Determinants of Sustainable Port Competitiveness for Transit Container Market: A Systematic Literature Review

Year 2022, Volume: 37 Issue: 1, 34 - 52, 14.03.2022

Sedat Baştuğ Soner Esmer

https://doi.org/10.24988/ije.767420

Cited By: 2

Abstract

Within the scope of Turkish Strategic Plan, it is to be aimed to improve port competitiveness with capacity expansion and develop occupational standards by creating strategic documents and master plans. For all these strategies to be successful, Turkish ports should be reached to a level of which can compete with other rival ports by the nature of the market. Therefore, the study aims to investigate the current port selection criteria in the literature in terms of the sustainable competitive advantage of container ports. A systematic literature review was preferred as the research method. As a result of the research, the cost criterion is found to have the highest values in the hierarchy.

Keywords

Container Transportation,, Competitive Advantage,, Port Selection Criteria,, Sustainability,

Konteyner Taşımacılığı Pazarında Sürdürülebilir Liman Rekabetinin Belirleyicileri: Sistematik Literatür Araştırması

Abstract

Türkiye’nin Stratejik Planları kapsamında, denizcilik alanında strateji belgeleri ve ana planlar oluşturularak ülkemizin konteyner liman kapasitesi ve rekabetçiliğinin arttırılması ve liman işletmeciliği meslek standartlarının geliştirilmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Tüm bu stratejilerin başarılı olması için, doğası gereği uluslararası bir alanda hizmet veren Türkiye limanlarının, bölgesindeki diğer ülke limanlarıyla rekabet edebilecek seviyeye ulaşması gerekmektedir. Bu yüzden, çalışma konteyner limanlarımızın sürdürülebilir rekabetçi üstünlüğü açısından literatürde yer alan güncel liman seçim kriterlerini araştırmayı hedeflemektedir. Araştırma yöntemi olarak sistematik literatür taraması tercih edilmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda maliyet faktörlerinin hiyerarşide en yüksek değere sahip olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Keywords

Konteyner taşımacılığı,, rekabetçi üstünlük, liman seçim kriterleri,, sürdürülebilirlik,

References

• Acar, A. Z., ve Zehir, C., (2010), “The Harmonized Effects of Generic Strategies and Business Capabilities on Business Performance”, Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11(4), 689-711.
• Akbayırlı, K., Deveci, D. A., Balcı, G., & Kurtuluş, E. (2016). Container port selection in contestable hinterlands. Journal of ETA Maritime Science, 4(3), 249-265.
• Barber, Elizabeth. (2001). Strategıc Transport Corrıdors In Indochına. World Conference on Transport Research, 2001 (WCTR): Seul. s:12.
• Barney, J., (1991), “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage”, Journal of Management, 17, 99-120.
• Barney, J., (1991), “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage”, Journal of Management, 17, 99-120
• Barney, J., (2001), “Resource-Based Theories of Competitive Advantage: A Ten-Year Retrospective on the Resource-Based View”, Journal of Management, 6, 643-650
• Baştuğ, S., Altuntaş, C., Eriş, E. D., & Okan, T. U. N. A. (2014) Türkiye’de Lojistik Sektörü: Epistemolojik Doküman Analiz Tekniği İle Stratejik Bir Değerlendirme. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi, 1(2), 7-24.
• Bichou, K. (2014). Port operations, planning and logistics. CRC Press.
• Blonigen, B. A., & Wilson, W. (2006). New measures of port efficiency using international trade data (No. w12052). National Bureau of Economic Research.
• Branch, Alan E. (1988). Economics of Shipping Practice and Management. Second Edition. Chapman and Hall, Ltd: London. S:19.
• Branch, Alan E. (1986). Elements of Port Operation and Managemend. Chapman and Hall, Ltd: London.S:1.
• Chang, Y. T., Lee, S. Y., & Tongzon, J. L. (2008). Port selection factors by shipping lines: Different perspectives between trunk liners and feeder service providers. Marine Policy, 32(6), 877-885.
• Cullinane, K., Fei, W. T., & Cullinane, S. (2004). Container terminal development in Mainland China and its impact on the competitiveness of the port of Hong Kong. Transport Reviews, 24(1), 33-56.
• Çifçi, H. (2004) İktisadi Gelişmede Uluslararası Rekabet ve Ulusal Kurumlar Dinamiği. Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara, 270 s.
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of management review, 14(1), 57-74.
• Esmer, Soner. (2011) Liman İşletmelerinde Hizmet Pazarlaması. Detay Yayıncılık: Ankara
• Feenstra, R.C. (1998). Integration of trade and disintegration of production in the global economy. Journal of EconometricPerspectives, 12(4), 31-50.
• Frankel, Ernest G. (1987) Port Planning and Development. John Wily & Sons. Inc, USA.
• Ghemewat, P., ve Rivkin, J. W., (2006), “Creating Competitive Advantage”, Harvard Business School Publishing.
• Goss R (1990) Economic policies and seaport: Part 4 – strategies for port authorities. Maritime Policy and Management 17(4): 1–28.
• Grosso, M., & Monteiro, F. (2009). Relevant strategic criteria when choosing a container port-the case of the port of Genoa. Research in Transport and Logistics, 299.
• Johnson, James C. Wood, Donald F., Wardlow, Daniel L. ve Murphy, Paul R. (1998). Contemporary Logistics. Seventh Edition. Prentice Hall, Inc: New Jersey. S: 173.
• Kim, A.R. (2016) A Study on Competitiveness Analysis of Ports in Korea and China by Entropy Wight TOPSIS. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics. 32(4) 187-194.
• Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications.
• Lam, J. S. L. (2015). Designing a sustainable maritime supply chain: A hybrid QFD–ANP approach. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 78, 70-81.
• Lirn, T. C., Thanopoulou, H. A., Beynon, M. J., & Beresford, A. K. C. (2004). An application of AHP on transhipment port selection: a global perspective. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 6(1), 70-91.
• Lovelock, Christoper H. (1991) Services Marketing. Second Edition. Prentice Hall, New Jersey. s:26.
• Lovelock, Christoper. (1996). Service Marketing. 3. Baskı. Prentice Hall. S:50. Malchow, M., & Kanafani, A. (2001). A disaggregate analysis of factors influencing port selection. Maritime Policy & Management, 28(3), 265-277.
• Mayring, P. (2000), Qualitative Content Analysis, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1.2, (accessed 7th December 2006), Available from: http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/2-00/2-00mayring-e.htm
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., Huberman, M. A., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. sage.
• Porter, M. E. (1980). “Competitive Strategy”, New York: The Free Press
• Porter, M. E. (1985). “Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance”, New York: The Free Press.
• Porter, M. E. (1996), “What is strategy?.” Harvard Business Review, November December, 61- 73.
• Robinson R (1998) Asian Hub/Feeder nets: the dynamics of restructuring. Maritime Policy and Management 25(1): 21–40
• Robinson R (2002) Ports as elements in value-driven chain systems: the new paradigm. Maritime Policy and Management 29(3): 241–255.
• Saeed, N. (2009). An analysis of carriers’ selection criteria when choosing container terminals in Pakistan. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 11(3), 270-288.
• Sayareh, J., ve Alizmini, H. R. (2014). A hybrid decision-making model for selecting container seaport in the Persian Gulf. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 30(1), 75-95.
• Seuring, S. and Gold, S. (2012), Conducting content-analysis based literature reviews in supply chain management, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(5), 544-555.
• Song, D. W., ve Yeo, G. T. (2015). A Competitive Analysis of Chinese Container Ports Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. In Port Management (pp. 339-359). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
• Thurbin, Patrick, (1998), The Influential Strategist Using the Power of Paradox in Strategic Thinking, Financial Times Pitman Publishing, London, UK
• Tiwari, P., Itoh, H., ve Doi, M. (2003). Shippers' port and carrier selection behaviour in China: a discrete choice analysis. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 5(1), 23-39.
• Tongzon, J. (2002, November). Port choice determinants in a competitive environment. IAME 2002.
• Tongzon, J. L. (1995). Determinants of port performance and efficiency. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 29(3), 245-252.
• Tongzon, J. L. (2009). Port choice and freight forwarders. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 45(1), 186-195.
• UNCTAD (1995) Marketing Promotion Tools for Ports. New York.
• UNCTAD (2009). Review of Maritime Transport. New York &Geneva: United Nations.
• UNCTAD (2012). Review of Maritime Transport.Geneva: United Nations.
• UNCTAD (2016) Review of Maritime Transport. Genève
• UNCTAD (2019) Review of Maritime Transport. Genève
• Yap, W. Y., Lam, J. S., & Notteboom, T. (2006). Developments in container port competition in East Asia. Transport Reviews, 26(2), 167-188.
• Yapraklı, Şükrü. (2006) Kargo Taşımacılık Hizmetleri Pazarlanması ve Kalitesi. Beta Yayınları. İstanbul. s: 53.
• Yeo, G. T., & Song, D. W. (2006). An application of the hierarchical fuzzy process to container port competition: policy and strategic implications. Transportation, 33(4), 409-422.
• Yeo, G. T., Roe, M., & Dinwoodie, J. (2008). Evaluating the competitiveness of container ports in Korea and China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42(6), 910-921.
• Yuen, Kum Fai, Vinh V. Thai, and Yiik Diew Wong. "Corporate social responsibility and classical competitive strategies of maritime transport firms: A contingency-fit perspective." Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 98 (2017): 1-13.