Information Systems for Repair Alternatives and Initial Cost Estimation of Damaged Building Structures

Year 2018, Volume: 4 Issue: 2, 81 - 89, 27.06.2018

Can Balkaya

Abstract

The evaluation of existing structures for repair and strengthening results in the application of the most economical and effective repair techniques. The main focus is the existing buildings in seismic areas. The method of repair or strengthening depends on the damaged structural system, structural (life safety) issues, applicable seismic building code requirements, restrictions in available methods, and architectural and construction requirements. The consideration of new techniques, previous technical information on repair methods, experience of experts, and updated cost information are important in the evaluation. The most cost-effective schemes cannot be determined by choosing the most economical means to repair each component; an integrated approach is necessary. Also, recently the use of computers and networks to share the information are increasing. A knowledge-based information system has been developed for the integrated solutions. The level of damage is determined from the damage and structural information. In the evaluation, major damage conditions are grouped as ground damage, foundation damage and superstructure damage, and then these groups are divided into subgroups. Each repair method is represented by a specific format to determine the damage information index. The developed software is a self-modifying and learning system as a result of the data stored for common types of damaged buildings. The use of information systems results in rapid and effective initial cost estimation of repair methods.

Keywords

Earthquake damage, Repair methods, Information systems, Building structures

References

• ASCE (2000). Seismic evaluation of existing buildings (draft). Fourth Ballot.
• Progress report on damage investigation after Kocaeli Earthquake (1999). Architectural Institute of Japan, Bogazici Univ., Istanbul Tech. Univ., Middle East Tech. Univ.
• ATC-21 (1988). Procedures for postearthquake safety evaluation of buildings. Applied Technology Council, California.
• Ohkubo, M. (1991). Current Japanese system on seismic capacity and retrofitting techniques for existing reinforced buildings and post-earthquake damage inspection and restoration techniques. University of California, San Diego, SSRP-02.
• Balkaya, C. (2000). Earthquake safety evaluation of existing building structures. Advances in Civil Engineering, 4 th International Congress 2000; 4:1577-1587 (in Turkish).
• Melchers, R.E. (2001). ‘Assessment of Existing Structures- Approaches and Research Needs.’ Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 127(4), 406-411.
• FEMA 274 (1997). NEHRP commentary on the guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings.
• UBC (1994). International Conference of Building Officials.
• Ministry of Public Works and Settlement (1998). Specifications for structures to be built in disaster areas. Ankara, Turkey.
• Freeman, A. Sigmund (1998). Development and use of capacity spectrum method. 6 th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 1-12.
• Balkaya, C. (1994). Evaluation of repair alternatives. Reference manual on earthquake damage repair. G.G. Marino Engineering Consultants, Champaign, IL, Chapter 8.
• Means Building Construction Cost Data (1995). RS Means Company, Inc.
• Ministry of Public Works Unit Prices (1997). Ankara, Turkey, (in Turkish).
• Wilson, E.L., Habibullah, A (1989). SAP90-Structural analysis programs. Computer and Structures, Inc.
• Wasti, S.T., Sucuoğlu, H. (1999). Rehabilitation of moderately damaged R/C buildings after the 1 October 1995 Dinar Earthquake. Report No: METU/EERC 99-01, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
• Ilıkkan, S. (1998). Information systems for the evaluation of repair alternatives of earthquake damaged building structures. M.Sc. thesis presented to Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.