Application and optimization of damping pad to a body-in-white of a vehicle for improved road noise, vibration and harshness performance

Abstract

Road noise is expected to become even more important in the vehicle product development cycle due to electrification and challenging lightweight/emission targets. In this study, a topology optimization algorithm is applied to determine the damping pad layout on the roof and floor panels of a Body-in-White (BIW), being the dominant contributors on road noise, vibration and harshness (NVH) performance of an automotive. Optimization algorithm yields the prescribed % of the surface area of these panels where the damping pad should be distributed set by the automotive Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs). The objective function is the minimization of the overall acceleration of these panels for the frequencies up to 200 Hz, while the weight of the BIW is considered as the optimization constraint. The results of the optimization are compared with the road NVH performance of panels with full damping and no damping. The optimization results indicate that by using 25% of the damping pad on the roof and floor panels improve the vibration performance especially in the frequency range of 80 Hz to 150 Hz significantly compared to bare BIW panels. Besides, the performance of the 25% damping is almost same as the application of full damping pad for frequencies between 90 Hz to 110 Hz. The results show that the methodology is able to address the trade-offs between road NVH and weight targets effectively.

Keywords

• Damping Pad,Topology Optimization,Body-in-White (BIW),Topology Optimization,Passenger Cars,Frequency Response Analysis,Finite Element Modeling (FEM)

References

1. 1. Kim D. S., Emerson R. W., Naghshineh K., Pliskow J., and Myers K., “Impact of adding artificially generated alert sound to hybrid electric vehicles on their detectability by pedestrians who are blind”, Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 49(3), 381-394, 2012.
2. 2. Reddy H. K., and Parmar A., “A Philosophy of Full Vehicle Simulation for analysing the Road NVH Problems”, SAE Technical Paper, 2019-28-2491, 2019.
3. 3. Larsson J. K., Lundgren J., Asbjornsson E., and Andersson H., “Extensive introduction of ultra-high strength steels sets new standards for welding in the body shop”, Welding in the World, 53, 4-14, 2009.
4. 4. Reff B., “Noise and vibration refinement of chassis and suspension”, in Wang, X., Vehicle Noise and Vibration Refinement, Woodhead Publishing Limited, Oxford, 318-350, 2010.
5. 5. Xu W., Vehicle Noise and Vibration Refinement, Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, England, 189-215, 2010.
6. 6. [6] Hampl N., “Advanced Simulation Techniques in Vehicle Noise and Vibration Refinement”, in Wang, X., Vehicle Noise and Vibration Refinement, Woodhead Publishing Limited, Oxford, 174-188, 2010.
7. 7. Hatekar H., Anthonysamy B., Saishanker V., Pavuluri L., and Pahwa G., “Silent Block Bush Design and Optimization for Pick-Up Truck Leaf Spring”, SAE Technical Paper, 2017-01-0455, https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-0455, 2017.
8. 8. Xu J., Ren C., Xie R., and Huang J., “Road Noise Prediction Based on FRF-Based Substructuring Method”, In Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE)-China Congress, 317-328, Springer, Singapore, 2017.

9. 9. Gur Y., Pan J., and Wagner D. A., “Low-and high-frequency NVH CAE–test methods for development of a lightweight sedan design”, In Automotive Acoustics Conference, 21-41, Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden, 2017.
10. 10. He R., “A New Kind of Road Structure-Borne Noise and Vibration Prediction Method Based on Combination of High-Frequency Parameterized Model of Bushes, Multi-Body Calculation on Adams and Finite Element Model”, SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-0139, https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-0139, 2018.
11. 11. Ryberg A. B., Backryd R. D., and Nilsson L., “A metamodel-based multidisciplinary design optimization process for automotive structures”, Engineering with Computers, 31 (4), 711-728, 2015.
12. 12. Yoo J. W., Ronzio F., and Courtois T., “Road Noise Reduction of a Sport Utility Vehicle Via Panel Shape and Damper Optimization on the Floor Using Genetic Algorithm”, International Journal of Automotive Technology, 20 (5), 1043-1050, 2019.
13. 13. Ou H., Tang X., Xiao J., Wang Y., and Ma Z., “Lightweight Body-In-White Design Driven by Optimization Technology”, Automotive Innovation, 1 (3), 255-262, 2018.
14. 14. Li S., and Feng X., “Study of structural optimization design on a certain vehicle body-in-white based on static performance and modal analysis”, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 135, 106405, 2020.
15. 15. Bendsoe M.P., “Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem”, Structural Optimization, 1, 193-202, 1989.
16. 16. Sun G., Tan D., Lv X., Yan X., Li Q., and Huang, X., “Multi-objective topology optimization of a vehicle door using multiple material tailor-welded blank (TWB) technology”, Advances in Engineering Software, 124, 1-9, 2018.
17. 17. Tuncer G., and Sendur P., “Frequency Based Dynamic Topology Optimization Methodology for Improved Door Closing Sound Quality”, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406219893396, 2019.
18. 18. Center for Collision Safety Analysis, 2010 Toyota Yaris detailed finite element model, https://www.ccsa.gmu.edu/models/2010-toyota-yaris (2010, accessed 1 August 2017).
19. 19. MSC Software, “MSC. Nastran 2004 Quick Reference Guide”, 2004.
20. 20. Sendur P., and Ozcan M. U., “The Modelling and Correlation Procedure for Assessment of Vibration Performance of a Heavy Commercial Truck”, International Journal of Automotive Engineering and Technologies, 6(1), 49-61, 2017.
21. 21. Sendur P., Gulsen D., Erman C., and Tinar E., “A Methodology to Optimize Damping Pad Application on a Complex Structure Using Finite Element Models”, In Proceedings of 25th International Congress on Sound and Vibration, Hiroshima, Japan, 2018.
22. 22. Huber P., and Ronchetti E., “Robust statistics”, Wiley New York, 1-11, 2009.