The effects of digital animation technology on the academic achievement and spatial perception of middle school students

Abstract

This study aimed at determining the effects of digital animation technology on students' academic achievements and spatial perceptions within the scope of the "Journey to History" unit of the social studies course. In addition, the sub-goals included revealing whether there was a relationship between academic success and spatial perception and whether academic success was a predictor of spatial perception. This research was conducted with a quasi-experimental design with a pretest/posttest control group. The sample consisted of a total of 82 students (EG1=30, EG2=24, CG=28) studying in a secondary school in Türkiye. Research data were collected through the academic achievement test and the spatial perception scale. It was determined that there was no statistically significant difference in the pretest academic achievement at the level of all groups, but there was a significant difference in the posttest in favor of the experimental group. In addition, a positive development was detected in the spatial perception of the students in the experimental group towards animation. It was found that there was a positive correlation between the posttest scores of the experimental groups and the spatial perception scale administered after the posttest. In addition, the posttest of the experimental groups predicted the spatial perception scale applied with the posttest. As a result of the research, it was observed that the learning method with animation technology had a significant positive impact on students' academic achievement and their spatial perception.

Keywords

• Digital animation
• Spatial perception
• Experimental design
• Achievement test
• Scale

The effects of digital animation technology on the academic achievement and spatial perception of middle school students

Abstract

The learning model based on visual and auditory elements, which reflects the modern education process, plays an important role in taking students' readiness levels to the highest levels by directly penetrating their innovative and creative thinking skills. Therefore, the aim is to determine the effects of digital animation technology, an essential instrument of digital media, on students' academic achievements and spatial perceptions within the scope of the "Journey to History" unit of the social studies course. In addition, the sub-goals include revealing whether there is a relationship between academic success and spatial perception and whether academic success is a predictor of spatial perception. This research was conducted with a quantitative research paradigm and a quasi-experimental design with a pretest/posttest control group, which is a type of experimental research, was applied. The sample consists of a total of 82 students (EG1=30, EG2=24, CG=28) studying in a secondary school in Türkiye. Research data were collected through the academic achievement test and spatial perception scale prepared and developed by the researcher himself. Analyzes of data was carried out using SPSS26, AMOS26 and EXCEL2016 software. It was determined that there was no statistically significant difference in the pretest academic achievement at the level of all groups, but there was a significant difference in the posttest in favor of the experimental group. In addition, a positive development was detected in the spatial perception of the students in the experimental group towards animation. It was found that there was a positive correlation between the posttest of the experimental groups and the spatial perception scale applied with the posttest. Also, the posttest of the experimental groups predicted the spatial perception scale applied with the posttest. As a result of the research; It has been observed that the learning method with animation technology has an increasing effect on students' academic achievement and a positive effect on their spatial perception.

Keywords

• Digital animation
• Spatial perception
• Experimental design
• Achievement test
• Scale

References

1. Akaydın, B.B., & Kaya, S. (2018). Sosyal bilgiler dersinde animasyon içeren ve içermeyen 5e modeli’nin öğrencilerin başarı ve tutumuna etkisi [The effect of 5e model with and without animation on students’ achievement and attitude in social studies]. Kastamonu University Kastamonu Education Journal, 26(1), 171-179. http://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.375723
2. Akdağ, M. (2022, November 20). Ölçme değerlendirme - madde analizi [Measurement and evaluation item analysis]. İnönü Üniversitesi Akademik Veri Yönetim Sistemi. https://avesis.inonu.edu.tr/mustafa.akdag/dokumanlar
3. Aksu, G., Eser, M.T., & Güzeller, C.O. (2017). Açımlayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ile yapısal eşitlik modeli uygulamaları [Applications of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling]. Detay Publishing.
4. Albayrak, B.M., & Kartal, A. (2020). Değerler eğitimi bağlamında animasyonlar: Kung Fu Panda 3 filmi incelemesi [Animations in the Context of Values Educatin: The Examination "Kung Fu Panda 3"]. Türkiye Education Journal, 5(2), 268-284.
5. Aslan-Efe, H. (2015). Animasyon destekli çevre eğitiminin akademik başarıya, akılda kalıcılığa ve çevreye yönelik tutuma etkisi [The Effects of Animation Supported Environmental Education on Achievement, Retention of Ecology and Environmental Attitude]. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 3(5), 130 143. http://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.90852
6. Azéma, M. (2015). Animation and graphic narration in the aurignacian. Palethnology: Archéologie et Sciences Humaines, 7, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.4000/palethnologie.850
7. Baglama, B., Evcimen, E., Altinay, F., Sharma, R.C., Tlili, A., Altinay, Z., Dagli, G., Jemni, M., Shadiev, R., Yucesoy, Y., & Celebi, M. (2022). Analysis of digital leadership in school management and accessibility of animation-designed game-based learning for sustainability of education for children with special needs. Sustainability, 14(13), 7730. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137730
8. Beatty, S. (2016). Students' perception of informal learning spaces in an academic library; An investigation into the relationship between learning behaviours and space design. Purdue e-Pubs. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2130&context=iatul

9. Berney, S., & Bétrancourt, M. (2016). Does animation enhance learning? A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 101, 150-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.06.005
10. Biyane, G. (2007). Students' perception of space at the Central University of Technology (Bloemfontein) and Free State School of Nursing Campuses: An exploratory study [Master’s thesis, University of Zululand]. University of Zululand Repository. https://uzspace.unizulu.ac.za/items/66b1df0b-c26a-44b4-b0d3-16ff70a4e3e9
11. Bolat, A., & Karamustafaoğlu, S. (2019). “Vücudumuzdaki Sistemler” ünitesi başarı testi geliştirme: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik [Development achievement of test on the unit “Systems in Our Body”: Validity and reliability]. Gazi Journal of Educational Science, 5(2), 131-159.
12. Büyük, K. (2022). Elektronik eğitim içeriklerinde animasyon ve 3d hareket yakalama tekniği (MOCAP) kullanımının faydaları [Benefits of using animation and 3d motion capture (MOCAP) techniques in electronic educational content]. Journal of Digital Technologies and Education, 1(2), 110-129. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7487706
13. Can, A. (2017). SPSS ile bilimsel araştırma sürecinde nicel veri analizi [Quantitative data analysis in the scientific research process with SPSS]. Pegem Academy Publishing.
14. Ceylan, N., & Seçken, N. (2019). 5e öğrenme modeline dayalı bilgisayar animasyonları destekli öğretim materyali tasarlama: “Tepkimelerde Hız ve Denge” ünitesi örneği [Computer animations-supported instructional material design based on 5e learning model: A case of “Chemical Speed and Equilibrium” unit]. Gazi University Gazi Faculty of Education Journal, 39(3), 1181-1202. http://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.565305
15. Christensen, L.B., Johnson, R.B., & Turner, L.A. (2014). Research methods, design, and analysis. Pearson. Creswell, J.W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
16. Escudero, E.B., Reyna, N.L., & Morales, M.R. (2000). The level of difficulty and discrimination power of the basic knowledge and skills examination. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 2(1), 1-16. http://redie.uabc.mx/vol2no1/contents-backhoff.html
17. Goldstein, E.B. (2008). Blackwell handbook of sensation and perception. Blackwell.
18. Husmann, P.R., & O'Loughlin, V.D. (2018). Another nail in the coffin for learning styles? Disparitiesamong undergraduate anatomy students’ study strategies, class performance, and reported vark learning styles. Anatomical Sciences Education, 12(1), 6 19. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1777
19. Jannah, T.M., & Bharata, H. (2020). The analysis of dyscalculia that referred to the learning style of fleming and mills theory on matrix materials of MAN 1 metro students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1563(012068), 1-8. http://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1563/1/012068
20. Kaba, F. (1992). Use animation for educational purposes [Master’s thesis, Anadolu University]. National Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr
21. Kamran, Z. (2022, August 05). Seven movies that leveled up live-action CGI this decade. https://www.digitalstudiome.com/production/seven-movies-that-leveled-up-live-action-cgi-this-decade
22. Kaya, Z. (2006). Öğretim teknolojileri ve materyal geliştirme [Instructional technologies and material development]. Pegem Academy Publishing.
23. Karagöz, Y. (2019). SPSS AMOS META uygulamalı nitel-nicel-karma bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri ve yayın etiği [SPSS AMOS META applied qualitative-quantitative-mixed scientific research methods and publication ethics]. Nobel Academic Publishing.
24. Kılıç, A. (2022). Türkçenin yabancı dil olarak öğretimi kapsamında bir animasyon anlatı: "Evliya Çelebi-Ölümsüzlük Suyu" [An animated narrative within the scope of teaching turkish as a foreign language: “Evliya Çelebi: The water of immortality”]. Eskişehir Osmangazi University Turkic World Application and Research Center Education Journal, 7(2), 62-75.
25. Kraepelien, M., Blom, K., Forsell, E., Isacsson, N.H., Bjurner, P., Morin, C.M., Jernelöv, S., & Kaldo, V. (2021). A very brief self-report scale for measuring insomnia severity using two items from the insomnia severity index - development and validation in a clinical population. Sleep Medicine, (81), 365-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2021.03.003
26. Linn, M.C., & Petersen, A.C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta analysis. Child Development, 56(6), 1479 1498. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130467
27. Mansor, N.R., Zakaria, R., Rashid, R.A., Arifin, R.M., Rahim, B.H.A., Zakaria, R., & Razak, M.T.A. (2018). A review survey on the use computer animation in education. International Journal of Educational Management, 32(7), 1202-1214. http://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/917/1/012021
28. Marsh, H., Hau, K-T., Balla, J.R., & Grayson, D. (2008). Is more ever too much? The number of indicators per factor in confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariate Behaivoral Research, 33(2), 181-220. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3302_1
29. Muck, P.M., Hell, B., & Gosling, S.D. (2007). Construct validation of a short five-factor model instrument: A self-peer study on the German adaptation of the ten-item personality inventory (TIPI G). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23(3), 166 175. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.23.3.166
30. Odabaşı, B. (2007). Mucizeyi yaratanların hikayesi: Beyin fırtınası [The story of those who created the miracle: Brainstorming]. Yurt Publishing.
31. Özaydın, A. (2020). Analysis of animation films according to social studies teaching program [Master's thesis, Afyon Kocatepe University]. National Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr
32. Özçakır, B., & Çakıroğlu, E. (2022). Fostering spatial abilities of middle school students through augmented reality: Spatial strategies. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 2977–3010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10729-3
33. Özdamar, K. (2017). Eğitim, sağlık ve davranış bilimlerinde ölçek ve test geliştirme yapısal eşitlik modellemesi: IBM SPSS, IBM SPPS AMOS ve MINITAB uygulamalı [Structural equation modeling for scale and test development in education, health and behavioral sciences: IBM SPSS, IBM SPPS AMOS and MINITAB applications]. Nisan Publishing.
34. Republic of Türkiye Ministry of National Education (2016). Child development and education animation studies. Strengthening Vocational Education and Training System Project. https://megep.meb.gov.tr/
35. Ritonga, S., Safrida, S., Huda, I., Supriatno, & Sarong, M.A. (2020). The effect of problem-based video animation instructions to improve students' critical thinking skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1460, The 1st Annual International Conference on Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 14th–15th September 2019, Kota Banda Aceh, Indonesia. http://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1460/1/012107
36. Saban, A. (2005). Öğrenme öğretme süreci: Yeni teori ve yaklaşımlar [Learning teaching process: New theories and approaches]. Nobel Publishing.
37. Saraç, H. (2018). Fen bilimleri dersi ‘maddenin değişimi’ ünitesi ile ilgili başarı testi geliştirme: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Development of achievement test about science lesson ‘change of matter’ unit: Validity and reliability study]. Abant Izzet Baysal University Journal of Faculty of Education, 18(1), 416 445. https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2018..-388815
38. Sel, B. (2022). Hayat bilgisi ve sosyal bilgiler öğretim programı kapsamında kültürel mirasın animasyon çizgi dizilerle aktarımı: Bir Yörük hikâyesi Maysa ve Bulut [Transfer of cultural heritage with animated cartoon series within the scope of life science and social studies curriculum: A nomad story Maysa and Bulut]. Millî Eğitim Dergisi, 51(236), 2969-3000. http://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.1052307
39. Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D., & Campbell, D.T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Haughton Publishing.
40. Shreesha, M., & Tyagi, S.K. (2018). Effectiveness of animation as a tool for communication in primary education: An experimental study in India. International Journal of Educational Management, 32(7), 1202-1214. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-04-2016-0077
41. Siegle, D. (2014). Technology: Student animation projects an avenue to promote creativity and learning. Gifted Child Today, 37(3), 194-199.
42. Smith, E.E., & Kosslyn, S.M. (2014). Bilişsel psikoloji: Zihin ve beyin [Cognitive psychology: Mind and brain] (M. Şahin, Trans.). Nobel Publishing (The original work was published in 2010).
43. Soylu, Ü.İ., Karamustafaoğlu, S., & Karamustafaoğlu, O. (2020). 6. sınıf “madde ve ısı” ünitesi başarı testi geliştirme: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik [6th grade "matter and heat" unit achievement test development: Validity and reliability]. Ihlara Journal Educational Research, 5(2), 271–293. https://doi.org/10.47479/ihead.800620
44. Tavşancıl, E. (2018). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi [Measuring attitudes and data analysis with SPSS]. Nobel Akademik Publishing.
45. Turgut, M., Yenilmez, K., & Balbağ, M.Z. (2017). Öğretmen adaylarının mantıksal ve uzamsal düşünme becerileri: Bölüm, cinsiyet ve akademik performansın etkisi [Prospective teachers’ logical and spatial thinking skills: The effects of department, gender and academic performance]. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty, 41, 265-283. http://doi.org/10.21764/efd.13098
46. University of Washington. (2023, November 15). Understanding item analyses. https://www.washington.edu/assessment/scanning-scoring/scoring/reports/item-analysis/
47. Uysal, M.Z. (2020). The effect of using web 2.0 animation tools in the science course for 4th grade students on various variables [Master's thesis, Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University]. National Thesis Center. https://tez.yok.gov.tr
48. Ünal, O. (2020). Yakın dönem Türk animasyon filmlerinin değerler eğitimi bağlamında incelenmesi [Analysis of recent Turkish animated films in the context of values education]. International Journal of Field Education, 6(2), 64-83.
49. Wells, P. (1998). Understanding animation. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
50. Wolfe, E.M., Alfonso, A.R., Diep, G.K., Berman, Z.P., Mills, E.C., Park, J.J., Hoffman, A.F., Felsenheld, J.H., Ramly, E.P., & Rodriguez, E.D. (2021). Is digital animation superior to text resources for facial transplantation education? Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 148(2), 419-426. http://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000008166
51. Xiao, L. (2013). Animation trends in education. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 3(3), 286-289.
52. Yani, A., Mulyadi, A., & Ruhimat, M. (2018). Contextualization of spatial intelligence: Correlation between spatial intelligence, spatial ability, and geography skills. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(4), 564-575.