The purpose of this study was to find out from each mathematical learning model, Interactive Setting Cooperative Learning Model (PSIK), Course Review Horey (CRH) and Conventional model, which ones provide better mathematics learning achievements, students who have mathematical intelligence, visual , kinesthetic, or interpersonal in middle school. This research method of this study is quasi-experimental research or pre-experimental research with research design using 3 x 4 factorial designs. The population in this study is the entire students 8th grade SMP N in Demak District. The fokus material in The Material Geometry Flat Side. Sampling was conduct with stratified cluster random sampling techniques. Instruments used to collect data are a questionnaire of multiple intelligences and mathematics learning achievement test. The prerequisite test includes the population normality test using the Lilliefors method and the homogeneity test of population variance using the Bartlett method. With α = 0, 05. Hypothesis testing of the study are analysis of two variance with unequal cell. Based on the results of hypothesis testing is [Fab 4,3390 > 2,14] with the decision of the H test are rejected, this means that there is an interaction between the learning model and students’ multiple intelligence towards mathematics learning achievement
Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Attle, S. & Baker, B. (2007). Cooperative learning ın a competitive environtment : Classrom applications.
International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 19(1), pp. 77-83.
Baroody, M. F. (1993). Interaksi Sosial dan Multi intelegensi . Malang: P3T IKIP Malang.
Budiyono. (2015). Penilaian Hasil Belajar. Surakarta: UNS Press.
Davies, I. K. 1981. Instructional technique. New York: McGraw Hill Book Company.
Duman, T., Karagoz, S. (2016). An evaluation of Turkish teacher education system compared to other models in different countries. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 1( 1), pp. 1-13.
Gardner, H. & Thomas, H. (1989). Multiple ıntellegence go to school educational ımplications of the theory of multiple intellegence. Journal Educational Researcher, 18(8),pp. 4-10.
Janah, I.I.N., & Subroto, W.T., (2019). Comparison Of cooperative learning models with ınquiry on student learning outcomes. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 4(2), 178-182.
Karagoz, S. (2016). Opinions and suggestions regarding various subjects on the educational guidance in the second constitutional era. Journal of Family, Counseling, and Education, 1( 1), 1-9.
Kusnandar, (2007). Guru Profesional Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Raja grafindo Persada.
Lestari, S.I .(2015). Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (PBL), Discovery Learning (Dl), Dan Problem Possing (PP) Ditinjau Dari Kecerdasan Majemuk Siswa Pada Materi Kubus Dan Balok Smp Negeri Kabupaten Demak Tahun Ajaran 2014/2015. Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika Universitas Negeri Sebelas Maret, 3(8), pp. 811-823.
Ling, W. N., Ghazali ,M. I., & Raman, A.(2016). The effectiveness of student teams-achievement division (STAD) cooperative learning on mathematics achievement among school students In Sarikei District Sarawak . International Journal of Advanced Research and Development, 1 (3), pp. 17-21.
Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., & Editors (2013). TIMSS 2015 assessment frameworks. Chestnut Hill MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center Boston Collage.
OECD. (2015). PISA 2015 draft mathematics framework. New York: Columbia University.
Pradana, L. N. 2014. Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Numbered Heads Together dengan Pendekatan Contextual Teaching and Learning pada Materi Pokok Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar Ditinjau dari Kecerdasan Majemuk Siswa SMP Negeri Kelas VIII Sekota Madiun. Surakarta: UNS Surakarta.
Ratumanan, T.G.(2002). Pengenalan Model Pembelajaran Interaktif dengan Setting Kooperatif. Buletin Pendidikan Matematik : Universitas Surabaya.
Shoimin, A. (2014). Model – Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.
Sugiyono. (2010). Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Solihatin & Raharjo. (2007). Model-Model Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah. Seminar Pengembangan Model-Model Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah : Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Attle, S. & Baker, B. (2007). Cooperative learning ın a competitive environtment : Classrom applications.
International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 19(1), pp. 77-83.
Baroody, M. F. (1993). Interaksi Sosial dan Multi intelegensi . Malang: P3T IKIP Malang.
Budiyono. (2015). Penilaian Hasil Belajar. Surakarta: UNS Press.
Davies, I. K. 1981. Instructional technique. New York: McGraw Hill Book Company.
Duman, T., Karagoz, S. (2016). An evaluation of Turkish teacher education system compared to other models in different countries. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 1( 1), pp. 1-13.
Gardner, H. & Thomas, H. (1989). Multiple ıntellegence go to school educational ımplications of the theory of multiple intellegence. Journal Educational Researcher, 18(8),pp. 4-10.
Janah, I.I.N., & Subroto, W.T., (2019). Comparison Of cooperative learning models with ınquiry on student learning outcomes. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 4(2), 178-182.
Karagoz, S. (2016). Opinions and suggestions regarding various subjects on the educational guidance in the second constitutional era. Journal of Family, Counseling, and Education, 1( 1), 1-9.
Kusnandar, (2007). Guru Profesional Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Raja grafindo Persada.
Lestari, S.I .(2015). Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (PBL), Discovery Learning (Dl), Dan Problem Possing (PP) Ditinjau Dari Kecerdasan Majemuk Siswa Pada Materi Kubus Dan Balok Smp Negeri Kabupaten Demak Tahun Ajaran 2014/2015. Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika Universitas Negeri Sebelas Maret, 3(8), pp. 811-823.
Ling, W. N., Ghazali ,M. I., & Raman, A.(2016). The effectiveness of student teams-achievement division (STAD) cooperative learning on mathematics achievement among school students In Sarikei District Sarawak . International Journal of Advanced Research and Development, 1 (3), pp. 17-21.
Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., & Editors (2013). TIMSS 2015 assessment frameworks. Chestnut Hill MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center Boston Collage.
OECD. (2015). PISA 2015 draft mathematics framework. New York: Columbia University.
Pradana, L. N. 2014. Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Numbered Heads Together dengan Pendekatan Contextual Teaching and Learning pada Materi Pokok Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar Ditinjau dari Kecerdasan Majemuk Siswa SMP Negeri Kelas VIII Sekota Madiun. Surakarta: UNS Surakarta.
Ratumanan, T.G.(2002). Pengenalan Model Pembelajaran Interaktif dengan Setting Kooperatif. Buletin Pendidikan Matematik : Universitas Surabaya.
Shoimin, A. (2014). Model – Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.
Sugiyono. (2010). Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Solihatin & Raharjo. (2007). Model-Model Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah. Seminar Pengembangan Model-Model Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah : Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Nugroho, M. A. C. A., ., B., & Slamet, İ. (2019). Experimentation of Innovative Learning Models in Terms of Students Multiple Intelligences Among Midle School Students in Demak District. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 4(2), 262-268. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.518497
AMA
Nugroho MACA, . B, Slamet İ. Experimentation of Innovative Learning Models in Terms of Students Multiple Intelligences Among Midle School Students in Demak District. IJERE. April 2019;4(2):262-268. doi:10.24331/ijere.518497
Chicago
Nugroho, Muhamad Asif Cahya Aji, Budiyono ., and İsnandar Slamet. “Experimentation of Innovative Learning Models in Terms of Students Multiple Intelligences Among Midle School Students in Demak District”. International Journal of Educational Research Review 4, no. 2 (April 2019): 262-68. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.518497.
EndNote
Nugroho MACA, . B, Slamet İ (April 1, 2019) Experimentation of Innovative Learning Models in Terms of Students Multiple Intelligences Among Midle School Students in Demak District. International Journal of Educational Research Review 4 2 262–268.
IEEE
M. A. C. A. Nugroho, B. ., and İ. Slamet, “Experimentation of Innovative Learning Models in Terms of Students Multiple Intelligences Among Midle School Students in Demak District”, IJERE, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 262–268, 2019, doi: 10.24331/ijere.518497.
ISNAD
Nugroho, Muhamad Asif Cahya Aji et al. “Experimentation of Innovative Learning Models in Terms of Students Multiple Intelligences Among Midle School Students in Demak District”. International Journal of Educational Research Review 4/2 (April 2019), 262-268. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.518497.
JAMA
Nugroho MACA, . B, Slamet İ. Experimentation of Innovative Learning Models in Terms of Students Multiple Intelligences Among Midle School Students in Demak District. IJERE. 2019;4:262–268.
MLA
Nugroho, Muhamad Asif Cahya Aji et al. “Experimentation of Innovative Learning Models in Terms of Students Multiple Intelligences Among Midle School Students in Demak District”. International Journal of Educational Research Review, vol. 4, no. 2, 2019, pp. 262-8, doi:10.24331/ijere.518497.
Vancouver
Nugroho MACA, . B, Slamet İ. Experimentation of Innovative Learning Models in Terms of Students Multiple Intelligences Among Midle School Students in Demak District. IJERE. 2019;4(2):262-8.
International Journal of Educational Research Review (ISSN:2458-9322) International Journal of Educational Research Review publishes scholarly articles that are of general significance to the education research community and that come from a wide range of areas. The International Journal of Educational Research Review aims to provide a forum for scholarly understanding of the field of education. Articles focus upon concepts, research, review and practices that emphasizes the intersections between education research and other fields, raises new questions, and develops innovative approaches to our understandings of pressing issues. The range of topics covered in the International Journal of Educational Research Review include; read full aims and scope; https://www.ijere.com/page/journal-scopes Peer Review Policy: All articles in this journal will undergo initial editor screening, rigorous double-anonymous peer review, and review by the editorial board. Double-blind peer review International Journal of Educational Research Review follows a double-blind reviewing procedure. This means that the author will remain anonymous to the reviewers throughout peer review. It is the responsibility of the author to anonymize the manuscript and any associated materials. read full Peer Review Policy; https://www.ijere.com/page/peer-review-policy Ownership and management IJERE journal is hosted by Dergipark/Tubitak. IJERE Journal is published with the support of Sakarya University Faculty of Education/TURKEY. Governing body Editor in Chief Dr. Serhat Arslan, Gazi University, serhatarslan@gazi.edu.tr , Turkey read full Governing body /Ownership and management/ Editorial board member ; https://www.ijere.com/page/editorial-board Copyright and licensing Copyright Statement Copyright violation is an important, and possibly related, ethical issue. Authors should check their manuscripts for possible breaches of copyright law (e.g., where permissions are needed for quotations, artwork or tables taken from other publications or from other freely available sources on the Internet) and secure the necessary permissions before submission to International Journal of Educational Research Review. read full Copyright and licensing; https://www.ijere.com/page/copyright-and-licensing-open-access-statement