The Relationship between Pre-service Teachers’ Cognitive Flexibility Levels and Techno-pedagogical Education Competencies

Abstract

The study aimed to examine the pre-service teachers’ cognitive flexibility levels and techno-pedagogical education competencies in terms of several variables and to determine whether there is a relationship between their cognitive flexibility levels and techno-pedagogical education competencies. Determining whether the relationship between the cognitive flexibility and techno-pedagogical content knowledge that was emphasized in theoretical studies exists would contribute to teacher education. Thus, it could be stated that the cognitive flexibility might be included among the factors to enable the development and use of the techno-pedagogical content knowledge. The study was conducted with a total of 616 pre-service teachers and designed by using the exploratory correlational research model. The sample was determined by using convenience sampling methods. “Cognitive Flexibility Scale” and “Techno-pedagogical Education Competency Scale” were used for data collection. The findings demonstrated that the pre-service teachers have a high level of cognitive flexibility and techno-pedagogical education competency. It was also found that the cognitive flexibility scores had a statistically significant difference in terms of all independent variables (gender, type of program, and having a computer and internet access), and the techno-pedagogical education competency scores did not indicate a statistically significant difference in terms of gender and type of program, while they demonstrated a significant difference in terms of having a computer and internet access. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was calculated to determine the relationship between the pre-service teachers’ cognitive flexibility and techno-pedagogical education competency scores, and a moderately significant relationship was found. It could be concluded that the relationship emphasized in theoretical studies between the cognitive flexibility and techno-pedagogical content knowledge is moderate. Accordingly, the cognitive flexibility could provide the development and use of techno-pedagogical content knowledge which has an important role in teacher education.

Keywords

• cognitive flexibility,techno-pedagogical education competency,preservice teachers

References

1. Akgün, F. (2013). Preservice teachers’ web pedagogical content knowledge and relationship between teachers’ perceptions of self efficacy. Trakya University Journal of Education, 3(1), 48-58.
2. Akgün F., Özgür, H., & Çuhadar, C. (2016). The investigation of technopedagogical knowledge competencies of teacher candidates and pedagogical formation students. Adiyaman University Journal of Social Sciences, 24, 837-872. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/adyusbd/issue/37218/429580
3. Algozzine, B., Bateman, L. R., Flowers, C. P., Gretes, J. A., Hughes, C. D., & Lambert, R. (1999). Developing technology competencies in a college of education. Current Issues in Education, 2(3), 1-12. Retrieved from http://cie.ed.asu.edu/volume2/number3/
4. Altunkol, F. (2011). The analysis of the relation between cognitive flexibility and perceived stress levels of college students (Unpublished master’s thesis). Çukurova University Institute of Social Sciences Department of Educational Sciences, Adana, Turkey.
5. Aminu, I. M., & Shariff, M. N. M. (2014). Strategic orientation, access to finance, business environment and SMEs performance in Nigeria: Data screening and preliminary analysis. European Journal of Business and Management, 6(35), 124-132.
6. Asıcı, E., & İkiz, F. (2015). A pathway to happiness: Cognitive flexibility. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty, 1(35), 191-211. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/maeuefd/issue/19408/206375
7. Baran, E., & Bilici, S. C. (2015). A review of the research on technological pedagogical content knowledge: The case of Turkey. H. U. Journal of Education, 30(1), 15-32.
8. Bilgin, M. (2009a). Developing a cognitive flexibility scale: Validity and reliability studies. Social Personality and Behavior, 37(3), 343-354.

9. Bilgin, M. (2009b). Some variables predicting cognitive flexibility. Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 3(36), 142–157.
10. Bilgin, M. (2017). Relations to five factor personality model with cognitive flexibility in adolescents. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 16(62), 945-954.
11. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2014). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (17. baskı) [Scientific research methods (17th ed.)]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
12. Camcı Erdoğan, S. (2018). The relationship between problem solving perceptions and cognitive flexibility skills of pre-service teachers of gifted students. Celal Bayar University Journal of Social Sciences, 16(3), 77-96. doi: 10.18026/cbayarsos.465710
13. Chen, X., He, J., & Fan, X. (2019). Relationships between openness to experience, cognitive flexibility, self-esteem, and creativity among bilingual college students in the U.S., International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, doi: 10.1080/13670050.2019.1688247
14. Cox, R. J. (2000). The information age and history looking backward to see us. Ubiquity, 2000 (September). Retrieved from https://ubiquity.acm.org/article.cfm?id=352537
15. Çikrıkci, Ö. (2018). The predictive roles of cognitive flexibility and error oriented motivation skills on life satisfaction. International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences, 9(31), 717-727.
16. Çoklar, A. N., & Özbek, A. (2017). Analyzing of relationship between teachers’ individual innovativeness levels and their TPACK self-efficacies. Journal of Human Sciences, 14(1), 427-440.
17. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2014). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik, SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları (3. baskı) [Multivariate statistics, SPSS and LISREL applications for social sciences (3rd ed.)]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
18. Çuhadar, C., Bülbül, T., & Ilgaz, G. (2013). Exploring of the relationship between individual innovativeness and techno-pedagogical education competencies of pre-service teachers. Elementary Education Online, 12(3), 797‐807. Retrieved from http://ilkogretim‐online.org.tr
19. Roussinos, D., & Jimoyiannis, A. (2019). Examining primary education teachers’ perceptions of TPACK and the related educational context factors. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 51(4), 377-397. doi: 10.1080/15391523.2019.1666323
20. Doğan Laçin, B. G., & Yalçın, İ. (2019). Predictive roles of self-efficacy and coping strategies in cognitive flexibility among university students. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 34(2), 358-371. doi: 10.16986/HUJE.2018037424
21. Drezner, Z., Turel, O., & Zerom, D. (2010). A modified Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation®, 39(4), 693-704. Duman, E. (2018). Flexible thinking as a kind of thinking. Turkish Studies Social Science, 13(26), 547-561. doi: 10.7827/TurkishStudies.14432
22. Erdemir, N., Bakırcı, H., & Eyduran, E. (2009). Determining of student teachers’ self-confidence using technology in instruction. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 6(3), 99-108.
23. Ersoy, M., Kabakçı Yurdakul, I., & Ceylan, B. (2016). Investigating preservice teachers’ TPACK competencies through the lenses of ICT Skills: An experimental study. Education and Science, 41(186), 119-135. doi: 10.15390/EB.2016.6345
24. Dennis, D. J., & Vander Wal, J. S. (2010). The cognitive flexibility inventory: instrument development and estimates of reliability and validity. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 34, 241-253. doi:10.1007/s10608-009-9276-4
25. Esen Aygün, H. (2018). The relationship between pre–service teachers’ cognitive flexibility and interpersonal problem solving skills. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 77, 105-128. doi: 10.14689/ejer.2018.77.6
26. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education (6th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
27. Ghasemi, A., & Zahediasl, S. (2011). Normality tests for statistical analysis: A guide for non-statisticians. International Journal of Endocrinology Metabolism, 10(2), 486–489. doi: 10.5812/ijem.3505
28. Gabrys, R. L., Tabri, N., Anisman, H., & Matheson, K. (2018). Cognitive control and flexibility in the context of stress and depressive symptoms: The cognitive control and flexibility questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2219. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02219
29. Günaydın, S., & Öztürk, G. (2016). The relationship between computer teacher candidates’ perceptions towards self-efficacy and their cognitive flexibility level. In İcbay, M. A., Arslan, H., & Jacobs, F. (Eds.), Research on social studies (pp. 35-45). Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.
30. Gündüz, B. (2013). Emotional intelligence, cognitive flexibility and psychological symptoms in pre-service teachers. Educational Research and Reviews, 8(13), 1048-1056.
31. Hacıömeroğlu, G., Şahin, Ç., & Arcagök, S. (2014). Turkish adaptation of preservice teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge assessment instrument. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 10(2), 297-315.
32. ISSU, & Ulmer, D. J. (2006). Beyond the information age: It’s time for a change. Retrieved from http://www.vias.org/beyinfoage/
33. Kabakci Yurdakul, I., & Coklar, A. N. (2014). Modeling preservice teachers’ TPACK competencies based on ICT usage. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(4), 363-376. doi: 10.1111/jcal.12049
34. Kabakci Yurdakul, I., Odabasi, H. F., Kilicer, K., Coklar, A. N., Birinci, G., & Kurt, A. A. (2012). The development, validity and reliability of TPACK-deep: A technological pedagogical content knowledge scale. Computers & Education, 58(3), 964-977. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.012
35. Kabakçı Yurdakul, I. (2011). Examining technopedagogical knowledge competencies of preservice teachers based on ICT usage. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 40, 397-408.
36. Kabakçı Yurdakul, I. (2013). Teknopedagojik eğitime dayalı öğretim teknolojileri ve materyal tasarımı [Instructional technologies and material design based on technopedagogical education]. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
37. Kabakci Yurdakul, I. (2018). Modeling the relationship between pre-service teachers’ TPACK and digital nativity. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(2), 267-281. doi: 10.1007/s11423-017-9546-x
38. Kabakçı Yurdakul, I., Odabaşı, H. F., Kılıçer, K., Çoklar, A. N., Birinci, G., & Kurt, A. A. (2014). Constructing technopedagogical education based on teacher competencies in terms of national standards. Elementary Education Online, 13(4), 1185-1202. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17051/io.2014.76490
39. Kaptanbaş Gürbüz, E., & Sezgin Nartgün, Ş. (2018). Cognitive flexibility and self efficacy levels of pedagogical formation program students. The Journal of International Social Research, 11(55), 629-640. doi: 10.17719/jisr.20185537235
40. Karadeniz, Ş. (2004). Bilişsel esneklik hiper metinleri ve hiper ortamları [Cognitive flexibility hypertext and hyper environments]. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 3(2), 119-124.
41. Karadeniz, Ş. (2008). Hypertext application based on cognitive flexibility: Virtual PC hospital. The Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 6(1), 135-152.
42. Karakaya, S., & Avgin, S. S. (2016). Investigation of teacher science discipline self-confidence about their technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). European Journal of Education Studies, 2(9), 1-20. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.165850
43. Karalar, H., & Altan, B. A. (2016). Examining pre-service primary education teachers’ TPACK competencies and teacher self-efficacies. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education-CIJE, 5 (USOS special issue), 15-30.
44. Kercood, S., Lineweaver, T. T., Frank, C. C., & Fromm, E. D. (2017). Cognitive flexibility and its relationship to academic achievement and career choice of college students with and without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 30(4), 327-342.
45. Kereluik, K., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2011). On learning to subvert signs: Literacy, technology and the TPACK framework. California Reader, 44(2), 12-18.
46. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
47. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131-152.
48. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators, In the AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (1st ed., pp. 2-29). New York, USA: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group for American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
49. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, 9(1), 60-70.
50. Koehler, M., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? The Journal of Education, 193(3), 13-19. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24636917
51. Krueger, K., Hansen, L., & Smaldino, S. (2000). Preservice teacher technology competencies: A model for preparing teachers of tomorrow to use technology. TechTrends, 44(3), 47-50.
52. Kul, U., Aksu, Z., & Birisci, S. (2019). The relationship between technological pedagogical content knowledge and web 2.0 self-efficacy beliefs. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 11(1),198-213.
53. Lau, W. W. F. (2018). Relationships between pre-service teachers’ social media usage in informal settings and technological pedagogical content knowledge. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(12), 1-12. doi: 10.29333/ejmste/94228
54. Lange, F., & Dewitte, S. (2019). Cognitive flexibility and pro-environmental behaviour: A multimethod approach. European Journal of Personality, 33, 488-505. doi: 10.1002/per.2204
55. Martin M. M, & Rubin R. B. (1995). A new measure of cognitive flexibility. Psychological Reports, 76(2), 623-626.
56. Martin, M. M., & Anderson, C. M. (1998). The cognitive flexibility scale: Three validity studies. communication reports, 11(1), 1-9. doi: 10.1080/08934219809367680
57. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
58. Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Henriksen, D. (2010). The 7 transdisciplinary habits of mind: Extending the TPACK framework towards 21st century learning. Educational Technology, 51(2), 22-28.
59. Orhaner, E., & Tunç, A. (2003). Ticaret ve turizm eğitiminde özel öğretim yöntemleri [Special teaching methods in trade and tourism education]. Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
60. Önen, A. S., & Koçak, C. (2015). The effect of cognitive flexibility on higher school students’ study strategies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 2346-2350. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.680
61. Özgür, H., & Çuhadar, C. (2015). Investigation the relationship between self-efficacy perceptions on computer programming and cognitive flexibility levels of information technology pre-service teachers. 9th International Computer & Instructional Technologies Symposium - ICITS 2015, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey.
62. Razali, N. M., & Wah, Y. B. (2011). Power comparison of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics, 2(1), 21–33.
63. Sapmaz, F., & Doğan, T. (2013). Assessment of cognitive flexibility: Reliability and validity studies of Turkish version of the cognitive flexibility inventory. Ankara University, Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 46(1), 143-162. doi: 10.1501/Egifak0000001278
64. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
65. Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Jacobson, M. J., & Coulson, R. L. (1992). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In Duffy, T. M., & Jonassen, D. H. (Ed.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation (pp. 57-80). New York: Routledge.
66. Şimşek, Ö., Demir, S., Bağçeci, B., & Kınay, İ. (2013). Examining technopedagogical knowledge competencies of teacher trainers in terms of some variables. Ege Journal of Education, 1(14), 1-23.
67. Turan, N., Durgun, H., Kaya, H., Ertaş, G., & Kuvan, D. (2019). The relationship between stress status and cognitive flexibility levels of nursing students. Journal of Academic Research in Nursing (JAREN), 5(1), 59-66. doi:10.5222/jaren.2019.43265
68. Üzümcü, B., & Müezzin, E. (2018). Investigation of the level of cognitive flexibility and job satisfaction of teachers. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 8(1), 8-25. doi: 10.19126/suje.325679
69. Valtonen, T, Sointu, E., Kukkonen, J., Mäkitalo, K., Hoang, N., Häkkinen, P., … Tondeur, J. (2019). Examining pre‐service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge as evolving knowledge domains: A longitudinal approach. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(4), 491-502. doi: 10.1111/jcal.12353
70. Yaşar, O. (2019). Managerial decisions and cognitive flexibility: How do managers make decisions? What does neuroscience say about? Journal of Social Sciences, 18(71), 1176-1194. doi:10.17755/esosder.491522
71. Yaşar Ekici, F., & Balcı, S. (2019). Examination of the cognitive flexibility and emotional reactivity levels of preschool teacher candidates. Journal of Higher Education & Science, 9(1), 65-77. doi: 10.5961/jhes.2019.310
72. Yelpaze, İ., & Yakar, L. (2019). The investigation of life satisfaction and cognitive flexibility of university students. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 9(54), 913-935.