The Effects of the Schools’ Humor Climates on Perceived Stress Levels of the Teachers

Year 2020, Volume: 7 Issue: 1, 71 - 84, 15.06.2020

Ahmet Şahin Ramazan Gök

https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.634449

Abstract

Purpose of the study is to determine the effects of the schools’ humor climates on the perceived stress levels of teachers. The sample of the study, which is a predictive correlational study, is made up of 387 teachers. In data collection, the Humor Climate Scale and the Perceived Stress Scale were used. Consequently, constructive humor climates (positive humor and supervisor support) were more dominant in schools than the destructive ones (negative humor and outgroup humor). In addition, the perceived stress levels of teachers were not high; but they seldom experienced inadequate self-efficacy and sometimes stress/distress perception. The results of the study also revealed that negative humor and outgroup humor climates of the schools were significant predictors of the perceived stress/distress levels of teachers. In this case, we can conclude that the presence of negative humor climates and outgroup humor climates in schools, which are negative and destructive, increases the perceived stress/distress levels of teachers.

Keywords

Teacher, Humor, Humor climate, Stress, Perceived stress

References

• Abel, M. H. (2002). Humor, stress, and coping strategies. Humor–International Journal of Humor Research, 15(4), 365-381.
• Akgül, A., & Çevik, O. (2003). İstatistiksel analiz teknikleri: SPSS’te işletme uygulamaları [Statistical Analyses Techniques: Enterprise Practices on SPSS]. Ankara: Emek Ofset.
• Akkaya, M. (2011). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin sınıf yönetimi becerileri ile mizah tarzları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi (İstanbul ili Şişli ilçesi örneği) [The relationship between the humor styles and the classroom management skills of teachers (Example of Şişli district of İstanbul province)]. Unpublished master’s thesis. Yeditepe University, İstanbul.
• Akpınar, B. (2008). Eğitim sürecinde öğretmenlerde strese yol açan nedenlere yönelik öğretmen görüşleri [Opinions of teachers on the factors causing stress on teachers in the process of education]. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 16(2), 359-366.
• Altınkurt, Y. & Yılmaz, K. (2011). İlköğretim okulu öğretmenlerinin mizah tarzları [Humor styles of primary school teachers]. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 1(2), 1-8.
• Armağan, E., & Kubak, S. (2013). Satış elemanlarının stres düzeylerinin performanslarına etkisi üzerine bir uygulama [A practice on the effect of the stress level of salespersons’ performance]. Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(2), 34-50.
• Aydın, İ. P. (2002). İş yaşamında stress [Stress on work life]. Ankara: Pegem A Yayınları
• Aydın, Ş. (2004). Örgütsel stres yönetimi [Organizational stress management]. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6(3), 49-74.
• Balaban, J. (2000). Temel eğitimde öğretmenlerin stres kaynakları ve başa çıkma teknikleri [Teachers’ stress sources and coping styles in primary education]. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(7), 188-195.
• Balcı, A. (2000). Öğretim elemanlarının iş stresi: Kuram ve uygulama [Work stress of faculty staff: Theory and practice]. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
• Blanchard, A. L., Stewart, O. J., Cann, A., & Follman, L. (2014). Making sense of humor at work. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 17(1), 49-70.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2001) Deneysel desenler: Öntest-sontest kontrol grubu desen ve veri analizi [Experimental designs: Pretest-posttest, control group, design and data analysis]. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2003). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı: İstatistik, araştırma deseni, SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum [Data analysis manual for social sciences: Statistics, research design, SPSS applications and interpretation.]. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2010). Bilimsel araştirma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Cann, A., Holt, K., & Calhoun, L. G. (1999). The roles of humor and sense of humor in responses to stressors. Humor, 12(2), 177-193.
• Cann, A., Watson, A. J., & Bridgewater, E. A. (2014). Assessing humor at work: The humor climate questionnaire. Humor, 27 (2), 307-323.
• Cemaloğlu, N., & Şahin, D. E. (2007). Öğretmenlerin mesleki tükenmişlik düzeylerinin farklı değişkenlere göre incelenmesi [A study of the teacher’s burnout level according to various variables]. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 15(2), 465-484.
• Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of health and social behavior, 385-396.
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). New York: Routledge.
• Cranwell-Ward, J. &. (2005). Organizational stress. Great Britain: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Crum, A., & Lyddy, C. (2013). De-stressing stress: The power of mindsets and the art of stressing mindfully. The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Mindfulness. Hoboken: NJ, Wiley-Blackwell.
• Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve Lisrel uygulamalari [Multivariate statistics for social sciences: SPSS and Lisrel applications]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Decker, W. H., & Rotondo, D. M. (2001). Relationships among gender, type of humor, and perceived leader effectivenes. Journal of Managerial Issues , 13 (4), 450-465.
• Donaldson-Feilder, E., Yarker, J., & Lewis, R. (2011). Preventing stress in organizations: How to develop positive managers. UK: John Wiley & Sons.
• Duncan, S. N. (2006). Humor and leadership: A study of the educational leaders on the national commission on terrorist attacks upon the United States (Also known as the 9/11 Commission). (Unpublished Dissertstion of Doctor of Education). United States: East Carolina University.
• George, J.M. & Jones, G. (2012). Understanding and managing organizational behavior, (6th ed.). United States: Prentice Hall.
• Gold, Y. &. (2005). Teachers managing stress & preventing burnout. London: Taylor & Francis.
• Greenberg, J.S. (2008). Comprehensive stress management. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
• Griffith, J., Steptoe, A., & Cropley, M. (1999). An investigation of coping strategies associated with job stress in teachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69(4), 517-531.
• Güler, Ç., & Güler, B. U. (2010). Mizah, gülme ve gülme bilimi [Humor, laughter and laughter science]. Ankara: Yazıt Yayıncılık.
• Hair J.F., Anderson R.E., Tahtam R.L. & Black W.C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education.
• Harrington, R. (2012). Stress, health and well-being: Thriving in the 21st century. United States: Cengage Learning.
• Harris, G. E. (2011). Individual stress management coursework in Canadian teacher preparation programs. Canadian Journal of Education, 34(4), 104-117.
• Hurren, B. L. (2008). The effects of principals’ humor on teachers’ job satisfaction (Trans. E. Recepoğlu). Education and Science, 33 (150), 74-86.
• Jones, J. R., & Hodgson, J. T. (1998). Self-reported work-related illness in 1995: Results from a household survey. London, UK: HSE Books.
• Jones, J. R., Huxtable, C. S., & Hodgson, J. T. (2006). Self-reported work-related illness in 2004/05: Results from the Labour Force Survey. Health & Safety Executive, Caerphilly, UK.
• Kara, H. (2014). Yöneticilerin mizah tarzlarının uygulamadaki durumunun kuramsal ve uygulamalı olarak açıklanması [The theoretical and applications explanation of manager’s humor styles at practice status]. Journal of History School, 7(17), 701-724.
• Korkmaz, M., & Ceylan, B. (2012). Örgütsel stres yönetimi ve stresin İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi çalışanlarının iş performansı üzerine etkisinin uygulamalı olarak incelenmesi [Organizational stress management and applied analysis of effect of stress on work performance of Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality employees]. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(10), 313-344.
• Kuiper, N. A., Martin, R. A., & Olinger, L. J. (1993). Coping humour, stress, and cognitive appraisals. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 25(1), 81-96.
• Leech, N., Barrett, K., & Morgan, G. A. (2007). SPSS for intermediate statistics: Use and interpretation (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Lefcourt, H. M., & Martin, R. A. (1986). Humor and life stress: Antidote to adversity. New York: Springer Verlag.
• Lyttle, J. (2007). The Judicious Use of Management of Humor in the Workplace. Business Horizons , 50, 239-245.
• Malone, P. B. (1980). Humor: A double-edged tool for today’s managers? Academy of Management Review (5), 357-360.
• Martin, R. A., & Lefcourt, H. M. (1983). Sense of humor as a moderator of the relation between stressors and moods. Journal of personality and social psychology, 45(6), 1313-1324.
• Mesmer-Magnus, J. & Glew, D.J. (2012). A meta-analysis of positive humor in the workplace. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27(2), 155-190.
• Meyer, J. C. (2000). Humor as a Double Edged Sword: Four Functions of Humor in Communication. Communication Theory , 10 (3), 310-331.
• Moran, C. C., & Massam, M. M. (1999). Differential influences of coping humor and humor bias on mood. Behavioral Medicine, 25(1), 36-42.
• Muijs, D. (2004). Doing Quantitative Research in Education with SPSS. London: Sage Publications.
• Oruç, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilgiler öğretiminde mizah kullanımının öğrencilerin akademik başarılarına ve tutumlarına etkisi [The effect of humour usage in social science teaching on academic success and attitude of students]. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 3, 56-73.
• Romero, E. J., & Cruthirds, K. W. (2006). The Use of Humor in the Workplace. Academy of Management Perspectives, May, 58-69.
• Romero, E. & Pescosolido, A. (2008). Humor and group effectiveness. Human Relations, 61(3), 395-418.
• Seçer, İ. (2015). SPSS ve Lisrel ile Pratik Veri Analizi [Practical data analyses with SPSS and Lisrel]. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
• Selye, H. (1976) Stress without Distress. In Serban G. (Eds.), Psychopathology of Human Adaptation (pp.137-146). Springer, Boston, MA.
• Snell, S. A., & Morris, S. (2019). Managing human resources. Boston: Cengage Learning.
• Şahin, A. (2016). İlköğretim kurumu yöneticilerinin yönetsel ilişkilerinde kullandıkları mizaha ilişkin görüşler ile mizah iklimi, yöneticilerin mizah tarzları ve çatışma yönetimi stratejileri arasındaki ilişki [Opinions on humour used in managerial tasks by primary school administrators and the relationship among schools' humour climate, administrators' humour styles and conflict management strategies] (Unpublished Doctorate Thesis). Akdeniz University, Antalya.
• Şahin, A. (2018). Yönetsel ve eğitsel araç olarak eğitim kurumlarında mizah [Humor in schools: As a managerial and educational tool]. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
• Şanlı, Ö. (2017). Öğretmenlerin algılanan stres düzeylerinin çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi [Analysing the perceived stress level of teachers with regards to some variables]. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 16(61), 385-396.
• Yardımcı, İ. (2010). Mizah kavramı ve sanattaki yeri [The concept of humor and place of it in art]. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2(3), 1-41.
• Yılmaz, S. (2018). Toplumsal Cinsiyet Rollerinin Günlük Hayattaki Yansımaları: Çorum/Alaca Örneği [Reflections of gender roles in daily life: An example of Çorum/Alaca]. İMGELEM, 2(2), 59-79.
• Yüksel, H. (2014). Çalışma yaşamı ve stres kavramı: Durumsal bir yaklaşım [Work life and the concept of stress: a situational approach]. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3(3), 109-131.