Students' Responses towards D-PBL Learning Model in the Material of Payment System and Means of Economic Exchange

Year 2018, , 17 - 22, 01.07.2018

Noviyana Sarı Sigit Santoso Wiedy Murtını

https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.415242

Cited By: 2

Abstract

This study aims to determine the student's response to the D-PBL learning model on the material of payment system and the means of economic exchange. The research method used was pre-experimental design using one-shot case study design. The sample of this research were 21 tenth grade students of high schools in Indonesia. The data collection methods used in this study were interviews, observations and questionnaires. Observations were used to assess the syntax implementation of the D-PBL learning model in the classroom learning process, and the questionnaire was used to find out the students' responses to the D-PBL model covering the display aspect, material relevance aspects, contextual learning aspects, and advantage aspects. The observation data were analysed using Guttman scale while the students' responses were analysed using five-point Likert scale. The results showed that the syntaxes implementation of the D-PBL model in the classroom learning process was 100%, and the average score of the students' responses to the D-PBL model was categorized as very good with a score of 91.9%. This study also showed that the students responded very positively to the D-PBL learning model. This indicates that the D-PBL learning model aims to construct the knowledge of the students through meaningful problem solving as well as to assist them in understanding the material of the payment system and the means of economic exchange.

Keywords

D-PBL model, Response, Payment System and Means

References

• Arends, R.I. (2001). Learning to teach (Fifth edition).Singapore: McGraw-Hill. Baharudin.(2010). Teori belajardanpembelajaran.Yogjakarta: Ar-Ruz Media. Bakar, R. (2014). The effect of learning motivation on student’s productive competencies in vocational high school, west sumatera. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 4(6), 722-732. Bhattacharjee, D., Paul, A., Kim, J.H., &Karthigaikumar, P. (2018). An immersive learning model using evolutionary learning.Computers and Electrical Engineering, 65, 236–249. Brookhart, S.M. (2010). How to asses higher order thinking skills in your classroom. Virginia: ASCD. Cahyo, A.N. (2013). Panduan aplikasi teori-teori belajar mengajar. Jogjakarta: DIVA Press . Chinnapan, M., &Tajudin, N.M. (2016). The link between higher order thingking skills, representation and concepts in enhancing timss tasks. International Journal of Instruction, 9(2), 199-214. Khana, F.M.A., &Masood, M. (2015).The effectiveness of an interactive multimedia courseware with cooperative mastery approach in enhancing higher order thinking skills in learning cellular respiration.Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 977-984. Liu, C, et al. (2014). An exploration of secondary students’ mental states when learning about acid and bases.Research in Science Education, 44, 133-154. 21. McNeil, S. (2015). Visualizing mental models: Understanding cognitive change to support teaching and learning of multimedia design and development. Education Tech Research Dev, 63, 73-96. National council for the social studies. (2000). Science-Technology-Society (STS) in social studies. Washington DC: NCSS. Ninlawan, G. (2015). Factors which affect teachers’ professional development in teaching innovation and educational technology in the 21st century under the bureau of special education, office of the basic education commission.Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 1732 – 1735. Poerwadarminta, W.J.S. (2003). Kamus umum bahasa indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka. Sugiyono.(2015). Metode penelitian pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta. Sukwiaty. (2009). Ekonomi sma kelas X. Jakarta: Yudistira. Yee, M.H., Yunos, J.Md.,Othman,W., Hassan,R., Tee,T.K., & Mohamad, M.M. (2015).Disparity of learning styles and higher order thinking skills among technical students.Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204, 143-152. 22