KARBON NÖTRLÜĞÜNE GİDEN YOLDA CCS TEKNOLOJİLERİ VE DİJİTALLEŞME PERSPEKTİFİ: SOSYAL, POLİTİK VE EKONOMİK BOYUTLARI OLAN BÜTÜNCÜL BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Abstract

Düşük karbonlu bir enerji sistemine küresel geçiş, emisyon azaltma, kontrol ve dengeleme süreçlerini yeni nesil teknolojilerle entegre eden kapsamlı karbon yönetimi stratejileri gerektirmektedir. Karbon Yakalama ve Depolama (CCS), enerji üretimi, demir-çelik ve çimento gibi enerji yoğun sektörlerde CO₂ emisyonlarını azaltmak için en umut verici yaklaşımlardan biri haline gelmiştir. Ancak geleneksel CCS uygulamaları, yüksek sermaye ve işletme maliyetleri, enerji verimliliği kayıpları ve toplumsal kabul sorunları gibi önemli zorluklarla karşı karşıyadır. Son çalışmalar, dijital ikizler, yapay zekâ (YZ), Nesnelerin İnterneti (IoT) sensör ağları ve blok zinciri tabanlı izleme sistemleri gibi yeni nesil dijital araçların entegrasyonunun, CCS operasyonlarının verimliliğini, şeffaflığını ve güvenliğini artırabileceğini göstermektedir. Bu teknolojiler, süreç optimizasyonunu geliştirmekte, enerji verimliliği kayıplarını azaltmakta ve MRV (İzleme, Raporlama, Doğrulama) çerçevelerini güçlendirerek CCS'nin daha geniş çapta benimsenmesine katkıda bulunmaktadır. Politika analizleri, CCS'nin yaygınlaştırılması için etkili karbon fiyatlandırmasının, uluslararası iş birliğinin ve finansal teşviklerin kritik önemini vurgulamaktadır. Bu bağlamda, CCS yalnızca fosil yakıt bazlı altyapının karbondan arındırılması için bir "geçiş teknolojisi" olarak değil, aynı zamanda karbonun yeniden kullanımını sağladığı için karbon ekonomisinin de temel taşı olarak kabul edilmektedir. Bu çalışma, enerji sektörü bağlamında karbon yönetim sistemleri ve CCS teknolojilerinin bütünsel entegrasyonunu, avantajlarını ve zorluklarını ele almakta ve mevcut teknolojilerin bir değerlendirmesini sunmayı amaçlamaktadır.

Keywords

• CO₂ emisyonları
• CCS teknolojileri
• Yeni Nesil CCS
• Yanma sonrası yakalama
• Yapay zeka
• Nesnelerin İnterneti (IoT)
• Karbon yönetimi
• Enerji dönüşümü

CCS TECHNOLOGIES AND DIGITALIZATION PERSPECTIVE ON THE ROAD TO CARBON NEUTRALITY: A HOLISTIC RESEARCH WITH SOCIAL, POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC DIMENSIONS

Abstract

The global transition to a low-carbon energy system requires comprehensive carbon management strategies that integrate emissions reduction, control, and offset processes with next-generation technologies. Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) has become one of the most promising approaches for reducing CO₂ emissions in energy-intensive sectors such as power generation, iron and steel, and cement. However, traditional CCS applications face significant challenges, including high capital and operating costs, energy efficiency losses, and social acceptance issues. Recent studies demonstrate that the integration of next-generation digital tools, such as digital twins, artificial intelligence (AI), Internet of Things (IoT) sensor networks, and blockchain-based monitoring systems, can increase the efficiency, transparency, and security of CCS operations. These technologies enhance process optimization, reduce energy efficiency losses, and strengthen MRV (Monitoring, Reporting, Verification) frameworks, contributing to the wider adoption of CCS. Policy analyses highlight the critical importance of effective carbon pricing, international cooperation, and financial incentives for scaling up CCS. In this context, CCS is considered not only a "transition technology" for decarbonizing fossil fuel-based infrastructure but also a cornerstone of the carbon economy because it enables carbon reuse. This study discusses the holistic integration of carbon management systems and CCS technologies in the context of the energy sector, their advantages and challenges, and aims to present an evaluation of current technologies.

Keywords

• CO₂ emissions
• CCS technologies
• Next-Generation CCS
• Post-Combustion capture
• Artificial intelligence
• IoT
• Carbon management
• Energy transformation

References

1. [1] IEA, “About CCUS,” Paris, France, 2021.
2. [2] M. Ravichandran, T. T. Ajith Kumar, and R. Dineshkumar, “Carbon dioxide capture, sequestration, and utilization models for carbon management and transformation,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 31, no. 44, pp. 55895–55916, 2024.
3. [3] J. Chen, C. Xu, M. Gao, and D. Li, “Carbon peak and its mitigation implications for China in the post-pandemic era,” Sci. Rep., vol. 12, no. 1, Art. no. 3473, 2022.
4. [4] J. J. Alava and G. G. Singh, “Changing air pollution and CO2 emissions during the COVID-19 pandemic: Lesson learned and future equity concerns of post-COVID recovery,” Environ. Sci. Policy, vol. 130, pp. 1–8, 2022.
5. [5] M. Q. Rasheed, A. Haseeb, T. S. Adebayo, Z. Ahmed, and M. Ahmad, “The long-run relationship between energy consumption, oil prices, and carbon dioxide emissions in European countries,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 29, pp. 24234–24247, 2021.
6. [6] M. G. Fikru, T. Shen, J. Brodmann, and H. Ma, “A strategic insight into the market for carbon management capacity,” Sustain. Futures, vol. 8, Art. no. 100374, 2024.
7. [7] W. Shen et al., “Research on digital energy carbon management platform and services for energy-using companies under the ‘3060’ target,” in IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 1171, no. 1, Art. no. 012019, 2023.
8. [8] S. Hochmeier, L. Kühberger, J. Kulich, H. Ott, and T. Kienberger, “A methodology for the determination of future carbon management strategies: A case study of Austria,” Int. J. Sustain. Energy Plan. Manag., vol. 41, pp. 108–124, 2024.

9. [9] C. F. A. Rodrigues, M. A. P. Dinis, and M. J. Lemos de Sousa, “Review of European energy policies regarding the recent ‘carbon capture, utilization and storage’ technologies scenario and the role of coal seams,” Environ. Earth Sci., vol. 74, pp. 2553–2561, 2015.
10. [10] O. O. Dosumu, O. Adediwin, E. O. Nwulu, and U. B. Chibunna, “Carbon capture and storage (CCS) in the U.S.: A review of market challenges and …,” Int. J. Multidiscip. Res. Growth Eval., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1515–1529, 2024.
11. [11] C. von Stechow, J. Watson, and B. Praetorius, “Policy incentives for carbon capture and storage technologies in Europe: A qualitative multi-criteria analysis,” Glob. Environ. Change, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 346–357, 2011.
12. [12] B. Atilgan and A. Azapagic, “Life cycle environmental impacts of electricity from fossil fuels in Turkey,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 106, pp. 555–564, 2015.
13. [13] S. G. Gizer, O. Polat, M. K. Ram, and N. Sahiner, “Recent developments in CO2 capture, utilization, related materials, and challenges,” Int. J. Energy Res., vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 16241–16263, 2022.
14. [14] Y. Zheng, L. Gao, S. He, and H. Jin, “Reduction potential of the energy penalty for CO2 capture in CCS,” Front. Energy, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 390–399, 2023.
15. [15] K. Gustafsson, R. Sadegh-Vaziri, S. Grönkvist, F. Levihn, and C. Sundberg, “BECCS with combined heat and power: Assessing the energy penalty,” Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, vol. 110, Art. no. 103434, 2021.
16. [16] D. Loachamin et al., “Amine-based solvents and additives to improve the CO2 capture processes: A review,” ChemEngineering, vol. 8, no. 6, Art. no. 129, 2024.
17. [17] C. C. Cormoş et al., “Synthetic natural gas (SNG) production by biomass gasification with CO2 capture: Techno-economic and life cycle analysis (LCA),” Energy, vol. 312, Art. no. 133507, 2024.
18. [18] D. Bose et al., “Innovative approaches for carbon capture and storage as crucial measures for emission reduction within industrial sectors,” Carbon Capture Sci. Technol., vol. 12, Art. no. 100238, 2024.
19. [19] S. Paltsev, J. Morris, H. Kheshgi, and H. Herzog, “Hard-to-abate sectors: The role of industrial carbon capture and storage (CCS) in emission mitigation,” Appl. Energy, vol. 300, Art. no. 117322, 2021.
20. [20] J. Gibbins and H. Chalmers, “Carbon capture and storage,” Energy Policy, vol. 36, no. 12, pp. 4317–4322, 2008.
21. [21] K. Zhou, J. Zhang, and M. Xu, “How to incentive carbon capture and storage technology application in waste-to-energy industry: A facility-level integrated assessment of China,” Carbon Capture Sci. Technol., vol. 14, Art. no. 100364, 2025.
22. [22] D. Y. Shu et al., “The role of carbon capture and storage to achieve net-zero energy systems: Trade-offs between economics and the environment,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 178, Art. no. 113246, 2023.
23. [23] A. G. Olabi et al., “Prospect of post combustion carbon capture technology and its impact on the circular economy,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 22, Art. no. 8639, 2022.
24. [24] P. E. Hardisty, M. Sivapalan, and P. Brooks, “The environmental and economic sustainability of carbon capture and storage,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 1460–1477, 2011.
25. [25] X. Tian et al., “Unleashing tomorrow’s potential: A comprehensive exploration of risks in carbon capture and storage,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 210, Art. no. 115174, 2025.
26. [26] M. Shen et al., “Carbon capture and storage (CCS): Development path based on carbon neutrality and economic policy,” Carbon Neutrality, vol. 1, no. 1, Art. no. 37, 2022.
27. [27] G. E. Martínez, “Influence of carbon dioxide removal policies in carbon capture utilization and storage system development,” 2023.
28. [28] M. N. Rahman, “Regulatory and standard insights on transboundary CO2 in the context of MRV,” Future Sustainability, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1–11, 2025.
29. [29] P. Psarras, M. Pisciotta, and H. Pilorgé, “Advancing the social license for carbon management in achieving net-zero GHG emissions,” 2024.
30. [30] C. Böhringer, “The Kyoto protocol: A review and perspectives,” Oxford Rev. Econ. Policy, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 451–466, 2003.
31. [31] I. Popova, “Emission trading systems as an instrument in the toolkit of decarbonization strategies,” Int. Organ. Res. J., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 62–94, 2022.
32. [32] M. J. Regufe et al., “Current developments of carbon capture storage and/or utilization—Looking for net-zero emissions defined in the Paris Agreement,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 9, Art. no. 2406, 2021.
33. [33] M. Pera-Titus, “Porous inorganic membranes for CO2 capture: Present and prospects,” Chem. Rev., vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 1413–1492, 2013.
34. [34] T. M. Gür, “Carbon dioxide emissions, capture, storage and utilization: Review of materials, processes and technologies,” Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., vol. 89, Art. no. 100965, 2022.
35. [35] D. Kearns, H. Liu, and C. Consoli, “Technology readiness and costs of CCS,” Global CCS Institute, 2021.
36. [36] S. Park, H. Mun, J. Park, and I. Lee, “Cost optimization methodology based on carbon-techno-economic analysis: An application to post-combustion carbon capture process,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 434, Art. no. 139887, 2024.
37. [37] D. Ferrario, T. Pröll, S. Stendardo, and A. Lanzini, “Cost and environmentally efficient design of an absorption-based post-combustion carbon capture unit for industry applications,” Chem. Eng. J., vol. 494, Art. no. 152900, 2024.
38. [38] G. E. Martinez, “Influence of carbon dioxide removal policies in carbon capture utilization and storage system development,” 2023.
39. [39] E. Mostafavi, O. Ashrafi, and P. Navarri, “Assessment of process modifications for amine-based post-combustion carbon capture processes,” Cleaner Eng. Technol., vol. 4, Art. no. 100249, 2021.
40. [40] L. Marques et al., “Review of post-combustion carbon capture in Europe: Current technologies and future strategies for largest CO2-emitting industries,” Energies, vol. 18, no. 13, Art. no. 3539, 2025.
41. [41] Z. Qiu, “Applications of carbon capture technologies in steel and cement industries,” Adv. Econ. Manag. Political Sci., vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 36–41, 2024.
42. [42] S. C. Galusnyak, L. Petrescu, and C.-C. Cormos, “Environmental impact assessment of post-combustion CO2 capture technologies applied to cement production plants,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 320, Art. no. 115908, 2022.
43. [43] C. Dong et al., “LCA-based cost-benefit assessment and carbon footprint accounting of CCUS technologies in China,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 486, Art. no. 144557, 2025.
44. [44] J. F. D. Tapia et al., “A review of optimization and decision-making models for the planning of CO2 capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) systems,” Sustain. Prod. Consum., vol. 13, pp. 1–15, 2018.
45. [45] X. Cao, S. Chen, and W. Xiang, “Life cycle assessment of post-combustion carbon capture and storage for the ultra-supercritical pulverized coal power plant,” Sci. Total Environ., vol. 927, Art. no. 172047, 2024.
46. [46] H. Sultan et al., “Reducing the efficiency penalty of carbon dioxide capture and compression process in a natural gas combined cycle power plant by process modification and liquefied natural gas cold energy integration,” Energy Convers. Manage., vol. 244, Art. no. 114495, 2021.
47. [47] C.-C. Cormos, “Techno-economic assessment of calcium and magnesium-based sorbents for post-combustion CO2 capture applied in fossil-fueled power plants,” Fuel, vol. 298, Art. no. 120794, 2021.
48. [48] P. R. Díaz-Herrera, A. Romero-Martínez, and G. Ascanio, “Cost projection of combined cycle power plants equipped with post-combustion carbon capture,” Front. Energy Res., vol. 10, Art. no. 987166, 2022.
49. [49] A. S. Joel and Y. M. Isa, “Novelty in fossil fuel carbon abatement technologies in the 21st century: Post-combustion carbon capture,” J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 838–855, 2023.
50. [50] F. Hosseinifard et al., “Cost-effective solar-driven configurations for post-combustion carbon capture at Abadan Power Plant: MEA, DEA, and DGA absorption-based,” Cleaner Eng. Technol., vol. 23, Art. no. 100842, 2024.
51. [51] Z. Chen, “A review of pre-combustion carbon capture technology,” in Proc. 7th Int. Conf. Social Sci. Econ. Dev. (ICSSED 2022), 2022.
52. [52] P. Vaziri et al., “Advancing carbon capture technologies in CCS: A comprehensive review of pre-combustion processes,” Gas Sci. Eng., vol. 131, Art. no. 205481, 2024.
53. [53] D. Veskovic, J. D. Beard, M. Roberts, and D. Graham, “Decarbonize LNG liquefaction with pre-combustion CO2 capture technology,” Gas Processing & LNG, pp. 21–24, 2022.
54. [54] A. G. Olabi et al., “Assessment of the pre-combustion carbon capture contribution into sustainable development goals SDGs using novel indicators,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 153, Art. no. 111710, 2022.
55. [55] D. Obi, S. Onyekuru, and A. Orga, “Minimizing carbon capture costs in power plants: A novel dimensional analysis framework for techno-economic evaluation of oxyfuel combustion, pre-combustion, and post-combustion capture systems,” Energy Sci. Eng., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1749–1770, 2025.
56. [56] S. A. M. Hashmi, C. Y. Chuah, E. Yang, and W. C. Poon, “Advances in H2-selective metallic membranes for pre-combustion CO2 capture: A critical review,” Carbon Capture Sci. Technol., vol. 13, Art. no. 100247, 2024.
57. [57] Z. Ni, S. Li, X. Zhang, J. Bao, and N. Zhang, “Analysis and comparison of the membrane-cryogenic hybrid process and multistage membrane process for pre-combustion carbon capture based on the superstructure method,” Sep. Purif. Technol., vol. 353, Art. no. 128636, 2025.
58. [58] E. Koohestanian and F. Shahraki, “Review on principles, recent progress, and future challenges for oxy-fuel combustion CO2 capture using compression and purification unit,” J. Environ. Chem. Eng., vol. 9, Art. no. 105777, 2021.
59. [59] S. Talei et al., “Oxyfuel combustion makes carbon capture more efficient,” ACS Omega, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 3250–3261, 2024.
60. [60] Y. Yuan et al., “Energy and economic assessment of oxy-fuel combustion CO2 capture in coal-fired power plants,” Energies, vol. 17, no. 18, Art. no. 4626, 2024.
61. [61] D. G. Faria et al., “Integrating oxy-fuel combustion and power-to-gas in the cement industry: A process modeling and simulation study,” Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, vol. 114, Art. no. 103602, 2022.
62. [62] A. Pavithran, M. Sharma, and A. K. Shukla, “Oxy-fuel combustion power cycles: A sustainable way to reduce carbon dioxide emission,” Distributed Gener. Altern. Energy J., pp. 335–362, 2021.
63. [63] X. Huang et al., “Simulation of CO2 capture process in flue gas from oxy-fuel combustion plant and effects of properties of absorbent,” Separations, vol. 9, no. 4, Art. no. 95, 2022.
64. [64] J. Krzywanski et al., “Towards cleaner energy: An innovative model to minimize NOx emissions in chemical looping and CO2 capture technologies,” Energy, vol. 312, Art. no. 133397, 2024.
65. [65] J. Li, C. Zhang, M. R. Davidson, and X. Lu, “Assessing the synergies of flexibly-operated carbon capture power plants with variable renewable energy in large-scale power systems,” Appl. Energy, vol. 377, Art. no. 124459, 2025.
66. [66] A. Kumar and A. K. Tiwari, “Solar-assisted post-combustion carbon-capturing system retrofitted with coal-fired power plant towards net-zero future: A review,” J. CO2 Util., vol. 65, Art. no. 102241, 2022.
67. [67] R. Cremona et al., “Techno-economic assessment of high temperature heat pumps integrated in MEA-based post-combustion CO2 capture for cement plant,” Carbon Capture Sci. Technol., Art. no. 100446, 2025.
68. [68] M. N. Dods, E. J. Kim, J. R. Long, and S. C. Weston, “Deep CCS: Moving beyond 90% carbon dioxide capture,” Environ. Sci. Technol., vol. 55, no. 13, pp. 8524–8534, 2021.
69. [69] Q. Qerimi and B. S. Sergi, “The case for global regulation of carbon capture and storage and artificial intelligence for climate change,” Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, vol. 120, Art. no. 103757, 2022.
70. [70] L. Cao, “Application of artificial intelligence on the CO2 capture: A review,” J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., vol. 145, pp. 1751–1768, 2021.
71. [71] S. Bhatia et al., “Role of IoT, AI, and ML in carbon management: A convergence of technologies for efficient monitoring and analysis,” in Advanced Systems for Monitoring Carbon Sequestration. Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global, 2025, pp. 481–508.
72. [72] X. Chen, X. Wu, and K. Y. Lee, “The mutual benefits of renewables and carbon capture: Achieved by an artificial intelligent scheduling strategy,” Energy Convers. Manage., vol. 233, Art. no. 113856, 2021.
73. [73] X. Du, M. N. Khan, and G. C. Thakur, “Machine learning in carbon capture, utilization, storage, and transportation: A review of applications in greenhouse gas emissions reduction,” Processes, vol. 13, no. 4, Art. no. 1160, 2025.
74. [74] W. M. Ashraf and V. Dua, “Machine learning based modelling and optimization of post-combustion carbon capture process using MEA supporting carbon neutrality,” Digital Chem. Eng., vol. 8, Art. no. 100115, 2023.
75. [75] P. Vaziri and B. Sedaee, “A machine learning-based approach to the multiobjective optimization of CO2 injection and water production during CCS in a saline aquifer based on field data,” Energy Sci. Eng., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 1461–1687, 2023.
76. [76] J. O. Ojadi, C. S. Odionu, E. C. Onukwulu, and O. A. Owulade, “AI-powered computer vision for remote sensing and carbon emission detection in industrial and urban environments,” Iconic Res. Eng. J., vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 490–505, 2024.
77. [77] D. Wang et al., “A review of research progress in carbon monitoring and carbon metering methods: Comparison at home and abroad,” Processes, vol. 12, no. 12, 2024.
78. [78] K.-J. Kim, J. T. Culp, J. E. Ellis, and M. D. Reeder, “Real-time monitoring of gas-phase and dissolved CO2 using a mixed-matrix composite integrated fiber optic sensor for carbon storage application,” Environ. Sci. Technol., vol. 56, no. 15, pp. 10891–10903, 2022.
79. [79] A. Chawla et al., “IoT-based monitoring in carbon capture and storage systems,” IEEE Internet Things Mag., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 106–111, 2023.
80. [80] A. Lichtschlag et al., “Suitability analysis and revised strategies for marine environmental carbon capture and storage (CCS) monitoring,” Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, vol. 112, Art. no. 103510, 2021.
81. [81] L. Acampora, S. Grilletta, and G. Costa, “The integration of carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) in waste-to-energy plants: A review,” Energies, vol. 18, no. 8, Art. no. 1883, 2025.
82. [82] F. Hosseinifard et al., “Achieving net zero energy penalty in post-combustion carbon capture through solar energy: Parabolic trough and photovoltaic technologies,” Energy Convers. Manage.: X, vol. 24, Art. no. 100757, 2024.
83. [83] K. Z. House, C. F. Harvey, M. J. Aziz, and D. P. Schrag, “The energy penalty of post-combustion CO2 capture & storage and its implications for retrofitting the U.S. installed base,” Energy Environ. Sci., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 193–205, 2009.
84. [84] N. Bahman et al., “Review of carbon capture and storage technologies in selected industries: Potentials and challenges,” Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio/Technol., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 451–470, 2023.
85. [85] M. H. J.-J. François, A. Grimstvedt, and H. K. Knuutila, “Iron solubility measurements in aqueous MEA for CO2 capture,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 2318–2328, 2025.
86. [86] C. Sun, Y. Yan, W. Zhang, and D. Shao, “Measurement of CO2 leakage from pipelines under CCS conditions through acoustic emission detection and data driven modeling,” Measurement, vol. 237, Art. no. 115164, 2024.
87. [87] J. A. Davis, N. Salehi, L. Li, and M. Shafiee-Jood, “Carbon dioxide pipelines are disproportionally located in marginalized communities in the United States,” Commun. Earth Environ., vol. 6, no. 1, Art. no. 339, 2025.
88. [88] B. Eissa et al., “A review of key challenges and evaluation of well integrity in CO2 storage: Insights from Texas potential CCS fields,” Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 13, Art. no. 5911, 2025
89. [89] E. S. Rubin, J. E. Davison, and H. J. Herzog, “The cost of CO2 capture and storage,” Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, vol. 40, pp. 378–400, 2015.
90. [90] K. Sievert, L. Cameron, and A. Carter, “Why the cost of carbon capture and storage remains persistently high,” The Bottom Line: Unpacking the Future of Canada’s Oil, 2023.
91. [91] F. Swennenhuis, V. de Gooyert, and H. C. de Coninck, “Socio-technical dynamics of carbon dioxide capture and storage: A systems view on enablers and barriers at North Sea Port,” Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, vol. 137, Art. no. 104201, 2024.
92. [92] R. Tardin-Coelho, B. Bharadwaj, and P. Ashworth, “Carbon capture utilisation and storage (CCUS) and public perceptions: A systematic literature review,” Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, vol. 145, Art. no. 104393, 2025.
93. [93] A.-H. Mohammed, S. Anders, N. Lokuge, and M. van der Baan, “Public perceptions and the acceptance of CCS development in Canada – A vignette experiment,” SSRN, Art. no. 5010866, 2024.
94. [94] M. R. T. L. Abdullah, S. Siraj, and Z. Ghazali, “An ISM approach for managing critical stakeholder issues regarding carbon capture and storage (CCS) deployment in developing Asian countries,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 12, Art. no. 6618, 2021.
95. [95] J. Wang and M. Zhang, “Barriers or boosters? The role of governance pathways in deploying offshore carbon capture and storage: Comparative implications from the EU and China,” Front. Mar. Sci., vol. 12, Art. no. 1621290, 2025.
96. [96] A. L. Fontenelle et al., “The role of the Sustainable Development Goals for better governance of carbon capture and storage (CCS),” Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, vol. 62, pp. 478–498, 2023.
97. [97] P. Akhator and B. Oboirien, “Digitilising the energy sector: A comprehensive digital twin framework for biomass gasification power plant with CO2 capture,” Cleaner Energy Syst., vol. 10, Art. no. 100175, 2025.
98. [98] H. Pourrahmani et al., “Revolutionizing carbon sequestration: Integrating IoT, AI, and blockchain technologies in the fight against climate change,” Energy Rep., vol. 13, pp. 5952–5967, 2025.
99. [99] Z. Lv, C. Cheng, and H. Lv, “Blockchain-based decentralized learning for security in digital twins,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 10, no. 24, pp. 21479–21488, 2023.
100. [100] A. Abdessadak et al., “Digital twin technology and artificial intelligence in energy transition: A comprehensive systematic review of applications,” Energy Rep., vol. 13, pp. 5196–5218, 2025.