Comparison of Microwave and Conventional Driven Adsorption Heat Pump Cycle Duration

Volume: 1 Number: 1 January 23, 2015
EN

Comparison of Microwave and Conventional Driven Adsorption Heat Pump Cycle Duration

Abstract

The present experimental study includes comparison of microwave regenerated and conventional heated adsorbent bed of adsorption heat pump. The novel adsorption heat pump driving with microwave heating system was designed and manufactured. Microwave oven was constructed for providing homogeneous temperature distribution in the adsorbent bed. Temperature and pressure variations in the adsorption heat pump for both microwave and conventional regenerated cycles were measured and investigated. Duration of isobaric desorption process with microwave heating was achieved 98.2% shorter than that of conventional heating system.

Keywords

References

  1. H. Demir, M. Mobedi, S. Ulku, “A review on adsorption heat pump: Problems and solutions”, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev, vol. 12, pp. 2381–2403, 2008.
  2. K.E. Haque, “Microwave energy for mineral treatment processes: a brief review”, Int. J. Miner. Process. vol. 57, pp. 1-24, 1999.
  3. M. Kumja, C.K. Ng, C. Yap, H. Yanaghi, S. Koyama, B.B. Saha, A.Chakraborty, “Modeling of a novel desorption cycle by dielectric heating”, Mod. Physic. Lett. B, vol. 23, pp. 425-428, 2009.
  4. H. Demir, “The effect of microwave regenerated adsorbent bed on the performance of an adsorption heat pump”, Appl. Therm. Eng. Vol. 50, pp. 134-142, 2013.
  5. G. Alefeld, P. Maier-Laxhuber, M. Rothmeyer, “Zeolite heat pump and zeolite heat transformer for load management”, In: Proc. of solid sorption refrigeration symposium, Paris, pp. 855-860, November 1992.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Publication Date

January 23, 2015

Submission Date

January 23, 2015

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2015 Volume: 1 Number: 1

APA
Demir, H. (2015). Comparison of Microwave and Conventional Driven Adsorption Heat Pump Cycle Duration. International Journal of Engineering Technologies IJET, 1(1), 8-12. https://doi.org/10.19072/ijet.105698
AMA
1.Demir H. Comparison of Microwave and Conventional Driven Adsorption Heat Pump Cycle Duration. IJET. 2015;1(1):8-12. doi:10.19072/ijet.105698
Chicago
Demir, Hasan. 2015. “Comparison of Microwave and Conventional Driven Adsorption Heat Pump Cycle Duration”. International Journal of Engineering Technologies IJET 1 (1): 8-12. https://doi.org/10.19072/ijet.105698.
EndNote
Demir H (March 1, 2015) Comparison of Microwave and Conventional Driven Adsorption Heat Pump Cycle Duration. International Journal of Engineering Technologies IJET 1 1 8–12.
IEEE
[1]H. Demir, “Comparison of Microwave and Conventional Driven Adsorption Heat Pump Cycle Duration”, IJET, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 8–12, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.19072/ijet.105698.
ISNAD
Demir, Hasan. “Comparison of Microwave and Conventional Driven Adsorption Heat Pump Cycle Duration”. International Journal of Engineering Technologies IJET 1/1 (March 1, 2015): 8-12. https://doi.org/10.19072/ijet.105698.
JAMA
1.Demir H. Comparison of Microwave and Conventional Driven Adsorption Heat Pump Cycle Duration. IJET. 2015;1:8–12.
MLA
Demir, Hasan. “Comparison of Microwave and Conventional Driven Adsorption Heat Pump Cycle Duration”. International Journal of Engineering Technologies IJET, vol. 1, no. 1, Mar. 2015, pp. 8-12, doi:10.19072/ijet.105698.
Vancouver
1.Hasan Demir. Comparison of Microwave and Conventional Driven Adsorption Heat Pump Cycle Duration. IJET. 2015 Mar. 1;1(1):8-12. doi:10.19072/ijet.105698

Cited By

88x31.png Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)