Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

The Difficulties in Implementing Scientific Approach for Mathematics Learning

Year 2019, Volume: 4 Issue: 4, 624 - 636, 01.10.2019
https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.628448

Abstract

The learning system of Curriculum 2013 uses a scientific approach regulated in the Minister of Education and Culture Regulation Number 65 of 2013. The scientific approach emphasizes the importance of collaboration and cooperation among students in knowing and understanding various materials. The purpose of curriculum 2013 is making students are able to formulate a problem and study analytical thinking. However, in fact, teachers face difficulties in implementing the scientific approach. It is a descriptive qualitative study. Data is obtained through observation on the mathematics learning process of X grade at Kupang city. The results reveal that there are several difficulties faced by the teachers in implementing the scientific approach. They are (1) difficulty in making students actively involved in the learning process, (2) difficulty in stimulating students to ask questions, (3) difficulty in making students formulate their own knowledge, and (4) difficulty in fostering the courage and language skills of students to communicate results.

References

  • Ayuk Kusumastuti, S. &. (2016). Faktor-faktor Penghambat Guru dalam Melaksanakan Kurikulum 2013 pada Pembelajaran Akuntansi di SMK Negeri 3 Surakarta. Tata Arta, 118-133.Buchory. 2013. “Problema Implementasi Kurikulum 2013”. Kedaulatan Rakyat. No. _ . 3 Januari.Darsono,Winarno & ST. Y. Slamet (2018). The need textbook writing of children’s story based on charactereducation.International JournalofEducational Research Review,3(2),1–8.Daryanto. (2014). Pendekatan Pembelajaran Saintifik Kurikulum 2013.Yogyakarta: Gava Media.Eraslan,A.(2013).Teachers’reflectionson the implementationof the newelementary school mathematicscurriculum inTurkey.HUJournalofofEducation.28(2),152-165.Hamalik, O. (2009). Psikologi Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: SinarBaruAlgensindo.Hosnan. (2014). Pendekatan saintifik dan kontekstual dalam pembelajaran abad 21.Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.Irfan Sandyoka, M. &. (2016). Analisis Kesulitan Guru dalam Pembelajaran Ekonomi pada Kurikulum 2013 di Kelas X SMA Negeri 4 Kota Jambi.JawaPos.(2014).TargetPelatihanKurikulumBaru SulitTercapai. No. . 25Juni.Majid, A. (2014). Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Kajian Teoritis dan Praktis.Bandung: Interes Media.Mayang A.D, Puspita. (2015). Identifikasi Kesulitan Guru IPA dalam Melaksanakan Pembelajaran Kurikulum 2013 di SMP Negeri 1 Wonogiri Tahun Pelajaran 2014/2015. Surakarta; Fakultas Keguruandan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.Mendikbud. (2013). Permendikbud nomor 69 tentang Kerangka Dasar dan Struktur Kurikulum Sekolah Menengah Atas, Kompetensi.Jakarta.Mendikbud. (2016). Permendikbud No 22 Tahun 2016 Tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.Milles,M.B.&Huberman,A.M.(1992).Qualitativedataanalysis,asourcebookofnewmethod. BeverlyHills :Sage Publication.Mizzi,D.(2013).Thechallengesfaced by scienceteacherswhenteachingoutside theirspecificscience specialism.Acta DidacticaNapocensia,6(4)1-6.Mulyasa,E.(2014).GurudalamImplementasiKurikulum2013. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.National Council of Teacher of Mathematics (NTCM)(2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.Ningsih. (2015).Analisis Kesulitan Guru Matematika Kelas Vii Dalam Menerapkan Kurikulum 2013 Di Smp N 12 Surakarta. Surakarta; Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.Perwira, D. E. (2015). Kendala-Kendala Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. JPTM, 21-28. Retnawati, H. (2015). Hambatan Guru Matematika Sekolah Menengah Pertama Dalam Menerapkan Kurikulum Baru. Cakrawala Pendidikan, Oktober 2015, Th. XXXIV, No. 3Şimşek,Y. (2017).Theevaluationof the applicationof transported education by teachers.International JournalofEducational Research Review,2(1),41–48.DOI:10.24331/ijere.309972Syomwene,A.(2013).Factorsaffecting teachers’ımplementation ofcurriculumreforms and educational policies in schools:The Kenyanexperience.JournalofEducationandPractice.4(22)80-86.Vaulina, J. (2015). Penerapan PendekatanSaintifik dalam Pembelajaran EkonomiSMAKelasXI MateriKetenagakerjaan.Jurnal:Universitas Negeri Surabaya.(25): 2-3.
Year 2019, Volume: 4 Issue: 4, 624 - 636, 01.10.2019
https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.628448

Abstract

References

  • Ayuk Kusumastuti, S. &. (2016). Faktor-faktor Penghambat Guru dalam Melaksanakan Kurikulum 2013 pada Pembelajaran Akuntansi di SMK Negeri 3 Surakarta. Tata Arta, 118-133.Buchory. 2013. “Problema Implementasi Kurikulum 2013”. Kedaulatan Rakyat. No. _ . 3 Januari.Darsono,Winarno & ST. Y. Slamet (2018). The need textbook writing of children’s story based on charactereducation.International JournalofEducational Research Review,3(2),1–8.Daryanto. (2014). Pendekatan Pembelajaran Saintifik Kurikulum 2013.Yogyakarta: Gava Media.Eraslan,A.(2013).Teachers’reflectionson the implementationof the newelementary school mathematicscurriculum inTurkey.HUJournalofofEducation.28(2),152-165.Hamalik, O. (2009). Psikologi Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: SinarBaruAlgensindo.Hosnan. (2014). Pendekatan saintifik dan kontekstual dalam pembelajaran abad 21.Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.Irfan Sandyoka, M. &. (2016). Analisis Kesulitan Guru dalam Pembelajaran Ekonomi pada Kurikulum 2013 di Kelas X SMA Negeri 4 Kota Jambi.JawaPos.(2014).TargetPelatihanKurikulumBaru SulitTercapai. No. . 25Juni.Majid, A. (2014). Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Kajian Teoritis dan Praktis.Bandung: Interes Media.Mayang A.D, Puspita. (2015). Identifikasi Kesulitan Guru IPA dalam Melaksanakan Pembelajaran Kurikulum 2013 di SMP Negeri 1 Wonogiri Tahun Pelajaran 2014/2015. Surakarta; Fakultas Keguruandan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.Mendikbud. (2013). Permendikbud nomor 69 tentang Kerangka Dasar dan Struktur Kurikulum Sekolah Menengah Atas, Kompetensi.Jakarta.Mendikbud. (2016). Permendikbud No 22 Tahun 2016 Tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.Milles,M.B.&Huberman,A.M.(1992).Qualitativedataanalysis,asourcebookofnewmethod. BeverlyHills :Sage Publication.Mizzi,D.(2013).Thechallengesfaced by scienceteacherswhenteachingoutside theirspecificscience specialism.Acta DidacticaNapocensia,6(4)1-6.Mulyasa,E.(2014).GurudalamImplementasiKurikulum2013. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.National Council of Teacher of Mathematics (NTCM)(2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.Ningsih. (2015).Analisis Kesulitan Guru Matematika Kelas Vii Dalam Menerapkan Kurikulum 2013 Di Smp N 12 Surakarta. Surakarta; Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.Perwira, D. E. (2015). Kendala-Kendala Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. JPTM, 21-28. Retnawati, H. (2015). Hambatan Guru Matematika Sekolah Menengah Pertama Dalam Menerapkan Kurikulum Baru. Cakrawala Pendidikan, Oktober 2015, Th. XXXIV, No. 3Şimşek,Y. (2017).Theevaluationof the applicationof transported education by teachers.International JournalofEducational Research Review,2(1),41–48.DOI:10.24331/ijere.309972Syomwene,A.(2013).Factorsaffecting teachers’ımplementation ofcurriculumreforms and educational policies in schools:The Kenyanexperience.JournalofEducationandPractice.4(22)80-86.Vaulina, J. (2015). Penerapan PendekatanSaintifik dalam Pembelajaran EkonomiSMAKelasXI MateriKetenagakerjaan.Jurnal:Universitas Negeri Surabaya.(25): 2-3.
There are 1 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Bakher Nenotaek This is me

İmam Sujadi This is me

Sri Subanti This is me

Publication Date October 1, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 4 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Nenotaek, B., Sujadi, İ., & Subanti, S. (2019). The Difficulties in Implementing Scientific Approach for Mathematics Learning. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 4(4), 624-636. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.628448
AMA Nenotaek B, Sujadi İ, Subanti S. The Difficulties in Implementing Scientific Approach for Mathematics Learning. IJERE. October 2019;4(4):624-636. doi:10.24331/ijere.628448
Chicago Nenotaek, Bakher, İmam Sujadi, and Sri Subanti. “The Difficulties in Implementing Scientific Approach for Mathematics Learning”. International Journal of Educational Research Review 4, no. 4 (October 2019): 624-36. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.628448.
EndNote Nenotaek B, Sujadi İ, Subanti S (October 1, 2019) The Difficulties in Implementing Scientific Approach for Mathematics Learning. International Journal of Educational Research Review 4 4 624–636.
IEEE B. Nenotaek, İ. Sujadi, and S. Subanti, “The Difficulties in Implementing Scientific Approach for Mathematics Learning”, IJERE, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 624–636, 2019, doi: 10.24331/ijere.628448.
ISNAD Nenotaek, Bakher et al. “The Difficulties in Implementing Scientific Approach for Mathematics Learning”. International Journal of Educational Research Review 4/4 (October 2019), 624-636. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.628448.
JAMA Nenotaek B, Sujadi İ, Subanti S. The Difficulties in Implementing Scientific Approach for Mathematics Learning. IJERE. 2019;4:624–636.
MLA Nenotaek, Bakher et al. “The Difficulties in Implementing Scientific Approach for Mathematics Learning”. International Journal of Educational Research Review, vol. 4, no. 4, 2019, pp. 624-36, doi:10.24331/ijere.628448.
Vancouver Nenotaek B, Sujadi İ, Subanti S. The Difficulties in Implementing Scientific Approach for Mathematics Learning. IJERE. 2019;4(4):624-36.

International Journal of Educational Research Review (ISSN:2458-9322)
International Journal of Educational Research Review publishes scholarly articles that are of general significance to the education research community and that come from a wide range of areas. The International Journal of Educational Research Review aims to provide a forum for scholarly understanding of the field of education. Articles focus upon concepts, research, review and practices that emphasizes the intersections between education research and other fields, raises new questions, and develops innovative approaches to our understandings of pressing issues.
The range of topics covered in the International Journal of Educational Research Review include; read full aims and scope; https://www.ijere.com/page/journal-scopes
Peer Review Policy: All articles in this journal will undergo initial editor screening, rigorous double-anonymous peer review, and review by the editorial board.
Double-blind peer review
International Journal of Educational Research Review follows a double-blind reviewing procedure. This means that the author will remain anonymous to the reviewers throughout peer review. It is the responsibility of the author to anonymize the manuscript and any associated materials. read full Peer Review Policy; https://www.ijere.com/page/peer-review-policy
Ownership and management
IJERE journal is hosted by Dergipark/Tubitak. IJERE Journal is published with the support of Sakarya University Faculty of Education/TURKEY.
Governing body
Editor in Chief
Dr. Serhat Arslan, Necmettin Erbakan University, Turkey (serhat.arslan@erbakan.edu.tr)
read full Governing body /Ownership and management/ Editorial board member ; https://www.ijere.com/page/editorial-board
Copyright and licensing
Copyright Statement
Copyright violation is an important, and possibly related, ethical issue. Authors should check their manuscripts for possible breaches of copyright law (e.g., where permissions are needed for quotations, artwork or tables taken from other publications or from other freely available sources on the Internet) and secure the necessary permissions before submission to International Journal of Educational Research Review.
read full Copyright and licensing; https://www.ijere.com/page/copyright-and-licensing-open-access-statement