Research Article

A comparison of PSO and Fmincon methods for finding optimum operating speed and time values in trams

Volume: 8 Number: 2 June 30, 2021
EN

A comparison of PSO and Fmincon methods for finding optimum operating speed and time values in trams

Abstract

All the studies in urban railways gained importance with the requirement of developing in this area. However, not only technological development but also energy-saving conditions have great importance. One of these efficiency conditions is to know the optimum operating conditions. There are two electronic drive-warning systems. These warning systems are Driver Advisory System (DAS) and Automatic Train Operation (ATO), which are algorithm-based. To enrich these algorithms with meta-heuristic methods provides that it can be adapted to the changing operating conditions. Thus, flexible management can be achieved. In this study, the Particle Swarm meta-heuristic and Fmincon which is a nonlinear programming solver in MATLAB methods are used to calculate optimum driving speed, acceleration, cruising, coasting, and full braking times under different operating conditions. Comparative optimization results of these selected methods are presented. Thus, attention is drawn to the efficiency in driving technique with different optimization methods. Specific speed-specific driving time matches obtained can be used to develop innovative driving warning systems.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

None

References

  1. Fernández-Rodríguez, A., Fernández-Cardador, A. and Cucala, A.P. July 2015. Energy Efficiency In High Speed Railway Traffic Operation: A Real-Time Ecodriving Algorithm. Proceedings of the IEEE 15th International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering (EEEIC), 10(13), Rome, Italy, 325–330.
  2. Scheepmaker, G.M., Goverde, R.M. and Kroon, L.G. 2017. Review of Energy-Efficient Train Control and Timetabling. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 257, 355–376.
  3. Howlett, P., Milroy, I. and Pudney, P. Energy-Efficient Train Control. Control Eng. Pract., 2, 193–200, 1994.
  4. Qu, J., Feng, X. and Wang, Q. 2014. Real-Time Trajectory Planning For Rail Transit Train Considering Regenerative Energy. Proceedings of the 17th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 8–11 October, Qingdao, China, 2738–2742.
  5. Milroy, I.P. 1980. “Aspects of Automatic Train Control”. Ph.D. thesis, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, UK.
  6. Liu, R.R. and Golovitcher, I.M. 2003. Energy-Efficient Operation Of Rail Vehicles. Transp. Res. Part A, 37, 917–932.
  7. Chang, C.S. and Sim, S.S. 1997. Optimizing Train Movements Through Coast Control Using Genetic Algorithms. IEE Proc. Electr. Power Appl., 144, 65–73.
  8. Wong, K.K. and Ho, T.K. 2004. Dynamic Coast Control of Train Movement with Genetic Algorithm. Int. J. Syst. Sci., 35, 835–846.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

June 30, 2021

Submission Date

September 23, 2020

Acceptance Date

May 24, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 8 Number: 2

APA
Sertsöz, M., & Fidan, M. (2021). A comparison of PSO and Fmincon methods for finding optimum operating speed and time values in trams. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies, 8(2), 48-52. https://doi.org/10.31593/ijeat.799129
AMA
1.Sertsöz M, Fidan M. A comparison of PSO and Fmincon methods for finding optimum operating speed and time values in trams. IJEAT. 2021;8(2):48-52. doi:10.31593/ijeat.799129
Chicago
Sertsöz, Mine, and Mehmet Fidan. 2021. “A Comparison of PSO and Fmincon Methods for Finding Optimum Operating Speed and Time Values in Trams”. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies 8 (2): 48-52. https://doi.org/10.31593/ijeat.799129.
EndNote
Sertsöz M, Fidan M (June 1, 2021) A comparison of PSO and Fmincon methods for finding optimum operating speed and time values in trams. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies 8 2 48–52.
IEEE
[1]M. Sertsöz and M. Fidan, “A comparison of PSO and Fmincon methods for finding optimum operating speed and time values in trams”, IJEAT, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 48–52, June 2021, doi: 10.31593/ijeat.799129.
ISNAD
Sertsöz, Mine - Fidan, Mehmet. “A Comparison of PSO and Fmincon Methods for Finding Optimum Operating Speed and Time Values in Trams”. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies 8/2 (June 1, 2021): 48-52. https://doi.org/10.31593/ijeat.799129.
JAMA
1.Sertsöz M, Fidan M. A comparison of PSO and Fmincon methods for finding optimum operating speed and time values in trams. IJEAT. 2021;8:48–52.
MLA
Sertsöz, Mine, and Mehmet Fidan. “A Comparison of PSO and Fmincon Methods for Finding Optimum Operating Speed and Time Values in Trams”. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies, vol. 8, no. 2, June 2021, pp. 48-52, doi:10.31593/ijeat.799129.
Vancouver
1.Mine Sertsöz, Mehmet Fidan. A comparison of PSO and Fmincon methods for finding optimum operating speed and time values in trams. IJEAT. 2021 Jun. 1;8(2):48-52. doi:10.31593/ijeat.799129