An Ecofeminist Reading of Shakespeare’s The Winter’s Tale

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ecofeminism
• Shakespeare
• The Winter’s Tale
• Nature and Women

An Ecofeminist Reading of Shakespeare’s The Winter’s Tale

Öz

Although ecofeminism emerged in the 1970s as a separate field of study, ecofeminist subjects and themes are not limited to the modern age but were also handled by Shakespeare centuries ago. Women, underclass people, working class, people of colour, animals, and nature have been oppressed and exploited in hierarchically structured patriarchal societies throughout history. Especially women have been closely associated with nature because of their physiology, and psychology and this close identification has been deeply coded in both their socio-culturally and ideologically assigned roles and patriarchal languages. Thus, this bond between nature and women has been established both ontologically and epistemologically. Therefore, “no attempt to liberate women (or any other oppressed group) will be successful without an equal attempt to liberate nature” (Gaard, 1993, p. 1) since all forms of oppression are essentially related. This paper aims to study Shakespeare’s The Winter’s Tale from an ecofeminist perspective by particularly focusing on the mutual domination of women and nature in a highly patriarchal and hierarchical society. Nature and women are both subjugated and victimized by androcentric and dualistically thinking men who fail to recognize the interconnectedness and interdependence between men and women, men and nature, and culture and nature.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ecofeminism
• Shakespeare
• The Winter’s Tale
• Nature and Women

Kaynakça

1. Adams, C. J. (1993). Introduction. In C.J. Adams (Ed.), Ecofeminism and the sacred (pp. 1-12). New York: The Continuum Publishing Company.
2. Barker, Simon, and Venetia Hill. (1996). “A month in Shakespeare country: Shakespeare, theory, and historicism.” Literature and History 5.1, 86-91
3. Birkeland, J. (1993). Ecofeminism: linking theory and practice. In G. Gaard (Ed.), Ecofeminism: women, animals, nature (pp. 13-59). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
4. Biswas, A. (2013). British Bengal’s feministic study of Sakuntala, Miranda and Desdemona: An ecocritical reinterpretation. Retrieved from http://www.researchscholar.co.in/member/25-asit-viswas.pdf, date access: March, 2016.
5. Brayton, D., Bruckner, L. (2011). Introduction: warbling invaders. In L.Bruckner & D. Brayton (Eds.), Ecocritical Shakespeare (pp. 1-12). England: Ashgate.
6. Butler, J. (1986). Sex and gender in Simone de Beauvoir’s second sex. Yale French Studies, 72, 35-49. Retrieved from Jstor Database, March 24, 2016.
7. Christ, C.P. (1990). Rethinking theology and nature. In I. Diamond & G. F. Orenstein (Eds.), Reweaving the world: The emergence of ecofeminism (pp. 58-69). San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.
8. Cohen, D. (1987). Patriarchy and jealousy in Othello and The Winter’s Tale. Modern Language Quarterly, 48 (3), 207-223. Retrieved from https://english15108.wikispaces.com/file/view/Patriarchy+and+Jealousy+In.pdf, date accessed: March 2014.