BibTex RIS Cite

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ENTREPRENEURIAL TRAINING: THE SAMPLE OF AKSARAY

Year 2014, Volume: 6 Issue: 1, 1 - 15, 01.06.2014

Abstract

The concept of entrepreneurship has often been associated with personality characteristics in organizational literature in Turkey. Studies on entrepreneurship in our country involve what type of personality characteristics the individuals that can be considered “entrepreneurs” have and which individuals possess a higher potential for entrepreneurship. Nevertheless, considering the literature on entrepreneurship in Turkey, it is possible to conclude that there is no sufficient amount of research regarding whether entrepreneurship is a concept that can be learnt or whether entrepreneurial skills can be gained through training. The effectiveness of the training that entrepreneurs receive through KOSGEB (Small and Medium Industry Development Organization) is analyzed in this paper. For this purpose, data were collected from entrepreneurs who received entrepreneurial training in Aksaray through a scale developed based on previous literature. We hope that the findings obtained from the research will contribute to current literature in terms of making up for the lack of research on the effectiveness of entrepreneurial training

References

  • Balaban, Ö. ve Özdemir, Y. 2008. “Girişimcilik Eğitiminin Girişimcilik Eğilimi Üzerindeki Etkisi: Sakarya Üniversitesi İİBF Örneği”, Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, Cilt 3, Sayı 2, http://girisim.comu.edu.tr/dergiall/eskisyilr/3in2.htm.
  • Bharadwaj, P.N., Osborne, S.W., Falcone, T.W., 2010. “Assuring Quality in Entrepreneurship Training: A Quality Function Deployment (QFD Approach)”, Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, Volume: 13, p: 107 – 132.
  • Bozkurt, Ç.Ö. ve Alparslan, M.A., 2013. ”Girişimcilerde Bulunması Gereken Özellikler ile Girişimcilik Eğitimi: Girişimci ve Öğrenci Görüşleri”, Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 8:1.
  • Börü, D., 2006. “Girişimcilik Eğilimi Marmara Üniversitesi İşletme Bölümü Öğrencileri Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, İstanbul, Marmara Üniversitesi Yayın No:733, İstanbul.
  • Dilsiz, İ. ve Kölük, N. 2008. ”Girişimcilik”, Detay Yayıncılık, Ankara.
  • Gülaçtı, M., 2013. 2013. “Girişimcilik ve İş Planı Süreci”, Girişimcilik, (Ed. H. Karadal), 12. Bölüm, Beta Yayınevi, İstanbul.
  • Güney, S. 2008. “Girişimcilik, Temel Kavramlar ve Bazı Güncel Konular”, Siyasal Kitabevi, Ankara.
  • Hisrich, Robert D. ve Michael P., 2001. “Entrepreneurship”, 5th Edition, McGraw- Hill Higher.
  • Karadal, H., 2013. “Girişimcilik Bilgisi ve Stratejik Girişimcilik”, Girişimcilik, (Ed. H. Karadal), 2. Bölüm, Beta Yayınevi, İstanbul.
  • Karadeniz, E., 2010. “Entrepreneurship in Turkey”, The Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM).
  • Karlan, D. and Valdivia, M. 2011. “Teaching Entrepreneurship: Impact of Business Training on Microfinance Clients and Institutions”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol: 93 (2), p. 510 – 527.
  • Lans, T., Hulsink, W., Baert, H., Mulder, M. 2008. “Entrepreneurship Education and Training in a Small Business Context: Insights from the Competence-Based Approach”, Journal of Enterprising Culture, Vol: 16 (4), p.363-383
  • Müftüoğlu, M. Tamer ve Tülin Durukan 2004. “Girişimcilik ve KOBİ’ler”, Gazi Kitabevi, Ankara.
  • Özçınar, M.Faruk, 2013. “Farklılıkların Yönetimi ve Girişimcilik”, Girişimcilik, (Ed. H. Karadal), 6. Bölüm, Beta Yayınevi, İstanbul.
  • Özdeveciğolu, M., 2013. ” “Uygulamalı Girişimcilik Eğitimi”, Girişimcilik, (Ed. H. Karadal), 1. Bölüm, Beta Yayınevi, İstanbul.
  • Parker, Simon C. 2009. “The Economics of Entrepreneurship”, Cambridge University Press,
  • Robinson, P.B., Stimpson, D.V., Huefner, J.C., Hunt, H.K. (1991). “An Attitude Approach to the Prediction of Entrepreneurship”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, p.13 - 31
  • Tezbaşaran, A. A. (1996). “Likert tipi ölçek geliştirme kılavuzu”. Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları, Ankara
  • Wu, S. and Jung, J. Y. 2008. “Is Non-Traditional Entrepreneurship Training Helpful to Nascent Entrepreneurs? Yes and No.”, Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, Volume: 11, p.43-51
  • Zımmerer, Thomas W. ve Norman M. Scarborough, 1998. “Essentials of Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management”, Second Edition, Prentice Hall, Inc.
Year 2014, Volume: 6 Issue: 1, 1 - 15, 01.06.2014

Abstract

References

  • Balaban, Ö. ve Özdemir, Y. 2008. “Girişimcilik Eğitiminin Girişimcilik Eğilimi Üzerindeki Etkisi: Sakarya Üniversitesi İİBF Örneği”, Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, Cilt 3, Sayı 2, http://girisim.comu.edu.tr/dergiall/eskisyilr/3in2.htm.
  • Bharadwaj, P.N., Osborne, S.W., Falcone, T.W., 2010. “Assuring Quality in Entrepreneurship Training: A Quality Function Deployment (QFD Approach)”, Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, Volume: 13, p: 107 – 132.
  • Bozkurt, Ç.Ö. ve Alparslan, M.A., 2013. ”Girişimcilerde Bulunması Gereken Özellikler ile Girişimcilik Eğitimi: Girişimci ve Öğrenci Görüşleri”, Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 8:1.
  • Börü, D., 2006. “Girişimcilik Eğilimi Marmara Üniversitesi İşletme Bölümü Öğrencileri Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, İstanbul, Marmara Üniversitesi Yayın No:733, İstanbul.
  • Dilsiz, İ. ve Kölük, N. 2008. ”Girişimcilik”, Detay Yayıncılık, Ankara.
  • Gülaçtı, M., 2013. 2013. “Girişimcilik ve İş Planı Süreci”, Girişimcilik, (Ed. H. Karadal), 12. Bölüm, Beta Yayınevi, İstanbul.
  • Güney, S. 2008. “Girişimcilik, Temel Kavramlar ve Bazı Güncel Konular”, Siyasal Kitabevi, Ankara.
  • Hisrich, Robert D. ve Michael P., 2001. “Entrepreneurship”, 5th Edition, McGraw- Hill Higher.
  • Karadal, H., 2013. “Girişimcilik Bilgisi ve Stratejik Girişimcilik”, Girişimcilik, (Ed. H. Karadal), 2. Bölüm, Beta Yayınevi, İstanbul.
  • Karadeniz, E., 2010. “Entrepreneurship in Turkey”, The Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM).
  • Karlan, D. and Valdivia, M. 2011. “Teaching Entrepreneurship: Impact of Business Training on Microfinance Clients and Institutions”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol: 93 (2), p. 510 – 527.
  • Lans, T., Hulsink, W., Baert, H., Mulder, M. 2008. “Entrepreneurship Education and Training in a Small Business Context: Insights from the Competence-Based Approach”, Journal of Enterprising Culture, Vol: 16 (4), p.363-383
  • Müftüoğlu, M. Tamer ve Tülin Durukan 2004. “Girişimcilik ve KOBİ’ler”, Gazi Kitabevi, Ankara.
  • Özçınar, M.Faruk, 2013. “Farklılıkların Yönetimi ve Girişimcilik”, Girişimcilik, (Ed. H. Karadal), 6. Bölüm, Beta Yayınevi, İstanbul.
  • Özdeveciğolu, M., 2013. ” “Uygulamalı Girişimcilik Eğitimi”, Girişimcilik, (Ed. H. Karadal), 1. Bölüm, Beta Yayınevi, İstanbul.
  • Parker, Simon C. 2009. “The Economics of Entrepreneurship”, Cambridge University Press,
  • Robinson, P.B., Stimpson, D.V., Huefner, J.C., Hunt, H.K. (1991). “An Attitude Approach to the Prediction of Entrepreneurship”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, p.13 - 31
  • Tezbaşaran, A. A. (1996). “Likert tipi ölçek geliştirme kılavuzu”. Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları, Ankara
  • Wu, S. and Jung, J. Y. 2008. “Is Non-Traditional Entrepreneurship Training Helpful to Nascent Entrepreneurs? Yes and No.”, Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, Volume: 11, p.43-51
  • Zımmerer, Thomas W. ve Norman M. Scarborough, 1998. “Essentials of Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management”, Second Edition, Prentice Hall, Inc.
There are 20 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA98JD82FZ
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Himmet Karadal This is me

Ümmügül Baş This is me

Turgut Emre Akyazı This is me

Muhammet Saygın This is me

Publication Date June 1, 2014
Published in Issue Year 2014 Volume: 6 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Karadal, H., Baş, Ü., Akyazı, T. E., Saygın, M. (2014). THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ENTREPRENEURIAL TRAINING: THE SAMPLE OF AKSARAY. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, 6(1), 1-15.
AMA Karadal H, Baş Ü, Akyazı TE, Saygın M. THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ENTREPRENEURIAL TRAINING: THE SAMPLE OF AKSARAY. IJBMS. June 2014;6(1):1-15.
Chicago Karadal, Himmet, Ümmügül Baş, Turgut Emre Akyazı, and Muhammet Saygın. “THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ENTREPRENEURIAL TRAINING: THE SAMPLE OF AKSARAY”. International Journal of Business and Management Studies 6, no. 1 (June 2014): 1-15.
EndNote Karadal H, Baş Ü, Akyazı TE, Saygın M (June 1, 2014) THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ENTREPRENEURIAL TRAINING: THE SAMPLE OF AKSARAY. International Journal of Business and Management Studies 6 1 1–15.
IEEE H. Karadal, Ü. Baş, T. E. Akyazı, and M. Saygın, “THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ENTREPRENEURIAL TRAINING: THE SAMPLE OF AKSARAY”, IJBMS, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2014.
ISNAD Karadal, Himmet et al. “THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ENTREPRENEURIAL TRAINING: THE SAMPLE OF AKSARAY”. International Journal of Business and Management Studies 6/1 (June 2014), 1-15.
JAMA Karadal H, Baş Ü, Akyazı TE, Saygın M. THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ENTREPRENEURIAL TRAINING: THE SAMPLE OF AKSARAY. IJBMS. 2014;6:1–15.
MLA Karadal, Himmet et al. “THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ENTREPRENEURIAL TRAINING: THE SAMPLE OF AKSARAY”. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, vol. 6, no. 1, 2014, pp. 1-15.
Vancouver Karadal H, Baş Ü, Akyazı TE, Saygın M. THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ENTREPRENEURIAL TRAINING: THE SAMPLE OF AKSARAY. IJBMS. 2014;6(1):1-15.