Numerical Analysis of Double Geopolymer Concrete Layer with Different Properties

Year 2023, , 195 - 200, 31.12.2023

Berivan Yılmazer Polat

https://doi.org/10.46460/ijiea.1382611

Abstract

Researchers have been working to find alternatives to conventionally produced concrete in recent years. Geopolymer concretes are also the focus of these studies. There are not enough studies on modelling geopolymer concretes, which are the subject of many experimental studies. In this study, which is believed to close the gap in the literature, stress and strain analyses of geopolymer concrete with two different properties under load in two different systems were performed. The locations of the concrete with different properties were also changed in the model, and the results obtained in both cases were compared. It was observed that when the geopolymer concrete with a lower modulus of elasticity and 100% slag content was on top, the stress values decreased, and the strain rates increased.

Keywords

Geopolymer Concrete, Slag, Finite Element Method, Stress, Strain

References

• McLellan, B. C., Williams, R. P., Lay, J., Van Riessen, A., & Corder, G. D. (2011). Costs and carbon emissions for geopolymer pastes in comparison to ordinary portland cement. Journal of cleaner production, 19(9-10), 1080-1090.
• Aygörmez, Y. (2022). Performance of different binders doped Portland Cement-based mortars using volcanic slag, petroleum coke and EPS foam aggregates. Construction and Building Materials, 336, 127538.
• Yılmaz, A., Ergün, S., Uysal, M., Dilbas, H., Aygörmez, Y., & Canpolat, O. (2023). Durability Performance of Fiber-Reinforced Metakaolin-Based and Red Mud-Fly Ash-Slag-Activated Geopolymers with Recycled Aggregates. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 1-20.
• Polat, B. Y. (2022). Self healing of alkali active mortars with expanded perlite aggregate. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 17, e01225.
• Nguyen, K. T., Ahn, N., Le, T. A., & Lee, K. (2016). Theoretical and experimental study on mechanical properties and flexural strength of fly ash-geopolymer concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 106, 65-77.
• Ganesan, N., Abraham, R., & Deepa, R. S. (2015). Experimental and Analytical Investigations on Geopolymer Concrete Columns under Repeated Axial Compression. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (bhrc) Vol. 16, 5, P. 651-662.
• Antonyamaladhas, M. R., Chachithanantham, S., & Ramaswamy, A. (2016). Performance and behaviour of ground granulated blast furnace slag imparted to geopolymer concrete structural elements and analyzed with ANSYS. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2016.
• Annapurna, D., Kishore, R., & Sree, M. U. (2016). Comparative Study of Experimental and Analytical Results of Geo Polymer Concrete. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), 7(1), 211-219.
• Aleem, M. A., & Arumairij, P. D. (2016). Analytical Modeling of Geopolymer Concrete with Manufactured Sand Using ANSYS. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology, 7, 1253-1255.
• Waryosh W. A., & A.S. Ali, A. S. (2023). Behavior and Strength of Geopolymer Castellated Composıte Beams. Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development (JEASD) , Pages 365-374.
• Polat, B. Y., Uysal, M., & Korkmaz, V. (2020). A research for bacterial self-healing in metakaolin based geopolymer mortars. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 38(3), 1401-1414.
• Aydın, M. (2020). Yeni ve Eski Nesil Betondan Üretilmiş Kompozit Kirişlerin Darbe Kuvveti Etkisi Altındaki Davranışının İncelenmesi (Master’s Dissertation Sakarya University).
• Venkatachalam, S., Vishnuvardhan, K., Amarapathi, G. D., Mahesh, S. R., & Deepasri, M. (2021). Experimental and finite element modelling of reinforced geopolymer concrete beam. Materials Today: Proceedings, 45, 6500-6506.
• Polat, B. Y., & Uysal, M. (2021). Bacterial crack healing in metakaolin based geopolymer mortars. Journal of Building Engineering, 39, 102291.