Assessing the applicability of the MCRAT, RAPS, RAMS and RATMI methods in the optimization of a dam geodetic control network

Year 2025, Volume: 10 Issue: 3, 364 - 379, 17.09.2025

Darko Anđić

https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.1630726

Abstract

Only a few studies have so far addressed the applicability of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods in the optimization of geodetic control networks. For instance, the methods such as Višekriterijumsko Kompromisno Rangiranje/Rešenje (VIKOR) (in english: Multi-Criteria Optimization and Compromise Ranking/Solution), Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment of Evaluations (PROMETHEE), Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison (MABAC), Multi-Attributive Ideal-Real Comparative Analysis (MAIRCA), Combined Compromise Solution (COCOSO), Range of Value (ROV) can be mentioned. Among them, the VIKOR method, it can be said, proved to be the most suitable tool in the mention area of engineering geodesy as it allows treating alternative solutions identified in a specific task in a desired way by using different preferential approaches represented by sets of criterion weights. Thus, the VIKOR method is used as a reference herein, and methods whose applicability is tested are four novel methods that have been used in some other areas, different from geodesy. It is about Multiple Criteria Ranking by Alternative Trace (MCRAT), Ranking the Alternatives by Perimeter Similarity (RAPS), Ranking by Alternatives Median Similarity (RAMS) and Ranking by Alternatives Using the Trace to Median Index (RATMI). The subject of this study is optimization of a 2D geodetic control network established to provide information regarding horizontal movements of a dam. The dam is located in Montenegro. The optimization is performed considering several pre-set constraints related to precision and reliability in the corresponding geodetic network. It turned out the four tested MCDM methods provided exactly the same results that were highly correlated with those obtained using the selected reference method. This fact led to the conclusion those four novel methods could be equally used in tasks similar to the one presented herein.

Keywords

MCRAT , RAPS , RAMS , RATMI , Geodetic Control Network

References

• Grafarend, E. W. (1974). Optimization of Geodetic Networks. The Canadian Surveyor, 28(5), 716–723. https://doi.org/10.1139/tcs-1974-0120
• Schmitt, G. (1982). Optimization of Geodetic Networks. Reviews of Geophysics, 20(4), 877–884. https://doi.org/10.1139/tcs-1974-0120
• Anđić, D., & Đurović, R. (2023). The use of VIKOR Method in Finding the Optimal Solution for a Special-Purpose Geodetic Network Design. Geodetski Vestnik, 67(2), 196–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.15292/geodetski-vestnik.2023.02.196-212
• Khorrami, B., & Kamran, K. V. (2022). A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach for the assessment of forest health applying hyper spectral imageries: A case study from Ramsar forest, North of Iran. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 7(3), 214–220. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.940166
• Pandian, R. S., Udayakumar, S., Balaji, K. K. P., & Narayanan, R. L. (2023). Identification of groundwater potential for urban development using multi-criteria decision-making method of analytical hierarchy process. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 8(3), 318–328.https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.1190998
• Hasanzadeh, M., Kamran, K. V., Feizizadeh, B., & Mollabashi, S. H. (2024). GIS based spatial decision-making approach for solar energy site selection, Ardabil, Iran. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 9(1), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.1341451
• Yaman, A. (2024). A GIS-based multi-criteria decision-making approach (GIS-MCDM) for determination of the most appropriate site selection of onshore wind farm in Adana, Turkey. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 26(12), 4231–4254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-024-02866-3
• Mousavi, V., Varshosaz, M., Rashidi, M., & Li, W. (2022). A New Multi-Criteria Tie Point Filtering Approach to Increase the Accuracy of UAV Photogrammetry Models. Drones, 6(12), Art. No. 413. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones6120413
• Marinković, G., Ilić, Z., Nestorović, Ž., Božić, M., & Bulatović, V. (2024). Sensitivity of Multi-Criteria Analysis Methods in Rural Land Consolidation Project Ranking. Land, 13(2), Art. No. 245. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13020245
• Anđić, D. (2010). Multi-Objective Optimization of Geodetic Control Network for Bridge Pillars Marking. At the 3rd International Scientific and Professional Meeting: ”Civil Engineering – Science and Practice”, February 15-19, Žabljak, Montenegro. Proceedings (pp. 1485–1490). University of Montenegro, Faculty of Civil Engineering in Podgorica. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/386471874_Multi-Objective_Optimization_of_Geodetic_Control_Network_for_Bridge_Pillars_Marking_published_in_Montenegrin_Visekriterijumska_optimizacija_geodetske_kontrolne_mreze_za_obiljezavanje_stubova_mosta
• Kobryń, A. (2019). Multicriteria Decision Making in Geodetic Network Design. Journal of Surveying Engineering, 146(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000301
• Anđić, D. (2024). Comparison of a tower geodetic micro-network optimization results obtained using the MABAC, MAIRCA, COCOSO and ROV methods with those obtained applying the VIKOR method. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, 20(10), 81–95. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/386388586_Comparison_of_a_tower_geodetic_micro-network_optimization_results_obtained_using_the_MABAC_MAIRCA_COCOSO_and_ROV_methods_with_those_obtained_applying_the_VIKOR_method
• Urošević, K., Gligorić, Z., Miljanović, I., Beljić, Č., & Gligorić, M. (2021). Novel Methods in Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Process (MCRAT and RAPS) – Application in the Mining Industry. Mathematics, 9(16), Art. No. 1980. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9161980
• Bafail, O. A., Abdulaal, R. M. S., & Kabli, M. R. (2022). AHP-RAPS Approach for Evaluating the Productivity of Engineering Departments at a Public University. Systems, 10(4), Art. No. 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems10040107
• Abdulaal, R. M. S., & Bafail, O. A. (2022). Two New Approaches (RAMS-RATMI) in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Tactics. Journal of Mathematics, 2022(1), Art. No. 6725318. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6725318
• Ulutaş, A., Balo, F., & Topal, A. (2023). Identifying the Most Efficient Natural Fibre for Common Commercial Building Insulation Materials with an Integrated PSI, MEREC, LOPCOW and MCRAT Model. Polymers, 15(6), Art. No. 1500. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15061500
• Barasin, A. M., Alqahtani, A. Y., & Makki, A. A. (2024). Performance Evaluation of Retail Warehouses: A Combined MCDM Approach Using G-BWM and RATMI. Logistics, 8(1), Art. No. 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics8010010
• Deniz Başar, Ö., Özden, Ü. H., & Bağdatlı Kalkan, S. (2024). Comparing The Performance of Women's National Volleyball Teams at the 2024 Paris Olympics Using Rams, Raps and Other Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods. Social Sciences Research Journal, 13(1), 257–267. Retrieved from https://avesis.ticaret.edu.tr/yayin/6bd55362-9199-485f-8f4c-1ef30b6e3b74/comparingtheperformanceofwomensnationalvolleyballteams-at-the-2024-paris-olympics-using-rams-raps-and-other-multi-criteriadecisionmakingmethods
• Dua, T. V. (2025). Development of the PSI-RAPS-MCRAT method: a hybrid model. EUREKA: Physics and Engineering, 1, 13–23. https://doi.org/10.21303/2461-4262.2025.003404
• Chatterjee, S., & Chakraborty, Sh. (2025). An intuitionistic fuzzy extension to RAMS-RATMI methods for optimizing electrical discharge machining processes. Journal of Fuzzy Extension and Applications, 6(1), 71–93. https://doi.org/10.22105/jfea.2024.450105.1427
• Perović, G. (2005). Least Squares. Monograph. Belgrade, Serbia: Faculty of Civil Engineering
• von Winterfeldt, D., & Edwards, W. (1986). Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press
• Opricović, S. (1986). Višekriterijumska optimizacija. Beograd, Srbija: Naučna knjiga
• Opricović, S. (1998). Višekriterijumska optimizacija sistema u građevinarstvu. Beograd, Srbija: Građevinski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu
• Churchman C. W., & Ackoff R. L. (1954). An approximate measure of value. Journal of Operations Research Society of America, 2(2), 172–187. https://www.jstor.org/stable/166603
• Maniya, K., & Bhatt, M. G. (2010). A selection of material using a novel type decision-making method: Preference selection index method. Materials and Design, 31(4), 1785–1789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.11.020
• Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D., Puška, A., & Chatterjee, P. (2020). Sustainable supplier selection in healthcare industries using a new MCDM method: Measurement Alternatives and Ranking according to COmpromise Solution (MARCOS). Computers & Industrial Engineering, 140, Art. No. 106231, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106231
• Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., & Antucheviciene, J. (2016). A new combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) method for multi-criteria decision-making. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 50(3), 25–44. https://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/handle/123456789/116529
• Pehlivan, H. (2021). The Analysis Methodology of Robotic Total Station Data for Determination of Structural Displacements. Advanced Geomatics, 1(1), 1–7. Retrieved from https://publish.mersin.edu.tr/index.php/geomatics/article/view/18
• Pehlivan, H., Karadeniz, B., & Arı, B. (2023). Examination of the Performance of Precise Point Positioning Technique with Real-Time Products on Smartphones. Advanced Geomatics, 3(1), 33–39. Retrieved from https://publish.mersin.edu.tr/index.php/geomatics/article/view/824
• Karadeniz, B., Pehlivan, H., Altıntaş, A. F., & Usta, S. (2024). Comparison of Network-RTK and PPP Technique in terms of Position Accuracy. Advanced Geomatics, 4(1), 31–36. Retrieved from https://publish.mersin.edu.tr/index.php/geomatics/article/view/1189
• Deliry, S. I., & Avdan, U. (2024). Accuracy assessment of UAS photogrammetry and structure from motion in surveying and mapping. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 9(2), 165–190. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.1366146