Comparison of Microwave and Conventional Driven Adsorption Heat Pump Cycle Duration

Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1 23 Ocak 2015
PDF İndir
EN

Comparison of Microwave and Conventional Driven Adsorption Heat Pump Cycle Duration

Öz

The present experimental study includes comparison of microwave regenerated and conventional heated adsorbent bed of adsorption heat pump. The novel adsorption heat pump driving with microwave heating system was designed and manufactured. Microwave oven was constructed for providing homogeneous temperature distribution in the adsorbent bed. Temperature and pressure variations in the adsorption heat pump for both microwave and conventional regenerated cycles were measured and investigated. Duration of isobaric desorption process with microwave heating was achieved 98.2% shorter than that of conventional heating system.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. H. Demir, M. Mobedi, S. Ulku, “A review on adsorption heat pump: Problems and solutions”, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev, vol. 12, pp. 2381–2403, 2008.
  2. K.E. Haque, “Microwave energy for mineral treatment processes: a brief review”, Int. J. Miner. Process. vol. 57, pp. 1-24, 1999.
  3. M. Kumja, C.K. Ng, C. Yap, H. Yanaghi, S. Koyama, B.B. Saha, A.Chakraborty, “Modeling of a novel desorption cycle by dielectric heating”, Mod. Physic. Lett. B, vol. 23, pp. 425-428, 2009.
  4. H. Demir, “The effect of microwave regenerated adsorbent bed on the performance of an adsorption heat pump”, Appl. Therm. Eng. Vol. 50, pp. 134-142, 2013.
  5. G. Alefeld, P. Maier-Laxhuber, M. Rothmeyer, “Zeolite heat pump and zeolite heat transformer for load management”, In: Proc. of solid sorption refrigeration symposium, Paris, pp. 855-860, November 1992.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

-

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

23 Ocak 2015

Gönderilme Tarihi

23 Ocak 2015

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2015 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Demir, H. (2015). Comparison of Microwave and Conventional Driven Adsorption Heat Pump Cycle Duration. International Journal of Engineering Technologies IJET, 1(1), 8-12. https://doi.org/10.19072/ijet.105698
AMA
1.Demir H. Comparison of Microwave and Conventional Driven Adsorption Heat Pump Cycle Duration. IJET. 2015;1(1):8-12. doi:10.19072/ijet.105698
Chicago
Demir, Hasan. 2015. “Comparison of Microwave and Conventional Driven Adsorption Heat Pump Cycle Duration”. International Journal of Engineering Technologies IJET 1 (1): 8-12. https://doi.org/10.19072/ijet.105698.
EndNote
Demir H (01 Mart 2015) Comparison of Microwave and Conventional Driven Adsorption Heat Pump Cycle Duration. International Journal of Engineering Technologies IJET 1 1 8–12.
IEEE
[1]H. Demir, “Comparison of Microwave and Conventional Driven Adsorption Heat Pump Cycle Duration”, IJET, c. 1, sy 1, ss. 8–12, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.19072/ijet.105698.
ISNAD
Demir, Hasan. “Comparison of Microwave and Conventional Driven Adsorption Heat Pump Cycle Duration”. International Journal of Engineering Technologies IJET 1/1 (01 Mart 2015): 8-12. https://doi.org/10.19072/ijet.105698.
JAMA
1.Demir H. Comparison of Microwave and Conventional Driven Adsorption Heat Pump Cycle Duration. IJET. 2015;1:8–12.
MLA
Demir, Hasan. “Comparison of Microwave and Conventional Driven Adsorption Heat Pump Cycle Duration”. International Journal of Engineering Technologies IJET, c. 1, sy 1, Mart 2015, ss. 8-12, doi:10.19072/ijet.105698.
Vancouver
1.Hasan Demir. Comparison of Microwave and Conventional Driven Adsorption Heat Pump Cycle Duration. IJET. 01 Mart 2015;1(1):8-12. doi:10.19072/ijet.105698

Cited By

ijet@gelisim.edu.tr

 Alıntı-Gayriticari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)