Educational Innovation affects Leadership and Interpersonal Relations in an Experimental School in Northern Greece

Year 2020, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 61 - 69, 01.01.2020

Eleni Papadopoulou Spyros Avdımıotıs

https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.659214

Cited By: 2

Abstract

Even though the educational system in Greece is exceedingly centralized, the
pioneering institution of “Experimental Schools” sheds a ray of light. The
innovative and researching acts are systematically conducted in experimental
schools with the aim to acquire, communicate and disperse knowledge. Based
on previous research findings regarding experimental units’ hypotheses was
developed towards the argument that innovation is directly correlated with (i)
leadership (ii) communication, (iii) interpersonal relationships among teaching
staff, contributing to a more effective transfer of knowledge and educational
effectiveness. Within this framework, the aim of the present study is to
investigate the association between the innovation and the leadership style as
well as the interpersonal staff relations of the educational unit, the motivation,
the work satisfaction and the communication in an experimental school unit.
The primary quantitative study was conducted, using a structured
questionnaire, in an experimental primary school in Northern Greece. Data
acquired were processed using SPSS v20 and AMOS v17 statistical software. In
the first stage the process of descriptive statistics and crosstabs analysis was
implemented, and in following stages, factor analysis and Structural Equation
Modeling was conducted. Results indicated that innovation is strongly interassociated
with motivation. Additionally, innovation is positively associated
with job satisfaction, interpersonal relations, leadership and communication
inside and outside the educational unit. The way the leadership is imposed is
changing using innovation procedures and becomes more participative
involving the whole educational staff in the process. The research outcomes
indicated that through innovation an educational unit obtains openness to the
community, resulting in interpersonal relations reinforcement and in transfer of
knowledge. All in all, innovation affects the relations and the way people work
in an educational unit to the better and it may be alleged that innovation
positively alters the profile of the organization.

Keywords

Innovation, motivation, job satisfaction

References

• Albert, D., & Levine, D. (1988). Teacher satisfaction. Peabody Journal of Education, 65(3), 47-58. Almudara, S . (2018). Total quality management to reduce cost and to improve quality process in education ınstitution. International Journal of Educational Research Review , 3 (2) , 22-28 . DOI: 10.24331/ijere.391174 Avdimiotis, S. (2016). Tacit knowledge management within hospitality establishments: Revealing the body of the Iceberg. International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), 12(3), 15-29. Avdimiotis, S. (2016). We do more than we can tell. perspectives of tacit knowledge transfer in tourism accommodation establishments. Tourismos: An International Multidisciplinary Journal of Tourism. 11, (2), 50-76. Barker, A. (2016). Improve your communication Skills. New York: Kogan Page. Barnett, K. & McCormick, J. (2003). Vision, relationships and teacher motivation: A case study. Journal of Educational Administration. 41, (1), 55-73. Batsis, T. (1987). Characteristics of excellent principals. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Catholic Educational Association, New Orleans, LA. Beck, L., & Murphy, J. (1996). The four imperatives of a successful school. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. Becker, A., Freeman, S., Giesinger Hall, A., Cummins, C.,and Yuhnke, B. (2016). NMC/CoSN Horizon Report: 2016 K-12 Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. Chandrasekar, K. (2011). Workplace environment and its impact organizational performance in public sector organizations. International Journal of Enterprise Computing and Business Systems,1(1), 1-19 C.I.D.R.E.E. (1999). Across the great divides. Interdisciplinary teaching and learningin secondary schools. Athens: Hellenic Educational Institute Cornali, F. (2012). Effectiveness and efficiency of educational measures. Evaluation Practices, Indicators and Rhetoric,2 (3), 255-260. Diamantopoulos, A. & Siguaw, J. (2000). Introducing LISREL. SAGE, London. Ellett, C. D., Logan, C. S., Claudet, J. G., Loup, K. S., Johnson, B. L., & Chauvin, S. W. (1997). School learning environment, organizational structures and effectiveness: A synthesis of research in 443 schools. International Journal of Educational Research, 27(4), 273–282. doi:10.1016/s0883-0355(97)90009-4 Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F., (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1), 39-50. Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Hair, Jr.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. και Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Hallstedt, S., Thomson, A. & Lindahl, P. (2013). Key elements for implementing a strategic sustainability perspective in the product innovation process. Journal of Cleaner production, 51, 277-288. Lewin, K., Lippit, R. and White, R.K. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created social climates. Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 271-301. Link, A. & D. Siegel (2007). Innovation, entrepreneurship, and technological change. Oxford University Press. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396. doi:10.1037/h0054346 Mercer, J., Baker, B. & Bird, R. (2010). Human resourse management in education. London and New York: Routledge. Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Van Alstine, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C. D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit ıindices for structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 430-445. Neves, S. and Conboy, J. (2001). A Stress management Course to prevent teacher distress. International Journal of Educational Management, 15(3),131 – 137. Normore, A. H. (2004). Lester B. pearson elementary school: First year on a journey with the change process. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 7(35). OECD (2000). Employment outlook 2000. Paris: OECD Oslo Manual (2005). Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. https://el.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CE%9A%CE%B1%CE%B9%CE%BD%CE%BF%CF%84%CE%BF%CE%BC%CE%AF%CE%B1 Papaoikonomou, A . (2017). The impact of political socialization on students’ behavior: Empirical research in schools of Central Macedonia in Greece. International Journal of Educational Research Review , 2 (2) , 1-10 . DOI: 10.24331/ijere.327468 Polka, W. and Kardash, J. (2013). Managing in the effective change zone to implement a ‘1-to-1’ laptop program in a rural school district. in Ran, B. (Ed.), The Dark Side of Technological Innovation, Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, NC, pp. 323-346. Salovey, P. & Mayer, J. (1990). Imagination, cognition and personality. Sage,9, (3), 185-211. Torrington, D., Hall, L., & Taylor, S., (2008). Human resource management. 7th ed. Edinburg : Pearson Education Limited. Whitaker, T., Whitaker, B. & Lumba, D. (2013). Motvating and ınspiring teachers. New york London: Routledge.