Perceptions of In-service English Language Teachers Involved in Erasmus Exchange Programs on Culture and Teacher Identity

Year 2022, Volume: 4 Issue: 2, 30 - 39, 31.08.2022

Ferzan Atay

https://doi.org/10.47806/ijesacademic.1135674

Cited By: 1

Abstract

This study was conducted with the participation of five in-service English language teachers and aimed to find out how in-service English language teachers with overseas intercultural experience evaluate the effects of this experience on their language teacher identity. The data of the study were collected through semi-structured interviews and metaphor elicitation. Content analysis procedure was employed to explore the obtained qualitative data. The results of the study showed that the participants all regarded Erasmus Exchange Program as an opportunity in their personal and academic life. They all mentioned that interacting and negotiating with people from different cultures changed their “opinions and attitudes” about the people and culture of other countries. Also, they all stated that this experience raised some “cultural awareness” about their own culture and the culture of other countries. Also, they said that this experience improved their “language skills” specially speaking and listening. They also said that Erasmus experience also affected their “intercultural identity”. They all confirmed that their teacher identity has influenced after their experience as an Erasmus student.

Keywords

English language teachers, teacher identity, culture, Erasmus Exchange Program

References

• Atay, D. & Ece, A. (2009). Multiple identities as reflected in English language education: The Turkish perspective. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 8(1), 21-34.
• Bada, E., & Genç, B. (2005). Culture in language teaching and learning. The Reading Matrix (5)1, 73-84.
• Brown, H.D. (1986). Learning a second culture. In J.M. Valdes (Ed.), Culture bound: Bridging the culture gap in language teaching (p. 33-48). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and Assessing Intercultural Communicative Competence. Multilingual Matters.
• Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.) New York, NY: Routledge.
• Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
• Çelik, M. (2018). Emerging Intercultural Identity in the Turkish EFL Context. MSKU Journal of Education, 5(1), 26-37.
• Girvan. G., & Savage, T. (2010). Identifying an appropriate pedagogy for virtual worlds: A communal constructivism case study. Computers & Education.
• Goatly A. (1997). The Language of Metaphors. London: Routledge.
• Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y.S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education setting. State University of New York Press.
• Kim, Y.Y. (2008). Intercultural personhood: Globalization and a way of being. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32, 359-368.
• Kırkgöz, Y. (2017). Exploring the Impact of the Fulbright Foreign Language Teaching Assistant Program on Grantees’ Educational and Cultural Beliefs and Practices. In: Mathews- Aydinli, J. (eds) International Education Exchanges and Intercultural Understanding. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
• McKay, S. (2003). Teaching English as an International Language: The Chilean context. ELT Journal, 57(2), 139-148.
• Merriam, S. B. (1983). Mentors and prote ´ge ´s: A critical review of the literature. Adult Education Quarterly, 33, 161–173.
• Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Pulverness, A. (2003). Distinctions & Dichotomies: Culture-free, Culture-bound. Online documents at URL http://elt.britcoun.org.pl/forum/distanddich.htm.
• Suri, H. (2011). Purposeful sampling qualitative research synthesis. Qualitative Research Journal, 11(2), 63-75.
• Vasilopoulos, G. (2015). Language learner investment and identity negotiation in the Korean EFL context. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 14(2), 61-79.