Comparative analysis of non-invasive measurement methods for optimizing architectural documentation

Year 2024, , 302 - 313, 28.07.2024

Serhan Tuncer , Uğur Avdan

https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.1424881

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Architectural documentation not only plays a critical role in the conservation of historical structures, but also enables their detailed comprehension of the structure. This study aims to assess the most effective methods for drawing and modeling architectural structures and present their advantages and disadvantages. Measurements play a significant role in this context, and today's technology offers the potential to accelerate this process and enhance accuracy. However, the application of these technologies can impose additional burdens such as elevated expenses, the requisite for specialized personnel, and the management of substantial data volumes. Therefore, determining the appropriate measurement method in line with the quality of architectural documentation is essential. For this study, the Mosque of Kurşunlu Complex in Eskişehir was selected for its historical and topographical attributes which enabled all methods to be examined. The data produced via terrestrial laser scanning, aerial photogrammetry and terrestrial photogrammetry methods were examined in terms of the production of drawings and models for different analysis methods such as structure, daylight and building acoustics, as well as survey drawings required for the architectural documentation processes of the building. The study concluded that no single method could produce holistic data on its own, and the best results for comprehensive documentation were achieved by integrating terrestrial laser scanning and aerial photogrammetry. Furthermore, for products that do not require comprehensive data, photogrammetric methods were more efficient.

Keywords

Terrestrial laser scanners, UAV, Photogrammetry, Architectural documentation, Non-invasive survey methods

References

• Özendi, M. (2022). Kültür varlıklarının yersel lazer tarama yöntemi ile dijital dokümantasyonu: Zonguldak Uzun Mehmet Anıtı örneği. Geomatik, 7(2), 139-148. https://doi.org/10.29128/geomatik.917528
• Uslu, A., & Uysal, M. (2017). Arkeolojik eserlerin fotogrametri yöntemi ile 3 boyutlu modellenmesi: Demeter Heykeli örneği. Geomatik, 2(2), 60-65. https://doi.org/10.29128/geomatik.319279
• Sarıtaş, B., Aydar, U., & Karademir, B. (2023). The Use of Terrestrial Laser Scanning Technology in the Documentation of Cultural Heritage: The Case of Bezmialem Valide Sultan Fountain. Advanced LiDAR, 3(2), 62-69.
• Köse, S., & Us, H. (2023). Application of Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) Technology for Documentation of Cultural Heritage Buildings and Structures: A Case Study Sarı İsmail Sultan Tomb. Advanced LiDAR, 3(1), 35-40.
• Doğan, Y., & Yakar, M. (2018). GIS and three-dimensional modeling for cultural heritages. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 3(2), 50-55. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.378257
• Pavlidis, G., & Royo, S. (2017). 3D Depth Scanning. Digital Techniques for Documenting and Preserving Cultural Heritage: Arc Humanities Press, 195-198.
• Bertellini, B., Gottardi, C., & Vernier, P. (2020). 3D survey techniques for the conservation and the enhancement of a Venetian historical architecture. Applied Geomatics, 12, 53-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-019-00267-6
• Guery, J., Hess, M., & Mathys, A. (2017). Photogrammetry. Digital Techniques for Documenting and Preserving Cultural Heritage: Arc Humanities, 229-235.
• www.kulturportali.gov.tr
• Yaman, A., & Yılmaz, H. M. (2017). The effect of object surface colors on terrestrial laser scanners. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 2(2), 68-74. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.296835
• Reznicek, J., & Pavelka, K. (2008). New low-cost 3d scanning techniques for cultural heritage documentation. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 37, 5298-5301.
• Riegl, M. (2015). General Description and Data Interfaces. Horn: Riegl Laser Measurement Systems.
• Hanke, K., & Grussenmeyer, P. (2002). Architectural Photogrammetry: Basic Theory, Procedures, Tools. ISPRS Commission, 5.
• Jo, Y. H., & Hong, S. (2019). Three-dimensional digital documentation of cultural heritage site based on the convergence of terrestrial laser scanning and unmanned aerial vehicle photogrammetry. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 8(2), 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8020053
• DJI, M. (2016). DJI Phantom 3 User Manual: DJI.
• DJI, M. (2016). DJI Pahntom 4 User Manual: DJI.
• Asadpour, A. (2021). Documenting historic tileworks using smartphone-based photogrammetry. Mersin Photogrammetry Journal, 3(1), 15-20. https://doi.org/10.53093/mephoj.899432
• Pellegri, G. (2015). Survey and drawing representation of architecture and environment: different teaching approach for architects and engineers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 4090-4095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.1159
• Özbalmumcu, M. (2007). Fotogrametrik yöntemle ortofoto harita üretiminin temel esasları, ortofotonun yararları ve kullanım alanları. TUFUAB IX. Teknik Sempozyumu, İstanbul.
• Xiang, H., & Tian, L. (2011). Method for automatic georeferencing aerial remote sensing (RS) images from an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) platform. Biosystems Engineering, 108(2), 104-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2010.11.003
• Harris, C. M. (2006). Dictionary of Architecture and Construction. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company
• İnce, K. (2011). Eskişehir Kurşunlu Külliyesi. Ankara: Bilgin Kültür Sanat.
• Christensen, C. L., & Koutsouris, G. (2013). ODEON Room Acoustics Software. Denmark: Scion DTU
• Ahunbay, Z. (2016). Tarihi Çevre Koruma ve Restorasyon. İstanbul: YEM Yayın.
• Doğan, Y. (2019). 3D Modelling of Bridges by UAV Photogrammetry Method. Mersin Photogrammetry Journal, 1(1), 7-11.
• Aktan, N., Çolak, A., & Yılmaz, H. M. (2022). Production of orthophoto by UAV data: Yaprakhisar example. Advanced UAV, 2(1), 17-23.
• Karataş, L., Alptekin, A., Karabacak, A., Yakar, M. (2022). Detection and documentation of stone material deterioration in historical masonry buildings using UAV photogrammetry: A case study of Mersin Sarisih Inn. Mersin Photogrammetry Journal, 4(2), 53-61. https://doi.org/10.53093/mephoj.1198605