Which Energy-Growth Hypothesis is Valid in OECD Countries? Evidence from Panel Granger Causality

Volume: 6 Number: 1 March 1, 2016
  • Aynur Pala
EN

Which Energy-Growth Hypothesis is Valid in OECD Countries? Evidence from Panel Granger Causality

Abstract

This paper aims to determine which energy consumption-economic growth hypothesis is valid in OECD countries. For this purpose, we used panel cointegration, panel Granger causality and panel vector error correction model for the period of 1995-2013. Panel cointegration test outcomes support the long-term equilibrium link among economic growth, energy consumption, labor force and capital formation. The consequences obtained from panel vector error correction model suggests that there is evidence of bi-directional causality between energy consumption and economic growth in the short-term. However, a long-run causality is not found between energy consumption and economic growth. This implies indicated that the OECD countries’ economies are founded on energy and the feedback hypothesis is valid in OECD countries. Policy makers in OECD countries consider the feedback effect by employing arrangements to cut energy consumption.

Keywords

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Aynur Pala This is me

Publication Date

March 1, 2016

Submission Date

March 1, 2016

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2016 Volume: 6 Number: 1

APA
Pala, A. (2016). Which Energy-Growth Hypothesis is Valid in OECD Countries? Evidence from Panel Granger Causality. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 6(1), 28-34. https://izlik.org/JA38NP33SN
AMA
1.Pala A. Which Energy-Growth Hypothesis is Valid in OECD Countries? Evidence from Panel Granger Causality. IJEEP. 2016;6(1):28-34. https://izlik.org/JA38NP33SN
Chicago
Pala, Aynur. 2016. “Which Energy-Growth Hypothesis Is Valid in OECD Countries? Evidence from Panel Granger Causality”. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 6 (1): 28-34. https://izlik.org/JA38NP33SN.
EndNote
Pala A (March 1, 2016) Which Energy-Growth Hypothesis is Valid in OECD Countries? Evidence from Panel Granger Causality. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 6 1 28–34.
IEEE
[1]A. Pala, “Which Energy-Growth Hypothesis is Valid in OECD Countries? Evidence from Panel Granger Causality”, IJEEP, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 28–34, Mar. 2016, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA38NP33SN
ISNAD
Pala, Aynur. “Which Energy-Growth Hypothesis Is Valid in OECD Countries? Evidence from Panel Granger Causality”. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 6/1 (March 1, 2016): 28-34. https://izlik.org/JA38NP33SN.
JAMA
1.Pala A. Which Energy-Growth Hypothesis is Valid in OECD Countries? Evidence from Panel Granger Causality. IJEEP. 2016;6:28–34.
MLA
Pala, Aynur. “Which Energy-Growth Hypothesis Is Valid in OECD Countries? Evidence from Panel Granger Causality”. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, vol. 6, no. 1, Mar. 2016, pp. 28-34, https://izlik.org/JA38NP33SN.
Vancouver
1.Aynur Pala. Which Energy-Growth Hypothesis is Valid in OECD Countries? Evidence from Panel Granger Causality. IJEEP [Internet]. 2016 Mar. 1;6(1):28-34. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA38NP33SN