EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON CHARPY IMPACT TOUGHNESS OF JUTE FABRIC REINFORCED SANDWICH COMPOSITES: BALSA VS. XPS CORES

Abstract

This study experimentally investigates the Charpy impact characteristics of sandwich composites comprising jute fabric reinforced epoxy face sheets with two distinct core materials: natural balsa wood and synthetic Extruded Polystyrene (XPS) foam. The composite panels were fabricated using a hand lay-up technique followed by hot-press consolidation. Three configurations were tested according to ISO 179-1 standards: monolithic jute laminate, Jute/Balsa/Jute, and Jute/XPS/Jute sandwich structures. The results demonstrated that the core material significantly governs the impact response and energy absorption capacity. The balsa-core sandwich composite exhibited the highest average impact toughness (1.99 J), absorbing 184% more energy than the monolithic jute laminate (0.70 J) and approximately 90% more than the XPS-core configuration (1.05 J). Fractographic analysis revealed that balsa-core specimens underwent ductile failure mechanisms, including fiber pull-out and matrix deformation, whereas XPS-core specimens exhibited brittle fracture with limited energy dissipation. These findings highlight the potential of balsa-cored natural fiber composites for sustainable, lightweight, and impact-resistant structural applications.

Keywords

• Charpy impact test
• Sandwich composites
• Jute fiber
• Balsa core
• XPS foam.

References

1. [1] Sanjay MR, Madhu P, Jawaid M, Senthamaraikannan P, Senthil S, Pradeep S. Characterization and properties of natural fiber polymer composites: A comprehensive review. J Clean Prod 2018; 172: 566–581.
2. [2] Mohanty AK, Misra M, Hinrichsen G. Review on the impact behavior of natural fiber epoxy-based composites. Polym Compos 2002; 23(6): 855–873.
3. [3] Faruk O, Bledzki AK, Fink HP, Sain M. Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibers: 2000–2010. Prog Polym Sci 2012; 37(11): 1552–1596.
4. [4] Liu H, Wu Z, Liu Y, Wang Y. Low-velocity impact response of natural fibre-based sandwich composites. Compos Part B Eng 2020; 192: 107987.
5. [5]Sultana, N., Hasan, M., Habib, A., Saifullah, A., Azim, A. Y. M. A., Alimuzzaman, S., & Sarker, F. (2023). Short Jute Fiber Preform Reinforced Polypropylene Thermoplastic Composite: Experimental Investigation and Its Theoretical Stiffness Prediction. ACS Omega, 8(27), 24311–24322. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c01533
6. [6] Zenkert D. The Handbook of Sandwich Construction. EMAS Publishing, 1995.
7. [7] Galos J. Review of balsa core sandwich composite structures. J Sandw Struct Mater 2022; 24(3): 874–898.
8. [8] Chaves AR, d’Almeida JRM, Monteiro SN. Mechanical behavior of epoxy–balsa sandwich structures. Mater Res 2008; 11(2): 193–197.

9. [9] Aktas M, Bal B. An experimental investigation on the impact response of sandwich composites with different core materials. Compos Struct 2013; 106: 701–708.
10. [10] Arya M, et al. Jute fiber-reinforced bio-based sandwich composites for lightweight structural applications. Polymers 2023; 15(2): 265.
11. [11] Jang J. Advanced Fiber-Reinforced Composite Materials. Elsevier, 2011.
12. [12] Cantwell WJ, Morton J. The impact resistance of composite materials — a review. Composites 1991; 22(5): 347–362.
13. [13] Pereira AC, Rodrigues DL, Silva RM. Charpy impact tenacity of epoxy matrix composites reinforced with aligned jute fibers. Polym Test 2017; 63: 516–523.
14. [14] Najafi SK, Tajvidi M, Hamidina E. Effect of core type and thickness on the mechanical properties of sandwich panels made from wood flour–polypropylene composites. Compos Part A 2009; 40(5): 723–727.
15. [15] Feng G, Liu Y, Xu Z. Experimental and numerical study on the impact mechanical response of sandwich structures with foam and wood cores. Compos Struct 2024; 327: 117682.