EN
Comparison of Microwave and Conventional Driven Adsorption Heat Pump Cycle Duration
Abstract
The present experimental study includes comparison of microwave regenerated and conventional heated adsorbent bed of adsorption heat pump. The novel adsorption heat pump driving with microwave heating system was designed and manufactured. Microwave oven was constructed for providing homogeneous temperature distribution in the adsorbent bed. Temperature and pressure variations in the adsorption heat pump for both microwave and conventional regenerated cycles were measured and investigated. Duration of isobaric desorption process with microwave heating was achieved 98.2% shorter than that of conventional heating system.
Keywords
References
- H. Demir, M. Mobedi, S. Ulku, “A review on adsorption heat pump: Problems and solutions”, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev, vol. 12, pp. 2381–2403, 2008.
- K.E. Haque, “Microwave energy for mineral treatment processes: a brief review”, Int. J. Miner. Process. vol. 57, pp. 1-24, 1999.
- M. Kumja, C.K. Ng, C. Yap, H. Yanaghi, S. Koyama, B.B. Saha, A.Chakraborty, “Modeling of a novel desorption cycle by dielectric heating”, Mod. Physic. Lett. B, vol. 23, pp. 425-428, 2009.
- H. Demir, “The effect of microwave regenerated adsorbent bed on the performance of an adsorption heat pump”, Appl. Therm. Eng. Vol. 50, pp. 134-142, 2013.
- G. Alefeld, P. Maier-Laxhuber, M. Rothmeyer, “Zeolite heat pump and zeolite heat transformer for load management”, In: Proc. of solid sorption refrigeration symposium, Paris, pp. 855-860, November 1992.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
-
Authors
Publication Date
January 23, 2015
Submission Date
January 23, 2015
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 2015 Volume: 1 Number: 1
APA
Demir, H. (2015). Comparison of Microwave and Conventional Driven Adsorption Heat Pump Cycle Duration. International Journal of Engineering Technologies IJET, 1(1), 8-12. https://doi.org/10.19072/ijet.105698
AMA
1.Demir H. Comparison of Microwave and Conventional Driven Adsorption Heat Pump Cycle Duration. IJET. 2015;1(1):8-12. doi:10.19072/ijet.105698
Chicago
Demir, Hasan. 2015. “Comparison of Microwave and Conventional Driven Adsorption Heat Pump Cycle Duration”. International Journal of Engineering Technologies IJET 1 (1): 8-12. https://doi.org/10.19072/ijet.105698.
EndNote
Demir H (March 1, 2015) Comparison of Microwave and Conventional Driven Adsorption Heat Pump Cycle Duration. International Journal of Engineering Technologies IJET 1 1 8–12.
IEEE
[1]H. Demir, “Comparison of Microwave and Conventional Driven Adsorption Heat Pump Cycle Duration”, IJET, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 8–12, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.19072/ijet.105698.
ISNAD
Demir, Hasan. “Comparison of Microwave and Conventional Driven Adsorption Heat Pump Cycle Duration”. International Journal of Engineering Technologies IJET 1/1 (March 1, 2015): 8-12. https://doi.org/10.19072/ijet.105698.
JAMA
1.Demir H. Comparison of Microwave and Conventional Driven Adsorption Heat Pump Cycle Duration. IJET. 2015;1:8–12.
MLA
Demir, Hasan. “Comparison of Microwave and Conventional Driven Adsorption Heat Pump Cycle Duration”. International Journal of Engineering Technologies IJET, vol. 1, no. 1, Mar. 2015, pp. 8-12, doi:10.19072/ijet.105698.
Vancouver
1.Hasan Demir. Comparison of Microwave and Conventional Driven Adsorption Heat Pump Cycle Duration. IJET. 2015 Mar. 1;1(1):8-12. doi:10.19072/ijet.105698
