Estimation of Spinal Dysfunction in Construction Site Labourers
Abstract
Purpose: The study aimed to assess the extent of spinal dysfunction experienced by construction site workers, considering factors such as experience, posture, discomfort, range of motion, and muscle strength. Method: This cross-sectional study selected 107 construction workers from various sites using a simple random sample approach, which was secured in writing. The study utilized various assessment tools, including the Double Leg Lowering Test, Nordic Musculoskeletal Pain Rating Scale, and Posture assessment, to evaluate the patient's pain levels using the SPSS version 23.0. Findings: The study found a significant correlation (P=0.0376) between worker type and postural abnormalities. Masons had 68.4% severe lumbar lordosis, 78.9% hyperextended knees, and 86.3% prominent thoracic kyphosis. There was significant correlation (P 0.0001) between the workers' experience and results of the double leg lowering test. Furthermore, there was a significant difference (P= 0.0017) between the Visual Analogue Pain Rating Scale and work experience. As laborers become more experienced, their abdominal muscles may weaken, causing significant tension on their spines. Conclusion: The study concluded that construction site workers with 10+ years of experience, undergo significant spinal dysfunction due to decreased abdominal muscle strength, resulting in increased strain on their spines.
Keywords
Spinal Posture , Lumbar Core Strength , lumbar Derangement , Lumbar Radiculopathy
References
- Abrams, D., Davidson, M., Harrick, J., Harcourt, P., Zylinski, M., & Clancy, J., et.al. (2006). Monitoring the change: current trends in outcome measure usage in physiotherapy. Manual therapy, 11(1), 46-53. [CrossRef]
- Adeyemi, O., Adejuyigbe, S., AkanbI, O., Ismaila, S., & Adekoya, A. F. (2013). Manual lifting task methods and low back pain among construction workers in the Southwestern Nigeria. Global J Res Eng, 13(3), 27-34. [PubMed]
- Alghadir, A. H., Anwer, S., Iqbal, A., & Iqbal, Z. A. (2018). Test–retest reliability, validity, and minimum detectable change of visual analog, numerical rating, and verbal rating scales for measurement of osteoarthritic knee pain. Journal of pain research, 851-856. [PubMed]
- Armstrong, T. J. (1986). Upper-extremity posture: definition, measurement and control. The ergonomics of working postures: Models, Methods and Cases. Taylor & Francis, London: 59-73. [PubMed]
- Armstrong, T. J., Buckle, P., Fine, L. J., Hagberg, M., Jonsson, B., Kilbom, A., et al. (1993). A conceptual model for work-related neck and upper-limb musculoskeletal disorders. Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health, 73-84. [PubMed]
- Babasaheb, S. S., Rajesh, K. K., Yeshwant, K. S., & Patil, S. (2021). Analysis of spinal dysfunction in breast cancer survivors with lymphedema. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention: APJCP, 22(6), 1869. [PubMed]
- Baruah, B. (2010). Gender and globalization: opportunities and constraints faced by women in the construction industry in India. Labor Studies Journal, 35(2), 198-221.[PubMed]
- Bowles, P., & MacPhail, F. (2008). Introduction to the special issue on pathways from casual work to economic security: Canadian and international perspectives. Social Indicators Research, 88, 1-13. [CrossRef]
- Buchholz, B., Paquet, V., Punnett, L., Lee, D., & Moir, S. (1996). PATH: A work sampling-based approach to ergonomic job analysis for construction and other non-repetitive work. Applied ergonomics, 27(3), 177-187. [ PubMed]
- Chiluba, B. C., Chansa, C., Chikoti, M., Thewo, S., & Sakala, S. (2019). A Comparison of The Prevalence of Low Back Pain in Formal and Informal Occupation Setup: A Review of The Literature. Journal of Integral Sciences, 24-28. [CrossRef]