BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Which Energy-Growth Hypothesis is Valid in OECD Countries? Evidence from Panel Granger Causality

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 28 - 34, 01.03.2016
https://izlik.org/JA38NP33SN

Öz

This paper aims to determine which energy consumption-economic growth hypothesis is valid in OECD countries. For this purpose, we used panel cointegration, panel Granger causality and panel vector error correction model for the period of 1995-2013. Panel cointegration test outcomes support the long-term equilibrium link among economic growth, energy consumption, labor force and capital formation. The consequences obtained from panel vector error correction model suggests that there is evidence of bi-directional causality between energy consumption and economic growth in the short-term. However, a long-run causality is not found between energy consumption and economic growth. This implies indicated that the OECD countries’ economies are founded on energy and the feedback hypothesis is valid in OECD countries. Policy makers in OECD countries consider the feedback effect by employing arrangements to cut energy consumption.

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 28 - 34, 01.03.2016
https://izlik.org/JA38NP33SN

Öz

Toplam 0 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Diğer ID JA85NY35ZD
Yazarlar

Aynur Pala Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Mart 2016
IZ https://izlik.org/JA38NP33SN
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2016 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Pala, A. (2016). Which Energy-Growth Hypothesis is Valid in OECD Countries? Evidence from Panel Granger Causality. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 6(1), 28-34. https://izlik.org/JA38NP33SN
AMA 1.Pala A. Which Energy-Growth Hypothesis is Valid in OECD Countries? Evidence from Panel Granger Causality. IJEEP. 2016;6(1):28-34. https://izlik.org/JA38NP33SN
Chicago Pala, Aynur. 2016. “Which Energy-Growth Hypothesis is Valid in OECD Countries? Evidence from Panel Granger Causality”. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 6 (1): 28-34. https://izlik.org/JA38NP33SN.
EndNote Pala A (01 Mart 2016) Which Energy-Growth Hypothesis is Valid in OECD Countries? Evidence from Panel Granger Causality. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 6 1 28–34.
IEEE [1]A. Pala, “Which Energy-Growth Hypothesis is Valid in OECD Countries? Evidence from Panel Granger Causality”, IJEEP, c. 6, sy 1, ss. 28–34, Mar. 2016, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA38NP33SN
ISNAD Pala, Aynur. “Which Energy-Growth Hypothesis is Valid in OECD Countries? Evidence from Panel Granger Causality”. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 6/1 (01 Mart 2016): 28-34. https://izlik.org/JA38NP33SN.
JAMA 1.Pala A. Which Energy-Growth Hypothesis is Valid in OECD Countries? Evidence from Panel Granger Causality. IJEEP. 2016;6:28–34.
MLA Pala, Aynur. “Which Energy-Growth Hypothesis is Valid in OECD Countries? Evidence from Panel Granger Causality”. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, c. 6, sy 1, Mart 2016, ss. 28-34, https://izlik.org/JA38NP33SN.
Vancouver 1.Aynur Pala. Which Energy-Growth Hypothesis is Valid in OECD Countries? Evidence from Panel Granger Causality. IJEEP [Internet]. 01 Mart 2016;6(1):28-34. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA38NP33SN