Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

A comparison of PSO and Fmincon methods for finding optimum operating speed and time values in trams

Year 2021, , 48 - 52, 30.06.2021
https://doi.org/10.31593/ijeat.799129

Abstract

All the studies in urban railways gained importance with the requirement of developing in this area. However, not only technological development but also energy-saving conditions have great importance. One of these efficiency conditions is to know the optimum operating conditions. There are two electronic drive-warning systems. These warning systems are Driver Advisory System (DAS) and Automatic Train Operation (ATO), which are algorithm-based. To enrich these algorithms with meta-heuristic methods provides that it can be adapted to the changing operating conditions. Thus, flexible management can be achieved.
In this study, the Particle Swarm meta-heuristic and Fmincon which is a nonlinear programming solver in MATLAB methods are used to calculate optimum driving speed, acceleration, cruising, coasting, and full braking times under different operating conditions. Comparative optimization results of these selected methods are presented. Thus, attention is drawn to the efficiency in driving technique with different optimization methods. Specific speed-specific driving time matches obtained can be used to develop innovative driving warning systems.

Supporting Institution

None

References

  • Fernández-Rodríguez, A., Fernández-Cardador, A. and Cucala, A.P. July 2015. Energy Efficiency In High Speed Railway Traffic Operation: A Real-Time Ecodriving Algorithm. Proceedings of the IEEE 15th International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering (EEEIC), 10(13), Rome, Italy, 325–330.
  • Scheepmaker, G.M., Goverde, R.M. and Kroon, L.G. 2017. Review of Energy-Efficient Train Control and Timetabling. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 257, 355–376.
  • Howlett, P., Milroy, I. and Pudney, P. Energy-Efficient Train Control. Control Eng. Pract., 2, 193–200, 1994.
  • Qu, J., Feng, X. and Wang, Q. 2014. Real-Time Trajectory Planning For Rail Transit Train Considering Regenerative Energy. Proceedings of the 17th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 8–11 October, Qingdao, China, 2738–2742.
  • Milroy, I.P. 1980. “Aspects of Automatic Train Control”. Ph.D. thesis, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, UK.
  • Liu, R.R. and Golovitcher, I.M. 2003. Energy-Efficient Operation Of Rail Vehicles. Transp. Res. Part A, 37, 917–932.
  • Chang, C.S. and Sim, S.S. 1997. Optimizing Train Movements Through Coast Control Using Genetic Algorithms. IEE Proc. Electr. Power Appl., 144, 65–73.
  • Wong, K.K. and Ho, T.K. 2004. Dynamic Coast Control of Train Movement with Genetic Algorithm. Int. J. Syst. Sci., 35, 835–846.
  • Acikbas, S. and Soylemez, M.T. 2008. Coasting Point Optimisation For Mass Rail Transit Lines Using Artificial Neural Networks And Genetic Algorithms. IET Electr. Power Appl., 2, 172–182.
  • Chevrier, R. Marliere, G. Vulturescu, B. and Rodriguez, J. 2011. Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm For Speed Tuning Optimization With Energy Saving In Railway: Application and Case Study. RailRome, Rome, Italy.
  • Chevrier, R. Pellegrini, P. and Rodriguez, J. 2013. Energy Saving in Railway Timetabling: A Bi-Objective Evolutionary Approach For Computing Alternative Running Times. Transp. Res. Part C, 37, 20–41.
  • Huang, Y. Ma, X. Su, S. and Tang, T. 2015. Optimization of Train Operation in Multiple Interstations with Multi-Population Genetic Algorithm. Energies, 8, 14311–14329.
  • Domínguez, M. Fernández-Cardador, A. Cucala, A.P. Gonsalves, T. and Fernández, A. 2014. Multi Objective Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm For the Design of Efficient ATO Speed Profiles in Metro Lines. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 29, 43–53.
  • Keskin, K. and Karamancioglu, A. 2017. Energy-Efficient Train Operation Using Nature-Inspired Algorithms. J. Adv. Transp., Article ID 6173795, 12 pages.
  • Sertsoz, M. 2018. “Raylı Sistemlerde Güneş Enerjisi Destekli Yenilikçi Enerji Modellemesi, Optimizasyonu Ve Analizi”. Ph.D. thesis, Bilecik Şeyh Edebali University, Enerji Sistemleri Mühendisliği, Bilecik, Turkey.
  • Huang, J. Deng, Y. Yang, Q. and Sun, J. 2016. An Energy-Efficient Train Control Framework for Smart Railway Transportation. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 65(5), 1407-1417.
Year 2021, , 48 - 52, 30.06.2021
https://doi.org/10.31593/ijeat.799129

Abstract

References

  • Fernández-Rodríguez, A., Fernández-Cardador, A. and Cucala, A.P. July 2015. Energy Efficiency In High Speed Railway Traffic Operation: A Real-Time Ecodriving Algorithm. Proceedings of the IEEE 15th International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering (EEEIC), 10(13), Rome, Italy, 325–330.
  • Scheepmaker, G.M., Goverde, R.M. and Kroon, L.G. 2017. Review of Energy-Efficient Train Control and Timetabling. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 257, 355–376.
  • Howlett, P., Milroy, I. and Pudney, P. Energy-Efficient Train Control. Control Eng. Pract., 2, 193–200, 1994.
  • Qu, J., Feng, X. and Wang, Q. 2014. Real-Time Trajectory Planning For Rail Transit Train Considering Regenerative Energy. Proceedings of the 17th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 8–11 October, Qingdao, China, 2738–2742.
  • Milroy, I.P. 1980. “Aspects of Automatic Train Control”. Ph.D. thesis, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, UK.
  • Liu, R.R. and Golovitcher, I.M. 2003. Energy-Efficient Operation Of Rail Vehicles. Transp. Res. Part A, 37, 917–932.
  • Chang, C.S. and Sim, S.S. 1997. Optimizing Train Movements Through Coast Control Using Genetic Algorithms. IEE Proc. Electr. Power Appl., 144, 65–73.
  • Wong, K.K. and Ho, T.K. 2004. Dynamic Coast Control of Train Movement with Genetic Algorithm. Int. J. Syst. Sci., 35, 835–846.
  • Acikbas, S. and Soylemez, M.T. 2008. Coasting Point Optimisation For Mass Rail Transit Lines Using Artificial Neural Networks And Genetic Algorithms. IET Electr. Power Appl., 2, 172–182.
  • Chevrier, R. Marliere, G. Vulturescu, B. and Rodriguez, J. 2011. Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm For Speed Tuning Optimization With Energy Saving In Railway: Application and Case Study. RailRome, Rome, Italy.
  • Chevrier, R. Pellegrini, P. and Rodriguez, J. 2013. Energy Saving in Railway Timetabling: A Bi-Objective Evolutionary Approach For Computing Alternative Running Times. Transp. Res. Part C, 37, 20–41.
  • Huang, Y. Ma, X. Su, S. and Tang, T. 2015. Optimization of Train Operation in Multiple Interstations with Multi-Population Genetic Algorithm. Energies, 8, 14311–14329.
  • Domínguez, M. Fernández-Cardador, A. Cucala, A.P. Gonsalves, T. and Fernández, A. 2014. Multi Objective Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm For the Design of Efficient ATO Speed Profiles in Metro Lines. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 29, 43–53.
  • Keskin, K. and Karamancioglu, A. 2017. Energy-Efficient Train Operation Using Nature-Inspired Algorithms. J. Adv. Transp., Article ID 6173795, 12 pages.
  • Sertsoz, M. 2018. “Raylı Sistemlerde Güneş Enerjisi Destekli Yenilikçi Enerji Modellemesi, Optimizasyonu Ve Analizi”. Ph.D. thesis, Bilecik Şeyh Edebali University, Enerji Sistemleri Mühendisliği, Bilecik, Turkey.
  • Huang, J. Deng, Y. Yang, Q. and Sun, J. 2016. An Energy-Efficient Train Control Framework for Smart Railway Transportation. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 65(5), 1407-1417.
There are 16 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Mine Sertsöz 0000-0003-1641-9191

Mehmet Fidan 0000-0003-2883-9863

Publication Date June 30, 2021
Submission Date September 23, 2020
Acceptance Date May 24, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2021

Cite

APA Sertsöz, M., & Fidan, M. (2021). A comparison of PSO and Fmincon methods for finding optimum operating speed and time values in trams. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies, 8(2), 48-52. https://doi.org/10.31593/ijeat.799129
AMA Sertsöz M, Fidan M. A comparison of PSO and Fmincon methods for finding optimum operating speed and time values in trams. IJEAT. June 2021;8(2):48-52. doi:10.31593/ijeat.799129
Chicago Sertsöz, Mine, and Mehmet Fidan. “A Comparison of PSO and Fmincon Methods for Finding Optimum Operating Speed and Time Values in Trams”. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies 8, no. 2 (June 2021): 48-52. https://doi.org/10.31593/ijeat.799129.
EndNote Sertsöz M, Fidan M (June 1, 2021) A comparison of PSO and Fmincon methods for finding optimum operating speed and time values in trams. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies 8 2 48–52.
IEEE M. Sertsöz and M. Fidan, “A comparison of PSO and Fmincon methods for finding optimum operating speed and time values in trams”, IJEAT, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 48–52, 2021, doi: 10.31593/ijeat.799129.
ISNAD Sertsöz, Mine - Fidan, Mehmet. “A Comparison of PSO and Fmincon Methods for Finding Optimum Operating Speed and Time Values in Trams”. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies 8/2 (June 2021), 48-52. https://doi.org/10.31593/ijeat.799129.
JAMA Sertsöz M, Fidan M. A comparison of PSO and Fmincon methods for finding optimum operating speed and time values in trams. IJEAT. 2021;8:48–52.
MLA Sertsöz, Mine and Mehmet Fidan. “A Comparison of PSO and Fmincon Methods for Finding Optimum Operating Speed and Time Values in Trams”. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies, vol. 8, no. 2, 2021, pp. 48-52, doi:10.31593/ijeat.799129.
Vancouver Sertsöz M, Fidan M. A comparison of PSO and Fmincon methods for finding optimum operating speed and time values in trams. IJEAT. 2021;8(2):48-52.