Click to download the article template.

Click to download the Copyright Form.

***Authors should prepare their articles in accordance with the article writing rules of our journal. Otherwise, the article is sent back to the author.
***All authors must sign the copyright form, scan it and upload it to the system at the time of submitting an article.

Article title



Author Names and Addresses


Summary



English Title

The title of the article should be written in bold, capital letters, and italicized in 14-point Times New Roman font.


Abstract



1. Introduction



2. Material and Method

In this section, the materials and methods used in the study should be explained in detail and clearly.

2.1. Subtitle

Main headings can contain subheadings.

2.2. Shapes, Tables and Equations


3. Findings and Discussion

In this section, the findings obtained as a result of the study should be given. Comparisons can be made by making literature studies on the findings obtained.

4. Conclusions and Recommendations

In this section, the results obtained from the study should be given. Suggestions and comments can be made for readers.


Thanks

In this section, the person or persons or institutions that helped or supported the study can be thanked.

Resources

References should be indexed according to the surname of the author and should be written starting from the left margin of the page. Literature explanations in the text should be arranged as (Surname, 2017), (Surname and Surname, 2017) by giving the surname and date. In case of more than two authors, “ark.” after the first author. abbreviation should be made (Surname et al., 2017). If more than one source is desired, they should be separated with semicolons (Surname, 2017; Surname and Surname, 2017). Resources are inspired by the APA format. Examples of resources are given below.

Periodic publications:

Surname, A., Surname, B. B., and Surname, C., (2017). Name of Published Article. Name of the Journal in which the Article was Published, 7(1), 1-12.

Harlow, H. F. (1983). Fundamentals for preparing psychology journal articles. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 55, 893-896.

Kernis, M. H., Cornell, D. P., Sun, C. R., Berry, A., Harlow, T., and Bach, J. S. (1993). There's more to self-esteem than whether it is high or low: The importance of stability of self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1190-1204.

Scruton, R. (1996). The eclipse of listening. The New Criterion, 15(3), 5-13.

Henry, W. A., III. (1990, April 9). Making the grade in today's schools. Time, 135, 28-31.

Schultz, S. (2005, December 28). Calls made to strengthen state energy policies. The Country Today, pp. 1A, 2A.

Moller, G. (2002, August). Ripples versus rumbles [Letter to the editor]. Scientific American, 287(2), 12.

Baumeister, R. F. (1993). Exposing the self-knowledge myth [Review of the book The self-knower: A hero under control, by R. A. Wicklund and M. Eckert]. Contemporary Psychology, 38, 466-467.

Brownlie, D. (2007). Toward effective poster presentations: An annotated bibliography. European Journal of Marketing, 41, 1245-1283. doi:10.1108/0309056071082161

Wooldridge, M.B., and Shapka, J. (2012). Playing with technology: Mother-toddler interaction scores lower during play with electronic toys. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 33(5), 211-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2012.05.05

Kenneth, I. A. (2000). A Buddhist response to the nature of human rights. Journal of Buddhist Ethics, 8. Retrieved from http://www.cac.psu.edu/jbe/twocont.html

Smyth, A. M., Parker, A. L., and Pease, D. L. (2002). A study of enjoyment of peas. Journal of Abnormal Eating, 8(3), 120-125. Retrieved from

http://www.articlehomepage.com/full/url/


Books:

Surname, A. A., (2017). Book name. Place of publication: Publisher.

Mayer, D. (2010). Essential evidence-based medicine (2nd ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Glasgow, N. A., McNary, S. J., and Hicks, C. D. (2006). What successful teachers do in diverse classrooms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Calfee, R. C., and Valencia, R. R. (1991). APA guide to preparing manuscripts for journal publication. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Duncan, G. J., and Brooks-Gunn, J. (Eds.). (1997). Consequences of growing up poor. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

Plath, S. (2000). The unabridged journals. K. V. Kukil (Ed.). New York, NY: Anchor.

Laplace, P. S. (1951). A philosophical essay on probabilities. (F. W. Truscott and F. L. Emory, Trans.). New York, NY: Dover. (Original work published 1814)

Helfer, M. E., Kempe, R. S., and Krugman, R. D. (1997). The battered child (5th ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

O'Neil, J. M., and Egan, J. (1992). Men's and women's gender role journeys: A metaphor for healing, transition, and transformation. In B. R. Wainrib (Ed.), Gender issues across the life cycle (pp. 107-123). New York, NY: Springer.

Wiener, P. (Ed.). (1973). Dictionary of the history of ideas (Vols. 1-4). New York, NY: Scribner's.

Symposium, Congress, Statement:

Surname, A., Surname, B. B., and Surname, C., (2017, Month). Name of Published Paper. Name of Symposium, Congress, Meeting or Conference in which the Paper was Published (p. 1-12). City: University or Institution, if applicable.

Schnase, J. L., and Cunnius, E. L. (Eds.). (1995). Proceedings from CSCL '95: The First International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Armstrong, D. B., Fogarty, G. J., and Dingsdag, D. (2007). Scales measuring characteristics of small business information system

s. In W-G. Tan (Ed.), Proceedings of Research, Relevance and Rigour: Coming of age: 18th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (pp. 163-171). Toowoomba, Australia: University of Southern Queensland.

Green, D. B. and DeSilva, A. (2015, June). The toxicity levels of household chemicals. Paper presented at the National Symposium on Air Pollution, University of Southern California, California.

Taylor, J. A. (2006, November). Assessment: a tool for development and engagement in the first year of university study. Paper presented at the Engaging Students: 9th Pacific Rim in Higher Education (FYHE) Conference, Griffith, Australia. Retrieved from http://www.fyhe.com.au/past_papers/2006/Papers/Taylor.pdf

Thesis:

Surname, A. A., (2017). Name of Master's or Doctoral Thesis. Master Thesis, Giresun University, Institute of Science and Technology, Giresun.

Yoshida, Y. (2001). Essays in urban transportation. Dissertation Abstracts International, 62, 7741A.

Considine, M. (1986). Australian insurance politics in the 1970s: Two case studies. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Kassover, A. (1987). Treatment of abusive males: Voluntary vs. court-mandated referrals (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Nova University, Fort Lauderdale, FL.

Biswas, S. (2008). Dopamine D3 receptor: A neuroprotective treatment target in Parkinson's disease. Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations. (AAT 3295214)

Cooley, T. (2009). Design, development, and implementation of a Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN): The Hartford Job Corps Academy case study (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3344745)

Adams, R. J. (1973). Building a foundation for evaluation of instruction in higher education and continuing education (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://www.ohiolink.edu/etd/

Other Resources:

Bergmann, P. G. (1993). Relativity. In The New Encyclopedia Britannica. (Vol. 26, pp. 501-508). Chicago, IL: Encyclopedia Britannica.

Bernstein, M. (2002). 10 tips on writing the living Web. A List Apart: For People Who Make Websites, 149. Retrieved from http://www.alistapart.com/articles/writeliving

Hallam, A. Duality in consumer theory [PDF document]. Retrieved from Lecture Notes Online Website: http://www.econ.iastate.edu/classes/econ501/Hallam/index.html

URL-1: http://www.giresun.edu.tr, (Access Date: 22 March 2017).

Editors' Duties

- The editor of the journal is responsible for deciding, on his own and independently, the publication conditions of the submitted article. The validity, importance and novelty of the article uploaded to the journal should always be considered before making a final decision.

- The editor and field editors follow the principles of the editorial board of the journal and evaluate issues such as copyright infringement and plagiarism in line with these principles. The editor may also collaborate with field editors or reviewers to reach the final decision.

- The editor and field editors are responsible for the equal, fair and timely completion of the evaluation process through expert referees in the relevant field. Unless an additional referee is needed, the editor or field editor ensures that the article submitted to the journal is evaluated by at least two external and independent referees.

- Articles should be evaluated by the editor or field editor according to their content and novelty, without considering the race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnicity, citizenship or political philosophy of the authors.

- The publication policies of the journal should be transparent and include honest reports from reviewers and authors. In addition, the editor and field editors should use the journal standard electronic system for all journal communications, with the exception of any technical problems.

- The editor will use a transparent disclosure process in appealing editorial decisions.

- The editor should not attempt to influence the ranking of the journal and should not compel authors to include the editor's or field editors' articles unless there are reasonable scientific reasons for this purpose.

- Confidentiality of all articles submitted to the journal, communications with interested parties, and the identity of the referees should be protected by the editor and field editor.

- Unpublished materials, information and ideas contained in the submitted article should not be used in the editor's or field editor's own research without the written consent of the author.

- The publisher must be notified of any potential editorial conflicts of interest. The publisher may publish the related notices in the journal.

- The editor or field editor should not make any decisions about articles written by himself, his family member or colleagues. Such an application should be subject to the general procedures of the journal and this process should be done without including the relevant author / editor and research groups.

- The editor must maintain the integrity of the published record by investigating suspected abuse.

- In case of doubt, if necessary, the editor should contact the author of the article and inform him about the relevant requests. However, in such a case, the editor should also be able to communicate with relevant institutions and research centers.

- In case of plagiarism, the editor must act with the publisher and ensure that the correction, retraction or explanatory statement is promptly published.

Duties of Referees

- During the peer-review process, the referees are expected to pay attention to the above-mentioned ethical issues and to consider the article objectively.

- If the subject of the article is not related to the field of the referees or if the referee will not be able to evaluate the article on time, the referee is expected to reject the evaluation process and immediately inform the editor.

- All articles submitted to the International Eastern Anatolian Journal of Science, Engineering and Design (IJEASED) are confidential. Reviewers should also not share any review or information about the article with anyone. In addition, referees should not communicate with authors without permission from the editor.

- Information or ideas presented in the refereed article should not be used for the personal benefit of the referees.

- The review should be constructive, and attention should be paid to ethical issues such as plagiarism. In case of any plagiarism, the referee should immediately warn the editor.

- Comments should be objective and supported by arguments that do not include any personal criticism.

- In case of any potential conflict of interest, the referee should warn the editor or field editor and the article should refuse to be evaluated.

- The recommendation of the referee appointed to evaluate the article to refer to the work of the referees (or their partners) must be scientifically reasonable, without the referee's intention to increase the number of citations.

Authors' Duties

- Authors submitting a research article or a short communication article to the journal should take care to include original results and discussions emphasizing the importance of the work. If the uploaded article is a compilation or other type of article, its content must be concrete and objective.

- The articles submitted to the journal should contain enough references and should be written in detail.

- All of the support sources of the study should be mentioned in the acknowledgment section of the article.

- Unethical issues such as plagiarism and controversial, false statements are never acceptable in the content of an article.

- An author may partially reproduce the same article (either as an abstract or a published

Except for a lecture or academic thesis or an electronic edition) or entirely to more than one journal. This type of behavior is unethical and is not accepted by the journal.

- Persons who do not contribute to the content intellectually in the creation of the work should not be specified as the author.

- All studies submitted for publication, if any, situations that may constitute a conflict of interest and their relations should be explained.

- To become a co-author, significant contributions must be made to the content, design and application areas of the article. Language editors or medical authors should be mentioned in the acknowledgments section.

- In case the author(s) realizes an error or mistake regarding his/her published work, in print or under evaluation, he/she has an obligation to cooperate with the editor in informing, correcting or withdrawing the journal editor or publisher.

- Changing the author responsibilities of a work whose evaluation process has begun (such as adding an author, changing the order of authors, removing an author) cannot be proposed.

- Relevant author of the article is responsible for eligible and inappropriate co-authors. In addition, the corresponding author should obtain the relevant approvals from all co-authors for the final version of the article and the journal to which it was sent.

- All authors are responsible for all parts of the article.

- If the article involves the use of animal or human subjects, necessary documentation, such as approval by the appropriate institutional committee(s), and a corresponding statement should be provided to the journal by the author.

- Any significant errors noticed by the author should be reported to the editor immediately. In case of any correction, the author is obliged to provide the evidence requested by the editor or the field editor.

- Complex changes such as enhancement, relocation, removal of any part, which will damage the originality, are not acceptable for images and images contained in the article. Such changes are perceived as unethical and necessary precautions are taken.

- The corresponding author is the authorized person on behalf of all authors. It is his/her own responsibility to inform the author(s) of the article process. The journal board does not accept any responsibility for the conflict of interest between the author(s) whose work is accepted.

Actions Contrary to Scientific Research and Publication Ethics


Fabrication: Making up data, reporting or publishing them as if they were made without a scientific research,

Distortion: To falsify research records and obtained data, to present methods, devices and materials that are not used in the research as if they were used, not to evaluate data that do not comply with the research hypothesis, to manipulate data and/or results in order to fit the relevant theory or assumptions, in line with the interests of the people and organizations that receive support. falsify or shape research results,

Plagiarism (plagiarism): Presenting the ideas, methods, data, practices, writings, figures or works of others as their own work, in whole or in part, without attribution in accordance with scientific rules,

Fraud: To produce data that is not based on research, to edit or change the presented or published work based on untrue data, to report or publish them, to make an unfinished research appear as if it has been done,

Republishing (Duplication): Republishing the results of a research in another journal without the permission of the editor of the journal in which it was originally published,

Slicing: Presenting the results of a research as separate works in the evaluations of associate professorship exams and in academic promotions, by breaking the integrity of the research, into parts inappropriately, and by making multiple publications without citing each other,

Unfair authorship: Including non-active contributors among authors, not including active contributors among authors, changing the order of authors unjustifiably and inappropriately, removing the names of active contributors from the work at the time of publication or in subsequent editions, using influence without active contribution include among the authors,

Other types of ethical violations: Not clearly stating the supporting persons, institutions or organizations and their contributions to the research in the publications of supported research, not following the ethical rules in research on humans and animals, not respecting the rights of patients in their publications, appearing in a work assigned to review as a referee. to share the field information with others before it is published, to misuse the resources, places, facilities and devices provided or reserved for scientific research, to accuse completely unfounded, groundless and intentional ethical violations.

Studies submitted to the International Eastern Anatolian Journal of Science, Engineering and Design go through the following processes:

Process before referee evaluation:

1- Author(s) submit their work to the journal via the Dergipark platform.

2- Editorial board within 15 days,

They evaluate whether the work is readable, complete and original, in line with the journal's publication policy.

3- The editorial board takes the studies with the above features to the evaluation stage in line with the double-blind refereeing system or sends the study back to the author(s) by presenting their justifications via the Dergipark platform.


Referee evaluation process:

1- After the editorial board determines the studies that will enter the referee evaluation process, they forward the study to the referee to be submitted to the evaluation of at least two referees.

2- The referees have 15 days to respond to the invitation. If the referees do not respond to the invitation, the invitation is sent to the referees again so that they can respond within an additional 7 days.

3- If the invitation is not accepted by one or both referees, the invitation is forwarded to the new referees so that the work can be evaluated by two referees.

4- After the invitation is accepted, the evaluation period of the referees is 42 days. If the referees do not evaluate the study within 42 days, an additional 7 days is given. The referees make their evaluations through the referee evaluation form created by the editorial board of the International Eastern Anatolian Journal of Science Engineering and Design.

5- After the study is evaluated by the referees, the study is sent to the author(s) in such a way that they cannot see the referee's names and the author(s) make the necessary arrangements.

6- In case of an acceptance-rejection conflict between the referees, the study can be published, rejected or forwarded to a third referee with the approval of the editorial board.


Post-review process:

1- The editor asks the author to make the necessary changes and upload the revised file according to the evaluation results from the referees, or the article may be given a "Reject" decision according to the status of the evaluation results.

2- Spelling Rule Check is also done in this step.

3- After the revision, the editor accepts the article after the referee's evaluation is positive and proceeds to editing. After the editing process, the journal publishes the article of the author or authors in the next issue or Early view of the issue.

Ethics Committee Approval

TR Index Journal Evaluation Criteria has been updated for 2020.
An "Ethics Committee Approval" document is also required for studies that require ethics committee approval within current criteria. Therefore;

1. “For research in all branches of science, including the social sciences, and for clinical and experimental studies on humans and animals that require an ethics committee decision.
Ethics committee approval should be obtained separately, this approval should be stated and documented in the article.

2. “In studies requiring ethics committee permission, information about the permission (name of the committee, date and number) should be included in the method section and also on the first/last page of the article. In case reports, it is necessary to include information on the signing of the informed consent/consent form in the article.


In the statement made by TR index, the studies in the following category were determined as articles that require Ethics Committee approval:

Ø All kinds of research conducted with qualitative or quantitative approaches that require data collection from the participants by using survey, interview, focus group work, observation, experiment, interview techniques.
Ø The use of humans and animals (including material/data) for experimental or other scientific purposes,
Ø Clinical studies on humans,
Ø Research on animals,
Ø Retrospective studies in accordance with the law on the protection of personal data,

Moreover;

Ø Indicating that an “informed consent form” has been received in case reports,
Ø Obtaining and specifying permission from the owners for the use of scales, questionnaires, photographs belonging to others,
Ø It should be stated that copyright regulations are complied with for the intellectual and artistic works used.

With this;

Journals should state that they comply with the rules on "Publication Ethics", "Research Ethics" and "Receiving Legal/Special Permission" by referring to international standards, by opening a separate heading for each one, both on the web page and in the printed journal.

The issue of compliance with publication ethics in journals should not be left to the sole responsibility of the authors, the path to be followed in journal publication ethics should be clearly defined.

In articles to be published in journals, whether ethics committee permission and/or legal/special permission is required should be stated in the article.

If it is necessary to obtain these permissions, it should be clearly presented from which institution, on what date and with what decision or issue number.

If the study requires the use of human and animal subjects, it should be declared that the study was carried out in accordance with the international declaration, guideline, etc.


ETHICS COMMITTEE PERMISSION

Dear authors and referees,

In line with the decisions taken by the ULAKBİM TR Index, for the researches carried out in all branches of science, including Social Sciences, since 2020 "

Ethics Committee Approval" must be obtained. For studies that require ethics committee permission, information about the permission (name of the committee, date and number) should be included in the method section and also at the end of the article. When uploading your study to our journal, you must also upload your Ethics Committee document along with your article file. If you are not in the working group that requires board permission, you must sign the declaration form stating this situation and indicate the relevant situation in your article text.

Is ethics committee approval required for all articles?
No. Studies that require ethics committee approval are as follows:
All kinds of research carried out with qualitative or quantitative approaches that require data collection from the participants by using survey, interview, focus group work, observation, experiment, interview techniques,
Use of humans and animals (including material/data) for experimental or other scientific purposes,
Clinical studies on humans,
Animal studies,
Retrospective studies in accordance with the personal data protection law

Moreover;
Stating that an “informed consent form” was taken in case reports,
Obtaining and specifying permission from the owners for the use of scales, questionnaires, photographs belonging to others,
Statement that copyright regulations are complied with for the intellectual and artistic works used

Should a retrospective Ethics Committee Permission be obtained for publications produced from studies and thesis completed in previous years?

Retrospective ethics committee approval is not required for articles that were published before 2020, produced from postgraduate/doctoral studies (must be specified in the article), submitted an application for publication to the journal in the previous year, and accepted but not yet published.

Are there any restrictions on publications made outside universities with these rules of TR Directory?
No. Non-university researchers can also apply to the Ethics Committees in their regions.

Authors regarding the articles within this scope to be sent to the Academic Language and Literature Journal must both upload the permission documents they have received to the system during their application and specify them in their articles. This information should be given at the end of the article before the bibliography as follows:
Ethics Committee Permission: Ethics committee approval for this study was obtained with the decision of the Ethics Committee dated ..../... / .... and numbered ....

Our journal is an open access journal whose editorial fee is paid by the author. I. FEES FROM READERS and/or SUBSCRIPTION SYSTEMS a. Our journal, which serves the academic world within the scope of its open access policy, does not charge any fees from its readers. II. AUTHOR FEES a. The publication fee to be paid by the author is requested before the article is uploaded. Each article submission fee is 400.00 TL. b. The price requested from the articles sent to our journal for publication is not subject to the Acceptance / Rejection condition in any way. This condition is carried out in accordance with the decision numbered 2021.18.643 on Predatory/Shabby Magazines taken at the session of the Council of Higher Education dated December 30, 2021 and numbered 2021.18. Inter-University Board (ÜAK) Associate Professorship Criteria 44-45. In accordance with the article, a fee is charged after the article is submitted, regardless of the acceptance/rejection condition. c. The fee payment requirement applies to all authors. Payments are in a transparent and auditable structure, which applies equally to each author. Reports on this issue are published in our journal at the end of each year. The fee is calculated by the authors jointly (jointly) in equal proportions among themselves. Payment is made from the authorized author's account. D. Article fee payments will be valid for articles uploaded to the system as of 17/12/2022. to. During the submission of the article, the e-receipt of the payment must be uploaded to the system. Receipt information should include the title of the article and the name, surname of the responsible author and the ID number of the Republic of Turkey or the country of citizenship. It is the author(s) responsibility to include this information on the receipt.