Experimentation of STAD and Jigsaw Learning Models on Learning Achievements in terms of Learning Motivation

Year 2019, Volume: 4 Issue: 4, 517 - 524, 01.10.2019

Mela Dewi Putri Berlyana Yunastiti Purwaningsih

https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.628311

Cited By: 13

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the value of the pretest and posttest in the experimentation of the STAD and Jigsaw learning models on learning achievement in terms of learning motivation. This research is a quantitative research with an experimental method. The population of this study was all X grade students of IPS of SMA Negeri 3 Boyolali in the Academic Year of 2017/2018with a total of 108 students, the study sample was determined by a cluster sampling technique of 2 classes with a total sample of 72 students. The learning model in the experimental class used the STAD method and the control class used the Jigsaw method. Data collection techniques in this study were the method of documentation, tests, and questionnaires. The research hypothesis test used two-way analysis of variance with a 2x2 factorial design and a significant level of 5%. The analysis prerequisite test that is carried out is the normality test and homogeneity test using SPSS 23. From the results of the analysis it can be concluded that (1) differences in the effect of economic learning achievement between students who learn using STAD and Jigsaw cooperative learning models; (2) differences in the effect oflearning motivation of students using STAD and Jigsaw cooperative models on economic learning achievement; (3) whether there is an influence of the interaction between the learning model and the learning motivation of students on economic learning achievement.

Keywords

STAD, Jigsaw, Learning Achievement

References

• Asfaroh, J. A. & Hidayati. (2014). Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw dan Tipe Think Pair Share terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa Kelas VII SMP Taman Dewasa Ibu Pawiyatan Tahun Ajaran 2012/2013, Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Natural, 1 (1), 1-73. Retrieved from http://journal.ustjogja.ac.id/download/jurnal%20nat%20edit%20hal%209.pdf.Adams, F. H. (2013). Using Jigsaw technique as an effective way of promoting cooperative learning among primary six pupils In Fijai. International Journal of Education and Practice. 1, 64-74. Retrieved fromhttp://www.aessweb.com/pdf-files/ijep%201(6),%2064-74.pdf. Berlyana, M., D., P, (2017). Kriteria Ketercapaian Tujuan Pendidikan Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi Kelas X IPS SMA Negeri 3 Boyolali Tahun Ajaran 2017/2018. Universitas Sebelas Maret. Hidayat, A. (2010). Metode Penelitian Kesehatan Paradigma Kuantitatif. Jakarta:Health Books. Hamzah, B. (2007). Teori Motivasi & Pengukurannya. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Isjoni. (2010). Cooperative Learning. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.Janah, I., I., N, & Subroto, W., T, (2018). Comparison of cooperative learning models with ınquiry on student learning outcomes. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 4(2):178-182. Retrieved from https://www.ijere.com/frontend//articles/pdf/v4i2/8pdf.pdf. Jansoon, N., Samsook, E., & Coll, R. K. (2008). Thai undergraduate chemistry practical learning experiences using the Jigsaw IV Method. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Shoutheast Asia, 31 (2), 178-200.Khan, G. N. & Inamullah, H. M. (2011). Effect of student’s team achievement division (STAD) on academic achievement of students. Asian Social Science, 7 (12), 211-215. doi:10.5539/ass.v7n12p211. Komara, E. (2014). Belajar dan Pembelajaran Interaktif. Bandung:.Aditama. Lukman, S., Rindarjono, M. G., & Karyanto, P. (2016). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw dan STAD Terhadap Hasil Belajar Geografi Ditinjau Dari Motivasi Belajar Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri Jatinom Klaten Tahun Pelajaran 2013/2014. Jurnal GeoEco, 2 (2), 114-127. Mulyati, Anitah, S., & Sunardi. (2013). Pengaruh Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD dan Tipe Jigsaw Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Ditinjau Dari Motivasi Siswa.Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 1 (3), 337-344. Rohmat., Hakim, L., & Sakti, N. C. (2019). Implementation of Jigsaw type cooperative learning model to ımprove economics learning results. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 4 (2): 350-357. Retrieved from https://www.ijere.com/frontend//articles/pdf/v4i3/template-ijere-rohmatpdfpdf.pdf.Saat, S. (2015). Faktor-faktor Determinan dalam Pendidikan (Studi Tentang Makna dan Kedudukannya dalam Pendidikan). Jurnal Al-Ta’dib, 8 (2), 1-17. Sapriya. (2014). Pendidikan IPS. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya. Sadirman, A. M. 2007. Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers. Sari, A. P., Ashadi., & Nugroho, A. 2013. Studi Komparasi Model Pembelajaran STAD dengan Menggunakan Media Animasi Macromedia Flash Player dan Molymod pada Pembelajaran Kimia Materi Pokok Ikatan Kovalen Ditinjau dari Kreativitas Siswa Kelas X SMA N 2 Sukoharjo Tahun Pelajaran 2011/2012. Jurnal Pendidikan kimia, 2 (2), 110-116.Sihwinedar, R. (2015). Meningkatkan hasil belajar IPA melalui penerapan model Pembelajan SAVI (Somatis, Auditori, Visual, dan Intelektual) pada siswa kelas III SDN Rejoagung 01 Semboro Tahun pelajaran 2013/2014. Jurnal Pancaran Pendidikan, 4(4): 137-148. Slameto. (2010). Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Slavin, R. E. (2005). Cooperative learning: Teori, Riset dan Praktik. Bandung: Nusa Media.Sulastri, Y. & Rochintaniawati, D. (2009). Pengaruh Penggunaan Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw dalam Pembelajaran Biologi di SMP N 2 Cimalaka. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 13 (1), 15-20. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v13i1.302.Sugiarto, S. & Suhendra, R. (2018). Pendampingan Terhadap Guru Sekolah Menengah Pertama Mengidentifikasi Masalah Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Jurnal Kependidikan, 2 (2):12-18.Suwandi, S. (2016). Pedoman Tesis dan Disertasi Pascasarjana Kependidikan Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan. Surakarta: UNS Press Undang-Undang RI. No. 20 Th. (2003). Undang-Undang Sisdiknas (sistem Pendidikan Nasional) 2003.Cet. II; Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2005. Wyk, M. V. (2012). The effects of the stad-cooperative learning method on student achievement, attitude and motivation in economics education. Journal Social and Science, 33 (2), 261-270. doi: 10.1080/09718923.2012.11893104. Yusnidar. (2016). Pendekatan Metode Kooperatif Type Jigsaw untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Belajar Siswa Materi Tentang Memahami Hadist Tentang Menjaga dan Melestarikan Lingkungan Alam. Jurnal Visipena, 2 (2), 138-156.Yusuf, M. O., Gambari, I. A., & Olumorin, C. O. (2012). Effectiveness of Computer-Supported Cooperative Learning Strategies in Learning Physics. International Jurnal Social, Science, & Education, 2 (2), 94-109.