BibTex RIS Cite

A STRUCTURED REVIEW OF COMPLEXITY IN ENGINEERING-PROJECTS State-of-research and solution concepts for the plant manufacturing business

Year 2013, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 318 - 327, 01.06.2013

Abstract

The term ‘complexity’ has been present in academic discussion and industrial
practice for many years. However, interpretations about its scope and content
differ. While research focused on the product business, a common understanding
and classification of complexity in the plant manufacturing industry are missing
yet.
Based on an extensive literature review and various analyses, this contribution
aims to describe complexity from the perspective of plant manufacturing business.
We found out that the differentiation of the dimensions multiplicity, variance,
changeability and ambiguity, as well as elements and interactions seems to be an
appropriate and suitable approach to structure complexity in an engineering
context. Further this contribution identifies causes and illustrates consequences of
complexity for a plant manufacturing company aiming for a better understanding
of complexity in the plant manufacturing business.

References

  • Aerni, A. (2004), The Best Way to Engineering Reuse. Whitepaper. In: digitalPLANT Business+Engineering 6, pp. II–IV.
  • Bliss, Ch. (2000), Management of complexity (Management von Komplexität),
  • University Wiesbaden, Muenster. Bruhn, M.; Schmidt, I.; Blockus, M.-O. (2009), Service complexity (Komplexität bei Dienstleistungen), WWZ report 06/09, University Basel.
  • Giessmann, M. (2010), Complexity management in logistics
  • (Komplexitätsmangement in der Logistik), Technical University Dresden Kersten, W.; Koppenhagen, F.; Meyer, Ch. (2004), Strategic management of complexity by modularization of product development (Strategisches Komplexitätmanagement durch Modularisierung in der Produktentwicklung). in:
  • Spath, D.: Forschungs- und Technologiemanagement, Munich, pp. 211–217. Large Industrial Plant Manufacturer’s Group (VDMA) (2010), Large industrial plant manufacturing – Industry concerned about the future, Status Report /2010, Frankfurt: VDMA.
  • Lindemann U., Maurer M., Braun Th. (2009), Structural Complexity
  • Management: An Approach for the Field of Product Design, Springer. Loewen U., Bertsch R., Boehm B., Prummer S., Tetzner T., (2005),
  • Systematization of engineering of industrial plants, atp, vol. 47, iss. 4, pp. 54-61. Pratt, J.; Gordon, P.; Plamping, D. (2005), Whole Systems: Putting Theory Into
  • Practice in Organisations, Radcliffe Publishing, Reiß, M. (1993), Komplexitätsmanagement I. in: WISU, pp. 132–137.
  • Richardson, K. A.; Cilliers, P. (2001), What is complexity science? A view from different directions. In: Emergence 3 (1), pp. 5–22.
  • Smith, N. J. (2002), Engineering Project Management, Blackwell Science, Oxford.
  • Schmieder, M.; Thomas, S. (2005), Plattformstrategien und Modularisierung in der Automobilentwicklung. Aachen: Shaker
  • Ulrich, H.; Probst, G. J. B. (1991), Anleitung zum ganzheitlichen Denken und Handeln. Bern, Haupt.
  • Wagner, Th.; Löwen, U. (2009), Modellierung technischer Systeme. Potenziale im
  • Projektgeschäft durch den Einsatz von modellbasiertem mechatronischem Engineering. Whitepaper. Siemens CT.
Year 2013, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 318 - 327, 01.06.2013

Abstract

References

  • Aerni, A. (2004), The Best Way to Engineering Reuse. Whitepaper. In: digitalPLANT Business+Engineering 6, pp. II–IV.
  • Bliss, Ch. (2000), Management of complexity (Management von Komplexität),
  • University Wiesbaden, Muenster. Bruhn, M.; Schmidt, I.; Blockus, M.-O. (2009), Service complexity (Komplexität bei Dienstleistungen), WWZ report 06/09, University Basel.
  • Giessmann, M. (2010), Complexity management in logistics
  • (Komplexitätsmangement in der Logistik), Technical University Dresden Kersten, W.; Koppenhagen, F.; Meyer, Ch. (2004), Strategic management of complexity by modularization of product development (Strategisches Komplexitätmanagement durch Modularisierung in der Produktentwicklung). in:
  • Spath, D.: Forschungs- und Technologiemanagement, Munich, pp. 211–217. Large Industrial Plant Manufacturer’s Group (VDMA) (2010), Large industrial plant manufacturing – Industry concerned about the future, Status Report /2010, Frankfurt: VDMA.
  • Lindemann U., Maurer M., Braun Th. (2009), Structural Complexity
  • Management: An Approach for the Field of Product Design, Springer. Loewen U., Bertsch R., Boehm B., Prummer S., Tetzner T., (2005),
  • Systematization of engineering of industrial plants, atp, vol. 47, iss. 4, pp. 54-61. Pratt, J.; Gordon, P.; Plamping, D. (2005), Whole Systems: Putting Theory Into
  • Practice in Organisations, Radcliffe Publishing, Reiß, M. (1993), Komplexitätsmanagement I. in: WISU, pp. 132–137.
  • Richardson, K. A.; Cilliers, P. (2001), What is complexity science? A view from different directions. In: Emergence 3 (1), pp. 5–22.
  • Smith, N. J. (2002), Engineering Project Management, Blackwell Science, Oxford.
  • Schmieder, M.; Thomas, S. (2005), Plattformstrategien und Modularisierung in der Automobilentwicklung. Aachen: Shaker
  • Ulrich, H.; Probst, G. J. B. (1991), Anleitung zum ganzheitlichen Denken und Handeln. Bern, Haupt.
  • Wagner, Th.; Löwen, U. (2009), Modellierung technischer Systeme. Potenziale im
  • Projektgeschäft durch den Einsatz von modellbasiertem mechatronischem Engineering. Whitepaper. Siemens CT.
There are 16 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA86HU75SP
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Michael Gepp This is me

Michael Amberg This is me

Jan Vollmar This is me

Thomas Schaeffler This is me

Publication Date June 1, 2013
Published in Issue Year 2013 Volume: 5 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Gepp, M., Amberg, M., Vollmar, J., Schaeffler, T. (2013). A STRUCTURED REVIEW OF COMPLEXITY IN ENGINEERING-PROJECTS State-of-research and solution concepts for the plant manufacturing business. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, 5(1), 318-327.
AMA Gepp M, Amberg M, Vollmar J, Schaeffler T. A STRUCTURED REVIEW OF COMPLEXITY IN ENGINEERING-PROJECTS State-of-research and solution concepts for the plant manufacturing business. IJBMS. June 2013;5(1):318-327.
Chicago Gepp, Michael, Michael Amberg, Jan Vollmar, and Thomas Schaeffler. “A STRUCTURED REVIEW OF COMPLEXITY IN ENGINEERING-PROJECTS State-of-Research and Solution Concepts for the Plant Manufacturing Business”. International Journal of Business and Management Studies 5, no. 1 (June 2013): 318-27.
EndNote Gepp M, Amberg M, Vollmar J, Schaeffler T (June 1, 2013) A STRUCTURED REVIEW OF COMPLEXITY IN ENGINEERING-PROJECTS State-of-research and solution concepts for the plant manufacturing business. International Journal of Business and Management Studies 5 1 318–327.
IEEE M. Gepp, M. Amberg, J. Vollmar, and T. Schaeffler, “A STRUCTURED REVIEW OF COMPLEXITY IN ENGINEERING-PROJECTS State-of-research and solution concepts for the plant manufacturing business”, IJBMS, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 318–327, 2013.
ISNAD Gepp, Michael et al. “A STRUCTURED REVIEW OF COMPLEXITY IN ENGINEERING-PROJECTS State-of-Research and Solution Concepts for the Plant Manufacturing Business”. International Journal of Business and Management Studies 5/1 (June 2013), 318-327.
JAMA Gepp M, Amberg M, Vollmar J, Schaeffler T. A STRUCTURED REVIEW OF COMPLEXITY IN ENGINEERING-PROJECTS State-of-research and solution concepts for the plant manufacturing business. IJBMS. 2013;5:318–327.
MLA Gepp, Michael et al. “A STRUCTURED REVIEW OF COMPLEXITY IN ENGINEERING-PROJECTS State-of-Research and Solution Concepts for the Plant Manufacturing Business”. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, vol. 5, no. 1, 2013, pp. 318-27.
Vancouver Gepp M, Amberg M, Vollmar J, Schaeffler T. A STRUCTURED REVIEW OF COMPLEXITY IN ENGINEERING-PROJECTS State-of-research and solution concepts for the plant manufacturing business. IJBMS. 2013;5(1):318-27.