Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Investigation of the Effect of Bitcoin Energy Consumption on Bitcoin Prices with RALS Approach

Year 2025, Volume: 40 Issue: 3, 814 - 829, 16.07.2025
https://doi.org/10.24988/ije.1502436

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the impact of Bitcoin energy consumption and Bitcoin hash rate on Bitcoin prices. Between 10.02.2017 and 31.10.2024, Engle-Granger and RALS-Engle-Granger cointegration tests were applied using daily data. According to the EG test, there is no long-run relationship between the variables. However, the RALS-EG test shows that there is a long-run relationship. The long-run coefficients of the variables were determined using the FMOLS, DOLS, and CCR tests, and the results were quite close. According to these methods, a 1% increase in bitcoin energy consumption leads to an increase in bitcoin prices of around 0.10%. A 1% increase in bitcoin hash rates leads to an increase in bitcoin prices of approximately 6.5%.

References

  • Baldwin, J. (2018). In digital we trust: Bitcoin discourse, digital currencies, and decentralized network fetishism. Palgrave Communications, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0065-0.
  • Bâra, A., Oprea, S. V. ve Panait, M. (2024). Insights into bitcoin and energy nexus. A bitcoin price prediction in bull and bear markets using a complex meta model and sql analytical functions. Applied Intelligence, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-024-05474-2.
  • Binda, J. (2020). Cryptocurrencies–problems of the high-risk instrument definition. investment Management and Financial Innovations, 17(1), 227-241. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.17(1).2020.20.
  • Boz, E., and Mendoza, E. G. (2014). Financial innovation, the discovery of risk, and the us credit crisis. Journal of Monetary Economics, 62, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2013.07.001.
  • Chitkasame, T., Rakpho, P. ve Khiewngamdee, C. (2022). Analyzing structural change and causality between energy consumption and Bitcoin’s activity. Energy Reports, 8, 736-743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.320.
  • Damour, F. ve Damour, F. (2024). The first blockchain: bitcoin, entropy, religion.Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science, 59(1), 280–301. https://doi.org/10.16995/zygon.11004.
  • De Vries, A. ve Stoll, C. (2021). Bitcoin’s growing e-waste problem. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 175, 105901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105901.
  • Engle, R. F. ve Granger, C. W. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 55(2), 251-276. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913236.
  • Fantazzini, D. ve Kolodin, N. (2020). Does the Hashrate Affect the Bitcoin Price? Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(11), 263. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13110263.
  • Giungato, P., Rana, R., Tarabella, A. ve Tricase, C. (2017). Current trends in sustainability of bitcoins and related blockchain technology. Sustainability, 9(12), 2214. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122214.
  • Güleç, Ö. F. (2018). Bitcoin ile finansal göstergeler arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Kırklareli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(2), 18-37.
  • Hansen, B. (1995). Rethinking the univariate approach to unit root testing. Econometric Theory, 11(5), 1148-1171. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466600009993.
  • Hong, H. ve Zhang, C. (2023). Bitcoin trading, economic growth, energy use, and CO2 emissions: An advanced panel study of emerging market economies. International Review of Economics & Finance, 87, 519-531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.06.003.
  • Hossain, M. S. (2021). What do we know about cryptocurrency? Past, present, future. China Finance Review International, 11(4), 552-572. https://doi.org/10.1108/CFRI-03-2020-0026.
  • Im, K. ve Schmidt, P. (2008). More efficient estimation under non-normality when higher moments do not depend on the regressors, using residual-augmented least squares. Journal of Econometrics, 144, 219-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.01.003.
  • Im, K. S., Lee, J. ve Tieslau, M. A. (2014). More powerful unit root tests with non-normal errors. İçinde Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt (Sickles, R., and Horrace, W. (eds)). Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-8008-3_10.
  • Judmayer, A., Stifter, N., Krombholz, K. ve Weippl, E. (2017). Blocks and chains: Introduction to bitcoin, cryptocurrencies, and their consensus mechanisms. Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
  • Jumde, A., ve Cho, B. Y. (2020). Can cryptocurrencies overtake the fiat money? International Journal of Business Performance Management, 21(1-2), 6-20.
  • Khan, D., Jung, L. T. ve Hashmani, M. A. (2021). Systematic literature review of challenges in blockchain scalability. Applied Sciences, 11(20), 9372. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11209372.
  • Kubal, J. ve Kristoufek, L. (2022). Exploring the relationship between bitcoin price and network’s hashrate within endogenous system. International Review of Financial Analysis, 84, 102375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102375.
  • Küfeoğlu, S. ve Özkuran, M. (2019). Energy consumption of bitcoin mining. Working Paper, University of Cambridge: Cambridge, UK. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.41230.
  • Lasla, N., Al-Sahan, L., Abdallah, M. ve Younis, M. (2022). Green-PoW: An energy-efficient blockchain proof-of-work consensus algorithm. Computer Networks, 214, 109118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2022.109118.
  • Lee, H., Lee, J. ve Im, K. (2015). More powerful cointegration tests with non-normal errors. studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 19(4), 397-413. https://doi.org/10.1515/snde-2013-0060.
  • Leydesdorff, L. ve Bensman, S. (2006). Classification and powerlaws: The logarithmic transformation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(11), 1470-1486. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20467.
  • Li, J., Li, N., Peng, J., Cui, H. ve Wu, Z. (2019). Energy consumption of cryptocurrency mining: A study of electricity consumption in mining cryptocurrencies. Energy, 168, 160-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.11.046.
  • Maiti, M. (2022). Dynamics of Bitcoin prices and energy consumption. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals: X, 9, 100086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csfx.2022.100086.
  • Mohsin, M., Naseem, S., Zia-ur-Rehman, M., Baig, S.A. ve Salamat, S. (2023). The crypto-trade volume, GDP, energy use, and environmental degradation sustainability: An analysis of the top 20 crypto-trader countries. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 28, 651–667. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2442.
  • Moşteanu, D. N. R., Faccia, D. A., Cavaliere, L. P. L. ve Bhatia, S. (2020). Digital technologies’ implementation within financial and banking system during socio distancing restrictions–back to the future. International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology, 11(6), 307-315.
  • Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf.
  • Oprea, S. V., Georgescu, I. A. ve Bâra, A. (2024). Is bitcoin ready to be a widespread payment method? Using price volatility and setting strategies for merchants. Electronic Commerce Research, 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-024-09812-x.
  • Pirinççi, A. E. (2018). Yeni dünya düzeninde sanal para Bitcoin’in değerlendirilmesi. Uluslararası Ekonomi Siyaset İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi,1(1), 45-52.
  • Rejeb, A., Rejeb, K. ve Keogh, J. G. (2021). Cryptocurrencies in modern finance: A literature review. Etikonomi, 20(1), 93-118. https://doi.org/10.15408/etk.v20i1.16911.
  • Sarker, P. K., Lau, C. K. ve Pradhan, A. K. (2023). Asymmetric effects of climate policy uncertainty and energy prices on bitcoin prices. Innovation and Green Development, 2, 100048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2023.100048.
  • Sarkodie, S. A., Ahmed, M. Y. ve Leirvik, T. (2022). Trade volume affects bitcoin energy consumption and carbon footprint. Finance Research Letters, 48, 102977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102977.
  • Schinckus, C., Nguyen, C. P. ve Chong, F. H. L. (2022). Cryptocurrencies’ Hashrate and electricity consumption: Evidence from mining activities. Studies in Economics and Finance, 39(3), 524-546. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEF-08-2021-0342.
  • Sedlmeir, J., Buhl, H. U., Fridgen, G. ve Keller, R. (2020). The energy consumption of
  • blockchain technology: Beyond myth. Business & Information Systems
  • Engineering, 62(6), 599-608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-020-00656-x.
  • Siddique, I., Smith, E. ve Siddique, A. (2023). Assessing the sustainability of bitcoin mining: comparative review of renewable energy sources. Journal of Alternative and Renewable Energy Sources, 10(1), 10-46610.
  • Stepanova, D., Yousif, N. B. A., Karlibaeva, R. ve Mikhaylov, A. (2024). Current analysis of cryptocurrency mining industry. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(7), 4803. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i7.4803.
  • Tan, T. M. ve Saraniemi, S. (2023). Trust in blockchain-enabled exchanges: future directions in blockchain marketing. Journal of the Academy of marketing Science, 51(4), 914-939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-022-00889-0.
  • Tommerdahl, J. (2024). Introduction to the blockchain, Bitcoin, and other cryptocurrencies for educators. Neural Computing and Applications, 36(32), 20527-20536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-024-10209-y.
  • Vranken, H. (2017). Sustainability of Bitcoin and blockchains. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 28, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.04.011.
  • Wang, Q., Qin, B., Hu, J. ve Xiao, F. (2020). Preserving transaction privacy in Bitcoin. Future Generation Computer Systems, 107, 793-804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.08.026.
  • Xiao, Z., Cui, S., Xiang, L., Liu, P. J. ve Zhang, H. (2023). The environmental cost of cryptocurrency: Assessing carbon emissions from bitcoin mining in China. Journal of Digital Economy, 2, 119-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdec.2023.11.001.
  • Yan, L., Mirza, N. ve Umar, M. (2022). The cryptocurrency uncertainties and investment transitions: evidence from high and low carbon energy funds in china. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121326.
  • Yılancı, V. ve Aydın, M. (2018). Türkiye’de kadın okullaşmasının ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkisi: Rals-Eg eşbütünleşme testi yaklaşımı. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 101-112. https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.426922.
  • Zhang, D., Chen, X. H., Lau, C. K. M. ve Xu, B. (2023). Implications of cryptocurrency energy usage on climate change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 187, 122219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122219.

RALS Yaklaşımı ile Bitcoin Enerji Tüketiminin Bitcoin Fiyatlarına Etkisinin İncelenmesi

Year 2025, Volume: 40 Issue: 3, 814 - 829, 16.07.2025
https://doi.org/10.24988/ije.1502436

Abstract

Bu çalışma, Bitcoin enerji tüketimi ve Bitcoin hash oranının Bitcoin fiyatları üzerindeki etkilerini analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. 10.02.2017 ile 31.10.2024 tarihleri arasındaki günlük veriler kullanılarak Engle-Granger ve RALS-Engle-Granger eşbütünleşme testleri uygulanmıştır. EG testine göre değişkenler arasında uzun dönemli bir ilişki olmadığı tespit edilmiştir. Ancak RALS-EG testi, uzun dönemli bir ilişki olduğunu göstermiştir. FMOLS, DOLS ve CCR testleriyle değişkenlerin uzun dönem katsayıları belirlenmiş ve sonuçların birbirine oldukça yakın olduğu görülmüştür. Bu yöntemlere göre, Bitcoin enerji tüketimindeki %1’lik artış, Bitcoin fiyatlarında yaklaşık %0,10’luk bir artışa yol açmaktadır. Bitcoin hash oranlarındaki %1’lik artış ise Bitcoin fiyatlarında yaklaşık %6.5’lik bir artışa yol açmaktadır.

References

  • Baldwin, J. (2018). In digital we trust: Bitcoin discourse, digital currencies, and decentralized network fetishism. Palgrave Communications, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0065-0.
  • Bâra, A., Oprea, S. V. ve Panait, M. (2024). Insights into bitcoin and energy nexus. A bitcoin price prediction in bull and bear markets using a complex meta model and sql analytical functions. Applied Intelligence, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-024-05474-2.
  • Binda, J. (2020). Cryptocurrencies–problems of the high-risk instrument definition. investment Management and Financial Innovations, 17(1), 227-241. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.17(1).2020.20.
  • Boz, E., and Mendoza, E. G. (2014). Financial innovation, the discovery of risk, and the us credit crisis. Journal of Monetary Economics, 62, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2013.07.001.
  • Chitkasame, T., Rakpho, P. ve Khiewngamdee, C. (2022). Analyzing structural change and causality between energy consumption and Bitcoin’s activity. Energy Reports, 8, 736-743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.320.
  • Damour, F. ve Damour, F. (2024). The first blockchain: bitcoin, entropy, religion.Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science, 59(1), 280–301. https://doi.org/10.16995/zygon.11004.
  • De Vries, A. ve Stoll, C. (2021). Bitcoin’s growing e-waste problem. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 175, 105901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105901.
  • Engle, R. F. ve Granger, C. W. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 55(2), 251-276. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913236.
  • Fantazzini, D. ve Kolodin, N. (2020). Does the Hashrate Affect the Bitcoin Price? Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(11), 263. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13110263.
  • Giungato, P., Rana, R., Tarabella, A. ve Tricase, C. (2017). Current trends in sustainability of bitcoins and related blockchain technology. Sustainability, 9(12), 2214. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122214.
  • Güleç, Ö. F. (2018). Bitcoin ile finansal göstergeler arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Kırklareli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(2), 18-37.
  • Hansen, B. (1995). Rethinking the univariate approach to unit root testing. Econometric Theory, 11(5), 1148-1171. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466600009993.
  • Hong, H. ve Zhang, C. (2023). Bitcoin trading, economic growth, energy use, and CO2 emissions: An advanced panel study of emerging market economies. International Review of Economics & Finance, 87, 519-531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.06.003.
  • Hossain, M. S. (2021). What do we know about cryptocurrency? Past, present, future. China Finance Review International, 11(4), 552-572. https://doi.org/10.1108/CFRI-03-2020-0026.
  • Im, K. ve Schmidt, P. (2008). More efficient estimation under non-normality when higher moments do not depend on the regressors, using residual-augmented least squares. Journal of Econometrics, 144, 219-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.01.003.
  • Im, K. S., Lee, J. ve Tieslau, M. A. (2014). More powerful unit root tests with non-normal errors. İçinde Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt (Sickles, R., and Horrace, W. (eds)). Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-8008-3_10.
  • Judmayer, A., Stifter, N., Krombholz, K. ve Weippl, E. (2017). Blocks and chains: Introduction to bitcoin, cryptocurrencies, and their consensus mechanisms. Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
  • Jumde, A., ve Cho, B. Y. (2020). Can cryptocurrencies overtake the fiat money? International Journal of Business Performance Management, 21(1-2), 6-20.
  • Khan, D., Jung, L. T. ve Hashmani, M. A. (2021). Systematic literature review of challenges in blockchain scalability. Applied Sciences, 11(20), 9372. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11209372.
  • Kubal, J. ve Kristoufek, L. (2022). Exploring the relationship between bitcoin price and network’s hashrate within endogenous system. International Review of Financial Analysis, 84, 102375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102375.
  • Küfeoğlu, S. ve Özkuran, M. (2019). Energy consumption of bitcoin mining. Working Paper, University of Cambridge: Cambridge, UK. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.41230.
  • Lasla, N., Al-Sahan, L., Abdallah, M. ve Younis, M. (2022). Green-PoW: An energy-efficient blockchain proof-of-work consensus algorithm. Computer Networks, 214, 109118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2022.109118.
  • Lee, H., Lee, J. ve Im, K. (2015). More powerful cointegration tests with non-normal errors. studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 19(4), 397-413. https://doi.org/10.1515/snde-2013-0060.
  • Leydesdorff, L. ve Bensman, S. (2006). Classification and powerlaws: The logarithmic transformation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(11), 1470-1486. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20467.
  • Li, J., Li, N., Peng, J., Cui, H. ve Wu, Z. (2019). Energy consumption of cryptocurrency mining: A study of electricity consumption in mining cryptocurrencies. Energy, 168, 160-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.11.046.
  • Maiti, M. (2022). Dynamics of Bitcoin prices and energy consumption. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals: X, 9, 100086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csfx.2022.100086.
  • Mohsin, M., Naseem, S., Zia-ur-Rehman, M., Baig, S.A. ve Salamat, S. (2023). The crypto-trade volume, GDP, energy use, and environmental degradation sustainability: An analysis of the top 20 crypto-trader countries. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 28, 651–667. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2442.
  • Moşteanu, D. N. R., Faccia, D. A., Cavaliere, L. P. L. ve Bhatia, S. (2020). Digital technologies’ implementation within financial and banking system during socio distancing restrictions–back to the future. International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology, 11(6), 307-315.
  • Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf.
  • Oprea, S. V., Georgescu, I. A. ve Bâra, A. (2024). Is bitcoin ready to be a widespread payment method? Using price volatility and setting strategies for merchants. Electronic Commerce Research, 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-024-09812-x.
  • Pirinççi, A. E. (2018). Yeni dünya düzeninde sanal para Bitcoin’in değerlendirilmesi. Uluslararası Ekonomi Siyaset İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi,1(1), 45-52.
  • Rejeb, A., Rejeb, K. ve Keogh, J. G. (2021). Cryptocurrencies in modern finance: A literature review. Etikonomi, 20(1), 93-118. https://doi.org/10.15408/etk.v20i1.16911.
  • Sarker, P. K., Lau, C. K. ve Pradhan, A. K. (2023). Asymmetric effects of climate policy uncertainty and energy prices on bitcoin prices. Innovation and Green Development, 2, 100048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2023.100048.
  • Sarkodie, S. A., Ahmed, M. Y. ve Leirvik, T. (2022). Trade volume affects bitcoin energy consumption and carbon footprint. Finance Research Letters, 48, 102977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102977.
  • Schinckus, C., Nguyen, C. P. ve Chong, F. H. L. (2022). Cryptocurrencies’ Hashrate and electricity consumption: Evidence from mining activities. Studies in Economics and Finance, 39(3), 524-546. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEF-08-2021-0342.
  • Sedlmeir, J., Buhl, H. U., Fridgen, G. ve Keller, R. (2020). The energy consumption of
  • blockchain technology: Beyond myth. Business & Information Systems
  • Engineering, 62(6), 599-608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-020-00656-x.
  • Siddique, I., Smith, E. ve Siddique, A. (2023). Assessing the sustainability of bitcoin mining: comparative review of renewable energy sources. Journal of Alternative and Renewable Energy Sources, 10(1), 10-46610.
  • Stepanova, D., Yousif, N. B. A., Karlibaeva, R. ve Mikhaylov, A. (2024). Current analysis of cryptocurrency mining industry. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(7), 4803. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i7.4803.
  • Tan, T. M. ve Saraniemi, S. (2023). Trust in blockchain-enabled exchanges: future directions in blockchain marketing. Journal of the Academy of marketing Science, 51(4), 914-939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-022-00889-0.
  • Tommerdahl, J. (2024). Introduction to the blockchain, Bitcoin, and other cryptocurrencies for educators. Neural Computing and Applications, 36(32), 20527-20536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-024-10209-y.
  • Vranken, H. (2017). Sustainability of Bitcoin and blockchains. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 28, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.04.011.
  • Wang, Q., Qin, B., Hu, J. ve Xiao, F. (2020). Preserving transaction privacy in Bitcoin. Future Generation Computer Systems, 107, 793-804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.08.026.
  • Xiao, Z., Cui, S., Xiang, L., Liu, P. J. ve Zhang, H. (2023). The environmental cost of cryptocurrency: Assessing carbon emissions from bitcoin mining in China. Journal of Digital Economy, 2, 119-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdec.2023.11.001.
  • Yan, L., Mirza, N. ve Umar, M. (2022). The cryptocurrency uncertainties and investment transitions: evidence from high and low carbon energy funds in china. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121326.
  • Yılancı, V. ve Aydın, M. (2018). Türkiye’de kadın okullaşmasının ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkisi: Rals-Eg eşbütünleşme testi yaklaşımı. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 101-112. https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.426922.
  • Zhang, D., Chen, X. H., Lau, C. K. M. ve Xu, B. (2023). Implications of cryptocurrency energy usage on climate change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 187, 122219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122219.
There are 48 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Econometric and Statistical Methods, Time-Series Analysis, Ecological Economics, Financial Economy
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Ayşegül Han 0000-0002-3390-2129

Early Pub Date July 14, 2025
Publication Date July 16, 2025
Submission Date June 18, 2024
Acceptance Date February 4, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 40 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Han, A. (2025). RALS Yaklaşımı ile Bitcoin Enerji Tüketiminin Bitcoin Fiyatlarına Etkisinin İncelenmesi. İzmir İktisat Dergisi, 40(3), 814-829. https://doi.org/10.24988/ije.1502436
İzmir Journal of Economics
is indexed and abstracted by
TR-DİZİN, DOAJ, EBSCO, ERIH PLUS, Index Copernicus, Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory, EconLit, Harvard Hollis, Google Scholar, OAJI, SOBIAD, CiteFactor, OJOP, Araştırmax, WordCat, OpenAIRE, Base, IAD, Academindex

Dokuz Eylul University Publishing House Web Page
https://kutuphane.deu.edu.tr/yayinevi/

Journal Contact Details Page
https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ije/contacts