Psychological Correlates of Cyberbullying and Cyber-Victimization

Year 2017, , 7 - 21, 29.12.2017

Ezgi Ildırım , Can Çalıcı , Barışhan Erdoğan

https://doi.org/10.19148/ijhbs.365829

Cited By: 12

Abstract

Technology use is increasing rapidly in today’s
world. Technological advances created new medium for aggression. Cyber bullying
is one type of these behaviors which is defined as bullying via electronic
communication tools. Although bullying is not an old issue, cyber bullying is a
new concept which has similarities and differences between bullying in real
life. Researchers found that cyber bullying and victimization have
psycho-social correlates. This research aims to investigate cyberbullying and
victimization along with their relationship with anxiety, depression,
hostility, negative self-concept, impulsivity, empathy and internet addiction.
The sample consists of 198 university students between 18 and 25 years of age.
65% of participants are female and the other 35% are male. In this study, The
Turkish version of Short Symptom Inventory is used to measure depression,
anxiety, somatization, hostility and negative self-concept. The Barratt
Impulsivity Scale is used to measure impulsiveness and Basic Empathy Scale is
used to measure empathy. Both cyberbullying and cyber victimization positively correlate
with anxiety, depression, somatization, hostility, impulsivity and internet
addiction. On the contrary, cyber bullying negatively correlated with empathy.
As a result, it was concluded that cyberbullying and cyber victimization go
hand in hand. The results showed that both variables show similar correlations
with same psychological aspects.

Keywords

cybervictimization, impulsivity, empathy, cyberbullying, self-concept

References

• Ahn, D. H. (2007, September). Korean policy on treatment and rehabilitation for adolescents’ internet addiction. In 2007 International Symposium on the Counseling and Treatment of Youth Internet Addiction. Seoul, Korea: National Youth Commission, p.49.
• Ang, R. P., & Goh, D. H. (2010). Cyberbullying among adolescents: The role of affective and cognitive empathy, and gender. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 41(4), 387-397.
• Anzieu, D. (1974). Le moi-peau. Nouvelle revue de psychanalyse, 9(19), 5-208.
• Aoyama, I., Saxon, T. F., & Fearon, D. D. (2011). Internalizing problems among cyberbullying victims and moderator effects of friendship quality. Multicultural Education & Technology Journal, 5(2), 92-105.
• Arıcak, O. T. (2009). Psychiatric symptomatology as a predictor of cyberbullying among university students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 34, 167-184.
• Bakken, I. J., Wenzel, H. G., Götestam, K. G., Johansson, A., & Øren, A. (2009). Internet addiction among Norwegian adults: A stratified probability sample study. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50(2), 121-127.
• Barlińska, J., Szuster, A., & Winiewski, M. (2013). Cyberbullying among adolescent bystanders: Role of the communication medium, form of violence, and empathy. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23(1), 37-51.
• Batson, C. D. (2009). These things called empathy: eight related but distinct phenomena. In J. Decety & W. Ickes (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy (3-15). London: The MIT Press.
• Bauman, S. (2014). Cyberbullying: What counselors need to know. New York City: John Wiley & Sons.
• Bauman, S., Cross, D., & Walker, J. L. (Eds.). (2013). Principles of cyberbullying research: Definitions, measures, and methodology. New York: Routledge.
• Belsey, B. (2004). Always on, always aware. Retrieved from: Cyberbullying http://www.cyberbullying. ca
• Block, J. J. (2008). Issues for DSM-V: Internet addiction. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 165(3), 306-307. doi: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07101556
• Bonanno, R. A., & Hymel, S. (2013). Cyber bullying and internalizing difficulties: Above and beyond the impact of traditional forms of bullying. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(5), 685-697.
• Campfield, D. C. (2008). Cyber bullying and victimization: Psychosocial characteristics of bullies, victims, and bully/victims. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. University of Montana.
• Casas, J. A., Del Rey, R., & Ortega-Ruiz, R. (2013). Bullying and cyberbullying: Convergent and divergent predictor variables. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 580-587.
• Cetin, B., Eroglu, Y., Peker, A., Akbaba, S. & Pepsoy, S. (2012). The investigation of relationship among relational-interdependent self-construal, cyberbullying, and psychological disharmony in adolescents: An investigation of structural equation modelling. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12(2), 646-653.
• Çetin, B., Yaman, E., & Peker, A. (2011). Cyber victim and bullying scale: A study of validity and reliability. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2261-2271.
• Chang, F. C., Chiu, C. H., Miao, N. F., Chen, P. H., Lee, C. M., Chiang, J. T., & Pan, Y. C. (2015). The relationship between parental mediation and internet addiction among adolescents, and the association with cyberbullying and depression. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 57, 21-28.
• Chen, Y. F., & Peng, S. S. (2008). University students' internet use and its relationships with academic performance, interpersonal relationships, psychosocial adjustment, and self-evaluation. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(4), 467-469.
• Corcoran, L., Connolly, I & O'Moore, M. (2012): Cyberbullying in Irish schools: an investigation of personality and self-concept, The Irish Journal of Psychology, 33(4), 153-165, doi:10.1080/03033910.2012.677995
• Craig, W. M. (1998). The relationship among bullying, victimization, depression, anxiety, and aggression in elementary school children. Personality and Individual Differences, 24(1), 123-130.
• Erdur-Baker, Ö. (2010). Cyberbullying and its correlation to traditional bullying, gender and frequent and risky usage of internet-mediated communication tools. New Media & Society, 12(1), 109-125.
• Erreygers, S., Pabian, S., Vandebosch, H., & Baillien, E. (2016). Helping behavior among adolescent bystanders of cyberbullying: The role of impulsivity. Learning and Individual Differences, 48, 61-67.
• Fanti, K. A., Demetriou, A. G., & Hawa, V. V. (2012). A longitudinal study of cyberbullying: Examining risk and protective factors. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(2), 168-181.
• Farrington, D. P., & Ttofi, M. M. (2009). School-based programs to reduce bullying and victimization. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 6, 1-149.
• Fekkes, M., Pijpers, F. I., & Verloove-Vanhorick, S. P. (2004). Bullying: Who does what, when and where? Involvement of children, teachers and parents in bullying behavior. Health Education Research, 20(1), 81-91.
• Gönül, A. S. (2002).Patolojik İnternet Kullanımı. Yeni Symposium, 40(3), 105-110.
• Guan, S. S. A., & Subrahmanyam, K. (2009). Youth internet use: Risks and opportunities. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 22(4), 351-356.
• Güleç, H., Tamam, L., Turhan, M., Karakuş, G., Zengin, M., & Stanford, M. S. (2008). Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11. Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni, 18(4), 251-258.
• Han, B. C. (2015). The transparency society. California: Stanford University Press.
• Harrison, T. (2015). Virtuous reality: moral theory and research into cyber-bullying. Ethics and Information Technology, 17(4), 275-283.
• Hazler, R. J., Carney, J. V., Green, S., Powell, R., & Jolly, L. S. (1997). Areas of expert agreement on identification of school bullies and victims. School Psychology International, 18(1), 5-14.
• Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2008). Cyberbullying: An exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant Behavior, 29(2), 129-156.
• Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2010). Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Archives of Suicide Research, 14(3), 206-221.
• Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2013). Social influences on cyberbullying behaviors among middle and high school students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(5), 711-722.
• Hines, H. N. (2011). Traditional bullying and cyber-bullying: Are the impacts on self-concept the same? (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://libres.uncg.edu/ir/wcu/f/Hines2011.pdf
• Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). Examining the relationship between low empathy and bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 32(6), 540–550. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1002/ab.20154.
• Katzer, C., Fetchenhauer, D., & Belschak, F. (2009). Cyberbullying: Who are the victims? A comparison of victimization in internet chatrooms and victimization in school. Journal of Media Psychology, 21(1), 25-36.
• Klomek, A. B., Marrocco, F., Kleinman, M., Schonfeld, I. S., & Gould, M. S. (2007). Bullying, depression, and suicidality in adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 46(1), 40-49.
• Koh, K. B. (2013). Somatization and psychosomatic symptoms. New York: Springer.
• Kowalski, R. M., & Limber, S. P. (2013). Psychological, physical, and academic correlates of cyberbullying and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53(1), S13-S20.
• Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychol Bulletin 140(4):1073-137. doi: 10.1037/a0035618.
• Lesch, K. P., & Merschdorf, U. (2000). Impulsivity, aggression, and serotonin: a molecular psychobiological perspective. Behavioral Sciences & The Law, 18(5), 581-604.
• Li, Q. (2006). Cyberbullying in schools: A research of gender differences. School Psychology International, 27(2), 157-170.
• Lianos, H., & McGrath, A. (2017). Can the general theory of crime and General Strain Theory explain cyberbullying perpetration? Crime & Delinquency, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128717714204
• Liu, T., & Potenza, M. N. (2010). Problematic internet use clinical aspects. In E. Aboujaoude & L. M. Koran (Eds.), Impulse Control Disorders, (167-181) New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Martinez-Pecino, R., & Durán, M. (2016). I love you but I cyberbully you: The role of hostile sexism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1-14. doi: 10.1177/0886260516645817.
• McKenna, K. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2000). Plan 9 from cyberspace: The implications of the internet for personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(1), 57-75.
• Menesini, E., Nocentini, A., & Camodeca, M. (2013). Morality, values, traditional bullying, and cyberbullying in adolescence. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 31(1), 1-14.
• Miller, T. Q., Smith, T. W., Turner, C. W., Guijarro, M. L., & Hallet, A. J. (1996). Meta-analytic review of research on hostility and physical health. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 322.
• Mishna, F., Khoury-Kassabri, M., Gadalla, T., & Daciuk, J. (2012). Risk factors for involvement in cyber bullying: Victims, bullies and bully–victims. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(1), 63-70.
• Na, H., Dancy, B. L., & Park, C. (2015). College student engaging in cyberbullying victimization: Cognitive appraisals, coping strategies, and psychological adjustments. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 29(3), 155-161.
• Navarro, R., Serna, C., Martínez, V., & Ruiz-Oliva, R. (2013). The role of internet use and parental mediation on cyberbullying victimization among Spanish children from rural public schools. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(3), 725-745.
• Neary, A., & Joseph, S. (1994). Peer victimization and its relationship to self-concept and depression among schoolgirls. Personality and Individual Differences, 16(1), 183-186.
• Nixon, C. L. (2014). Current perspectives: the impact of cyberbullying on adolescent health. Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, 5, 143.
• Nocentini, A., Calmaestra, J., Schultze-Krumbholz, A., Scheithauer, H., Ortega, R., & Menesini, E. (2010). Cyberbullying: Labels, behaviours and definition in three European countries. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 20(2), 129-142.
• Notar, C. E., Padgett, S., & Roden, J. (2013). Cyberbullying: A review of the literature. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(1), 1-9.
• Ogel, K., Karadag, F., Satgan, D., & Koc, C. (2015). Development of the Addiction Profile Index Internet Addiction Form (APIINT): Validity and reliability. Düşünen Adam, 28(4), 337.
• Pabian, S., & Vandebosch, H. (2014). Using the theory of planned behaviour to understand cyberbullying: The importance of beliefs for developing interventions. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 11(4), 463-477.
• Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: A preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4(2), 148-169.
• Patton, D. U., Hong, J. S., Ranney, M., Patel, S., Kelley, C., Eschmann, R., & Washington, T. (2014). Social media as a vector for youth violence: A review of the literature. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 548-553.
• Perren, S., & Gutzwiller-Helfenfinger, E. (2012). Cyberbullying and traditional bullying in adolescence: Differential roles of moral disengagement, moral emotions, and moral values. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(2), 195-209.
• Pornari, C. D., & Wood, J. (2010). Peer and cyber aggression in secondary school students: The role of moral disengagement, hostile attribution bias, and outcome expectancies. Aggressive Behavior, 36(2), 81-94.
• Price, M., Chin, M. A., Higa-McMillan, C., Kim, S., & Frueh, B. C. (2013). Prevalence and internalizing problems of ethnoracially diverse victims of traditional and cyber bullying. School Mental Health, 5(4), 183-191.
• Pyżalski, J. (2012). From cyberbullying to electronic aggression: Typology of the phenomenon. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 17(3-4), 305-317.
• Richardson, D. R., Hammock, G. S., Smith, S. M., Gardner, W., & Signo, M. (1994). Empathy as a cognitive inhibitor of interpersonal aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 20(4), 275-289.
• Roy-Byrnr, P. (2004). Anxiety. In Craighead, W. E., & Nemeroff, C. B. (Eds.), The concise Corsini encyclopedia of psychology and behavioral science. New York City: John Wiley & Sons.
• Sanders, C. E., & Henry, B. C. (2017). The role of beliefs about aggression in cyberbullying and Animal abuse. Psychology, Crime & Law, 23(9), 827-840.
• Seroczynski, A. D., Bergeman, C. S., & Coccaro, E. F. (1999). Etiology of the impulsivity/aggression relationship: genes or environment? Psychiatry Research, 86(1), 41-57.
• Solberg, M. E., & Olweus, D. (2003). Prevalence estimation of school bullying with the Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire. Aggressive Behavior, 29(3), 239-268.
• Spears, B., Slee, P., Owens, L., & Johnson, B. (2009). Behind the scenes and screens: Insights into the human dimension of covert and cyberbullying. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 217(4), 189-196.
• Strayer, J., & Roberts, W. (2004). Empathy and Observed Anger and Aggression in Five‐Year Olds. Social Development, 13(1), 1-13.
• Şahin, N. H., & Durak, A. (1994). Kısa semptom envanteri (Brief Symptom Invetory-BSI): Türk gencleri icin uyarlanmasi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 9(31), 44-56
• Şahin, M., Sarı, S. V., Ömer, Ö. Z. E. R., & Er, S. H. (2010). Lise öğrencilerinin siber zorba davranışlarda bulunma ve maruz kalma durumlarına ilişkin görüşleri. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 21, 257-270 Tarlow, E. M., & Haaga, D. A. (1996). Negative self-concept: Specificity to depressive symptoms and relation to positive and negative affectivity. Journal of Research in Personality, 30(1), 120-127.
• Tennant, J. E., Demaray, M. K., Coyle, S., & Malecki, C. K. (2015). The dangers of the web: Cybervictimization, depression, and social support in college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 348-357.
• Tokunaga, R. S. (2010). Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 277-287.
• Tomşa, R., Jenaro, C., Campbell, M., & Neacşu, D. (2013). Student's experiences with traditional bullying and cyberbullying: Findings from a Romanian sample. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 78, 586-590.
• Topçu, Ç. (2008). The relationship of cyber bullying to empathy, gender, traditional bullying, internet use and adult monitoring. Unpublished Master Dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
• Topcu, Ç., & Erdur-Baker, Ö. (2012). Affective and cognitive empathy as mediators of gender differences in cyber and traditional bullying. School Psychology International, 33(5), 550-561.
• Topçu, Ç., Baker, Ö. E., & Aydın, Y. Ç. (2016). Temel empati ölçeği Türkçe uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 4(34), 174-182
• Valkenburg, P. M., Peter, J., & Schouten, A. P. (2006). Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents' well-being and social self-esteem. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9(5), 584-590.
• van Noorden, T. H., Haselager, G. J., Cillessen, A. H., & Bukowski, W. M. (2014). Dehumanization in children: The link with moral disengagement in bullying and victimization. Aggressive Behavior, 40(4), 320-328.
• Wigderson, S., & Lynch, M. (2013). Cyber-and traditional peer victimization: Unique relationships with adolescent well-being. Psychology of Violence, 3(4), 297.
• Willard, N. E. (2007). Cyberbullying and cyberthreats: Responding to the challenge of online social aggression, threats, and distress. Illinois: Research Press.
• Yang, S. C. (2012). Paths to bullying in online gaming: The effects of gender, preference for playing violent games, hostility, and aggressive behavior on bullying. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 47(3), 235-249.
• Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2004). Online aggressor/targets, aggressors, and targets: A comparison of associated youth characteristics. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(7), 1308-1316.
• Ybarra, M. L., Espelage, D. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2007). The co-occurrence of internet harassment and unwanted sexual solicitation victimization and perpetration: Associations with psychosocial indicators. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(6), 31-41.
• Ybarra, M. L., Mitchell, K. J., Wolak, J., & Finkelhor, D. (2006). Examining characteristics and associated distress related to internet harassment: Findings from the second youth internet safety survey. Pediatrics, 118(4), 1169-1177.
• Young, K. S. (2004). Internet addiction: A new clinical phenomenon and its consequences. American Behavioral Scientist, 48(4), 402-415.
• Zezulka, L. A., & Seigfried-Spellar, K. C. (2016). Differentiating cyberbullies and internet trolls by personality characteristics and self-esteem. Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law, 11(3), 7-26.