Discussion

Embodied Cognition and Critique of Cartesian Dualism in Design Learning

Volume: 1 Number: 1 March 31, 2020
EN

Embodied Cognition and Critique of Cartesian Dualism in Design Learning

Abstract

This research explores the relationship between mind and body in the design learning environment. The research focuses on design learning, embodied cognition, mind-body relationship and Cartesian dualism. In the research, the role of embodied cognition in design learning process is drawn attention. The traditional mind-body dualism of Cartesian theory is criticized by embodied cognition in design learning. In the design learning process, it is pointed out that the mind-body dualism of the Cartesian theory becomes dysfunctional. In this research, the concept of reflection-in-action is considered as a type of design learning. It is explained how the epistemological origins of this concept reject Cartesian theory. In this research, mind-body-environment harmony and embodied cognition which are used in reflection-in-action, is explained as the solution of the design problem which has an ‘ill-defined’ problem type. As a result of the research, the importance of mind-body-environment harmony in design learning process is emphasized. Moreover, it is pointed out that the embodied cognition which occurs with this harmony is an important parameter in the design learning process. Finally, it is possible to conclude that in design learning process, embodied cognition rejects Cartesian dualism, and thus the distinction between theory and practice.

Keywords

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Architecture

Journal Section

Discussion

Publication Date

March 31, 2020

Submission Date

February 4, 2020

Acceptance Date

March 4, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 1 Number: 1

APA
Yazıcı, G. (2020). Embodied Cognition and Critique of Cartesian Dualism in Design Learning. International Journal of Education in Architecture and Design, 1(1), 55-65. https://izlik.org/JA77NN89YR
AMA
1.Yazıcı G. Embodied Cognition and Critique of Cartesian Dualism in Design Learning. IJEAD Education in Architecture and Design. 2020;1(1):55-65. https://izlik.org/JA77NN89YR
Chicago
Yazıcı, Gizem. 2020. “Embodied Cognition and Critique of Cartesian Dualism in Design Learning”. International Journal of Education in Architecture and Design 1 (1): 55-65. https://izlik.org/JA77NN89YR.
EndNote
Yazıcı G (March 1, 2020) Embodied Cognition and Critique of Cartesian Dualism in Design Learning. International Journal of Education in Architecture and Design 1 1 55–65.
IEEE
[1]G. Yazıcı, “Embodied Cognition and Critique of Cartesian Dualism in Design Learning”, IJEAD Education in Architecture and Design, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 55–65, Mar. 2020, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA77NN89YR
ISNAD
Yazıcı, Gizem. “Embodied Cognition and Critique of Cartesian Dualism in Design Learning”. International Journal of Education in Architecture and Design 1/1 (March 1, 2020): 55-65. https://izlik.org/JA77NN89YR.
JAMA
1.Yazıcı G. Embodied Cognition and Critique of Cartesian Dualism in Design Learning. IJEAD Education in Architecture and Design. 2020;1:55–65.
MLA
Yazıcı, Gizem. “Embodied Cognition and Critique of Cartesian Dualism in Design Learning”. International Journal of Education in Architecture and Design, vol. 1, no. 1, Mar. 2020, pp. 55-65, https://izlik.org/JA77NN89YR.
Vancouver
1.Gizem Yazıcı. Embodied Cognition and Critique of Cartesian Dualism in Design Learning. IJEAD Education in Architecture and Design [Internet]. 2020 Mar. 1;1(1):55-6. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA77NN89YR