Havacılık Sektöründe Algılanan İş Yeri Romantizminin Çalışanlar Üzerindeki Etkisi

Öz

Bu çalışma, iş yeri romantizminin (performans düşüklüğü, sorunlu ilişki yönetimi ve bireysel başarıda artış) cinsiyet, medeni durum, yaş, eğitim düzeyi, örgütteki çalışma süresi, gelir düzeyi, hizmet alanı ve unvan gibi demografik faktörler açısından farklılık gösterip göstermediğini incelemektedir. Araştırma kapsamında Türk havayolu sektöründe çeşitli pozisyonlarda çalışan 393 kişi ile bir saha araştırma gerçekleştirilmiştir. İş yeri romantizminin çalışanların iş performansları ve ilişkileri üzerindeki etkilerini anlamaya yönelik önemli bulgular ortaya konmuştur. Analiz sonuçlarına göre, erkek çalışanların iş yeri romantizmini kadınlara oranla daha yoğun deneyimlediği, bekar çalışanların ise evli çalışanlara kıyasla iş yeri romantizmine daha eğilimli olduğu gözlemlenmiştir. Genç çalışanlar ile eğitim ve gelir düzeyi düşük çalışanlar arasında iş yeri romantizminin daha yaygın olduğu, bu grupların iş yeri romantizmi nedeniyle daha fazla performans düşüklüğü ve ilişki yönetiminde sorun yaşadıkları tespit edilmiştir. Yer hizmetleri çalışanları ile teknik pozisyonlardaki çalışanlar iş yeri romantizminin performans üzerindeki olumsuz etkilerinden daha fazla etkilenmektedir. Bu bulgular ışığında, örgütlerin iş yeri romantizminin olumsuz etkilerini minimize etmek ve çalışan verimliliğini artırmak için eğitim ve farkındalık programları, sosyal destek mekanizmaları ve mentorluk sistemleri gibi stratejiler geliştirmeleri önerilmektedir. Çalışma, iş yeri romantizminin iş performansı ve ilişkileri üzerindeki etkilerinin demografik farklılıklarla birlikte ele alınmasının, örgütsel yönetim politikalarının geliştirilmesine önemli katkılar sağlayacağını ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İş Yeri Romantizmi
• Havayolu
• Havacılık
• Havalimanı
• Yer Hizmetleri
• Çalışan

The Effect of Perceived Workplace Romance on Employees in the Aviation Sector

Öz

This study investigates whether workplace romance (performance decline, problematic relationship management, and increased individual success) varies across demographic factors such as gender, marital status, age, education level, tenure, income level, service area, and job title. A field study was conducted with 393 employees in various positions within the Turkish aviation sector, yielding significant findings regarding the impact of workplace romance on employees' job performance and interpersonal relationships. The analysis results indicate that male employees experience workplace romance more intensely than their female counterparts, and single employees are more inclined towards workplace romance than married employees. Workplace romance was found to be more prevalent among younger employees and those with lower education and income levels, with these groups experiencing greater performance declines and difficulties in relationship management due to workplace romance. Ground services employees and those in technical positions are more affected by the negative impact of workplace romance on job performance. In light of these findings, it is recommended that organizations develop strategies such as training and awareness programs, social support mechanisms, and mentorship systems to minimize the negative effects of workplace romance and improve employee productivity. The study highlights the importance of considering the demographic variations in workplace romance and its effects on job performance and relationships, suggesting that this perspective can significantly contribute to the development of organizational management policies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Workplace Romance
• Airline
• Aviation
• Airport
• Ground Handling
• Employee

Kaynakça

1. Aaker, D. A., Kumar, V., & Day, G. S. (2007). Marketing research (9th Edition). John Wiley & Sons.
2. Alder, G. S., & Quist, D. M. (2014). Rethinking love at the office: Antecedents and consequences of coworker evaluations of workplace romances. Human Resource Management, 53(3), 329–351.
3. Anderson, C. J., & Fisher, C. (1991). Male-female relationships in the workplace: Perceived motivations in office romance. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 25(3-4), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289852
4. Anderson, C. I., & Hunsaker, P. L. (1985). Why there's romancing at the office and why it's everybody's problem. Personnel, 62(2), 57–63.
5. Bordwin, M. (1994). Are office romances OK? Training Dev., 48(5)
6. Brown, T. J., & Allgeier, E. R. (1995). Managers’ perceptions of workplace romances: An interview study. Journal of Business and Psychology, 10, 169–176.
7. Büyükyılmaz, O., & Shehadeh, M. J. S. (2023). Mixing love with work: Do perceptions of workplace romance of employees affect their attitudes towards job? International Journal of Management and Administration, 7(1), 95–111.
8. Cole, N. (2009). Workplace romance: A justice analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24(4), 363–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-009-9117-1

9. Chory, R. M., Mainiero, L. A., & Horan, S. M. (2022/2025). Workplace romance and career reputation effects across industries. International Journal of Business Communication, 62(1), 84–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884221100800
10. Cowan, R. L., & Horan, S. M. (2014). Love at the office? Understanding workplace romance disclosures and reactions from the coworker perspective. Western Journal of Communication, 78(2), 238–253.
11. Dillard, J. P. (1987). Close relationships at work: Perceptions of the motives and performance of relational participants. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4, 179–193.
12. Dillard, J. P., & Broetzmann, S. M. (1989). Romantic relationships at work: Perceived changes in job-related behaviors as a function of participant’s motive, partner’s motive, and gender. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19(2), 93–110.
13. Dillard, J. P., Hale, J. L., & Segrin, C. (1994). Close relationships in task environments: Perceptions of relational types, illicitness, and power. Management Communication Quarterly, 7(3), 227–255.
14. Dillard, J. P., & Miller, K. I. (1988). Intimate relationships in task environments. In S. W. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (pp. 449–465). New York: Wiley.
15. Dillard, J. P., & Witteman, H. (1985). Romantic relationships at work: Perceived changes in job-related behaviors as a function of participant's motive, partner's motive, and gender. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1985.tb00981.x
16. Evans, P., & Bartolomé, F. (1984). The Changing Pictures of the Relationship Between Career and Family. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 5(1), 9–21. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3000306
17. Foley, S., & Powell, G. N. (1999). Not all is fair in love and work: Coworkers’ preferences for and responses to managerial interventions regarding workplace romances. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 1043–1056.
18. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56(2), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109
19. Horan, S. M., & Chory, R. M. (2013). Relational Implications of Gay and Lesbian Workplace Romances: Understanding Trust, Deception, and Credibility. The Journal of Business Communication, 50(2), 170–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943612474993
20. Horan, S. M., Chory, R. M.. Craw, E. S. & Mainiero, L. (2023). Workplace romance policies, behaviors, and reputational beliefs: experiences of employees from major US cities. Communication Quarterly 72: 121–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2023.2293969.
21. Indu Sri, I., Priyanka, P., & Chaurasia, U. (2024). Exploring the dynamics: Workplace romance and its impact on job performance. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, 11(5), 680–705.
22. Jones, G. E. (1999). Hierarchical workplace romance: An experimental examination of team member perceptions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 1057–1072.
23. Jung, H. S., & Yoon, H. H. (2020). How does workplace romance influence employee performance in the hospitality industry? Sustainability, 12(13), 5478. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135478
24. Kakabadse, A. & Kakabadse, N. (2004), Intimacy: International Survey of the Sex Lives of People at Work, Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire.
25. Karabey, C. N. (2019). Bilgi kaynakları ve ikinci elden veriler, modelleme ve hipotez, örnekleme. In S. Ünal (Ed.), Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri (s.91–131). Atatürk Üniversitesi Açıköğretim Fakültesi Yayınları.
26. Karl, K. A., & Sutton, C. L. (2000). An examination of the relationships between gender, marital status, and work-family conflict. Journal of Business and Psychology, 15(1), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007798311743
27. Khan, M. A. S., Jianguo, D., Usman, M., & Ahmad, M. (2017). Moderated mediation model of interrelations between workplace romance, wellbeing, and employee performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2158. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02158
28. Khan, M.A.S., Du Jianguo, A.A.H., Mushtaq, T.U.L., Usman, M. (2018). Affective commitment foci as parallel mediators of the relationship between workplace romance and employee job performance: a cross-cultural comparison of the People’s Republic of china and Pakistan. Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag. 11, 267.
29. Khalilzadeh, J. & Pizam, A. (2021). Workplace romance across different industries with a focus on hospitality and leisure, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 94, 102845 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102845
30. Kolesnikova, J., & Analoui, F. (2012). Managing human resource romance at work: Towards a “considerate” approach. Journal of Management Development, 32(1), 36–56. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621711211191017
31. La France, B. H. (2022). “Don’t Get Your Meat Where You Get Your Bread”: Beliefs and Advice about Workplace Romance. Behavioral Sciences, 12(8), 278. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12080278
32. Liberman, B. E., & Okimoto, T. G. (2008). Information regarding social-sexual behavior as an antecedent to perceptions of ineffectiveness in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 2787–2820.
33. Livingston, G. (2009). How to Love (First Edition). Da Capo Lifelong Books
34. Malachowski, C. C., Chory, R. M., & Claus, C. J. (2012). Mixing pleasure with work: Employee perceptions of and responses to workplace romance. Western Journal of Communication, 76(4), 358–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2012.670690
35. Malhotra, N. K. (2004). Marketing research: An applied orientation (4th Edition). Pearson Prentice Hall.
36. Mainiero, L. A. (1986). A review and analysis of power dynamics in organizational romances. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 750–762. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4283935
37. Narayanan, S., Haque, R., bin S Senathirajah, A. R., bin Omar Din, F. M., Isa, M. b. M., Ramasamy, G., Krishnasamy, H. N. (2024).Workplace Romance and Organisational Performance: A Case Study of Malaysian Oeganizations. International Journal of Instructional Cases, 8(1), 121-134.
38. Ömüriş, E., & Ehtiyar, R. (2008). Örgütsel yapılarda romantik ilişkiler: Algılanan güdüler ve davranış değişiklikleri üzerine bir araştırma. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, 16(1), 20–39.
39. Pierce, C. A., & Aguinis, H. (1997). Bridging the gap between romantic relationships and sexual harassment in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 197–200.
40. Pierce, C. A., & Aguinis, H. (2001). A framework for investigating the link between workplace romance and sexual harassment. Group and Organization Management, 26, 206–229.
41. Pierce, C. A., & Aguinis, H. (2003). Romantic relationships in organizations: A test of a model of formation and impact factors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(6), 811–831. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.213
42. Pierce, C. A., Aguinis, H., & Adams, S. K. R. (2000). Effects of a dissolved workplace romance and rater characteristics on responses to a sexual harassment accusation. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 869–880.
43. Pierce, C. A., Broberg, B. J., McClure, J. R. & Aguinis, H., (2004). Responding to sexual harassment complaints: Effects of a dissolved workplace romance on decision-making standards, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 95(1), 66–82.
44. Pierce, C. A., Byrne, D., & Aguinis, H. (1996). Attraction in organizations: A model of workplace romance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17(1), 5–32.
45. Powell, G. N., & Foley, S. (1998). Something to talk about: Romantic relationships in organizational settings. Journal of Management, 24(3), 421–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(99)80067-1
46. Riach, K. and Wilson, F. (2007), Don't Screw the Crew: Exploring the Rules of Engagement in Organizational Romance. British Journal of Management, 18: 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00503.x
47. Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). (2002). Workplace romance survey. Alexandria, VA: SHRM Public Affairs Department
48. Spragins, E. (2004). Dangerous liaisons. Fortune Small Business, 14(1), 62–73.
49. Quinn, R. E. (1977). Coping with Cupid: The formation, impact, and management of romantic relationships in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(1), 30–45. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391745
50. Tabachnick, B. & Fidell, L. (2015). Çok Değişkenli İstatistiklerin Kullanımı. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık, Ankara, 6. Baskı
51. Uzun, S. G. (2014). Örgütlerde yaşanan romantik ilişkiler: Örgütsel davranışlar üzerindeki etkisine yönelik algılar üzerine bir araştırma. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. TOBB Ekonomi ve Teknoloji Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
52. Üstün, P. (2018). Örnekleme Yöntemleri. https://www.Phdernegi.Org/Wp-Content/Uploads/2016/03/ %C3%B6rnekleme_Yontemleri.Pdf
53. Williams, C. L., Giuffre, P. A., & Dellinger, K. (1999). Sexuality in the workplace: Organizational control, sexual harassment, and the pursuit of pleasure. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.73
54. Wilson, F. (2015). Romantic relationships at work: why love can hurt,. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12034
55. Zikmund, W. G. (1997). Business research methods (5th Edition). The Dryden Press