Comparison of Turkey and Canada (Ontario) Science Curriculum in the Context of Physics Learning Area
Abstract
In this study, it is aimed to determine the similarities and differences of both programs by analyzing physics subjects, vision, purpose, learning areas according to grade levels, units, course hours and number of learning outcomes in the context of physics learning area of secondary school science curriculums in Turkey and Canada (Ontario). In this research, the document analysis method, one of the qualitative research methods, was used. It has been seen that Turkey secondary school science curriculum aims to be expressed longer and more intensely than Canada (Ontario) secondary school science and technology curriculum, while spiral approach is used in Turkey science curriculum, modular approach is used in Canada (Ontario) science and technology curriculum. Both countries are similar to the vision of raising scientifically literate individuals. The Turkish science curriculum includes physics-containing Units, course hours and the number of learning outcomes numerically compared to the Canadian (Ontario) physics curriculum. Canada (Ontario) physics curriculum is completely associated with daily life in terms of learning outcomes compared to the Turkish physics curriculum.
References
- Aydın Ceran, S. (2021). Present and future of science education in the context of 21st century skills: An analysis from the perspective of Turkey. Journal of Human and Social Science Researches, 10 (4), 3191- 3218. http://www.itobiad.com/tr/pub/issue/66167/908645
Comparison of Turkey and Canada (Ontario) Science Curriculum in the Context of Physics Learning Area
Abstract
In this study, it is aimed to determine the similarities and differences of both programs by analyzing physics subjects, vision, purpose, learning areas according to grade levels, units, course hours and number of learning outcomes in the context of physics learning area of secondary school science curriculums in Turkey and Canada (Ontario). In this research, the document analysis method, one of the qualitative research methods, was used. It has been seen that Turkey secondary school science curriculum aims to be expressed longer and more intensely than Canada (Ontario) secondary school science and technology curriculum, while spiral approach is used in Turkey science curriculum, modular approach is used in Canada (Ontario) science and technology curriculum. Both countries are similar to the vision of raising scientifically literate individuals. The Turkish science curriculum includes physics-containing Units, course hours and the number of learning outcomes numerically compared to the Canadian (Ontario) physics curriculum. Canada (Ontario) physics curriculum is completely associated with daily life in terms of learning outcomes compared to the Turkish physics curriculum.
References
- Aydın Ceran, S. (2021). Present and future of science education in the context of 21st century skills: An analysis from the perspective of Turkey. Journal of Human and Social Science Researches, 10 (4), 3191- 3218. http://www.itobiad.com/tr/pub/issue/66167/908645
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Studies on Education |
| Journal Section | Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | March 24, 2023 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2023 Volume: 8 Issue: 2 |
Cite
International Journal of Educational Research Review (ISSN:2458-9322)
International Journal of Educational Research Review publishes scholarly articles that are of general significance to the education research community and that come from a wide range of areas. The International Journal of Educational Research Review aims to provide a forum for scholarly understanding of the field of education. Articles focus upon concepts, research, review and practices that emphasizes the intersections between education research and other fields, raises new questions, and develops innovative approaches to our understandings of pressing issues.
The range of topics covered in the International Journal of Educational Research Review include; read full aims and scope; https://www.ijere.com/page/journal-scopes
Peer Review Policy: All articles in this journal will undergo initial editor screening, rigorous double-anonymous peer review, and review by the editorial board.
Double-blind peer review
International Journal of Educational Research Review follows a double-blind reviewing procedure. This means that the author will remain anonymous to the reviewers throughout peer review. It is the responsibility of the author to anonymize the manuscript and any associated materials. read full Peer Review Policy; https://www.ijere.com/page/peer-review-policy
Ownership and management
IJERE journal is hosted by Dergipark/Tubitak. IJERE Journal is published with the support of Sakarya University Faculty of Education/TURKEY.
Governing body
Editor in Chief
Dr. Serhat Arslan, Necmettin Erbakan University, Turkey (serhat.arslan@erbakan.edu.tr)
read full Governing body /Ownership and management/ Editorial board member ; https://www.ijere.com/page/editorial-board
Copyright and licensing
Copyright Statement
Copyright violation is an important, and possibly related, ethical issue. Authors should check their manuscripts for possible breaches of copyright law (e.g., where permissions are needed for quotations, artwork or tables taken from other publications or from other freely available sources on the Internet) and secure the necessary permissions before submission to International Journal of Educational Research Review.
read full Copyright and licensing; https://www.ijere.com/page/copyright-and-licensing-open-access-statement