Ahududu (Rubus idaeus Linnaeus) Genotiplerinde Kimyasal ve Agromorfolojik Özellikler Arasındaki İlişkilerin Multivariate Analizi ile Belirlenmesi

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’de Bolu ili merkez ilçesi Çivril yöresinde doğal olarak yetişen ahududu (Rubus idaeus Linnaeus) genotiplerine ait meyvelerin agro-morfolojik özellikleri belirlenmiştir. Çalışmada, genotiplere ait parametrelerde, meyve ağırlığı 2.52 g (Genotip 4) ile 1.30 g (Genotip 2), meyve eni 18.18 mm (Genotip 6) ile 15.33 mm (Genotip 2), meyve boyu 18.45 mm (Genotip 6) ile 12.87 mm (Genotip 2), çekirdek eni 1.30 mm (Genotip 4) ile 1.10 mm (Genotip 6), çekirdek boyu 2.37 mm (Genotip 1) ile 1.84 mm (Genotip 6) arasında saptanmıştır. Ek olarak, genotiplerde, meyve sap kalınlığı 0.91 mm (Genotip 4) - 0.67 mm (Genotip 5); meyve sap çukur derinliği 13.99 mm (Genotip 6) - 10.58 mm (Genotip 5); meyve sap çukur genişliği 10.08 mm (Genotip 4) - 7.82 mm (Genotip 9) aralığında tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca, en yüksek çözünebilir katı madde miktarı (SÇKM) açısından Genotip 3 (% 13.80) genotipi, en yüksek titre edilebilir asitlik (TA) değeri açısından Genotip 9 (% 3.60) genotipi daha baskın olmuştur. Genotiplerde gözlenen pH değerleri ise 3.06 ile 3.29 arasında değişmiştir. Ayrıca, renk değeri parametrelerinde, en yüksek L*, a*, b*, kroma ve hue açısı değerleri, sırasıyla, 32.22 (Genotip 8), 23.75 (Genotip 1), 12.86 (Genotip 1), 27.10 (Genotip 1) ve 28.22 (Genotip 1) olarak bulunmuştur. Çalışmada sonuç olarak, agro-morfolojik özellikler açısından öne çıkan çeşitli genotiplerin fonksiyonel ahududu üretiminde ıslah materyali olarak değerlendirilebileceği kanısına varılmıştır.

Keywords

• Ahududu
• morfoloji
• çözünebilir katı madde miktarı (SÇKM)
• titre edilebilir asitlik değeri (TA)
• renk parametreleri

Identification of Relationships Between Chemical and Agromorphological Traits in Raspberry (Rubus idaeus Linnaeus) Genotypes by Multivariate Analysis

Abstract

In this study, agro-morphological characteristics of raspberry (Rubus idaeus Linnaeus) genotypes naturally grown in Çivril, the central district of Bolu province in Türkiye were determined. In the study, parameters belonging to the genotypes were determined as follows: fruit weight was between 2.52 g (Genotype 4) and 1.30 g (Genotype 2), fruit width was between 18.18 mm (Genotype 6) and 15.33 mm (Genotype 2), fruit length was between 18.45 mm (Genotype 6) and 12.87 mm (Genotype 2), seed width was between 1.30 mm (Genotype 4) and 1.10 mm (Genotype 6), seed height was between 2.37 mm (Genotype 1) and 1.84 mm (Genotype 6). In addition, in genotypes, fruit stem thickness ranged from 0.91 mm (Genotype 4) to 0.67 mm (Genotype 5), fruit stem pit depth ranged from 13.99 mm (Genotype 6) to 10.58 mm (Genotype 5), fruit stem pit width ranged from 10.08 mm (Genotype 4) to 7.82 mm (Genotype 9). Also, genotype 3 (13.80%) had the highest soluble solids content (SSC) and Genotype 9 (3.60%) had the highest titratable acidity (TA). The pH values observed in the genotypes varied between 3.06 and 3.29. Also, in color value parameters, the highest L*, a*, b*, chroma and hue° angle values were 32.22 (Genotype 8), 23.75 (Genotype 1), 12.86 (Genotype 1), 27.10 (Genotype 1) and 28.22 (Genotype 1), respectively. As a result of the study, it was concluded that various genotypes that stand out in terms of agro-morphological characteristics can be evaluated as breeding material in functional raspberry production.

Keywords

• Raspberry
• morphology
• soluble solids content (SSC)
• titratable acidity value (TA)
• color parameters

References

1. Ahmed, M., Akbar Anjum, M., Khaqan, K., & Hussain, S. (2014). Biodiversity in morphological and physico-chemical characteristics of wild raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) germplasm collected from temperate region of Azad Jammu & Kashmir (Pakistan). Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus, 13(4), 117-134.
2. Augšpole, I., Dimiņš, F., Romanova, I., & Liniņa, A. (2021). Characterization of red raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) for theirphysicochemical and morphological properties. Agronomy Research, 19(S3), 1227-1233. https://doi.org/10.15159/AR.21.077
3. Brodowska, A. (2017). Raspberry pomace-composition, properties and application. European Journal of Biological Research, 7, 86-96.
4. Cefali, L. C., Franco, J. G., Nicolini, G. F., Ataide, J. A., & Mazzola, P. G. (2019). In vitro antioxidant activity and solar protection factor of blackberry and raspberry extracts in topical formulation. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 18, 539-544. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12842
5. Davarynejad, G., Zarei, M., Ardakani, E., & Nasrabadi, M. E. (2013). Influence of putrescine application on storability, postharvest quality and antioxidant activity of two Iranian apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) cultivars. Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 5(2), 212-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.15835/nsb529041
6. Dujmović Purgar, D., Duralija, B., Voća, S., Vokurka, A., & Ercisli, S. A. (2012). Comparison of fruit chemical characteristics of two wild grown Rubus species from different locations of Croatia. Molecules, 17, 10390-10398. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules170910390
7. Ertekin, C., Gozlekci, S., Kabas, O., Sonmez, S., & Akıncı, I. (2006). Some physical, pomological and nutritional properties of two plum (Prunus domestica L.) cultivars. Journal of Food Engineering, 75, 508-514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.04.034
8. Erturk, Y. E., & Gecer, M. K. (2012). Üzümsü meyveler ekonomisi. Iğdır Üniversitesi Kütüphane ve Dokümantasyon Daire Başkanlığı.

9. Esitken, A. (1992). Erzincan’da yetiştirilen Hasanbey, Şalak ve Şekerpare kayısı çeşitlerinde meydana gelen fiziksel ve kimyasal değişmeler ile hasat kriterlerinin saptanması üzerinde bir araştırma [Yüksek lisans tezi, Atatürk Üniversitesi]. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
10. Gentleman, R. C., Carey, V. J., Bates, D. M., Bolstad, B., Dettling, M., Dudoit, S., Ellis, B., Gautier, L., Ge, Y., Gentry, J., Hornik, K., Hothorn, T., Huber, W., Lacus, S., Irizarry, R., Leisch, F., Li, C., Maechler, M., Rossini, A. J., Sawitzki, G., Smith, C., Smyth, G., Tierney, L., Hanh, J. H. Y., & Zhang, J. (2004). Bioconductor: Open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biology, 5(10), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2004-5-10-r80
11. Giovanelli, G., Limbo, S., & Buratti, S. (2014). Effects of new packaging solutions on physico-chemical, nutritional and aromatic characteristics of red raspberries (Rubus idaeus L.) in postharvest storage. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 98, 72-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2014.07.002
12. Giuffrè, A. M., Louadj, L., Rizzo, P., Poiana, M., & Sicari, V. (2019). Packaging and storage condition affect the physicochemical properties of red raspberries (Rubus idaeus L., cv. Erika). Food Control, 97, 105-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.10.027
13. Glisic, I., & Milosevic, T. (2017). Potentials of Hilly and Mountainous areas for raspberry production: Current situation and perspectives. Academy of Sciences and Arts of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
14. Gomes, M. D. S., Cardoso, M. D. G., Guimarães, A. C. G., Guerreiro, A. C., Gago, C. M. L., Vilas Boas, E. V. D. B., Dias, C. M. B., Manhita, A. C. C., Faleiro, M. L., & Miguel, M. G. C. (2017). Effect of edible coatings with essential oils on the quality of red raspberries over shelf-life. Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture, 97, 929-938. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.7817
15. Hummer, K. E. (2010). Rubus pharmacology: Antiquity to the present. HortScience, 45(11), 1587-1591. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.45.11.1587
16. Kalyoncu, I. H. (1996). Konya’nın yöresindeki kızılcık (Cornus mas L.) tiplerinin bazı özellikleri ve farklı nem ortamlarındaki köklenme durumu üzerine bir araştırma [Doctoral Thesis, Selçuk Üniversitesi]. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
17. Karacali, I. (2002). Bahçe ürünlerinin muhafaza ve pazarlaması. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi. Karadeniz, T., Kalkisim, O., & Balta, F. (1996). Vezirköprü’de yetişen kızılcık (Cornus mas L.) tiplerinde bazı olgunluk parametreleri arasındaki ilişkiler. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 6, 205-214.
18. Kula, M., & Krauze-Baranowska, M. (2015). Rubus occidentalis: The black raspberry-Its potential in the prevention of cancer. Nutrition and Cancer, 68, 18-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2016.1115095 Li, S., Wu, B., Fu, W., & Reddivari, L. (2019). The anti-inflammatory effects of dietary anthocyanins against ulcerative colitis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20(10), 2588. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20102588
19. Nowak, D., Gośliński, M., Wojtowicz, E., & Przygoński, K. (2018). Antioxidant properties and phenolic compounds of vitamin C-rich juices. Journal of Food Science, 83, 2237-2246. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.14284
20. Tas, A., Gundogdu, M., Ercisli, S., Orman, E., Celik, K., Marc, R. A., Buckova, M., Adamkova, A., & Mlcek, J. (2023). Fruit quality characteristics of service tree (Sorbus domestica L.) genotypes. ACS Omega, 8, 19862-19873. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c01788
21. Teng, H., Fang, T., Lin, Q., Song, H., Liu, B., & Chen, L. (2017). Red raspberry and its anthocyanins: Bioactivity beyond antioxidant capacity. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 66, 153-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2017.05.015
22. Tosun, M., Ercisli, S., Karlidag, H., & Sengul, M. (2009). Characterization of red raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) genotypes for their physicochemical properties. Journal of Food Science, 74(7), C575-C579. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01297.x
23. TÜİK. (2022). Bitkisel üretim istatistikleri. http://tuikapp.tuik.gov.tr/bitkiselapp/bitkisel.zul. [Erişim tarihi: 28 Ekim 2023].
24. Yang, J., Cui, J., Chen, J., Yao, J., Hao, Y., Fan, Y., & Liu, Y. (2020). Evaluation of physicochemical properties in three raspberries (Rubus idaeus) at five ripening stages in northern China. Scientia Horticulturae, 263, 109146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.109146
25. Zejak, D., Glisic, I., Spalevic, V., Maskovic, P., & Dudic, B. (2021). The impact of location on the phenological and nutritional properties of raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) in Montenegro. Agronomy, 11, 1663. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/agronomy11081663
26. Zha, J., & Koffas, M. A. G. (2017). Production of anthocyanins in metabolically engineered microorganisms: Current status and perspectives. Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology, 2, 259-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synbio.2017.10.005