conditions such as temperature, humidity and air flow rate. If the thermal comfort conditions are insufficient in the working environment, distress is felt and discomfort begins, and accordingly, the working capacity and work efficiency of the person decreases. In this article, temperature physiology and occupational health will be evaluated with fuzzy logic in weaving business. Recognition of risks in the work environment is the most important factor in preventing occupational disease, work-related illness and occupational accidents. The air flow velocity Va (m/s) read from the thermal micro air conditioner is a parameter related to how people in an environment perceive the environment in which the components of personal and environmental factors affecting thermal comfort are expressed mathematically, using PMV and PMV value. The index PPD change, which indicates the rate of change, was determined with the help of fuzzy logic.

Keywords

Weaving, Thermal, Fuzzy, Safety, Comfort.

References

• 1. Dionova, B. W., Mohammed, M. N., Al-Zubaidi, S., Yusuf, E., “Environment indoor air quality assessment using fuzzy inference system”, Ict Express, Vol. 6, Issue 3, Pages 185-194, 2020.
• 2. Srinavin, K. and Mohamed, S. “Thermal environment effects on construction workers' productivity”, Work Study, Vol.51, Issue 6/7, Page 297, 2002.
• 3. Sensharma, N.P., Woods, J.E. Goodwin, A.K. “Relationships between the indoor environment and productivity: a literature review”, ASHRAE Transactions, Vol. 104, Issue 1A, Pages 686-700, 1998.
• 4. Mohamed, S. and Srinavin, K. “Forecasting labor productivity changes in construction using the PMV index”, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 35, Issue 4, Pages 345-351, 2005.
• 5. Ye, X.J., Lian, Z.W., Zhou, Z.P., Li, C.Z., Liu, Y.M. “Indoor environment, thermal comfort and productivity”, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate-Indoor Air '05, Pages 407-411 Beijing, China, 2005.
• 6. Kodaloğlu, M., “Yalvaç oto tamir esnafının sorunları ve iş güvenliği açısından bazı öneriler" Yalvaç Kent Araştırmaları, Çizgi Kitabevi Yayınları, Pages 379-384, Konya, 2020.
• 7. Kodaloğlu, M., Delikanlı, K., “Battaniye işletmesinde maruz kalınan gürültünün iş sağlığı ve güvenliği açısından değerlendirilmesi”, Teknik Bilimler Dergisi, Vol. 11, Issue 1, Pages 33-38, 2021.
• 8. Kodaloğlu, M.. Günaydın Karakan, G., “Evaluation of dust exposure measurements regarding to occupational health and safety in a warp knitting facility”, International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Research, Vol. 3, Issue 1, Pages 1-11, 2021.
• 9. Kodaloğlu M., “Evaluation of particular material and exposure measurements in terms of occupational health and safety in a yarn and weaving factory in Denizli organized industry region”, Teknik Bilimler Dergisi, Vol. 12, Issue 1, Pages 43-50, 2022.
• 10. Kodaloğlu, M., “Gül/Lavanta uygulanması ile aromaterapi sağlayan koruyucu maske tasarımı”, YEKARUM dergisi. Vol.6, Issue 1, Pages 1-5, 2021.
• 11. Kodaloğlu, M., Kodaloğlu Akarslan, F., Kodaloğlu, A. I., “Problems faced in cotton export by the ginner role, cost analysis and assessments in terms of occupational safety”, International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Research, Vol. 4, Issue 1, Pages 23-32, 2022.
• 12. Kodaloğlu, M., Kodaloğlu Akarslan F., “Felt cloak manufacturing and some evaluations in terms of occupational safety”, YEKARUM dergisi. Vol. 6, Issue 2, Pages 12-20, 2021.
• 13. Kodaloğlu, M.. “Evaluation of noise from jacquard and dobby in the weaving facility the in terms of occupational health and safety”, International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Research, Vol. 3, Issue 3, Pages 222-235, 2021.
• 14. Zadeh, L.A., "Fuzzy sets", Information and Control, Vol.8, Issue 3, Pages 338–353, 1965. 15. Wierman, M. J., "An introduction to the mathematics of uncertainty including set theory, logic, probability, fuzzy sets, rough sets, and evidence theory", Creighton University, Pages 105-118, 2010.
• 16. Yılmaz, M., Arslan, E., “Bulanık mantığın jeodezik problemlerin çözümünde kullanılması”, Harita ve Kadastro Mühendisleri Odası, Mühendislik Ölçmeleri STB Komisyonu 2. Mühendislik Ölçmeleri Sempozyumu, Pages 512-522, İstanbul, 2005.