Alternative Procedures of Damage Evaluation Integrated Rapid Assessment Techniques for Reinforced Concrete Buildings

Year 2019, Volume: 3 Issue: 2, 84 - 101, 28.06.2019

Efe Selman

Abstract

Rapid seismic assessment techniques have been frequently preferred over
the last decade with less effort and time. 
Recently, two of the most leading examples in this area are P25 method
and Capacity Index method, they both are based on scoring and evaluation of
main structural parameters being close to the code based design approach
instead of simple checks and survey. However, damage states of members are not
directly reflected to the vulnerability assessments according to the damage
qualification but some generalized coefficients are used. From this viewpoint,
in this study, the microregional building stock (150 systems) is selected, P25
and Capacity Index method are carried out and damage state of members is taken
into account by visual observation scores. With the procedures proposed in this
study, alternative evaluation procedures of damage qualification integrated
rapid assessment techniques are proposed in a simpler and clearer way.  The main aim of this research is to emphasize
the validity of rapid assessment techniques combined with damage qualification
of members.

 

Keywords

rapid assessment technique, P25 Method, Capacity Index Method, damage qualification

References

• 1. Tezcan SS, Bal İE, Gülay GF. “P25 Scoring Method for the Collapse Vulnerability Assessment of RC Buildings”. Journal of Chinese Institute of Engineers, 34(6), 769-781, 2011.
• 2. Gülay GF, Bal İE, Gökçe T. “Correlation between Detailed and Preliminary Assessment Techniques in the Light of Real Damage States”. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 12(2), 129-139, 2008.
• 3. Kaplan O, Güney Y, Topçu A, Ozcelikors Y. “A Rapid Seismic Safety Assessment Method for Mid-Rise Reinforced Concrete Buildings”. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 16(2), 889-915, 2018.
• 4. Yakut A. “Preliminary Seismic Performance Assessment Procedure for Existing RC Buildings”. Engineering Structures, 26, 1447-1461, 2004.
• 5. Pardalopoulos SI, Pantazopoulou SJ, Lekidis VA. “Simplified Method for Rapid Seismic Assessment of Older RC Buildings”. Engineering Structures, 154, 10-22, 2018.
• 6. Sucuoğlu H, Yazgan U, Yakut A. “A Screening Procedure for Seismic Risk Assessment in Urban Building Stocks”. Earthquake Spectra, 23(2), 441-458, 2007.
• 7. Bal İE, Tezcan SS, Gulay GF, “Betonarme Binaların Göçme Riskinin Belirlenmesi için P25 Hızlı Değerlendirme Yöntemi”. Altıncı Ulusal Deprem Mühendisliği Konferansı, İstanbul, Türkiye, 16-20 Ekim 2007.
• 8. FEMA. “FEMA 154 ATC 21 Rapid Visual Screening of Buildings for Potential Seismic Hazards: A Handbook”. https://www.fema.gov/media-library (20.04.2018).
• 9. FEMA. “FEMA 155 ATC 21-1 Rapid Visual Screening of Buildings for Potential Seismic Hazards: Supporting Documentation”. https://www.fema.gov/media-library (20.04.2018).
• 10. Japan Association of Building Disaster Prevention (JABDP). “Standard for Seismic Capacity Assessment of Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings”. JABDP, Tokyo, 563, 2001.
• 11. İlki A, Cömert M, Demir C, Orakcal K, Ulugtekin D, Tapan M, Kumbasar N. “Performance Based Rapid Seismic Assessment Method for Reinforced Concrete Frame buildings”. Advances in Structural Engineering, 17(3), 439-459, 2014.
• 12. New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering (NZSEE). “Recommendations for Assessment and Improvement of the Structural Performance of Buildings in Earthquakes”. NZSEE, New Zealand, 793, 2012.
• 13. Hassan AF, Sozen MA. “Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Low-Rise Buildings in Regions with Infrequent Earthquakes”. ACI Structural Journal, 94(1), 31–39, 1997.
• 14. Sucuoğlu H, Yazgan U, Yakut, A. “A screening procedure for seismic risk assessment in urban building stocks”. Earthquake Spectra, 23(2), 441–458, 2007.
• 15. İlki A, Demir C, Cömert M. “Betonarme ve Yığma Yapılarda Deprem Sonrası Hasar Değerlendirme”. http://imoistanbul.org/imoarsiv/2015seminernotlari/2015-kasim/2015-12-10-alper-ilki/alper-ilki-notlar.pdf (15.04.2018).
• 16. Tural M. Betonarme Yapıların Deprem Güvenilirliklerinin Hızlı Değerlendirme Yöntemleri ile Karşılaştırılması. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gebze Teknik Üniversitesi, Kocaeli, Türkiye, 2014.
• 17. Tüysüz S. Betonarme Binaların Göçme Riskinin Hızlı Değerlendirme Yöntemleri ile Belirlenmesi: P25 Puanlama Yöntemi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, İstanbul, Türkiye, 2007. 18. T.C. Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı. “Türk Bina Deprem Yönetmeliği 2018(TBDY-2018)”. Afet İşleri Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara, Türkiye, 221, 2018.
• 19. Computers and Structures Incorporation(CSI). “SAP2000 (Structural Analysis Program) version 19.2.2”, CSI, Berkeley, California, 236, 2017.
• 20. Türk Standartları Enstitüsü(TSE). “TS-500 Betonarme Yapıların Tasarım ve Yapım Kuralları”, TSE, Ankara, Türkiye, 79, 2000.