Ethical Principles and Publication Policy
In accordance with the TR Index journal evaluation criteria (2020), Ethics Committee approval is mandatory for all research conducted using qualitative or quantitative approaches that require data collection from researchers via surveys, interviews, focus group studies, observation, experiments or other interview techniques. Authors must upload the Ethics Committee Approval document to the system at the time of manuscript submission. Furthermore, the name of the Ethics Committee, the date of the decision and the reference number must be clearly stated at the end of the Methodology section and on the final page of the manuscript.
International Journal of Health Management and Tourism is committed to ensuring ethics in the publication and quality of articles. The editorial board of International Journal of Health Management and Tourism is responsible for preventing publication malpractices. Unethical behaviour is unacceptable and plagiarism is not tolerated in any form. Authors, reviewers, and editors are to be fully committed to good publication practice and take charge of fulfilling the following responsibilities. In order to avoid any type of publication malpractice, each submission must be accomplished by our journal sample “Cover Letter” signed by all of the authors. Until to sign the “Cover Letter” please read carefully the “Declaration” section at the end of the letter (above the signatures).
The editorial board pursue the best practice guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). To guarantee the integrity of the published papers, Constructive Mathematical Analysis editors are guided for using COPE’s flowcharts whenever they suspect an ethical issue about the paper they process. The authors, reviewers, editors and owner of the journal are expected to be strictly committed to ensuring the policy of publication ethics and malpractice, and respect the following statements:
Publication and authorship
- All submitted manuscripts are subject to a double-blind peer-review process by at least two international reviewers that are experts in the subject matter of the submitted manuscript. The factors that consider in the review are relevance, significance, originality, readability and language. The editors will prepare a preview version of the submitted manuscript by deleting the title page to ensure anonymity. The authors must avoid self-referencing like "In a previous work we (Author et al. 2018) ......". The third person should be used to refer to work the Authors have previously undertaken. Acknowledgements part will also be removed during the review process if includes any information that can risk anonymity.
- The editors of the International Journal of Health Management and Tourism Journal of Biology reserve the right to reject manuscripts without peer-review if they do not comply with the author’s guidelines or are beyond the aim and scope of the journal. Each paper will be sent to at least two independent reviewers. If there are inconsistencies between the reviewers, a third reviewer will be asked to review the manuscript. The editor will decide the acceptance or rejection of the manuscripts according to these reviews.
- Authors can suggest five potential reviewers - experts in the subject matter of the article - but the editorial board of International Journal of Health Management and Tourism Journal can accept or reject suggested referees.
- The accepted articles may be subject to further editing by journal editorial staff before they appear in print.
- The possible decisions include acceptance, acceptance with revisions, or rejection based on reviewers' comments or editorial board decisions. If authors are encouraged to revise and resubmit a manuscript, there is no guarantee that the revised submission will be accepted. Rejected manuscripts will not be considered for further reviewing process.
- International Journal of Health Management and Tourism is committed to completing reviewing process if there is no response from any requested potential reviews. The editorial board can assign the manuscript to the section editor to make a final decision or reject the manuscript.
- Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate.
- No research can be included in more than one publication.
Authors' responsibilities
- Authors should certify that their manuscripts are their original work and not previously been published elsewhere (except thesis) and not currently being considered for publication elsewhere. Submitting your paper for evaluation concomitant to other journals is unacceptable. In such cases, the manuscript will be rejected automatically and all of the authors lose the right to submit and publish manuscript to/in the International Journal of Health Managemenent and Tourism.
- All authors listed in the manuscript need to meet the authorship criteria and all of them participated in the work in a substantive way and are prepared to take public responsibility for the work. All authors have contributed to the manuscript and a common agreement has been reached before submission. In other cases, the manuscript can’t be accepted for evaluation in order to be published in the International Journal of Health Management and Tourism.
If the work involves the use of animal or human subjects, the author should ensure that the manuscript contains a statement that all procedures were performed in compliance with relevant laws and institutional guidelines and that the appropriate institutional committee(s) has approved them. Authors should include a statement in the manuscript that informed consent was obtained for experimentation with human subjects. The privacy rights of human subjects must always be observed and the author should avoid the practices that harm the environment.
Information on patient consent, the name of the ethics committee, and the ethics committee approval number and date should also be stated in the Methods section of the manuscript.
- If the authors have used the work and/or words of others, that should be appropriately cited or quoted.
- Authors are obliged to provide an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance.
- Authors must provide corrections for mistakes.
- All Authors mentioned in the paper must have significantly contributed to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study.
- Authors must state that all data in the paper are real and authentic. The authors need to ensure that the original data in their manuscript can be clearly distinguished by the one published in other scientific papers. The authors of the manuscript need to ensure that the text, illustrations, and any other materials included in the manuscript do not infringe upon any existing copyright or other rights of anyone.
- Authors must notify the Editors of any conflicts of interest.
- Authors must identify all sources used in the creation of their manuscript. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work.
- Authors must notify the journal editor of any errors or inaccuracy in their published work when they discover in them published paper.
- When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
- Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review and should be prepared to provide public access as well.
- Acknowledgment of the work of others must be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
- Submissions must comply with the writing rules of the journal. (You can find it https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ijhmt/writing-rules)
-Similarity rate should be less than 20%.
Reviewers' responsibilities
- Reviewers should keep all information regarding manuscripts confidential and treat them as privileged information.
- Reviews should be conducted objectively, with no personal criticism of the author.
- Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
- Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors.
- Reviewers should also call to the Editor-in-Chief or Managing editor’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
- Reviewers should not review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Editors' responsibilities
- Editors have complete responsibility and authority to reject/accept a submitted manuscript.
- Editors are responsible for the contents and overall quality of the publication.
- Editors should guarantee the quality of the papers and the integrity of the academic record.
- Editors should have a clear picture of a research's funding sources.
- Editors should base their decisions solely on the papers' importance, originality, clarity and relevance to the publication's scope.
- Editors should not reverse their decisions nor overturn the ones of previous editors without serious reason.
- Editors should preserve the anonymity of reviewers.
- Editors should ensure that all research material they publish conforms to internationally accepted ethical guidelines.
- Editors should act if they suspect misconduct, whether a paper is published or unpublished, and make all reasonable attempts to persist in obtaining a resolution to the problem.
- Editors should not allow any conflicts of interest between staff, authors, reviewers and board members.
- Editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Research Ethics
It is good practice for journals to adopt publication policies to ensure that ethical and responsible research is published, and that all necessary consents and approvals have been obtained from authors to publish their work. Ethics committee approval must be obtained for the clinical and experimental studies that are conducted on people and animals and this approval must be specified and documented in the article These publication policies might include the items presented in the sections below.
Human rights, privacy, and confidentiality
For manuscripts reporting medical studies involving human participants, it is suggested that journals require authors to provide a statement identifying the ethics committee that approved the study, and that the study conforms to recognized standards, for example:
• Declaration of Helsinki
• US Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects
• European Medicines Agency Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice
These standards encourage authors to conduct studies in a way that ensures adequate steps have been taken to minimize harm to participants, to avoid coercion or exploitation, protect the confidentiality, and to minimize the risk of physical and psychological harm.
Across the scholarly disciplines there are variations in practice around privacy and confidentiality, relative to the risks of participation and the reasonable expectations of participants.
The best policy is for journals to require that authors confirm whether explicit written consent to publish has been received from any people described (for example, in case reports), shown in still or moving images, or whose voices are recorded. In the case of technical images (for example, radiographs or micrographs), editors should also ensure that all information that could identify the subject has been removed from the image. For voices or images of any human subject, permission according to applicable national laws must be sought from research participants before recording. In many jurisdictions, it is a requirement that formal copyright clearance is obtained to publish any video or audio recordings. When publishing genetic sequences or family genograms editors may need consent from more than just the index case. The CARE guidelines are useful for editors who publish case reports.
In the social sciences and humanities, there are numerous ethical guidelines for researchers working with human participants. Social science and humanities researchers regularly work with audio and video materials gathered in public places where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy. They also use materials derived from broadcast sources, as in some political science or cultural studies work, where copyright must be addressed but where consent issues do not arise. However, wherever appropriate, social scientists are also responsible for protecting the confidentiality of human participants, and obtaining informed consent from all participants by openly communicating any and all information that is likely to influence their willingness to participate (for example, sponsorship, purpose and anticipated outcomes, and possible consequences that publication of the research may have for participants). International Society of Ethnobiology.
For social research data the Association of Social Anthropologists of the UK and the Commonwealth suggests in its "Ethical Guidelines for Good Research Practice" that it is not always possible or necessary to gain written consent to publish, particularly when researchers are working with people with limited literacy or in cultures where formal bureaucratic procedures are problematic. However, it remains prudent for journals to ask authors to provide evidence that they have obtained informed consent.
Exceptional cases might arise where gaining an individual's free prior informed consent is not possible but where publishing an individual's information or image can be demonstrated to have a genuine public health interest or to serve an important public need. In cases like this, before taking any action editors should seek and follow counsel from the journal owner, the publisher, and/or legal professionals.
Plagiarism
The plagiarism of all articles is determined by the iThenticate software. The plagiarism rate should be less than 20%, except for the "References" section.
Animals in research
Research involving animals should be conducted with the same rigour as research on humans. Journals can encourage authors to implement the 4Rs principles:
"The 3Rs are a widely accepted ethical framework for conducting scientific experiments using animals humanely: Replacement - use of non-animal methods; Reduction - methods which reduce the number of animals used; Refinement - methods which improve animal welfare."
The International Council for Laboratory Animal Science has published ethical guidelines for editors and reviewers.
Journals should encourage authors to adhere to animal research reporting standards, for example, the ARRIVE reporting guidelines, which describe the details journals should require from authors regarding:
- Study design and statistical analysis.
- Experimental procedures.
- Experimental animals.
- Housing and husbandry.
Journals should ask authors to confirm that ethical and legal approval was obtained prior to the start of the study, and state the name of the body giving the approval. Authors should also state whether experiments were performed in accordance with relevant institutional and national guidelines and regulations.
The authors should conform to Directive 2010/63/EU.
Editors may ask authors to describe in their articles how discomfort, distress, and pain were avoided and minimized, and to confirm that animals did not suffer unnecessarily at any stage of an experiment. The authors of articles that are based on experiments that caused injuries or death of animals should explain and justify the grounds of the study and state that the scientific results of the study are at least in the trade-off with the sufferings caused. When available, references should be added to justify that the techniques used were not invasive. When alternative non-harming techniques exist but were not used, the manuscripts may not be considered for publication.
Editors may request that reviewers comment on the standard of experimental reporting, experimental design, or any other aspects of the study reported that may cause concern. If concerns are raised or clarifications are needed, they may need to request evidence of ethical research approval or question authors
Publication Policy
International Journal of Health Management and Tourism accepts unpublished original research. Only manuscripts uploaded from the journal system are evaluated. The article is not accepted through e-mail. All submitted works go through pre-evaluation and peer-review processes. These stages are carried out by the editor of the journal.
Pre-Evaluation Process
After the author uploads the article to the journal, the pre-evaluation process of the article begins. At this stage, the editor examines the article in terms of content and form and whether the study is suitable for the purpose and scope of the journal, and; may decide that the article is not suitable for the journal and rejects it, may resend the article to the corresponding author for corrections, may direct the article to the referees and initiate the peer-review process.
Peer-Review Process
All manuscripts submitted to IJHTM will go through a double-blind peer-review process. Each submission will be reviewed by at least two, independent reviewers who are experts in their fields in order to ensure an unbiased evaluation process. In the cases where there is no consensus among the reviewers, the article is evaluated by the third reviewer. The final decision authority in the decision-making process of all articles belongs to the Editor.
Review articles may be accepted after they have been evaluated by the editors in limited numbers in each issue. Articles submitted to IJHMT are decided within an average of 6 weeks and a maximum of 12 weeks. Accepted articles are available on our website until the next issue is published with a DOI number. The journal accepts articles from all areas of biology due to its mission to integrate all of its fields. It is published electronically three times a year (March, July, November).
Open Access Policy
JHMT is an open-access journal and there is no charge for the printing, and evaluation process and no fee is requested from those who want to download the articles.
Advertising Policy
Commercially funded publications and advertisements are not subject to editorial judgments. Any product or service marked as an advertisement or sponsored by a sponsor in IJHMT publications is not endorsed by IJHMT. Commercial or financial interests, as well as any special relationships with advertising clients or sponsors, have no bearing on IJHMT editorial content.
IJHMT has the right to refuse any sort of advertising that is harmful to the IJHMT brand or unsuited to the IJHMT network's content.
IJHMT will not run ads for products or services that are known to be hazardous to one's health (e.g. tobacco and alcohol products).
July 28, 2026
Page
137-154
