The relationship between school effectiveness and organizational peace: Evidence from southeastern Türkiye

Öz

As student outcomes affect the entire society, the effectiveness of schools has been a subject of significant debate for more than half a century. Another issue of vital importance for societies is peace. Although peace is given the importance that it deserves in many disciplines, it has remained a neglected concept for organizations. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between school effectiveness and organizational peace. This study was designed in a cross-sectional and correlational model in accordance with the quantitative method. The sample of the study consisted of 517 teachers working at public middle schools and high schools in the Şanlıurfa province in southeastern Türkiye who were selected by stratified sampling. A significant relationship was found between school effectiveness and the internal peace dimension of organizational peace, and as the organizational peace levels of schools increased, their effectiveness levels also increased. The participants perceived the effectiveness of their schools to be low and moderate, while they considered organizational peace to be negative. As another noteworthy result of the study, the participants who were working at middle schools perceived the effectiveness and organizational peace at their institutions to be substantially lower than those who were working at high schools. Our results contribute to the literature on school effectiveness in an organizational peace context and the expansion of the body of knowledge on the topic by offering evidence from Türkiye as a developing country. Additionally, we also bring practical recommendations for the improvement of organizational peace and school effectiveness levels.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Organizational peace
• Positive psychology
• School effectiveness

References

1. Aibieyi, S., & Okojie, J.O. (2006). Causes and consequences of conflict in an organization: Workers and management. Nigerian Journal of Social Development, 2(1), 9-13.
2. Alanoğlu, M., Karabatak, S., Uslukaya, A., & Kuloğlu, A. (2024). Adaptation of the quiet quitting scale for teachers to Turkish culture: An empirical psychometric investigation. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 11(3), 463 480. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1437506
3. Al‐Shammari, M.M. (1992). Organizational climate. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 13(6), 30-32.
4. Barnard, C.I. (1938). The functions of the executive (1st ed). Harvard University Press.
5. Bellibaş, M. Ş., & Liu, Y. (2017). Multilevel analysis of the relationship between principals’ perceived practices of instructional leadership and teachers’ self-efficacy perceptions. Journal of Educational Administration, 55(1), 49-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JEA-12-2015-0116
6. Bernhard, R., McDermott, T., Hasenhüttl, C., Burn, K., & Sammons, P. (2024). A focus on quality of teaching in schools increases students’ progress of attainment. Evidence from English secondary schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 35(4), 506–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2024.2398601
7. Bozak, A., & Karabulut, B. (2021). The Administrative ınvestigation in local educational organizations: An evaluation through the lens of school managers. International Journal of Education Technology and Scientific Researches, 6(15), 771 830. http://dx.doi.org/10.35826/ijetsar.359
8. Bozanoğlu, B. (2020). Relationship between teachers' fellowship, job satisfaction and organizational peace [Doctoral dissertation, İnönü University]. Council of Higher Education (CoHE) thesis no: 636716

9. Bozkurt Bostancı, A., Akçadağ, T., Kahraman, Ü., & Tosun, A. (2016). The relationship between schools' DNA profiles and political behavior in school. Journal of Human Sciences, 13(3), 5693-5705. https://doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v13i3.4307
10. Börü, N., & Bellibaş, M.Ş. (2021). Comparing the relationships between school principals’ leadership types and teachers’ academic optimism. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.1889035
11. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E.K., Akgün, Ö.E., Karagöz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2009). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods] (4th ed.). Pegem.
12. Cameron, K.S., & Quinn, R.E. (1999). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture, based on the competing values framework. Jossey-Bass.
13. Cameron, K.S., Dutton, J.E., & Quinn, R.E. (2003). Foundations of positive organizational scholarship. In K.S. Cameron, J.E. Dutton & R.E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship, foundations of a new discipline (pp. 3-13). Berrett-Koehler.
14. Chin, T. (2015). Harmony and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese organizations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(8), 1110 1129. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2014.934882
15. Campbell, A. (2017). Forgiveness and reconciliation as an organizational leadership competency within transitional justice instruments. The International Journal of Servant-Leadership, 11(1), 139-186.
16. Cansoy, R., & Parlar, H. (2018). Teacher leadership as a predictor of school effectiveness. Kastamonu Education Journal, 26(3), 925-934. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.346648
17. Coleman, J.S., Campbell, E.Q., Hobson, C.J., McPartland, J., Mood, A.M., Weinfeld, F.D., & York, R.L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
18. Creswell, J.W. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.) (S.B. Demir, Trans. Ed). Eğiten.
19. Çevik, M.S., & Doğan, E. (2025). Is there a significant relationship between the empowering leadership behaviors of school principals and the psychological resilience of teachers? Understanding the moderating effects of gender and length of time spent with the school principal. BMC Psychology, 13, 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02330-3
20. Demir, K. (2011). Editörden: Pozitif örgüt araştırmaları [Editorial: Positive organizational research]. Journal of Educational Sciences Research, 1(2). http://ebad‐jesr.com/
21. Doğuş, Y. (2019). A qualitative research on organizational peace in schools. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 14(4), 661-675.
22. Doğuş, Y. (2021). Phenomenological studuy of organizational peace and its relationship with school effectiveness [Doctoral dissertation, Gazi University]. CoHE thesis no: 704229
23. Doğuş, Y., & Eres, F. (2021). A study of validity and reliability on the organizational peace at school scale (OPPS). OPUS International Journal of Societiy Researches, 18(Special Issue on Educational Sciences), 4598-4623. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.895221
24. Donaldson, S.I., Chen, C., & Donaldson, S. (2021). Designing positive organizational psychology interventions. In S.I. Donaldson & C. Chen (Eds.), Positive organizational psychology interventions design & evaluation (pp. 1-38). Wiley Blackwell.
25. Doran, J.A. (2004). Effective school characteristics and student achievement correlates as perceived by teachers in American-style international schools. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Central Florida]. http://purl.fcla.edu/fcla/etd/CFE0000245
26. Edmonds, R.R., & Frederiksen, J.R. (1979). Search for effective schools: the identification and analysis of city schools that are instructionally effective for poor children, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 170 396.
27. Erikson, E.H. (2019). İnsanın 8 evresi [8 stages of a person] (Translated Gonca Akkaya). Okyan Us.
28. Etxeberria, F., Intxausti, N., & Azpillaga, V. (2017). School climate in highly effective schools in the Autonomous Region of the Basque Country (Spain). Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficaciay Cambio en Educacion, 15(4), 5 26. https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2017.15.4.001
29. Gaur, S., & Rajat, Dr. (2024). Principles of business management (1st ed.). Kripa-Drishti Publications.
30. Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1986). The social context of effective schools. American Journal of Education, 94, 328–355. https://doi.org/10.1086/443853
31. Hardwick, C.T., & Landuyt, B.F. (1961). Administrative strategy (1st ed.). Simmons-Boardman.
32. Hopkins, D., Stringfield, S., Harris, A., Stoll, L., & Mackay, T. (2014). School and system improvement: A narrative state-of-the-art review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(2), 257–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2014.885452
33. Hoy, W.K. (2009). School Effectiveness Index (SE Index). http://waynekhoy.com/pdfs/School_Effectiveness_Index.pdf
34. Hoy, W.K., & Miskel, C.G. (2015). Educational administration: Theory, research and practice. (7th ed). Nobel.
35. James, L.A., & James, L.R. (1989). Integrating work perceptions: explorations into the measurement of meaning. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(5), 739 751. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.74.5.739
36. Jarl, M., Andersson, K., & Blossing, U. (2021). Organizational characteristics of successful and failing schools: A theoretical framework for explaining variation in student achievement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 32(3), 448 464. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2021.1903941
37. Jencks, C.S., Smith, M., Ackland, H., Bane, M.J., Cohen, D., Ginter, H., Heyns, B., & Michelson, S. (1972). Inequality: A reassessment of the effect of the family and schooling in America (1st ed.). Basic.
38. John, M.C., & Taylor V., J.W. (1999). Leadership style, school climate, and the institutional commitment of teachers. Feature, 2(1), 25-57.
39. Karacabey, M.F. & Boyacı, A. (2018). Factors contributing to secondary school dropouts and the dropouts’ socioeconomic profiles: Şanlıurfa sample. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 24(2), 247-293. https://doi.org/10.14527/kuey.2018.007
40. Kirss, L., Säälik, Ü., Leijen, Ä., & Pedaste, M. (2021). School effectiveness in multilingual education: A review of success factors. Education Sciences, 11(193), 2 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11050193
41. Koçak, S., & Nartgün, Ş.S. (2020). Relationship betweenteacher's work engagementand effectiveness of school. Journal of Human Sciences, 17(3), 792 811. https://doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v17i3.5959
42. Koh, G.A., Askell-Williams, H., & Barr, S. (2023). Sustaining school improvement initiatives: advice from educational leaders. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 34(3), 298–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2023.2190130
43. Limon, İ. (2023). A bibliometric analysis of school effectiveness Research. Kocaeli University Journal of Education. 6(2), 522-542. http://doi.org/10.33400/kuje.1317097
44. Little, R.J. 1988. A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(404), 1198-1202.
45. Liu, Y., & Watson, S. (2020). Whose leadership role is more substantial for teacher professional collaboration, job satisfaction and organizational commitment: a lens of distributed leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 26(6), 1082–1110. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2020.1820580
46. Luthans, F. (2002). The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. Journal of Organitational Behavior, 23, 695-706. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.165
47. Martinez-Abad, F., Gamazo, A., & Rodriguez-Conde, M.J. (2020). Educational data mining: Identification of factors associated with school effectiveness in PISA assesment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 66, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.10087
48. MoNE, (2016). Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı Ortaöğretim Kurumları Yönetmeliği [Ministry of National Education Secondary Education Institutions Regulation]. http://ogm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2016_11/03111224_ooky.pdf
49. MoNE, (2018). Turkey’s 2023 Education Vision. http://2023vizyonu.meb.gov.tr/doc/2023_EGITIM_VIZYONU.pdf
50. MoNE, (2019). PISA 2018 Türkiye ön raporu [PISA 2018 Türkiye preliminary report]. https://www.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2019_12/03105347_PISA_2018_Turkiye_On_Raporu.pdf
51. MoNE, (2020). 2020 Ortaöğretim kurumlarına ilişkin merkezi sınav [2020 Central exam for secondary education institutions]. http://www.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2020_07/17104126_2020_Ortaogretim_Kurumlarina_Iliskin_Merkezi_Sinav.pdf
52. Moçoşoğlu, B. & Kaya, A. (2018). The relationship between organizational silence and organizational happiness levels of school principals and teachers: The sample of Şanlıurfa province. Harran Education Journal, 3(1), 52-70. https://doi.org/10.22596/2018.0301.52.70
53. Moore, R. (2022). Variation, context, and inequality: comparing models of school effectiveness in two states in India. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 33(4), 588–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2022.2089169
54. Mueller, R.K. (1978). Career conflict: Management's inelegant dysfunction. Lexington.
55. Nassir, M., & Benoliel, P. (2023). Promoting school effectiveness: Examining the mediating role of teachers’ organisational commitment and the moderating role of school cultural attributes. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 53(2), 456-478. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432231167715
56. Obiekwe, O., Felix, O., & Izim, B. (2018). Industrial relations environment in Nigeria: implications for managers in Nigeria workplaces. İnternational Journal of Economics and Business Management, 4(1), 1-10.
57. OECD. (2015). Skills for social progress: The power of social and emotional skills. OECD Publishing.
58. OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results: Factsheets, Türkiye. https://www.oecd.org/publication/pisa-2022-results/country-notes/turkiye-d67e6c05/
59. Okorie, J. C. (2014). Industrial democracy and labour stability in Nigeria: a case study of selected organizations in Imo State 2007-2011. [Master’s Thesis, Faculty of Sciences University of Nigeria]. https://afribary.com/works/industrial-democracy-and-labour-stability-in-nigeria-a-case-study-of-selected-organizations-in-imo-state-2007-2011/read
60. Okpalıbekwe, U.N., Onyekwelu, R.U. & Dıke, E.E. (2015). Collective bargaining and organizational performance; A study of the Nigeria Union of Local Government. Public Policy and Administration Research, 5(4), 53-69.
61. Organ, D.W. (1988). A restatement of the satisfaction-performance hypothesis. Journal of management, 14(4), 547-557. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638801400405
62. Özdoğan, B. (2001). Education and school success of children aged between six and twelve. Education and Science, 26(120), 3-7.
63. Pragadeeswaran, S. (2018). Yoga for win–win leadership through spirituality’ spirit + ability = win–win leadership or karma Yogi’. NOLEGEIN-Journal of Human Resource Management & Development, 1(8).
64. Ram, H. S. G., Ravindran, S., & Unnithan, A. B. (2011). A Study on the relationship between managerial effectiveness and conflict managerial effectiveness and conflict management styles, changing perspective of management. Revisit the Existing and Explore the Novel Ideas Conference Proceedings, Kathmandu, Nepal.
65. Rapti, D. (2013). School climate as an important component in school effectiveness. Academicus International Scientific Journal, 8(8), 110 125. https://doi.org/10.7336/academicus.2013.08.06
66. Reed, L. (2017). How peace plays a role in the workplace. https://www.business.com/articles/how-peace-plays-a-role-in-the-workplace/
67. Reynolds, D., Sammons, P., De Fraine, B., Van Damme, J., Townsend, T., Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (2014). Educational effectiveness research (EER): A state-of-the-art review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(2), 197 230. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2014.885450
68. Scheerens, J., Witziers, B., & Steen, R. (2013). A meta-analysis of school effectiveness studies. Revista de Educacion, 361, 619-645. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2012.718485
69. Seligman, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: Anintroduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5
70. Sönmez, E. (2020). Culture of learning in effective schools: A case study. [Doctoral dissertation, Gazi University]. (CoHE) thesis no: 657168.
71. Sürücü, A., Yıldırım, A., & Ünal, A. (2018). Examining the relationship between school safety and subjective well-being. Milli Eğitim, 217, 179-192.
72. Spady, R.J., Bell, C.H., & Kirby, R.S. (2002). The leadership of civilization building: Administrative and civilization theory, symbolic dialogue, and citizen skills for the 21st century. Forum Foundation.
73. Şen, S., Yıldırım, İ., & Karacabey, M.F. (2020). The implementation of the value-added assessment to determine school effectiveness. Education and Science, 45(202), 79-91. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2020.8023
74. Şimşek, H., & Şahin, S. (2012). Dropout tendency among secondary school students and its reasons (A case study in Şanlıurfa). Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University Journal of Faculty of Education, 12(2), 41-72.
75. Turunç, Ö., & Çelik, M. (2010). The effect of perceived organizational support and work stress on organizational identification and job performance. Journal of Management and Economics, 17(2), 183-206
76. UNESCO. (2000). Education for all: Meeting our collective commitments. Notes on the Dakar Framework for Action. Paris: UNESCO.
77. Uzoh, N. (2013). Maintaining peace and harmony at the workplace. https://kxw1.wordpress.com/2013/11/28/maintaining-peace-and-harmony-at-the-workplace/
78. Vatanseven, H., & Heperkan, H.A. (2021). Analysis of the relationship between employee demographic characteristics and working conditions at workplaces: The example of market chains. Journal of Business Research Turk, 13(3), 2414 2439. https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2021.1269
79. Wang, M.T. & Holcombe, R. (2010). Adolescents’ perceptions of school environment, engagement, and academic achievement in middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 47(3), 633–662. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209361209
80. Yıldırım, İ., & Ada, Ş. (2015). The relation between school principals’ personalitiy traits and locus of control and school effectiveness. Ines Journal, 2(5), 113 130. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/inesj/issue/40015/475748